留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

砂岩气藏岩石孔喉结构及渗流特征

胡勇 郭长敏 徐轩 焦春艳 闫永强

胡勇, 郭长敏, 徐轩, 焦春艳, 闫永强. 砂岩气藏岩石孔喉结构及渗流特征[J]. 石油实验地质, 2015, 37(3): 390-393. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201503390
引用本文: 胡勇, 郭长敏, 徐轩, 焦春艳, 闫永强. 砂岩气藏岩石孔喉结构及渗流特征[J]. 石油实验地质, 2015, 37(3): 390-393. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201503390
Hu Yong, Guo Changmin, Xu Xuan, Jiao Chunyan, Yan Yongqiang. Pore throat structure and flow characteristics of sandstone reservoirs[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2015, 37(3): 390-393. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201503390
Citation: Hu Yong, Guo Changmin, Xu Xuan, Jiao Chunyan, Yan Yongqiang. Pore throat structure and flow characteristics of sandstone reservoirs[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2015, 37(3): 390-393. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201503390

砂岩气藏岩石孔喉结构及渗流特征

doi: 10.11781/sysydz201503390
基金项目: 国家科技重大专项"致密砂岩气有效开发评价技术"(2011ZX05013-002)资助.
详细信息
    作者简介:

    胡勇(1978-),男,博士研究生,高级工程师,从事石油天然气开发与实验研究工作.E-mail:huy69@petrochina.com.cn.

  • 中图分类号: TE122.2+3

Pore throat structure and flow characteristics of sandstone reservoirs

  • 摘要: 以多孔介质中气水两相渗流理论为基础,选择了四川须家河组气藏岩心,其渗透率在(0.002~70.28)×10-3μm2之间,分别开展了高压压汞、气水相渗以及气藏衰竭开采物理模拟实验研究,从岩石孔喉结构、受力特征以及气水两相渗流特征3方面对比分析了致密与中高渗砂岩气藏特征的差异。采用孔喉类型及数量比例、平均孔喉半径、孔喉中值半径3项参数对不同渗透率砂岩孔喉结构特征进行了精细描述,对比分析了低渗致密与常规及高渗砂岩孔喉结构特征差异;采用排驱压力、沿程阻力量化评价了气、水在不同渗透率砂岩中渗流时的受力情况,对比分析了孔喉结构对致密与常规砂岩产能的影响;建立了气相渗流能力与含水饱和度关系图版,对比分析了含水饱和度大小对不同渗透率岩心气相渗流能力的影响。研究成果将为气藏储层微观建模以及气、水渗流机理研究提供一定的参考依据。

     

  • [1] 贾承造,郑民,张永峰.中国非常规油气资源与勘探开发前景[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,39(2):129-136. Jia Chengzao,Zheng Min,Zhang Yongfeng.Unconventional hydrocarbon resources in China and the prospect of exploration and development[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(2):129-136.
    [2] 戴金星,倪云燕,吴小奇.中国致密砂岩气及在勘探开发上的重要意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,39(3):257-264. Dai Jinxing,Ni Yunyan,Wu Xiaoqi.Tight gas in China and its significance in exploration and exploitation[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(3):257-264.
    [3] 赵文智,卞从胜,徐兆辉.苏里格气田与川中须家河组气田成藏共性与差异[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(4):400-408. Zhao Wenzhi,Bian Congsheng,Xu Zhaohui.Similarities and differences between natural gas accumulations in Sulige gas field in Ordos Basin and Xujiahe gas field in central Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(4):400-408.
    [4] 胡勇,李熙喆,万玉金,等.致密砂岩气渗流特征物理模拟[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(5):580-584. Hu Yong,Li Xizhe,Wan Yujin,et al.Physical simulation on gas percolation in tight sandstone[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(5):580-584.
    [5] 胡勇,邵阳,陆永亮,等.低渗气藏储层孔隙中水的赋存模式及对气藏开发的影响[J].天然气地球科学,2011,22(1):176-181. Hu Yong,Shao Yang,Lu Yongliang,et al.Experimental study on occurrence models of water in pores and the influencing to the development of tight gas reservoir[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2011,22(1):176-181.
    [6] 胡勇.气体渗流启动压力实验测试及应用[J].天然气工业,2010,30(11):48-50. Hu Yong.Experimental test analysis of threshold pressure in tight sandstone gas flow:A case study of the Sulige gas field[J].Natural Gas Industry,2010,30(11):48-50.
    [7] 胡勇,朱华银,万玉金,等.大庆火山岩孔隙结构及气水渗流特征[J].西南石油大学学报,2007,29(5):63-65. Hu Yong,Zhu Huayin,Wan Yujin,et al.The pore structure and the properties of water-gas flowing through porous media in a volcanic rock in Daqing[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University,2007,29(5):63-65.
    [8] 胡作维,李云.基于偏最小二乘法评价低渗透砂岩储层质量[J].特种油气藏,2013,20(5):36-39. Hu Zuowei,Li Yun.Based on partial least squares evaluation of low permeability sandstone reservoir quality[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2013,20(5):36-39.
    [9] 杨正明,姜汉桥,朱光亚,等.低渗透含水气藏储层评价参数研究[J].石油学报,2008,29(2):252-255. Yang Zhengming,Jiang Hanqiao,Zhu Guangya,et al.Research on reservoir evaluation index for low-permeability water-bearing gas reservoir[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2008,29(2):252-255.
    [10] 邹才能,朱如凯,白斌,等.中国油气储层中纳米孔喉首次发现及其科学价值[J].岩石学报,2011,27(6):1857-1864. Zou Caineng,Zhu Rukai,Bai Bin,et al.First discovery of nano-pore throat in oil and gas reservoir in China and its scientific value[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica,2011,27(6):1857-1864.
    [11] 肖开华,冯动军,李秀鹏.川西新场须四段致密砂岩储层微观孔喉与可动流体变化特征[J].石油实验地质,2014,36(1):77-82. Xiao Kaihua,Feng Dongjun,Li Xiupeng.Micro pore and throat characteristics and moveable fluid variation of tight sandstone in 4th member of Xujiahe formation,Xinchang gas field,western Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2014,36(1):77-82.
    [12] 王瑞飞,沈平平,宋子齐,等.特低渗透砂岩储层油藏储层微观孔喉特征[J].石油学报,2009,30(4):560-563. Wang Ruifei,Shen Pingping,Song Ziqi,et al.Characteristics of micro-pore throat in ultra-low permeability sandstone reservoir[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2009,30(4):560-563.
    [13] 林晓英,郭春阳,曾溅辉,等.低渗透砂岩天然气运移和聚集模拟实验[J]石油实验地质,2014,36(3):370-375. Lin Xiaoying,Guo Chunyang,Zeng Jianhui,et al.Experimental study on gas migration and accumulation in low-permeability sandstone reservoirs[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2014,36(3):370-375.
    [14] 马勇,钟宁宁,程礼军,等.渝东南两套富有机质页岩的孔隙结构特征:来自FIB-SEM的新启示[J].石油实验地质,2015,37(1):109-116. Ma Yong,Zhong Ningning,Cheng Lijun,et al.Pore structure of two organic-rich shales in southeastern Chongqing area:insight from Focused Ion Beam Scanning Electron Microscope (FIB-SEM)[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2015,37(1):109-116.
    [15] 国家发展和改革委员会.SY/T 5345—2007 岩石中两相相对渗透率测定方法[S].北京:石油工业出版社,2007. SY/T 5345—2007 Test method for two phase relative permeabi-lity in rock[S].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2007.
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1055
  • HTML全文浏览量:  91
  • PDF下载量:  1228
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2014-03-18
  • 修回日期:  2015-03-24
  • 刊出日期:  2015-05-28

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回