Characteristics of source rocks in Shahezi Formation and implications for hydrocarbon accumulation, Changling Fault Depression, southern Songliao Basin
-
摘要: 烃源岩形成时期的古构造和古沉积环境共同控制了烃源岩的宏观分布。基于“原型控源”这一思想,利用元素化学对长岭断陷主力烃源岩,即下白垩统沙河子组烃源岩,形成古环境进行了恢复,结合古构造恢复,明确了沙河子组残留烃源岩的分布特征。长岭断陷沙河子组沉积时期总体表现为较大的古水深、潮湿—半潮湿气候、淡水相、厌氧—贫氧环境,这为沙河子组优质烃源岩的形成提供了有利的沉积条件;该时期盆地由2个较统一的断陷构成,整体为广湖,烃源岩广泛发育,受后期多次反转作用影响,沙河子组发生掀斜并遭受不同程度的剥蚀,沙河子组残留烃源岩出现在现今斜坡带;这为斜坡带和盆缘超剥带油气成藏提供了新的思路,即龙凤山—东岭斜坡、查干花东斜坡和伏龙泉西斜坡富有机质烃源岩发育,油气成藏“近水楼台”,为油气勘探有利区。此外,盆缘超剥带具备了油气成藏条件,具有一定的勘探潜力。Abstract: The paleo-tectonics and sedimentary environment during source rock deposition controlled the macro distribution of source rocks. The deposition environment of the Lower Cretaceous Shahezi Formation (K1sh) source rocks, which are the main source rocks in the Changling Fault Depression of the southern Songliao Basin, was restored based on the theory that "basin prototype controlled source rock development". The distribution of preserved source rocks in the K1sh was determined using tectonic restoration. The paleo-environment of the Changling Fault Depression during the K1sh period was characterized by deep water, humid to subhumid climate and anaerobic freshwater, which was favorable for the deposition of source rocks. The Changling Fault Depression was composed of two relatively unified fault subsags during the K1sh period, and the K1sh source rocks were widely developed. After multiple stages of reversal, the Shahezi Formation was uplifted and eroded to different degrees, and the residual source rocks were mainly found on the present slope. This study provided a new idea for the oil and gas accumulation on the slope belt and the basin margin super-stripping belt. The Longfengshan-Dongling slope, the Chaganhua east slope and the Fulongquan west slope are favorable exploration areas for oil and gas exploration, where excellent source rocks were developed. In addition, the super-stripping zone of the Shahezi Formation is also favorable for hydrocarbon accumulation, showing a certain exploration potential.
-
表 1 松辽盆地长岭断陷SL1井下白垩统元素标志、水体相对深度及沉积环境划分
Table 1. Element indexes, relative water depth and sedimentary environments of Lower Cretaceous in well SL1, Changling Fault Depression, Songliao Basin
层位 泥岩主要颜色 泥地比/% Fe/Mn (Al+Fe)/(Ca+Mg) 反映的沉积环境 参考指标范围 范围 均值 范围 均值 营二段 灰色 32 38~56 47 5.7~7.9 6.9 滨浅湖 滨浅湖:Fe /Mn>40,(Al+Fe)/(Ca+ Mg)>5.0;
半深湖:30 < Fe/Mn < 40,2.5 < (Al+Fe)/(Ca+ Mg) < 5.0;
深湖:Fe/Mn < 30,(Al+Fe)/(Ca+ Mg) < 2.5营一段 灰色 4 64 64 7.7 7.7 滨浅湖 沙二段 黑色、深灰色 57 24~45 37 0.9~5.6 3.1 深湖 沙一段 深灰色,顶部灰黑色 50 35~49 39 4.1~5.7 5.0 半深湖 -
[1] 秦建中. 中国烃源岩[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2005.QIN Jianzhong. Source rocks of China[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2005. [2] 王健, 王权, 钟雪梅, 等. 二连盆地优质烃源岩发育特征及成藏贡献[J]. 石油实验地质, 2015, 37(5): 641-647. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201505641WANG Jian, WANG Quan, ZHONG Xuemei, et al. Characteristics of high-quality hydrocarbon source rocks and their contributions to reservoirs in the Erlian Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2015, 37(5): 641-647. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201505641 [3] 张渝昌. 中国含油气盆地原型分析[M]. 南京: 南京大学出版社, 1997.ZHANG Yuchang. Prototype analysis of petroliferous basins in China[M]. Nanjing: Nanjing University Press, 1997. [4] DEMAISON G J, MOORE G T. Anoxic environments and oil source bed genesis[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1980, 64(8): 1179-1209. [5] KATZ B J. Controls on distribution of lacustrine source rocks through time and space[M]//KATZ B J. Lacustrine basin exploration: case studies and modern analogs, AAPG memoir, 1990: 61-76. [6] KELTS K. 湖相烃源岩的沉积环境: 绪论[C]//汪品先, 刘传联. 古湖泊论文集. 北京: 海洋出版社, 1991: 68-77.KELTS K. Sedimentary environment in lacustrine source rocks[C]//WANG Pinxian, LIU Chuanlian. Memoir of palaeolimnology. Beijing: China Ocean Press, 1991: 68-77. [7] 张林晔. 湖相烃源岩研究进展[J]. 石油实验地质, 2008, 30(6): 591-595. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200806591ZHANG Linye. The progress on the study of lacustrine source rocks[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2008, 30(6): 591-595. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200806591 [8] GRADSTEIN F M, OGG J G, SMITH A G, et al. A new geologic time scale, with special reference to Precambrian and Neogene[J]. Episodes, 2004, 27(2): 83-100. doi: 10.18814/epiiugs/2004/v27i2/002 [9] 刘刚, 周东升. 微量元素分析在判别沉积环境中的应用: 以江汉盆地潜江组为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2007, 29(3): 307-310. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200703307LIU Gang, ZHOU Dongsheng. Application of microelements analysis in identifying sedimentary environment: taking Qianjiang Formation in the Jianghan Basin as an example[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2007, 29(3): 307-310. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200703307 [10] 宋明水. 东营凹陷南斜坡沙四段沉积环境的地球化学特征[J]. 矿物岩石, 2005, 25(1): 67-73. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KWYS200501013.htmSONG Mingshui. Sedimentary environment geochemistry in the Shasi section of southern ramp, Dongying Depression[J]. Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology, 2005, 25(1): 67-73. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KWYS200501013.htm [11] 李浩, 陆建林, 李瑞磊, 等. 长岭断陷下白垩统湖相烃源岩形成古环境及主控因素[J]. 地球科学, 2017, 42(10): 1774-1786. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX201710012.htmLI Hao, LU Jianlin, LI Ruilei, et al. Generation paleoenvironment and its controlling factors of Lower Cretaceous lacustrine hydrocarbon source rocks in Changling Depression, south Songliao Basin[J]. Earth Science, 2017, 42(10): 1774-1786. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX201710012.htm [12] 王春连, 刘成林, 湖海兵, 等. 江汉盆地江陵凹陷南缘古新统沙市组四段含盐岩系沉积特征及其沉积环境意义[J]. 古地理学报, 2012, 14(2): 165-175. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GDLX201202004.htmWANG Chunlian, LIU Chenglin, HU Haibing, et al. Sedimentary characteristics and its environmental significance of salt-bearing strata of the Member 4 of Paleocene Shashi Formation in southern margin of Jiangling Depression, Jianghan Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2012, 14(2): 165-175. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GDLX201202004.htm [13] 张永生, 杨玉卿, 漆智先, 等. 江汉盆地潜江凹陷古近系潜江组含盐岩系沉积特征与沉积环境[J]. 古地理学报, 2003, 5(1): 29-35. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GDLX200301002.htmZHANG Yongsheng, YANG Yuqing, QI Zhixian, et al. Sedimentary characteristics and environments of the salt-bearing series of Qianjiang Formation of the Paleogene in Qianjiang Sag of Jianghan Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2003, 5(1): 29-35. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GDLX200301002.htm [14] HUNT J M. Petroleum geochemistry and geology[M]. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman, 1979: 1-617. [15] HATCH J R, LEVENTHAL J S. Relationship between inferred redox potential of the depositional environment and geochemistry of the Upper Pennsylvanian (Missourian) Stark Shale Member of the Dennis Limestone, Wabaunsee County, Kansas, U.S.A. [J]. Chemical Geology, 1992, 99(1/3): 65-82. [16] JONES B, MANNING D A C. Comparison of geochemical indices used for the interpretation of palaeoredox conditions in ancient mudstones[J]. Chemical Geology, 1994, 111(1/4): 111-129. [17] MONGENOT T, TRIBOVILLARD N P, DESPRAIRIES A, et al. Trace elements as palaeoenvironmental markers in strongly mature hydrocarbon source rocks: the Cretaceous La Luna Formation of Venezuela[J]. Sedimentary Geology, 1996, 103(1/2): 23-37. [18] 李进龙, 陈东敬. 古盐度定量研究方法综述[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2003, 10(5): 1-3. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS200305001.htmLI Jinlong, CHEN Dongjing. Summary of quantified research method on paleosalinity[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2003, 10(5): 1-3. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS200305001.htm [19] 郑荣才, 柳梅青. 鄂尔多斯盆地长6油层组古盐度研究[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 1999, 20(1): 20-25. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT901.019.htmZHENG Rongcai, LIU Meiqing. Study on palaeosalinity of Chang 6 oil reservoir set in Ordos Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 1999, 20(1): 20-25. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT901.019.htm [20] 文华国, 郑荣才, 唐飞, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地耿湾地区长6段古盐度恢复与古环境分析[J]. 矿物岩石, 2008, 28(1): 114-120. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KWYS200801016.htmWEN Huaguo, ZHENG Rongcai, TANG Fei, et al. Reconstruction and analysis of paleosalanity and paleoenvironment of the Chang 6 member in the Gengwan region, Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology, 2008, 28(1): 114-120. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KWYS200801016.htm [21] 王彦青, 陈迎宾, 胡烨, 等. 蒸发环境烃源岩生烃能力探讨: 以川西坳陷雷口坡组为例[J]. 断块油气田, 2018, 25(4): 426-430. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT201804004.htmWANG Yanqing, CHEN Yingbin, HU Ye, et al. Discussion on hydrocarbon generation ability of evaporation environment: a case study of Leikoupo Formation in West Sichuan Depression[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2018, 25(4): 426-430. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT201804004.htm [22] CARROLL A R, BOHACS K M. Lake-type controls on petroleum source rock potential in Nonmarine basins[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2001, 85(6): 1033-1053. [23] 王辉, 朱占平, 宋土顺, 等. 突泉盆地中侏罗统万宝组沉积环境与烃源岩特征[J]. 断块油气田, 2019, 26(6): 687-692. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT201906003.htmWANG Hui, ZHU Zhanping, SONG Tushun, et al. Sedimentary environment and characteristics of hydrocarbon source rock of Middle Jurassic Wanbao Formation in Tuquan Basin[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2019, 26(6): 687-692. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT201906003.htm [24] 沈扬, 林会喜, 赵乐强, 等. 准噶尔盆地西北缘超剥带油气运聚特征与成藏模式[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2015, 36(5): 505-509. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD201505002.htmSHEN Yang, LIN Huixi, ZHAO Leqiang, et al. Hydrocarbon migration-accumulation characteristics and pool-forming patterns in overlap-erosion zones in northwestern margin of Junggar Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2015, 36(5): 505-509. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD201505002.htm