PETROLEUM GENERATION MODEL OF A SULFUR—RICH KEROGEN FROM THE LINNAN SAG, THE BOHAI BAY BASIN
-
摘要: 渤海湾盆地临南洼陷沙河街组三段—四段暗色页岩和暗色泥岩干酪根中富含有机硫,对这类干酪根的油气生成模式一直未进行深入的研究。应用生烃动力学方法对取自渤海湾盆地临南洼陷沙河街组四段的一块典型富硫干酪根进行了生烃动力学参数及生烃模式研究。结果表明,该干酪根油气生成模式为:生油门限出现在Easy Ro为0.53%,主生油期出现在0.60%~0.75%,生油下限出现在0.85%,对应埋深分别为2 500,2 600~3 250,3 850 m;天然气生成门限出现在EasyRo为1.05%与1.23%,对应埋深分别为4 100 m和4 650 m。与传统生油模式相比,该干酪根具有石油窗范围窄,主生油峰出现较早等特点。该研究成果对该区油气评价与勘探具有重要的指导作用。Abstract: Kerogen from some source rocks in the third and forth members of the Sahejie Formation in the Linnan Sag,the Bohai Bay Basin have been reported to be sulfur-rich.However,there has been little knowledge about the petroleum-generating model of this type of kerogen.In this paper,the kinetics method was applied to investigate petroleum generation kinetics parameters and geological model for a typical sulfur-rich kerogen from the sag.The results have shown that the oil-generating threshold of the kerogen occurs at EasyRo of 0.53%,the oil-generating peak range from 0.60% to 0.75% and oil-generating death line at 0.85%,corresponding to burial depths of 2 500 m,2 600~3 250 m and 3 850 m,respectively,and its gas-generating threshold is at EasyRo of 1.05% and main gas generation stage occurs from 1.23%,with a burial depth of 4100m and 4 650 m,respectively.Compared with conventional kerogen petroleum-generating models,this sulfur-rich kerogen is characterized by a narrow oil window and an earlier occurrence of oil-generating peak.This result will provide a guide to the petroleum evaluation and exploration in this area.
-
[1] 黄高健,孙钰,姜在兴.惠民凹陷西部沙四段油气成藏条件分析[J].油气地质与采收率,2007,14(4):46~48,52. [2] Lewan M D.Sulphur-radical control on petroleum formation rates[J].Nature,1998,391(6663):164~166. [3] 宋之光,王茂春,刘祖发.典型有机硫化合物热演化的加水热解实验研究[J].地球化学,2007,36(3):247~252. [4] 雷天柱,张更新,邱军利.硫对甲烷碳同位素分馏的影响[J].石油实验地质,2006,28(2):173~176. [5] Orr W L.Kerogen/asphaltene/sulphur relationship in sulfur-rich Monterey oils[J].Oganic Geochemistry,1986,10:499~516. [6] 王建宝,肖贤明,郭汝泰等.渤海湾盆地东营凹陷烃源岩生烃动力学研究[J].石油实验地质,2003,25(4):403~409. [7] 陈永红,鹿洪友,曾庆辉等.应用生烃动力学方法研究渤海湾盆地埕岛油田成藏地质时期[J].石油实验地质,2004,26(6):580~585. [8] 中国石油地质志编委会.中国石油地质志(卷6)胜利油田[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1987.78~99. [9] 肖焕饮,刘震,赵阳等.济阳坳陷地温—地压场特征及其石油地质意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2003,30(3):68~70. [10] 朱芒征,陈建渝.惠民凹陷临南洼陷下第三系烃源岩生烃门限[J].油气地质与采收率,2002,9(2):43~45. [11] Tang Y,Jenden P D,Nigrini A,et al.Modeling early methane generation in coal[J].Energy and Fuels,1996,10(3):659~671. [12] Tang Y,Perry J,Jenden P D,et al.Mathematical modeling of stable carbon isotope ratios in natural gases[J].Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta,2000,64 (15):2673~2687. [13] Tissot B P,Welte D H.Petroleum Formation and Occurrence[M].Berlin:Springer—Verlag,1978.196~245. [14] 黄第藩.陆相有机质演化和成烃机理[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1984.151~187. [15] 江继纲,张聪.江汉盆地潜江期盐湖沉积石油的形成与演化[J].石油与天然气地质,1982,18(1):1~14. [16] Cross M M,Manning D A C,Bottrell S H,et al.Thermchemical sulphate(TSR):experimental detemiation of reaction kinetics and implication of the observed kinetic and implication of the observed reaction rates for petroleum reservoirs[J].Org Geochem,2004,35:393~404
计量
- 文章访问数: 807
- HTML全文浏览量: 56
- PDF下载量: 334
- 被引次数: 0