中国与SEC储量评估差异分析——以元坝长兴组元坝103H井区长二段气藏为例

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名

邮箱

手机号码

标题

留言内容

验证码

基金项目: 中国石化西南油气分公司“2011年上市油气储量评估及储量库管理”(11KT-02)资助

Reasons for differences of reserve estimation results between domestic and SEC rules：A case study of gas reservoir in 2nd section of Changxing Formation, well Yuanba 103H

Exploration & Production Research Institute, SINOPEC Southwest Oil & Gas Company, Chengdu, Sichuan 610081, China

摘要: 2000年以来,我国三大石油公司陆续在美国证券交易市场成功上市,上市储量评估采用的技术规范是SEC准则.国内外储量评估内涵、分类和目的有所不同,使国内外评估结果存在差异.该文以元坝103H井区长二段气藏为例,就国内规范和SEC准则在容积法评估储量过程中确定含气面积、有效厚度等参数取值的具体方法逐一对比分析.
- 国内规范 /
- SEC准则 /
- 容积法 /
- 储量评估 /
- 元坝气田
Abstract: Three main petroleum companies in our country have successfully come into the SEC in succession since 2000,and the reserve estimations on oversea market have been made based on SEC rules.The differences of reserve estimation concept,classification and purpose lead to the differences of estimation results between domestic and SEC rules.A case study of gas reservoir has been carried out in the 2nd section of the Changxing Formation,well Yuanba 103H.The determination of gas-bearing area and effective thickness based on domestic and SEC rules has been compared.
- domestic rule /
- SEC rule /
- volumetric method /
- reserve estimation /
- Yuanba Gas Field

[1]	徐永梅.SEC储量评估与中国储量评价的区别[J].企业科技与发展,2009,09(10):179-181.
[2]	赵文智,毕海滨.浅析中国与西方在储量计算中确定有效厚度之差异[J].石油勘探与开发,2005,32(3):125-129.
[3]	钱勤,凡睿,段金宝,等.元坝气田元坝27、元坝101、元坝103H井区长二段及元坝29、元坝12井区长兴组气藏新增天然气探明储量报告.成都:中国石化勘探南方分公司,2011:146-179.
[4]	吕鸣岗,程永才,袁自学,等.中华人民共和国地质矿产行业标准DZ/T0217-2005石油天然气储量计算规范[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2005:4-8.
[5]	杨通佑,范尚炯,陈元千,等.石油及天然气储量计算方法[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1987:2-3.
[6]	张玲,袁向春,林豪,等.国内储量计算与上市储量评估对比分析[J].中国西部油气地质,2006,2(3):245-248.
[7]	尚明忠.用SEC标准进行储量评估应注意的主要问题[J].油气地质与采收率,2005,12(1):50-51.
[8]	贾承造.美国SEC油气储量评估方法[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2004:2-5.