Risk analysis and play evaluation of marine residual basins in South China
-
摘要: 中国南方发育有下海上陆的多旋回生储盖组合,总体形成了震旦系-下古生界及中-上古生界2套大的海相成藏组合;平面上形成以江绍-十万大山断裂为界的南、北两大成藏区,其中北区发育2套组合,南区发育中-上古生界1套组合。平面上古油藏与油气显示分布受古隆起控制,油气成藏经历了加里东-海西期生油、印支期裂解成气、燕山-喜马拉雅期调整与改造3期以上事件。现今保存的海相油气藏具有明显的残留特征。综合分析认为,南方海相普遍存在勘探程度低、技术尚不成熟、油气成藏规律认识局限等方面的风险,其中常规油气勘探风险相对较高,海陆叠合盆地勘探风险相对较低,非常规页岩气勘探风险最低,并由此对南方海相进行了评价与有利区带优选。Abstract: Multiple cycles of hydrocarbon generation, reserve and cap assemblages with sea at the bottom and continent at the top developed in South China. There were mainly 2 sets of marine accumulation assemblages including Sinian-the Lower Paleozoic and the Middle-Upper Paleozoic. On plane map, the study area was divided into 2 accumulation zones (the southern one and the northern one) by the Jiangshao-Shiwandashan Fault. In the northern accumulation zone, 2 sets of accumulation assemblages developed, while in the southern accumulation zone, only the Middle-Upper Paleozoic assemblage existed. The distribution of ancient reservoirs and oil-and-gas shows was controlled by ancient uplifts. Petroleum accumulation experienced over 3 stages of tectonic events, for example, oil generating in Caledonian-Hercynian stages, oil cracking to gas in Indosinian stage, and adjusting and deforming in Yanshanian-Himalayan stages. The present marine reservoirs in South China have distinctive residual features. Their exploration degrees are low, techniques are not mature, and the knowledge about accumulation rules is restricted. The risks are higher for normal petroleum explorations, lower for marine superimposed basin explorations, and the lowest for unconventional shale gas explorations. The marine strata in South China were evaluated and the favorable zones for exploration were pointed out.
-
Key words:
- oil and gas exploration /
- risk analysis /
- evaluation of play /
- marine residual basin /
- South China
-
[1] 高瑞祺,赵政璋.中国南方海相油气地质及勘探前景[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社,2001:321. [2] 马力,陈焕疆,甘克文,等.中国南方大地构造和海相油气地质[M].北京:地质出版社,2004:3-19. [3] 马永生,陈洪德,王国力,等.中国南方层序地层与古地理[M].北京:科学出版社,2009. [4] 徐政语,姚根顺,郭庆新,等.黔南坳陷构造变形特征及其成因解析[J].大地构造与成矿学,2010,34(1):20-31. [5] 陈洪德,覃建雄,田景春,等.中国南方古生界层序格架中的生储盖组合类型及特征[J].石油与天然气地质,2004,25(1):62-69. [6] 贺训云,姚根顺,贺晓苏,等.桂中坳陷桂中1 井沥青成因及油气成藏模式[J].石油学报,2010,31(3):420-425. [7] 王根海,赵宗举,李大成,等.中国油气新区勘探(第五卷)[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2001. [8] 何登发,李德生,童晓光,等.多期叠加盆地古隆起控油规律[J].石油学报,2008,29(4):475-488. [9] 丁道桂,潘文蕾,黄继文.楚雄前陆盆地的改造变形[J].石油实验地质,2012,34(4):345-351. [10] 孙玮,刘树根,王国芝,等.四川威远震旦系与下古生界天然气成藏特征[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2010,37(5):481-489. [11] 王津义,涂伟,曾华盛,等.黔西北地区天然气成藏地质特征[J].石油实验地质,2008,30(5):445-455. [12] 徐思煌,袁彩萍,梅廉夫,等.叠合盆地成藏流体源类型、演化及控藏意义[J].地质科技情报,2007,26(2):59-64. [13] 曾允孚,张锦泉,刘文均,等.中国南方泥盆纪岩相古地理与成矿作用[M].北京:地质出版社,1993. [14] 张抗.中国海相油气演化成藏特点研究[J].石油与天然气地质,2007,28(6):713-720. [15] 周雁,金之钧,朱东亚,等.油气盖层研究现状与认识进展 [J].石油实验地质,2012,34(3):234-245. [16] 沃玉进,周雁,肖开华.中国南方海相油气成藏条件地区差异性[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2007,34(5):519-526. [17] 赵孟军,张水昌,赵陵,等.南盘江盆地古油藏沥青地球化学特征及成因[J].地质学报, 2006,80(6):894-901. [18] 董大忠,程克明,王世谦,等.页岩气资源评价方法及其在四川盆地的应用[J].天然气工业,2009,29(5):33-39. [19] 聂海宽,包书景,高波,等.四川盆地及其周缘上奥陶统-下志留统页岩气成藏体系研究[J].石油实验地质,2012,34(2):115-119. [20] 郑学涛.丰城区煤层气开发前景及试验的效果与思考[J].地学前缘,1999,6(增刊):227-232. [21] 周尚忠,张文忠.丰城区块煤层气地质特征及资源量估算[J].录井工程,2011,22(2):62-64. [22] 陈本金,温春齐,曹盛远,等.贵州六盘水煤层气勘探开发有利目标区优选[J].西南石油大学学报:自然科学版,2010,32(3):56-60. [23] 尹中山,徐锡惠,李茂竹,等.四川省煤层气勘探开发工作进展与建议[J].天然气工业,2009,29(10):14-16. [24] 徐政语,姚根顺,张喜满,等.中国南方五省区陆相中小盆地石油地质特征分析[J].石油实验地质,2012,34(2):158-166.
计量
- 文章访问数: 2078
- HTML全文浏览量: 141
- PDF下载量: 963
- 被引次数: 0