油页岩不同温度原位热解物性变化核磁共振分析

李广友; 马中良; 郑家锡; 鲍芳; 郑伦举

doi:10.11781/sysydz201603402

油页岩不同温度原位热解物性变化核磁共振分析

doi: 10.11781/sysydz201603402

李广友^1,2,
马中良^1,2, ,,
郑家锡¹,
鲍芳^1,2,
郑伦举^1,2

1.
中国石化石油勘探开发研究院无锡石油地质研究所, 江苏无锡 214126
2. 中国石化油气成藏重点实验室, 江苏无锡 214126

基金项目: 中国石化科技开发部基础前瞻性项目(P13047)和中国石化石油勘探开发研究院院控项目(YK514003)资助。

详细信息

作者简介:
李广友(1963-),男,工程师,从事油气地球化学实验研究。E-mail:ligy.syky@sinopec.com。

通讯作者:
马中良(1984-),男,工程师,从事成烃成藏物理模拟和油页岩原位转化开采技术研究。E-mail:mazl.syky@sinopec.com。

中图分类号: TE19
计量
- 文章访问数: 1650
- HTML全文浏览量: 176
- PDF下载量: 1175
- 被引次数: 25
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2015-12-14
- 修回日期: 2016-03-12
- 刊出日期: 2016-05-28

NMR analysis of the physical change of oil shales during in situ pyrolysis at different temperatures

Li Guangyou^1,2,
Ma Zhongliang^{1,2
, ,},
Zheng Jiaxi¹,
Bao Fang^1,2,
Zheng Lunju^1,2

1.
Wuxi Research Institute of Petroleum Geology, SINOPEC, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214126, China
2. SINOPEC Key Laboratory of Petroleum Accumulation Mechanisms, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214126, China

摘要

摘要: 油页岩原位热解过程中产生的孔隙和裂缝的连通程度是制约转化后的油页岩油气能否原位可采的关键要素,而常规岩石物性测试手段无法全覆盖测定油页岩层内不同级别的孔隙及裂缝。利用核磁共振仅对岩石孔隙流体有响应可以识别刻画不同级别孔、缝的优势,根据核磁共振分析岩石物性的方法和相关参数模型,开展了模拟地下500 m原位加热到不同反应温度后的油页岩热解系列样品的核磁共振测试。结果表明,不同转化温度原位开采过程中,油页岩的孔隙度演变可以分为3个阶段,250~350℃时逐渐增大,350~400℃时略有减小,400℃之后大幅增大;渗透率在400℃之前变化不大,400~450℃渗透率提高了2个数量级,500℃时改善更为可观,提高了4个数量级。油页岩原位干馏开采需要400℃以上的高温,而实际地下开采大尺度的油页岩受热均一性较差,可能大部分区域温度达不到400℃,可以采取升到更高的温度并延长加热时间或加热前对油页岩层进行储层压裂改造,以改善油页岩层的物性,提高油页岩原位开采油气采收率。
- 核磁共振 /
- 孔隙度 /
- 渗透率 /
- 原位开采 /
- 油页岩
Abstract: The connectivity between pores and fissures during in situ oil shale pyrolysis is an important element which controls shale oil and gas recoverable amount. However, conventional petrophysical testing methods can not cover all levels of pores and fissures in oil shales. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) can show fluids in core pores and fissures, hence can be used to identify different levels of pores and fissures. We carried out NMR tests with oil shale samples by simulating the same conditions as 500 m underground and heating the samples to different temperatures. Results showed that the porosity of oil shales change according to temperature during in situ exploitation. Porosity increases from 250 to 350℃, decreases slightly from 350 to 400℃, and then increases again after 400℃. Permeability remains stable when temperature is lower than 400℃, increases by 10² times from 400 to 450℃, and increases by 10⁴ times at 500℃. The in situ retorting of oil shales should be made at a temperature higher than 400℃; however, oil shales underground might not reach 400℃ in many areas. In this case, we should explore at a higher temperature and heat for longer time, or fracture oil shales before heating.
- nuclear magnetic resonance /
- porosity /
- permeability /
- in situ mining /
- oil shale

HTML全文

参考文献(15)

[1]	刘洪林,刘德勋,方朝合,等.利用微波加热开采地下油页岩的技术[J].石油学报,2010,31(4):623-625. Liu Honglin,Liu Dexun,Fang Chaohe,et al.Microwave heating technology of in situ oil shale developing[J].Acta Petrolei Sinnica,2010,31(4):623-625.
[2]	王红岩,赵群,刘洪林,等.中国油页岩资源分布及技术进展[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2013. Wang Hongyan,Zhao Qun,Liu Honglin,et al.The distribution and advances in production technologies of oil shale in China[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2013.
[3]	赵静,冯增朝,杨栋,等.基于三维CT图像的油页岩热解及内部结构变化特征分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2014,33(1):112-117. Zhao Jing,Feng Zengchao,Yang Dong,et al.Study of pyrolysis and internal structural variation of oil shale based on 3D CT images[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2014,33(1):112-117.
[4]	孙军昌,陈静平,杨正明,等.页岩储层岩芯核磁共振响应特征实验研究[J].科技导报,2012,30(14):25-30. Sun Junchang,Chen Jingping,Yang Zhengming,et al.Experimental study of the NMR characteristics of shale reservoir rock[J].Science & Technology Review,2012,30(14):25-30.
[5]	黄磊,申维.页岩气储层孔隙发育特征及主控因素分析:以上扬子地区龙马溪组为例[J].地学前缘,2015,22(1):374-385. Huang Lei,Shen Wei.Characteristics and controlling factors of the formation of pores of a shale gas reservoir:A case study from Longmaxi Formation of the Upper Yangtze region,China[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2015,22(1):374-385.
[6]	赵蕾.核磁共振在储层物性测定中的研究及应用[D].青岛:中国石油大学,2010. Zhao Lei.Research and application of NMR in measurement of reservoir physical property[D].Qingdao:China University of Petroleum,2010.
[7]	郑伦举,秦建中,何生,等.地层孔隙热压生排烃模拟实验初步研究[J].石油实验地质,2009,31(3):296-302,306. Zheng Lunju,Qin Jianzhong,He Sheng,et al.Preliminary study of formation porosity thermocompression simulation experiment of hydrocarbon generation and expulsion[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2009,31(3):296-302,306.
[8]	马中良,郑伦举,李志明.烃源岩有限空间温压共控生排烃模拟实验研究[J].沉积学报,2012,30(5):955-963. Ma Zhongliang,Zheng Lunju,Li Zhiming.The thermocompression simulation experiment of source rock hydrocarbon generation and expulsion in formation porosity[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2012,30(5):955-963.
[9]	于炳松.页岩气储层孔隙分类与表征[J].地学前缘,2013,20(4):211-220. Yu Bingsong.Classification and characterization of gas shale pore system[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2013,20(4):211-220.
[10]	王志战.页岩油气层二维核磁共振分析与评价技术[R].北京:中国石油化工股份有限公司石油工程技术研究院,2014. Wang Zhizhan.2D NMR analyis and evaluation technology of shale oil and gas reservoir[R].Beijing:SINOPEC Research Institute of Petroleum Engineering,2014.
[11]	李杰林.基于核磁共振技术的寒区岩石冻融损伤机理试验研究[D].长沙:中南大学,2012. Li Jielin.Experiment study on deterioration mechanism of rock under the conditions of freezing-thawing cycles in cold regions based on NMR technology[D].Changsha:Central South University,2012.
[12]	牛强,王志战,曾溅辉,等.2D NMR在泥页岩物性及流体评价中的应用探讨[J].波谱学杂志,2014,31(2):206-213. Niu Qiang,Wang Zhizhan,Zeng Jianhui,et al.Evaluating shale porosity and oil content with 2D NMR[J].Chinese Journal of Magnetic Resonance,2014,31(2):206-213.
[13]	李晓强.基于核磁共振的岩心分析实验及应用研究[D].成都:西南石油大学,2012. Li Xiaoqiang.Core analysis and application based on NMR technology[D].Chengdu:Southwest Petroleum University,2012.
[14]	刘中华,杨栋,薛晋霞,等.干馏后油页岩渗透规律的实验研究[J].太原理工大学学报,2006,37(4):414-416. Liu Zhonghua,Yang Dong,Xue Jinxia,et al.Experimental study on seepage law of distilled oil shale[J].Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology,2006,37(4):414-416.
[15]	严轩辰.农安和桦甸油页岩力学性能及其水力压裂与破碎关键参数研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2012. Yan Xuanchen.Research on mechanical properties of oil shale in Nong'an and Huadian and key parameters of hydraulic fracturing[D].Changchun:Jilin University,2012.

施引文献

期刊类型引用(12)

1.	唐巨鹏，余泓浩. 油页岩原位开采物理模拟试验研究现状及展望. 辽宁工程技术大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(05): 565-580 . 百度学术
2.	孙颖. 核磁共振在页岩储层参数评价中的应用综述. 地球物理学进展. 2023(01): 254-270 . 百度学术
3.	杨立红，朱超凡，曾皓，苏建政，王益维，武俊文，陈旭东，郭威. 油页岩自生热原位转化直井与水平井开发效果数值模拟——以鄂尔多斯盆地旬邑地区油页岩为例. 石油学报. 2023(08): 1333-1343 . 百度学术
4.	Wei Guo，Qiang Li，Sun-Hua Deng，Yuan Wang，Chao-Fan Zhu. Mechanism and reservoir simulation study of the autothermic pyrolysis in-situ conversion process for oil shale recovery. Petroleum Science. 2023(02): 1053-1067 . 必应学术
5.	赵静，刘增琪，康志勤，杨栋. 原位开采状态下油页岩渗透特性演化规律研究. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2021(05): 892-901 . 百度学术
6.	马中良，王强，郑伦举，张彩明. 油页岩原位开采温度-时间-转化率判识方法及应用. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版). 2019(02): 394-399 . 百度学术
7.	何军，李云龙，项忠华，王兆会，侯兵，黄昭，张清. 油页岩原位开采井筒结构设计. 科学技术与工程. 2019(20): 151-155 . 百度学术
8.	刘志军，杨栋，邵继喜，胡耀青. 基于低场核磁共振的抚顺油页岩孔隙连通性演化研究. 波谱学杂志. 2019(03): 309-318 . 百度学术
9.	徐良发，马中良，郑伦举，鲍芳. 升温速率、时间和含水率对油页岩热解后物性变化的影响. 石油实验地质. 2018(04): 545-550 . 本站查看
10.	马存飞，董春梅，栾国强，林承焰，刘小岑，段宏亮，刘世丽. 苏北盆地古近系泥页岩有机质孔发育特征及影响因素. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版). 2017(03): 1-13 . 百度学术
11.	吕永亮. 油页岩高频多场对流法加热特性数值模拟研究. 科技创新导报. 2017(20): 28-29 . 百度学术
12.	刘志军，杨栋，邵继喜. 温度影响下油页岩动力学参数的实验研究. 黑龙江科技大学学报. 2017(04): 396-399 . 百度学术