核磁共振岩心实验分析在低孔渗储层评价中的应用

王振华; 陈刚; 李书恒; 章辉若; 黄得顺; 杨甫; 雷盼盼; 刘小伸

doi:10.11781/sysydz201406773

核磁共振岩心实验分析在低孔渗储层评价中的应用

doi: 10.11781/sysydz201406773

1.
西北大学地质学系大陆动力学国家重点实验室, 西安 710069
2. 中国石油长庆油田分公司, 西安 710021

基金项目: 教育部高校博士点基金(20116101110006)、陕西省自然科学基金(2012JZ5001)、西北大学大学生创新创业训练计划项目(2013001)和国家基础科学人才培养基金(XDCX12-15)资助。

详细信息

作者简介:
王振华(1991-),男,本科,地质学系资源勘查工程专业。E-mail:wang.zhen.hua.larry@gmail.com。

通讯作者:
陈刚(1965-),男,博士生导师,教授,从事含油气盆地地质学研究工作。E-mail:chengang@nwu.edu.cn。

中图分类号: TE135⁺.1
计量
- 文章访问数: 1151
- HTML全文浏览量: 115
- PDF下载量: 925
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2013-05-06
- 修回日期: 2014-10-11
- 刊出日期: 2014-11-28

Application of NMR core experimental analysis in evaluation of low-porosity and low-permeability sandstone reservoirs

1.
State Key Laboratory of Continental Dynamics, Department of Geology, Northwest University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710069, China
2. Changqing Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710021, China

摘要

摘要: 根据核磁共振(NMR)岩心实验分析的基本原理、方法和相关参数模型的研究进展,对鄂尔多斯盆地东部ZC油田3062井延长组长6油层组低孔渗砂岩样品进行了储层物性、孔隙结构和束缚水饱和度等参数的NMR岩心实验分析,并将其与常规岩心测试参数进行了分析与对比,探讨了低孔渗储层NMR岩心实验分析的精度及其应用效果。结果表明,3062井长6油层组砂岩属于典型的低孔渗储层,孔隙度在8.6%~13.0%,渗透率在(0.07~1.27)×10^-3 μm²;低孔渗砂岩样品NMR岩心实验所分析的孔隙结构、孔隙度、束缚水饱和度数据与其常规岩心分析结果基本一致,且系统偏差较小,但基于NMR实验参数的储层渗透率预测模型尚存在较多的不确定性,核磁共振渗透率预测结果与常规岩心分析渗透率数据存在较大偏差。
- 核磁共振(NMR) /
- 岩心样品分析 /
- 微观孔隙结构 /
- 储层物性参数 /
- 鄂尔多斯盆地
Abstract: Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) core experimental analysis is a new developing technique in experi-mental geology. Based on the principles and methods of NMR core experimental analysis, as well as some improved parametric models, a series of reservoir parameters of Chang6 low-porosity and low-permeability oil-bearing sandstone core samples from well 3062 in the ZC Oil Field in the eastern Ordos Basin were systematically measured by NMR. Additionally, the accuracy and relative error of the NMR analysis were calculated and discussed by means of recognized exact method of conventional core experimental analysis as control group. It is revealed that the Chang6 oil-bearing sandstones are typical low-porosity and low-permeability reservoirs, with porosity ranging from 8.6% to 13.0%, and permeability from 0.07×10^-3 to 1.27×10^-3 μm². NMR core experimental analysis has advantages of convenience, high efficiency and accepted accuracy with a smaller relative error for testing the low-porosity and low-permeability reservoir parameters of porosity, microscopic pore structure and irreducible water saturation. However, compared with the results of conventional core analysis, there is a larger relative error in NMR prediction for the permeability parameters, which is most probably due to some uncertainty of the reservoir permeability predictive models.
- nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) /
- core sample analysis /
- microscopic pore structure /
- reservoir parameter /
- Ordos Basin

HTML全文

参考文献(23)

[1]	Coates G R,Xiao Lizhi,Prammer M G.NMR logging:principles and applications[M].Michigan:Haliburton Energy Services,1999.
[2]	王为民.核磁共振岩石物理研究及其在石油工业中的应用.武汉:中国科学院研究生院(武汉物理与数学研究所),2001. Wang Weiming.The physical study of nuclear magnetic resonance in rock and its application on petroleum industry.Wuhan:Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics of Chinese Academy of Sciences,2001.
[3]	Wang Xiaowen,Xiao Lizhi,Xie Ranhong,et al.Study of NMR porosity for terrestrial formation in China[J].Science in China Series G:Physics Mechanics and Astronomy,2006,49(3):313-320.
[4]	Morriss C,Rossini D,Straley C,et al.Core analysis by low-field NMR[J].The Log Analyst,1997,38(2):84-94.
[5]	肖立志,石红兵.低场核磁共振岩心分析及其在测井解释中的应用[J].测井技术,1998,22(1):42-49. Xiao Lizhi,Shi Hongbing.Low field NMR core analysis and its applications in log analysis[J].Well Logging Technology,1998,22(1):42-49.
[6]	李太伟,郭和坤,李海波,等.应用核磁共振技术研究页岩气储层可动流体[J].特种油气藏,2012,19(1):107-109. Li Taiwei,Guo Hekun,Li Haibo,et al.Research on movable fluids in shale gas reservoirs with NMR technology[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2012,19(1):107-109.
[7]	肖立志,谢然红,廖广志.中国复杂油气藏核磁共振测井理论与方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2012. Xiao Lizhi,Xiao Ranhong,Liao Guangzhi.The principle and methods of nuclear magnetic resonance well logging of complex hydrocarbon reservoirs in China[M].Beijing:Science Press,2012.
[8]	张冲,张占松,严伟.核磁共振T₂分布评价阳离子交换容量方法研究[J].断块油气田,2012,19(5):666-669. Zhang Chong,Zhang Zhansong,Yan Wei.Study on evaluation method of cation exchange capacity using NMR T₂ distribution[J].Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field,2012,19(5):666-669.
[9]	Slijkerman W F J,Hofman J P,Looyestijn W J,et al.A practical approach to obtain primary drainage capillary pressure curves from NMR core and log data[J].Petrophysics,2001,42(4):334-343.
[10]	何雨丹,毛志强,肖立志,等.利用核磁共振T₂分布构造毛管压力曲线的新方法[J].吉林大学学报:地球科学版,2005,35(2):177-181. He Yudan,Mao Zhiqiang,Xiao Lizhi,et al.A new method to obtain capillary pressure curve using NMR T₂ distribution[J].Journal of Jilin University:Earth Science Edition,2005,35(2):177-181.
[11]	刘卫,肖忠祥,杨思玉,等.利用核磁共振(NMR)测井资料评价储层孔隙结构方法的对比研究[J].石油地球物理勘探,2009,44(6):773-778. Liu Wei,Xiao Zhongxiang,Yang Siyu,et al.Comparative studies on methods of evaluation of reservoir pore structure by using NMR (Nuclear Magnetic Resonance) well logging data[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2009,44(6):773-778.
[12]	刘晓鹏,胡晓新.近五年核磁共振测井在储集层孔隙结构评价中的若干进展[J].地球物理学进展,2009,24(6):2194-2201. Liu Xiaopeng,Hu Xiaoxin.Progress of NMR log in evaluating reservoir pore structure in the last five years[J].Progress in Geophysics,2009,24(6):2194-2201.
[13]	刘堂宴,王绍民,傅容珊,等.核磁共振谱的岩石孔喉结构分析[J].石油地球物理勘探,2003,38(3):328-333. Liu Tangyan,Wang Shaomin,Fu Rongshan,et al.Analysis of rock pore throat structure with NMR spectra[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2003,38(3):328-333.
[14]	Liu Z H,Zhou C C,Zhang L H,et al.An innovative method to evaluate formation pore structure using NMR logging data//SPWLA 48th Annual Logging Symposium.Austin,Texas:Society of Petrophysicists and Well-Log Analysts,2007.
[15]	Kenyon W E,Day P I,Straley C,et al.A three-part study of NMR longitudinal relaxation properties of water-saturated sandstones[J].SPE Formation Evaluation,1988,3(3):622-636.
[16]	Coates G R,Peveraro R C A,Hardwick A,et al.The magnetic resonance imaging log characterized by comparison with petrophysical properties and laboratory core data//SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition.Dallas,Texas:Society of Petroleum Engineers,1991.
[17]	Kubica P.Statistical tests of permeability estimates based on NMR measurements//SPWLA 36th Annual Logging Symposium.Paris,France:Society of Petrophysicists and Well-Log Analysts,1995.
[18]	Richard S.Coates and SDR permeability:two variations on the same theme[J].Petrophysics,2002,43(1):38-46.
[19]	Coates G R,Marschall D,Mardon D,et al.A new characterization of bulk-volume irreducible using magnetic resonance//SPWLA 38th Annual Logging Symposium.Houston,Texas:Society of Petrophysicists and Well-Log Analysts,1997.
[20]	Chen S,Arro R,Minetto C,et al.Methods for computing SWI and BVI from NMR logs//SPWLA 39th Annual Logging Symposium.Keystone,Colorado:Society of Petrophysicists and Well-Log Analysts,1998.
[21]	Kleinberg R L,Boyd A.Tapered cutoffs for magnetic resonance bound water volume//SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition.San Antonio,Texas:Society of Petroleum Engineers,1997.
[22]	阙洪培,雷卞军.NMR束缚流体体积确定方法及其应用条件[J].西南石油学院学报,2002,24(2):5-8. Que Hongpei,Lei Bianjun.Method of determining bulk irreducible fluid volume with NMR and its constrains in application[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum Institute,2002,24(2):5-8.
[23]	肖亮,肖忠祥.核磁共振测井T_2cutoff确定方法及适用性分析[J].地球物理学进展,2008,23(1):167-172. Xiao Liang,Xiao Zhongxiang.Analysis of methods for determining NMR T_2cutoff and its applicabilty[J].Progress in Geophysics,2008,23(1):167-172.