渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷沙河街组页岩油微观储集特征

刘毅; 陆正元; 戚明辉; 田同辉; 冯明石

doi:10.11781/sysydz201702180

渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷沙河街组页岩油微观储集特征

doi: 10.11781/sysydz201702180

1.
油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室(成都理工大学), 成都 610059
2. 页岩气评价与开采四川省重点实验室(四川省煤田地质局), 成都 610091
3. 中国石化胜利油田分公司, 山东东营 257000

基金项目: 国家重点基础研究发展计划（973 计划）项目"陆相页岩油储集性能与流动机理"（2014CB239103）；中国石化重点科技攻关课题"页岩油开发基础研究"（P13059）联合资助。

详细信息

作者简介:
刘毅(1988-),女,博士研究生,从事油气田开发地质研究。E-mail:Liuyi49@cdut.edu.cn。

通讯作者:
陆正元(1963-),男,教授,博士生导师,从事油气田开发地质研究。E-mail:lzy@cdut.edu.cn。

中图分类号: TE122.2
计量
- 文章访问数: 987
- HTML全文浏览量: 64
- PDF下载量: 293
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2016-07-18
- 修回日期: 2017-01-11
- 刊出日期: 2017-03-28

Microscopic characteristics of shale oil reservoirs in Shahejie Formation in Zhanhua Sag, Bohai Bay Basin

1.
State Key Laboratory of Oil & Gas Reservoir and Exploitation (Chengdu University of Technology), Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, China
2. Sichuan Key Laboratory of Shale Gas Evaluation and Exploitation (Sichuan Coalfield Geology Bureau), Chengdu, Sichuan 610091, China
3. SINOPEC Shengli Oilfield Company, Dongying, Shandong 257000, China

摘要

摘要: 页岩油储层微观孔隙储集特征是勘探开发的重要基础资料。采集渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷罗69井沙河街组三段页岩油层段18块岩心样品，利用氩离子抛光-场发射扫描电镜实验，研究页岩油储层孔隙发育特征。沾化凹陷沙三段页岩油层段为泥岩和灰岩的过渡岩性，以灰质泥岩、泥质灰岩和含泥灰岩为主，夹少量灰岩薄层。页岩油层段主要孔隙类型包括泥质碎片间微孔和碳酸盐矿物的溶蚀孔、晶间孔和晶内孔。页岩油层段的储层孔隙主要由泥质部分提供，泥质粒间孔提供的面孔率贡献最大，方解石溶蚀孔对面孔率有一定贡献，晶间孔和晶内孔的面孔率贡献最低。页岩油储层孔隙的孔径属于纳米级和微米级，纳米级孔隙数量占绝对优势，然而储层孔隙面积主要由数量较少的微米级孔隙提供，即页岩油开发的储集空间应该以微米级孔隙为主要对象。
- 孔径 /
- 孔隙贡献 /
- 页岩油 /
- 沙河街组 /
- 沾化凹陷 /
- 渤海湾盆地
Abstract: The microscopic pore characteristics of shale oil reservoirs are important basic data for exploration and development. Eighteen core samples were collected from the third member of Shahejie Formation (Es₃) in well Luo 69 in the Zhanhua Sag, Bohai Bay Basin, and were analyzed using argon-ion polishing Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) to discuss the pore development characteristics of shale oil reservoirs. The shale oil layer in Es₃ showed a transitional lithology of mudstone and limestone, dominated by limy mudstone, argillaceous limestone and mud bearing limestone, with minor thin layers of limestone. Argillaceous inter-particle pores, carbonate dissolved pores, inter-crystal pores and intra-crystal pores are the main pore types of the shale oil layer. Argillaceous pores provided most of reservoir pores of the shale oil layer. Most of the plane porosity was argillaceous inter-particle pores, while calcite dissolved pores made a smaller contribution and inter-crystal pores and intra-crystal pores were less important. The pore diameters of shale oil reservoirs were classed as nano scale and micron scale, and the nano scale pores have an absolute dominance quantitatively. The reservoir pore area was mainly provided by non-dominant micro-scale pores, which should be focused on in shale oil exploration.
- pore size /
- porosity contribution /
- shale oil /
- Shahejie Formation /
- Zhanhua Sag /
- Bohai Bay Basin

HTML全文

参考文献(21)

[1]	邹才能,朱如凯,白斌,等. 中国油气储层中纳米孔首次发现及其科学价值[J]. 岩石学报,2011,27(6):1857-1864. Zou Caineng,Zhu Rukai,Bai Bin,et al. First discovery of nano-pore throat in oil and gas reservoir in China and its scientific value[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica,2011,27(6):1857-1864.
[2]	聂海宽,唐玄,边瑞康. 页岩气成藏控制因素及中国南方页岩气发育有利区预测[J]. 石油学报,2009,30(4):484-491. Nie Haikuan,Tang Xuan,Bian Ruikang. Controlling factors for shale gas accumulation and prediction of potential development area in shale gas reservoir of South China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2009,30(4):484-491.
[3]	Cusack C,Beeson J,Stoneburner D,et al. The discovery,reservoir attributes,and significance of the Hawkville field and Eagle Ford shale trend,Texas[J]. Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transactions,2010,60:165-179.
[4]	Keller L M,Schuetz P,Erni R,et al. Characterization of multi-scale microstructural features in Opalinus clay[J]. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials,2013,170:83-94.
[5]	贾承造,郑民,张永峰. 中国非常规油气资源与勘探开发前景[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2012,39(2):129-136. Jia Chengzao,Zheng Min,Zhang Yongfeng. Unconventional hydrocarbon resources in China and the prospect of exploration and development[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(2):129-136.
[6]	张林晔,李钜源,李政,等. 北美页岩油气研究进展及对中国陆相页岩油气勘探的思考[J]. 地球科学进展,2014,29(6):700-711. Zhang Linye,Li Juyuan,Li Zheng,et al. Advances in shale oil/gas research in North America and considerations on exploration for continental shale oil/gas in China[J]. Advances in Earth Science,2014,29(6):700-711.
[7]	Slatt R M,O'Brien N R. Pore types in the Barnett and Woodford gas shales:Contribution to understanding gas storage and migration pathways in fine-grained rocks[J]. AAPG Bulletin,2011,95(12):2017-2030.
[8]	Nelson P H. Pore-throat sizes in sandstones,tight sandstones,and shales[J]. AAPG Bulletin,2009,93(3):329-340.
[9]	Kuila U,Prasad M. Specific surface area and pore-size distribution in clays and shales[J]. Geophysical Prospecting,2013,61(2):341-362.
[10]	杨超,张金川,李婉君,等. 辽河坳陷沙三、沙四段泥页岩微观孔隙特征及其成藏意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2014,35(2):286-294. Yang Chao,Zhang Jinchuan,Li Wanjun,et al. Microscopic pore characteristics of Sha-3 and Sha-4 shale and their accumulation significance in Liaohe Depression[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2014,35(2):286-294.
[11]	刘伟新,朱晓军,马安林,等. 不同泥岩相有机质赋存特征及对比表面积的影响:以渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷古近系为例[J]. 石油实验地质,2016,38(2):204-210. Liu Weixin,Zhu Xiaojun,Ma Anlin,et al. Occurrence of organic matter in different mudstone lithofacies and its influence on specific surface area:A case study of the Paleogene in the Zhanhua Sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2016,38(2):204-210.
[12]	张盼盼,刘小平,王雅杰,等. 页岩纳米孔隙研究新进展[J]. 地球科学进展,2014,29(11):1242-1249. Zhang Panpan,Liu Xiaoping,Wang Yajie,et al. Research progress in shale nanopores[J]. Advances in Earth Science,2014,29(11):1242-1249.
[13]	李钜源. 渤海湾盆地东营凹陷古近系泥页岩孔隙特征及孔隙度演化规律[J]. 石油实验地质,2015,37(5):566-574. Li Juyuan. Pore characteristics and their evolution in Paleogene mud shales,Dongying Sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2015,37(5):566-574.
[14]	Sondergeld C H,Ambrose R J,Rai C S,et al. Micro-structural studies of gas shales[C]//Society of Petroleum Engineers Unconventional Gas Conference. Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania:SPE,2010:17.
[15]	聂海宽,张金川. 页岩气储层类型和特征研究:以四川盆地及其周缘下古生界为例[J]. 石油实验地质,2011,33(3):219-225. Nie Haikuan,Zhang Jinchuan. Types and characteristics of shale gas reservoir:A case study of Lower Paleozoic in and around Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2011,33(3):219-225.
[16]	白志强,刘树根,孙玮,等. 四川盆地西南雷波地区五峰组-龙马溪组页岩储层特征[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2013,40(5):521-531. Bai Zhiqiang,Liu Shugen,Sun Wei,et al. Reservoir characteristics of Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation in southwest of Sichuan Basin,China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition),2013,40(5):521-531.
[17]	刘惠民,张守鹏,王朴,等. 沾化凹陷罗家地区沙三段下亚段页岩岩石学特征[J]. 油气地质与采收率,2012,19(6):11-15. Liu Huimin,Zhang Shoupeng,Wang Pu,et al. Lithologic characteristics of lower Es₃ shale in Luojia area,Zhanhua Sag[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2012,19(6):11-15.
[18]	王永诗,李政,巩建强,等. 济阳坳陷页岩油气评价方法:以沾化凹陷罗家地区为例[J]. 石油学报,2013,34(1):83-91. Wang Yongshi,Li Zheng,Gong Jianqiang,et al. Discussion on an evaluation method of shale oil and gas in Jiyang Depression:A case study on Luojia area in Zhanhua Sag[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34(1):83-91.
[19]	王鸿升,胡天跃. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷页岩油形成影响因素分析[J]. 天然气地球科学,2014,25(1):141-149. Wang Hongsheng,Hu Tianyue. Analysis of influence factors of shale oil formation in Zhanhua Depression of Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(1):141-149.
[20]	武晓玲,高波,叶欣,等. 中国东部断陷盆地页岩油成藏条件与勘探潜力[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2013,34(4):455-462. Wu Xiaoling,Gao Bo,Ye Xin,et al. Shale oil accumulation conditions and exploration potential of faulted basins in the east of China[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2013,34(4):455-462.
[21]	康仁华,刘魁元,赵翠霞,等. 济阳坳陷渤南洼陷古近系沙河街组沉积相[J]. 古地理学报,2002,4(4):19-29. Kang Renhua,Liu Kuiyuan,Zhao Cuixia,et al. Sedimentary facies of the Shahejie Formation of Paleogene in Bonan Sag of Jiyang Depression[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography,2002,4(4):19-29.