川东南五峰组—龙马溪组与黔东南牛蹄塘组页岩储层特征对比分析与差异性探讨

王濡岳; 胡宗全; 聂海宽; 刘忠宝; 陈前; 高波; 刘光祥; 龚大建

doi:10.11781/sysydz201805639

川东南五峰组—龙马溪组与黔东南牛蹄塘组页岩储层特征对比分析与差异性探讨

doi: 10.11781/sysydz201805639

王濡岳^1,2,3,
胡宗全^1,2,3,
聂海宽^1,2,3,
刘忠宝^1,2,3,
陈前^1,2,3,
高波^1,2,3,
刘光祥^1,2,3,
龚大建⁴

1. 页岩油气富集机理与有效开发国家重点实验室, 北京 100083;
2. 中国石化石油勘探开发研究院, 北京 100083;
3. 中国石化页岩油气勘探开发重点实验室, 北京 100083;
4. 铜仁中能天然气有限公司, 贵州铜仁 554300

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目（41202103，41872124），国家油气重大专项（2017ZX05036002-001，2016ZX05061001-002和2016ZX05034004-003）和中国石化科技开发部项目（P17027-2）联合资助。

详细信息

作者简介:
王濡岳(1990-),男,博士,工程师,从事非常规油气地质研究。E-mail:wry1990@vip.qq.com。

中图分类号: TE122.2
计量
- 文章访问数: 1479
- HTML全文浏览量: 150
- PDF下载量: 264
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2018-05-17
- 修回日期: 2018-07-12
- 刊出日期: 2018-09-28

Comparative analysis and discussion of shale reservoir characteristics in the Wufeng-Longmaxi and Niutitang formations: a case study of the well JY1 in SE Sichuan Basin and well TX1 in SE Guizhou area

WANG Ruyue^1,2,3,
HU Zongquan^1,2,3,
NIE Haikuan^1,2,3,
LIU Zhongbao^1,2,3,
CHEN Qian^1,2,3,
GAO Bo^1,2,3,
LIU Guangxiang^1,2,3,
GONG Dajian⁴

1. State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Effective Development, Beijing 100083, China;
2. SINOPEC Petroleum Exploration and Production Research Institute, Beijing 100083, China;
3. SINOPEC Key Laboratory of Shale Gas/Oil Exploration & Production, Beijing 100083, China;
4. Tongren SINO-Energy Natural Gas Corporation, Tongren, Guizhou 554300, China

摘要

摘要: 以川东南JY1井五峰组—龙马溪组与黔东南TX1井牛蹄塘组为例，依据矿物学、有机地球化学、孔隙结构、甲烷吸附性、岩石力学和裂缝发育特征等对页岩储层发育特征进行系统对比分析。结果表明：（1）龙马溪组储集空间以迁移有机质（固体沥青）内部有机孔为主，孔径较大，可达微米级；牛蹄塘组有机孔发育程度低，有机孔径普遍小于30 nm，碎粉状有机—无机矿物粒间孔为重要储集空间，裂缝发育程度高，孔隙结构更为复杂，甲烷吸附/解吸能力更强；五峰组孔隙与裂缝发育规模介于龙马溪组与牛蹄塘组之间。（2） TOC含量与脆性的分段式关系使储层孔隙与裂缝发育特征存在显著差异，当w（TOC）<6%时，五峰组—龙马溪组与牛蹄塘组TOC含量、脆性、有机/无机孔与裂缝协同发育；当w（TOC）>6%时，牛蹄塘组塑性增强使裂缝总量降低，但具有擦痕面的滑脱和压扭/张扭性裂缝数量增加，裂缝有效性与储集空间得到显著改善。（3）龙马溪组、五峰组和牛蹄塘组代表不同地质条件下储层演化的阶段性特征：随热演化、成岩和构造（与泄压）作用的增强，有机孔规模逐渐降低，孔隙结构趋于复杂，甲烷吸附/解吸能力增强，无机孔与裂缝对储集空间贡献逐渐增大。
- 储集空间 /
- 孔隙结构 /
- 甲烷吸附性 /
- 裂缝 /
- 下志留统 /
- 下寒武统 /
- 川东南 /
- 黔东南
Abstract: Wells JY1 in the southeastern Sichuan Basin and TX1 in the southeastern Guizhou were used as examples for a systematic analysis of shale reservoir characteristics of the Wufeng-Longmaxi and Niutitang formations using mineralogy, organic geochemistry, pore structure, methane sorption, brittleness and fracture characteristics. (1) Organic pores with bigger pore sizes that could reach μm in the Longmaxi shale are well-developed in migrated organic matter rather than in in situ organic matter, which are the dominant reservoir spaces. However, organic pores in the Niutitang shale have lower amounts and sizes, commonly lower than 30 nm with more complicated pore structures. The inter-particle pores in the cataclastic organic-inorganic mineral masses are significant reservoir spaces and have stronger methane sorption and desorption capacities. (2) Due to the piecewise correlation between TOC content and brittleness, the developmental characteristics of pore and fracture have significant differences:when the TOC content is less than 6%, the TOC, brittleness, organic/inorganic pores and fractures had positive correlations; when the TOC content is greater than 6%, although the increase of ductility reduces the number of fractures, the lower cohesive strength, internal friction angle and more weak surfaces of interlayer fractures and cataclastic minerals favor to the development of slip fractures, which have significantly improved fracture effectiveness and reservoir space. (3) The Longmaxi, Wufeng and Niutitang shale respectively represent the characteristics of reservoir evolution under different geological conditions, i.e. with the thermal evolution, diagenesis and tectonic deformation and pressure relief, the size, scale and proportion of organic pores gradually decrease, the complexity of pore-fracture structure, methane sorption/desorption capacity and the proportion of inorganic pores and fractures in reservoir space gradually increase.
- reservoir space /
- pore structure /
- methane sorption /
- fracture /
- Lower Silurian /
- Lower Cambrian /
- southeastern Sichuan /
- southeastern Guizhou

HTML全文

参考文献(22)

[1]	胡宗全,杜伟,彭勇民,等.页岩微观孔隙特征及源-储关系:以川东南地区五峰组-龙马溪组为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2015,36(6):1001-1008. HU Zongquan,DU Wei,PENG Yongmin,et al.Microscopic pore characteristics and the source-reservoir relationship of shale:a case study from the Wufeng and Longmaxi formations in southeast Sichuan Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2015,36(6):1001-1008.
[2]	金之钧,胡宗全,高波,等.川东南地区五峰组-龙马溪组页岩气富集与高产控制因素[J].地学前缘,2016,23(1):1-10. JIN Zhijun,HU Zongquan,GAO Bo,et al.Controlling factors on the enrichment and high productivity of shale gas in the Wufeng-Longmaxi formations,southeastern Sichuan Basin[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2016,23(1):1-10.
[3]	刘忠宝,高波,张钰莹,等.上扬子地区下寒武统页岩沉积相类型及分布特征[J].石油勘探与开发,2017,44(1):21-31. LIU Zhongbao,GAO Bo,ZHANG Yuying,et al.Types and distribution of the shale sedimentary facies of the Lower Cambrian in Upper Yangtze area,South China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2017,44(1):21-31.
[4]	王濡岳,龚大建,冷济高,等.黔北地区下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩储层发育特征:以岑巩区块为例[J].地学前缘,2017,24(6):286-299. WANG Ruyue,GONG Dajian,LENG Jigao,et al.Developmental characteristics of the Lower Cambrian Niutitang shale reservoir in northern Guizhou area:a case study in the Cengong block[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2017,24(6):286-299.
[5]	何治亮,胡宗全,聂海宽,等.四川盆地五峰组-龙马溪组页岩气富集特征与"建造-改造"评价思路[J].天然气地球科学,2017,28(5):724-733. HE Zhiliang,HU Zongquan,NIE Haikuan,et al.Characterization of shale gas enrichment in the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in the Sichuan Basin and its evaluation of geological construction-transformation evolution sequence[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2017,28(5):724-733.
[6]	YANG Rui,HE Sheng,YI Jizheng,et al.Nano-scale pore structure and fractal dimension of organic-rich Wufeng-Longmaxi shale from Jiaoshiba area,Sichuan Basin:investigations using FE-SEM,gas adsorption and helium pycnometry[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2016,70:27-45.
[7]	聂海宽,边瑞康,张培先,等.川东南地区下古生界页岩储层微观类型与特征及其对含气量的影响[J].地学前缘,2014,21(4):331-343. NIE Haikuan,BIAN Ruikang,ZHANG Peixian,et al.Micro-types and characteristics of shale reservoir of the Lower Paleozoic in Southeast Sichuan Basin,and their effects on the gas content[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2014,21(4):331-343.
[8]	聂海宽,包书景,高波,等.四川盆地及其周缘下古生界页岩气保存条件研究[J].地学前缘,2012,19(3):280-294. NIE Haikuan,BAO Shujing,GAO Bo,et al.A study of shale gas preservation conditions for the Lower Paleozoic in Sichuan Basin and its periphery[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2012,19(3):280-294.
[9]	王濡岳,丁文龙,龚大建,等.黔北地区海相页岩气保存条件:以贵州岑巩区块下寒武统牛蹄塘组为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2016,37(1):45-55. WANG Ruyue,DING Wenlong,GONG Dajian,et al.Gas preservation conditions of marine shale in northern Guizhou area:a case study of the Lower Cambrian Niutitang Formation in the Cen'gong block,Guizhou Province[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2016,37(1):45-55.
[10]	魏祥峰,李宇平,魏志红,等.保存条件对四川盆地及周缘海相页岩气富集高产的影响机制[J].石油实验地质,2017,39(2):147-153. WEI Xiangfeng,LI Yuping,WEI Zhihong,et al.Effects of preservation conditions on enrichment and high yield of shale gas in Sichuan Basin and its periphery[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2017,39(2):147-153.
[11]	张培先.黔中隆起及邻区下寒武统页岩气成藏特殊性分析[J].石油实验地质,2017,39(2):162-168. ZHANG Peixian.Peculiar accumulation conditions for shale gas in the Lower Cambrian in Qianzhong uplift and its periphery[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2017,39(2):162-168.
[12]	易积正,王超.四川盆地焦石坝地区龙马溪组海相页岩储层非均质性特征[J].石油实验地质,2018,40(1):13-19. YI Jizheng,WANG Chao.Differential pore development characteristics in various shale lithofacies of Longmaxi Formation in Jiaoshiba area,Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2018,40(1):13-19.
[13]	赵建华,金之钧,金振奎,等.四川盆地五峰组-龙马溪组页岩岩相类型与沉积环境[J].石油学报,2016,37(5):572-586. ZHAO Jianhua,JIN Zhijun,JIN Zhenkui,et al.Lithofacies types and sedimentary environment of shale in Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation,Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(5):572-586.
[14]	刘伟新,俞凌杰,张文涛,等.川东南龙马溪组页岩微观孔隙结构特征[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质,2016,36(3):127-134. LIU Weixin,YU Lingjie,ZHANG Wentao,et al.Micro-pore structure of Longmaxi shale from southeast Sichuan Basin[J].Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology,2016,36(3):127-134.
[15]	YAO Yanbin,LIU Dameng,TANG Dazhen,et al.Fractal characterization of adsorption-pores of coals from North China:an investigation on CH₄ adsorption capacity of coals[J].International Journal of Coal Geology,2008,73(1):27-42.
[16]	张文静,琚宜文,卫明明,等.不同变质变形煤储层吸附/解吸特征及机理研究进展[J].地学前缘,2015,22(2):232-242. ZHANG Wenjing,JU Yiwen,WEI Mingming,et al.Study on characteristics and mechanism of adsorption/desorption on different metamorphic-deformed coal reservoirs[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2015,22(2):232-242.
[17]	王朋飞,姜振学,韩波,等.中国南方下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩气高效勘探开发储层地质参数[J].石油学报,2018,39(2):152-162. WANG Pengfei,JIANG Zhenxue,HAN Bo,et al.Reservoir geolo-gical parameters for efficient exploration and development of Lower Cambrian Niutitang Formation shale gas in South China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2018,39(2):152-162.
[18]	王濡岳,丁文龙,龚大建,等.渝东南-黔北地区下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩裂缝发育特征与主控因素[J].石油学报,2016,37(7):832-845. WANG Ruyue,DING Wenlong,GONG Dajian,et al.Development characteristics and major controlling factors of shale fractures in the Lower Cambrian Niutitang Formation,southeastern Chongqing-northern Guizhou area[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(7):832-845.
[19]	王濡岳,龚大建,丁文龙,等.上扬子地区下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩储层脆性评价:以贵州岑巩区块为例[J].地学前缘,2016,23(1):87-95. WANG Ruyue,GONG Dajian,DING Wenlong,et al.Brittleness evaluation of the Lower Cambrian Niutitang shale in the Upper Yangtze region:a case study in the Cengong block,Guizhou Province[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2016,23(1):87-95.
[20]	LAUBACH S E,OLSON J E,GROSS M R.Mechanical and fracture stratigraphy[J].AAPG Bulletin,2009,93(11):1413-1426.
[21]	王濡岳, 胡宗全, 刘敬寿, 等. 中国南方海相与陆相页岩裂缝发育特征及主控因素对比:以黔北岑巩地区下寒武统为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(4):631-640. WANG Ruyue, HU Zongquan, LIU Jingshou, et al. Comparative analysis of characteristics and controlling factors of fractures in marine and continental shales:a case study of the Lower Cambrian in Cengong area,northern Guizhou Province[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2018, 39(4):631-640.
[22]	WANG Yuman,WANG Hongkun,ZHANG Chenchen,et al.Fracture pore evaluation of the Upper Ordovician Wufeng to Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formations in southern Sichuan Basin,SW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2017,44(4):563-572.