镜质体反射率剖面反演中的不确定性分析——以鄂西渝东茶园1井为例

王玮; 周祖翼

doi:10.11781/sysydz200803292

镜质体反射率剖面反演中的不确定性分析——以鄂西渝东茶园1井为例

doi: 10.11781/sysydz200803292

王玮,
周祖翼

同济大学, 海洋地质国家重点实验室, 上海, 200092

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(40572075,40621063)

详细信息

作者简介:
王玮(1969- ),男,博士生,主要从事盆地模拟研究.E-mail:ww200211@gmail.com.

中图分类号: TE122.1
计量
- 文章访问数: 849
- HTML全文浏览量: 79
- PDF下载量: 275
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2007-05-16
- 修回日期: 2008-05-07
- 刊出日期: 2008-05-28

UNCERTAINTIES IN THE INVERSION OF VITRINITE REFLECTANCE PROFILE—A CASE STUDY OF WELL CHAYUAN 1, WEST HUBEI AND EAST CHONGQING

Wang Wei,
Zhou Zuyi

State Key Laboratory of Marine Geology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

摘要

摘要: 由于镜质体反射率与地层温度史之间的高度非线性关系,镜质体反射率剖面反演中存在着不确定性;同时输入参数的误差会进一步导致反演结果的不确定性。反演的不确定性可以借助马尔科夫链—蒙特卡洛(MCMC)方法进行描述和分析。对于鄂西渝东茶园1井,反演结果不确定性表现为:(1)镜质体反射率剖面只能对地层经历最高古温度时的地温梯度及相应的剥蚀量进行有效的约束;(2)对于可接受的反演结果,剥蚀量和古热流之间存在负相关关系;(3)岩石骨架热导率、古地表温度和孔隙度—深度关系等输入参数的误差增加了反演结果的不确定性。反演结果表明,中新生代以来鄂西渝东热流下降约20%,从145 Ma时的(57±4.7)mW/m²到现今的45 mW/m²,相应的剥蚀量约为(3.4±0.4)km。
- 镜质体反射率反演 /
- 不确定性 /
- 马尔科夫链—蒙特卡洛 /
- 鄂西渝东
Abstract: Uncertainties in the inversion of vitrinite reflectance profile are resulted from the strongly nonlinear relationship between strata temperature history and vitrinite reflectance,and as well as the parametric errors further cause the uncertainties.This uncertainties can be described and analyzed by means of Markov Chain Monte Carlo(MCMC).As for the inversion of vitrinite reflectance profile in Well Chayuan 1,the uncertainties can be summarized as:(1) Only when the strata experience the maximum paleotemperature,can vitrinite reflectance profile provide valid constraints on the geothermal gradient and corresponding denudation thickness;(2) For acceptable results,there is negative correlation between the geothermal gradient and the eroded thickness;(3) Errors in input parameters,such as thermal conductivity of rock,ancient surface temperature and relationship between porosity and depth,increase the uncertainties.The inversion results show that the heat flow of this area has decreased by about 20% since Meso-Cenozoic,from(57±4.7) mW/m² at 145 Ma to 45 mW/m² at present,and the corresponding denudation thickness is(3.4±0.4) km.
- vitrinite reflectance inversion /
- uncertainties /
- Markov Chain Monte Carlo /
- West Hubei—East Chongqing

HTML全文

参考文献(14)

[1]	Lopatin N V.Temperature and geologic time as factors in coalification (in Russian)[J].Nauk SSSR Izv Ser Geol,1971,3:95～106.
[2]	Waples D W.Time and temperature in petroleum formation:application of Lopatin's method to petroleum exploration[J].AAPG Bulletin,1980,64(6):916～926.
[3]	Burnham A K,Sweeney J J.A chemical kinetic model of vitrinite maturation and reflectance[J].Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta,1989,53:2649～2657.
[4]	庞雄奇,陈章明,陈发景.含油气盆地地史、热史、生排烃史数值模拟研究与烃源岩定量评价[M].北京:地质出版社,1993.
[5]	Lerche I,Kendall CG.Determination of Paleoseat Flux from vitrinite reflectance data[J].AAPG Bulletin,1984,59:1704～1717.
[6]	Gallagher K,Sambridge M.The resolution of past heat flow in sedimentary basins from non-linear inversion of geochemical data:the smoothest model approach,with synthetic examples[J].Geophys J Int,1992,109(1):78～95.
[7]	Gallagher K.Inverse thermal history modelling as a hydrocarbon exploration tool[J].Inverse Problems,1998,14(3):479～497.
[8]	Nielsen S B.Sensitivity analysis in thermal and maturity modelling[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,1996,13(4):415～425.
[9]	施小斌,汪集旸,罗晓容.古温标重建沉积盆地热史的能力探讨[J].地球物理学报,2000,43(3):386～392.
[10]	Ferrero C,Gallagher K.Stochastic thermal history modelling.1.Constraining heat flow histories and their uncertainty[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2002,19:633～648.
[11]	伍大茂,吴乃苓,郜建军.四川盆地古地温研究及其地质意义[J].石油学报,1998,19(1):18～23.
[12]	卢庆治,胡圣标,郭彤楼等.川东北地区异常高压形成的地温场背景[J].地球物理学报,2005,48(5):1110～1116.
[13]	Perrier R,Quiblier J.Thickness changes in sedimentary layers during compaction history; methods for quantitative evaluation[J].AAPG Bulletin,1974,58(3):507～520.
[14]	Sambridge M,Beghein C,Simons F J,et al.How do we understand and visualize uncertainty? [J].The Leading Edge,2006,25(5):542～546