HYDROCARBON YIELD AND GEOCHEMIAL PARAMETERS AFFECTED BY HEATING TIME AND ADDED WATER AMOUNT IN THE SIMULATION TEST
-
摘要: 该文作者进行了不同加温时间、加水量和样品颗粒大小的模拟实验,发现加温时间、加水量和样品颗粒大小对模拟实验油气产率有明显影响。延长时间,产油率明显降低,而烃气产率大大增多。加水量由不加水(0%)到加水20%和50%时,烃气产量、残留油量、排出油量、总油产量、总烃产量均明显增加,加水量再增多,产油率和总烃产率均明显降低,烃气产量仍逐渐增加。1~2.5mm的小颗粒样品与5~10mm大颗粒样品相比较,总产气率、烃气产率明显增加,总油和总烃产率明显降低。加温时间、加水量对油的族组成、饱和烃色谱、饱和烃色谱-质谱、气和油的碳同位素及干酪根的热解和H/C、O/C原子比等地化参数均有明显影响。Abstract: The simulation test of source rock under different heating time,added water amount and sample grain size was carried out.The yield of oil and gas in the simulation test of source rock varied obviously with different heating time,added water amount and sample grain size.When extending heating time,the oil yield was obviously decreased,and the gas yield of hydrocarbon was greatly increased.When added water amount was changed from 0% to 20% and to 50%,the gas yield of hydrocarbon,the remained oil,the expulled oil,the total oil yield and the total hydrocarbon yield were all obviously increased.When added water amount was more than 50%,the total oil yield and the total hydrocarbon yield were obviously decreased,but the gas yield of hydrocarbon was increased.From 1-2.5mm to 5-10mm of grain size,the total gas yield and the gas yield of hydrocarbon were obviously increased,and the total oil yield and the total hydrocarbon yield were obviously decreased.The simulation test of source rock under different heating time,added water amount and sample grain size showed that the component of oil,the GC and GC-MS of saturated hydrocarbon,the δ13C of gas and oil,the pyrolysis of kerogen,the H/C and O/C atom ratio of kerogen and other geochemical parameters were affected.
-
Key words:
- heating time /
- added water amount /
- simulation test /
- oil and gas yield /
- geochemical parameter
-
[1] Castelli A,Chiaramonte M A,Beltrame P L,et al.Thermal degradation of kerogen by hydrous pyrolysis - a kinetic study[J].Org Geochem,1990,16,(1-3):75-82. [2] Lewan M D,Winters J C,and McDonald J H.Generation of oil-like prolyzates from organic rich shale[J].Science,1979,203:897-899. [3] Winters J C,Williams J A,Lewan M D.A laboratory study of petroleum generation by hydrous pyrolysis[A].Advances in Organic Geochemistry 1981[M].Bjorey M,et al.Wiley,Chichester:1983.524-533. [4] Barth T,Borgund A E,Hopland A L.Generation of organic compounds by hydrous pyrolysis of Kemmeridge oil shale-bulk results and activation energy calculations[J].Org Geochem,1989,14:69-76. [5] Comet P A,McEvoy J,Giger W,et al.Hydrous and anhydrous pyrolysis of DSDP Leg 75 kerogens-a comparative study using a biological marker approach[J].Org Geochem,1986,9:171-182. [6] Iglinton T I,Douglas A G,Rowland S J.Release of aliphatic,aromatic and sulphur compounds from Kimmeridge kerogen by hydrous pyrolysis:a quantitative study[J].Org Geochem,1988,13(4-6):655-663. [7] 石卫,等.烃源岩在水价质下热压模拟的初步研究[A].第五届全国有机地球化学会议论文[C].广州:1992. [8] 王兆云,等.加水热模拟实验气态产物特征及演化规律研究[J].石油勘探与开发1995,22(3):36-40. [9] 程克明,等.碳酸盐岩油气生成理论与实践[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1996.139-174页. [10] 卢双舫,等.煤成烃生成与运移的模拟实验研究—Ⅰ.气态和液态产物特征及其演化[J].石油实验地质,1994,16(3):291-296.
计量
- 文章访问数: 599
- HTML全文浏览量: 60
- PDF下载量: 499
- 被引次数: 0