岩心分段密封及逸散轻烃采集测定技术与初步应用

鲍云杰; 李志明; 黎茂稳; 钱门辉; 刘鹏; 徐二社; 陶国亮; 杨振恒

doi:10.11781/sysydz202003422

岩心分段密封及逸散轻烃采集测定技术与初步应用

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202003422

鲍云杰^{1, 2, 3, 4,},
李志明^{1, 2, 3, 4},
黎茂稳^{1, 2, 3, 4},
钱门辉^{1, 2, 3, 4},
刘鹏^{1, 2, 3, 4},
徐二社^{1, 2, 3, 4},
陶国亮^{1, 2, 3, 4},
杨振恒^{1, 2, 3, 4}

1.
中国石化石油勘探开发研究院无锡石油地质研究所, 江苏无锡 214126
2.
中国石油化工集团公司油气成藏重点实验室, 江苏无锡 214126
3.
页岩油气富集机理与有效开发国家重点实验室, 江苏无锡 214126
4.
国家能源页岩油研发中心, 江苏无锡 214126

基金项目:

国家科技重大专项 2017ZX05049001

国家科技重大专项 2017ZX05036002

国家自然科学基金石油化工联合基金 U1663202

详细信息

作者简介:
鲍云杰(1963-), 男, 硕士, 高级工程师, 从事测试技术与页岩油气评价研究。E-mail: baoyj.syky@sinopec.com

中图分类号: TE135
计量
- 文章访问数: 623
- HTML全文浏览量: 112
- PDF下载量: 88
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2019-10-08
- 修回日期: 2020-03-18
- 刊出日期: 2020-05-28

Segmented sealing of cores and collection and test of escaped light hydrocarbons and its preliminary application

BAO Yunjie^{1, 2, 3, 4
,},
LI Zhiming^{1, 2, 3, 4},
LI Maowen^{1, 2, 3, 4},
QIAN Menhui^{1, 2, 3, 4},
LIU Peng^{1, 2, 3, 4},
XU Ershe^{1, 2, 3, 4},
TAO Guoliang^{1, 2, 3, 4},
YANG Zhenheng^{1, 2, 3, 4}

1.
Wuxi Research Institute of Petroleum Geology, SINOPEC, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214126, China
2.
SINOPEC Key Laboratory of Petroleum Accumulation Mechanisms, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214126, China
3.
State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Effective Development, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214126, China
4.
State Energy Center for Shale Oil Research and Development, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214126, China

摘要

摘要: 含油气岩心轻烃逸散具有普遍性，岩心出筒后轻烃收集及其逸散差异性的表征技术和方法尚有提升空间。以专利"一种岩心分段式密封装置及其使用方法（2013101681829）"技术为核心，研究设计了岩心分段密封装置及轻烃采集测定方法。装置具有筒状结构，内置数个环状密封圈，能够将置入其中的岩心进行非破坏式的分段密封，形成数个互不连通的密闭空间以存储岩心逸散的轻烃；装置配套了气体采样泵、便携式甲烷检测仪以及气相色谱仪等辅助设备，用于对不同密闭空间中的轻烃进行采样以及逸散轻烃浓度和组分测定，建立了密闭空间中逸散轻烃浓度转换为逸散量的方法。初步实验应用表明，利用该装置及方法能够获取岩心出筒后逸散的轻烃，进而表征岩心轴向不同部位轻烃逸散量及其组分的差异性，结合岩性及物性等资料，为页岩油气层系非均质性评价及其主控因素研究提供依据。
- 岩心 /
- 分段密封 /
- 逸散轻烃 /
- 测定装置 /
- 含气量 /
- 含油率
Abstract: Light hydrocarbons easily escape from hydrocarbon-bearing cores when they are recovered from wellbores, which makes it necessary to improve the methods for collecting light hydrocarbons from cores and characterizing the differences of hydrocarbon losses. A new method for the segmented sealing of cores and the collection and test of light hydrocarbons was developed based on the patent "a segmented sealing device for cores and its instructions(2013101681829)". The device has a cylindrical structure with several annular seals built in, which can non-destructively seal the core inserted therein to form several closed spaces that are not interconnected to store light hydrocarbons escaping from the core. The device is matched with auxiliary equipment such as gas sampling pumps, portable methane detectors, and gas chromatographs, which are used to sample light hydrocarbons in different confined spaces to determine the concentration and composition of mobile light hydrocarbons. The concentration of escaped light hydrocarbons in confined spaces can be converted to escape quantity. Preliminary applications show that the device and method can be used to obtain light hydrocarbons that escape after the cores are recovered from the wellbores, and then to characterize the differences in the amount and components of light hydrocarbons escaping from different parts of the core in an axial direction. Combined with lithology and physical properties, it provides a basis for the evaluation of shale oil and gas formation heterogeneity and its main controlling factors.
- core /
- segmented seal /
- escaped light hydrocarbon /
- measuring device /
- gas content /
- oil content

HTML全文

图 1 密封单元组成

Figure 1. Composition of sealing units

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 A井部分井段录井图

Figure 2. Logging diagram of some sections in well A

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 孔隙度与热解S₁交会图

Figure 3. Porosity vs. S₁

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 孔隙度与荧光含油率交会图

Figure 4. Porosity vs. fluorescent oil content

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 荧光含油率与热解S₁、逸散气量对应关系

Figure 5. Fluorescent oil content vs. S₁ and escaped gas amount

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 孔隙度与24 h逸散气量交会图

Figure 6. Porosity vs. escaped gas amount (24 h)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 不同岩性岩心孔隙度及逸散轻烃组分

Table 1. Composition of escaped light hydrocarbon from core samples with different porosities and lithology

岩性	孔隙度/%	组分/%
岩性	孔隙度/%	C₁	C₂	C₃	iC₄	nC₄	iC₅	nC₅
灰黑色、黑色泥页岩	1~9	80.46	6.52	8.54	1.59	2.25	0.49	0.15
灰色、紫红色(泥质)粉砂岩	< 3	98.76	1.24	0	0	0	0	0
灰黑色粉砂岩	3~6	92.63	4.84	2.04	0.06	0.43	0	0
灰色(泥质)粉砂岩、细砂岩	> 6	72.16	11.65	12.14	1.29	2.55	0.21	0

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(15)

[1]	段毅, 赵阳, 姚泾利, 等. 轻烃地球化学研究进展及发展趋势[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(12): 1875-1887. doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2014.12.1875 DUAN Yi, ZHAO Yang, YAO Jingli, et al. Research advance and tendency of light hydrocarbon geochemistry[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2014, 25(12): 1875-1887. doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2014.12.1875
[2]	张林晔, 包友书, 李钜源, 等. 湖相页岩油可动性: 以渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷东营凹陷为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2014, 41(6): 641-649. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201406001.htm ZHANG Linye, BAO Youshu, LI Juyuan, et al. Movability of lacu-strine shale oil: a case study of Dongying Sag, Jiyang Depression, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(6): 641-649. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201406001.htm
[3]	宋国奇, 徐兴友, 李政, 等. 济阳坳陷古近系陆相页岩油产量的影响因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2015, 36(3): 463-471. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201503017.htm SONG Guoqi, XU Xingyou, LI Zheng, et al. Factors controlling oil production from Paleogene shale in Jiyang Depression[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2015, 36(3): 463-471. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201503017.htm
[4]	蒋启贵, 黎茂稳, 马媛媛, 等. 页岩油可动性分子地球化学评价方法: 以济阳坳陷页岩油为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2018, 40(6): 849-854. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201806849 JIANG Qigui, LI Maowen, MA Yuanyuan, et al. Molecular geoche-mical evaluation of shale oil mobility: a case study of shale oil in Jiyang Depression[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2018, 40(6): 849-854. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201806849
[5]	梅海燕, 何浪, 张茂林, 等. 页岩油注气提高采收率现状及可行性分析[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2018, 8(6): 77-82. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1426.2018.06.014 MEI Haiyan, HE Lang, ZHANG Maolin, et al. Status and feasibility analysis on improved shale-oil recovery by gas injection[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2018, 8(6): 77-82. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1426.2018.06.014
[6]	谌卓恒, 黎茂稳, 姜春庆, 等. 页岩油的资源潜力及流动性评价方法: 以西加拿大盆地上泥盆统Duvernay页岩为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(3): 459-468. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201903003.htm CHEN Zhuoheng, LI Maowen, JIANG Chunqing, et al. Shale oil resource potential and its mobility assessment: a case study of Upper Devonian Duvernay shale in Western Canada Sedimentary Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(3): 459-468. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201903003.htm
[7]	朱日房, 张林晔, 李政, 等. 陆相断陷盆地页岩油资源潜力评价: 以东营凹陷沙三段下亚段为例[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2019, 26(1): 129-136. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201901014.htm ZHU Rifang, ZHANG Linye, LI Zheng, et al. Evaluation of shale oil resource potential in continental rift basin: a case study of Lower Es₃ Member in Dongying Sag[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2019, 26(1): 129-136. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201901014.htm
[8]	张居和, 吕金龙, 董艳华, 等. 岩石吸留烃气相色谱快速检测技术及其应用研究[J]. 地质地球化学, 2003, 31(2): 93-99. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZDQ200302014.htm ZHANG Juhe, LÜ Jinlong, DONG Yanhua, et al. Quick gas chromatography analysis technology of the adsorbed hydrocarbon in rocks and its applications[J]. Geology-Geochemistry, 2003, 31(2): 93-99. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZDQ200302014.htm
[9]	徐冠军, 王培荣, 刘建宪, 等. 烃源岩中C₅-C₁₃分析新方法及在油源对比中的应用[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2008, 35(6): 710-714. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK200806013.htm XU Guanjun, WANG Peirong, LIU Jianxian, et al. A new analysis method for C₅-C₁₃ fractions of organic matter in source rocks and its primary application to oil-source correlation[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2008, 35(6): 710-714. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK200806013.htm
[10]	蒋启贵, 黎茂稳, 钱门辉, 等. 页岩油探井现场地质评价实验流程与技术进展[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(3): 571-582. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201903013.htm JIANG Qigui, LI Maowen, QIAN Menhui, et al. Experimental procedures of well-site geological evaluation for shale oil and related technological progress[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(3): 571-582. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201903013.htm
[11]	朱日房, 张林晔, 李钜源, 等. 页岩滞留液态烃的定量评价[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(1): 13-18. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201501002.htm ZHU Rifang, ZHANG Linye, LI Juyuan, et al. Quantitative evaluation of residual liquid hydrocarbons in shale[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(1): 13-18. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201501002.htm
[12]	李进步, 卢双舫, 陈国辉, 等. 热解参数S₁的轻烃与重烃校正及其意义: 以渤海湾盆地大民屯凹陷E₂s⁴⁽²⁾为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2016, 37(4): 538-545. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201604011.htm LI Jinbu, LU Shuangfang, CHEN Guohui, et al. Correction of light and heavy hydrocarbon loss for residual hydrocarbon S₁ and its significance to assessing resource potential of E₂s⁴⁽²⁾ member in Damintun Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geo-logy, 2016, 37(4): 538-545. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201604011.htm
[13]	薛海涛, 田善思, 王伟明, 等. 页岩油资源评价关键参数: 含油率的校正[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2016, 37(1): 15-22. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201601004.htm XUE Haitao, TIAN Shansi, WANG Weiming, et al. Correction of oil content: one key parameter in shale oil resource assessment[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2016, 37(1): 15-22. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201601004.htm
[14]	李志明, 钱门辉, 黎茂稳, 等. 中-低成熟湖相富有机质泥页岩含油性及赋存形式: 以渤海湾盆地渤南洼陷罗63井和义21井沙河街组一段为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(3): 448-456. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201703004.htm LI Zhiming, QIAN Menhui, LI Maowen, et al. Oil content and occurrence in low-medium mature organic-rich lacustrine shales: a case from the 1st member of the Eocene-Oligocene Shahejie Formation in well Luo-63 and Yi-21, Bonan Subsag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2017, 38(3): 448-456. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201703004.htm
[15]	习传学, 孙冲, 方帆, 等. 页岩含气量现场测试技术研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2018, 40(1): 25-29. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201801025 XI Chuanxue, SUN Chong, FANG Fan, et, al. Field testing technology for shale gas content[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2018, 40(1): 25-29. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201801025