盐间页岩油形成有利条件与地质甜点评价关键参数——以潜江凹陷潜江组潜3<sup>4</sup>-10韵律为例

李志明; 钱门辉; 黎茂稳; 蒋启贵; 吴世强; 鲍云杰; 曹婷婷; 陶国亮; 刘鹏; 徐二社; 刘伟新

doi:10.11781/sysydz202004513

文章导航 > 石油实验地质 > 2020 > 42(4): 513-523

李志明, 钱门辉, 黎茂稳, 蒋启贵, 吴世强, 鲍云杰, 曹婷婷, 陶国亮, 刘鹏, 徐二社, 刘伟新. 盐间页岩油形成有利条件与地质甜点评价关键参数——以潜江凹陷潜江组潜34-10韵律为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(4): 513-523. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202004513

引用本文:

李志明, 钱门辉, 黎茂稳, 蒋启贵, 吴世强, 鲍云杰, 曹婷婷, 陶国亮, 刘鹏, 徐二社, 刘伟新. 盐间页岩油形成有利条件与地质甜点评价关键参数——以潜江凹陷潜江组潜3⁴-10韵律为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(4): 513-523. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202004513

LI Zhiming, QIAN Menhui, LI Maowen, JIANG Qigui, WU Shiqiang, BAO Yunjie, CAO Tingting, TAO Guoliang, LIU Peng, XU Ershe, LIU Weixin. Favorable conditions of inter-salt shale oil formation and key parameters for geological sweet spots evaluation: a case study of Eq34-10 rhythm of Qianjiang Formation in Qianjiang Sag, Jianghan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2020, 42(4): 513-523. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202004513

Citation:

LI Zhiming, QIAN Menhui, LI Maowen, JIANG Qigui, WU Shiqiang, BAO Yunjie, CAO Tingting, TAO Guoliang, LIU Peng, XU Ershe, LIU Weixin. Favorable conditions of inter-salt shale oil formation and key parameters for geological sweet spots evaluation: a case study of Eq₃⁴-10 rhythm of Qianjiang Formation in Qianjiang Sag, Jianghan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2020, 42(4): 513-523. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202004513

引用本文:

Citation:

LI Zhiming, QIAN Menhui, LI Maowen, JIANG Qigui, WU Shiqiang, BAO Yunjie, CAO Tingting, TAO Guoliang, LIU Peng, XU Ershe, LIU Weixin. Favorable conditions of inter-salt shale oil formation and key parameters for geological sweet spots evaluation: a case study of Eq₃⁴-10 rhythm of Qianjiang Formation in Qianjiang Sag, Jianghan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2020, 42(4): 513-523. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202004513

盐间页岩油形成有利条件与地质甜点评价关键参数——以潜江凹陷潜江组潜3⁴-10韵律为例

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202004513

李志明^{1, 2, 3,},
钱门辉^{1, 2, 3},
黎茂稳^{1, 2, 3},
蒋启贵^{1, 2, 3},
吴世强⁴,
鲍云杰^{1, 2, 3},
曹婷婷^{1, 2, 3},
陶国亮^{1, 2, 3},
刘鹏^{1, 2, 3},
徐二社^{1, 2, 3},
刘伟新^{1, 2, 3}

1.
中国石化石油勘探开发研究院无锡石油地质研究所, 江苏无锡 214126
2.
页岩油气富集机理与有效开发国家重点实验室, 江苏无锡 214126
3.
中国石化油气成藏重点实验室, 江苏无锡 214126
4.
中国石化江汉油田分公司勘探开发研究院, 武汉 430223

基金项目:

国家科技重大专项 2017ZX05049-001

中国石化科技开发部项目 P17027-1

详细信息

作者简介:
李志明(1968-), 男, 研究员, 从事油气地球化学、页岩油气地质研究。E-mail: lizm.syky@sinopec.com

中图分类号: TE132.8
计量
- 文章访问数: 1124
- HTML全文浏览量: 237
- PDF下载量: 146
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-04-16
- 修回日期: 2020-06-29
- 刊出日期: 2020-07-28

Favorable conditions of inter-salt shale oil formation and key parameters for geological sweet spots evaluation: a case study of Eq₃⁴-10 rhythm of Qianjiang Formation in Qianjiang Sag, Jianghan Basin

LI Zhiming^{1, 2, 3
,},
QIAN Menhui^{1, 2, 3},
LI Maowen^{1, 2, 3},
JIANG Qigui^{1, 2, 3},
WU Shiqiang⁴,
BAO Yunjie^{1, 2, 3},
CAO Tingting^{1, 2, 3},
TAO Guoliang^{1, 2, 3},
LIU Peng^{1, 2, 3},
XU Ershe^{1, 2, 3},
LIU Weixin^{1, 2, 3}

1.
Wuxi Research Institute of Petroleum Geology, SINOPEC, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214126, China
2.
State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Effective Development, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214126, China
3.
SINOPEC Key Laboratory of Petroleum Accumulation Mechanisms, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214126, China
4.
Research Institute of Exploration and Development, SINOPEC Jianghan Oilfield Branch Company, Wuhan, Hubei 430223, China

摘要

摘要: 江汉盆地潜江凹陷潜江组潜3⁴-10韵律盐间细粒沉积岩是页岩油勘探开发有利层系。基于页岩油专探井/兼探井取心段分析结果与前人资料，阐述潜3⁴-10韵律盐间细粒沉积岩总体是一套好—优质烃源岩，有机质以腐泥组无定形体组分为主，类型主要为Ⅱ₁、Ⅰ型，现今处于生排油高峰期；其储集条件优越，与国内外主要页岩油产层储集条件相当，尤以白云岩、泥质白云岩相最佳；盐间细粒沉积岩上部和下部连续分布的厚层盐岩构成了盐间页岩油优质的顶板和底板封盖层。潜3⁴-10韵律盐间细粒沉积岩层系发育层内侧向运移富集型和原位—近源聚集富集型2类页岩油，前者发育于王场背斜构造带，后者发育于蚌湖洼陷的深洼与南斜坡带。提出了2类页岩油富集类型的地质甜点评价关键参数与指标，为潜江凹陷其他盐间细粒沉积层系页岩油勘探开发评价提供依据与借鉴。
- 成熟度 /
- 烃源岩 /
- 甜点评价 /
- 页岩油 /
- 潜江组 /
- 潜江凹陷 /
- 江汉盆地
Abstract: The inter-salt fine-grained sedimentary rocks of the Eq₃⁴-10 rhythm of the Qianjiang Formation in the Qianjiang Sag, Jianghan Basin, are favorable for shale oil exploration and development. They are excellent source rocks according to the analysis of cored intervals from specialized/concurrent shale oil exploration wells and the archival data. The organic matter is composed of the amorphous components of the sapropelic group, mainly of types Ⅱ₁ and I, and is currently in the peak period of oil generation and expulsion. The reservoir properties are good especially for dolomites and argillaceous dolomites, and are equivalent to the reservoir properties of main shale oil production layers at home and abroad. Thick layers of salt distributed continuously above and below the inter-salt fine-grained sedimentary rocks constitute high-quality top and bottom seals of the inter-salt shale oil. The inter-salt fine-grained sedimentary rocks of the Eq₃⁴-10 rhythm developed two types of shale oil, including the lateral migration and enrichment type in the sedimentary rocks in the Wangchang anticline area, and the in situ and near-source enrichment type in the Benghu Deep Sag and the southern slope area. Some key parameters and limits for geological sweet spot evaluation for the two enrichment types were put forward. The results provided the evidence and reference for shale oil exploration and development evaluation of other inter-salt fine-grained sedimentary rocks in the Qianjiang Sag, Jianghan Basin.
- maturity /
- source rock /
- sweet spot evaluation /
- shale oil /
- Qianjiang Formation /
- Qianjiang Sag /
- Jianghan Basin

HTML全文

图 1 江汉盆地潜江凹陷潜3⁴-10韵律盐间细粒沉积岩相

Figure 1. Sedimentary lithofacies of inter-salt fine-grained sediments in Eq₃⁴-10 rhythm, Qianjiang Sag, Jianghan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 江汉盆地潜江凹陷潜3⁴-10韵律盐间细粒沉积岩有机碳含量与生烃潜量图解

Figure 2. TOC contents andS₁+S₂ of inter-salt fine-grained sediments in Eq₃⁴-10 rhythm, Qianjiang Sag, Jianghan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 江汉盆地潜江凹陷潜3⁴-10韵律盐间细粒沉积岩有机岩石学图片

Figure 3. Organic petrology photos of inter-salt fine-grained sediments in Eq₃⁴-10 rhythm, Qianjiang Sag, Jianghan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 江汉盆地潜江凹陷含盐富有机质白云质页岩生排烃模拟结果

Figure 4. Simulation results of oil generation and expulsion for organic-rich dolomitic shale with salt in Qianjiang Formation, Qianjiang Sag, Jianghan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 江汉盆地潜江凹陷BYY2和BYY1HF井潜3⁴-10韵律盐间细粒沉积岩孔隙度

Figure 5. Porosities of inter-salt fine-grained sedimentary rocks of wells BYY2 and BYY1HF for Eq₃⁴-10 rhythm, Qianjiang Sag, Jianghan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 江汉盆地潜江凹陷BYY2井潜3⁴-10韵律盐间细粒沉积岩有机碳含量与游离油图解

Figure 6. TOC content vs.S₁ of inter-salt fine-grained sedimentary rocks of well BYY2 for Eq₃⁴-10 rhythm, Qianjiang Sag, Jianghan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 江汉盆地潜江凹陷王场背斜带W4X7-7井潜3⁴-10韵律岩心有机地球化学综合柱状图

Figure 7. Organic geochemical comprehensive histogram of cored intervals of Eq₃⁴-10 rhythm, well W4X7-7, Wangchang anticline, Qianjiang Sag, Jianghan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 江汉盆地潜江凹陷潜3⁴-10韵律盐间细粒沉积岩2类页岩油富集模式

Figure 8. Two models of shale oil enrichment of inter-salt fine-grained sedimentary rocks of Eq₃⁴-10 rhythm, Qianjiang Sag, Jianghan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 江汉盆地潜江凹陷盐间出油井与不出油井细粒沉积岩有机碳含量与游离油图解

据文献[42]修改。

Figure 9. TOC content vs.S₁ of inter-salt fine-grained sedimentary rocks of wells producing or not producing oil, Qianjiang Sag, Jianghan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 江汉盆地潜江凹陷潜江组潜三段油组划分、Ⅲ级盐韵律层数及小层编号

Table 1. Oil layer division, third order salt rhythm numbers and numbering of Eq₃, Qianjiang Sag, Jianghan Basin

地层层段		Ⅲ级韵律数	Ⅲ级韵律小层编号
段	油组	Ⅲ级韵律数	Ⅲ级韵律小层编号
潜三段	Eq₃¹	0	0
	Eq₃^1x	3	1~3
	Eq₃²	0	0
	Eq₃³	3	1~3
	Eq₃^3x	5	4~8
	Eq₃⁴	6	9~15

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 江汉盆地潜江凹陷潜3⁴-10韵律盐间细粒沉积岩与国内外页岩油产层岩性、孔隙度对比

Table 2. Lithology and porosity comparison of inter-salt fine-grained sedimentary rocks for Eq₃⁴-10 rhythm, Qianjiang Sag, Jianghan Basin, with shale oil production layers at home and abroad

盆地与层系	页岩油产层主要岩性	孔隙度峰值范围/%	备注
威利斯顿盆地Bakken组	粉砂岩、云质砂岩、白云岩	5.0~12.0	据文献[33]
墨西哥湾盆地Eagleford组	页岩、泥质岩	6.0~12.0
二叠盆地Wolfcamp组	粉砂岩、泥质岩	8.0~12.0
准噶尔盆地芦草沟组	云质粉砂岩、泥质白云岩	6.0~14.0
渤海湾盆地孔店组二段	页岩、泥岩、粉砂岩、云灰质泥岩、白云岩	3.0~7.0
鄂尔多斯盆地延长组7段	页岩、泥岩、粉细砂岩	5.0~12.0
柴达木盆地下干柴沟组上段	泥岩、页岩、泥质白云岩、泥质灰岩	4.0~6.0	据文献[20]
江汉盆地潜江组潜3⁴-10韵律	泥质白云岩、白云质泥岩、灰质泥岩、钙芒硝充填云质泥岩	5.0~13.0	本文实测

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(47)

[1]	金之钧, 白振瑞, 高波, 等. 中国迎来页岩油气革命了吗?[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(3): 451-458. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201903002.htm JIN Zhijun, BAI Zhenrui, GAO Bo, et al. Has China ushered in the shale oil and gas revolution?[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(3): 451-458. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201903002.htm
[2]	杜金虎, 胡素云, 庞正炼, 等. 中国陆相页岩油类型、潜力及前景[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(5): 560-568. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2019.05.003 DU Jinhu, HU Suyun, PANG Zhenglian, et al. The types, potentials and prospects of continental shale oil in China[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(5): 560-568. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2019.05.003
[3]	孙焕泉, 蔡勋育, 周德华, 等. 中国石化页岩油勘探实践与展望[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(5): 569-575. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2019.05.004 SUN Huanquan, CAI Xunyu, ZHOU Dehua, et al. Practice and prospect of SINOPEC shale oil exploration[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(5): 569-575. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2019.05.004
[4]	赵贤正, 周立宏, 赵敏, 等. 陆相页岩油工业化开发突破与实践: 以渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔二段为例[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(5): 589-600. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2019.05.006 ZHAO Xianzheng, ZHOU Lihong, ZHAO Min, et al. Breakthrough and practice of industrial development on continental shale oil: a case study on Kong-2 Member in Cangdong Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(5): 589-600. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2019.05.006
[5]	付金华, 牛小兵, 淡卫东, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地中生界延长组长7段页岩油地质特征及勘探开发进展[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(5): 601-614. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2019.05.007 FU Jinhua, NIU Xiaobing, DAN Weidong, et al. The geological characteristics and the progress on exploration and development of shale oil in Chang 7 member of Mesozoic Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(5): 601-614. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2019.05.007
[6]	霍进, 何吉祥, 高阳, 等. 吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组页岩油开发难点及对策[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2019, 40(4): 379-388. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD201904001.htm HUO Jin, HE Jixiang, GAO Yang, et al. Difficulties and countermeasures of shale oil development in Lucaogou Formation of Jimsar Sag[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2019, 40(4): 379-388. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD201904001.htm
[7]	吴世强, 唐小山, 杜小娟, 等. 江汉盆地潜江凹陷陆相页岩油地质特征[J]. 东华理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 36(3): 282-286. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3504.2013.03.006 WU Shiqiang, TANG Xiaoshan, DU Xiaojuan, et al. Geologic chara-cteristics of continental shale oil in the Qianjiang Depression, Jianghan Salt Lake Basin[J]. Journal of East China Institute of Technology (Natural Science), 2013, 36(3): 282-286. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3504.2013.03.006
[8]	龙玉梅, 陈曼霏, 陈凤玲, 等. 潜江凹陷潜江组盐间页岩油储层发育特征及影响因素[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2019, 26(1): 59-64. doi: 10.13673/j.cnki.cn37-1359/te.2019.01.006 LONG Yumei, CHEN Manfei, CHEN Fengling, et al. Characte-ristics and influencing factors of inter-salt shale oil reservoirs in Qianjiang Formation, Qianjiang Sag[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2019, 26(1): 59-64. doi: 10.13673/j.cnki.cn37-1359/te.2019.01.006
[9]	熊智勇, 吴世强, 王洋, 等. 江汉盐湖盆地盐间泥质白云岩油藏地质特征与实践[J]. 地质科技情报, 2015, 34(2): 181-187. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201502027.htm XIONG Zhiyong, WU Shiqiang, WANG Yang, et al. Geological characteristics and practice for intersalt argillaceous dolomites reservoir in the Qianjiang Depression of Jianghan Salt Lake Basin[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2015, 34(2): 181-187. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201502027.htm
[10]	费安国. 盐间泥质白云岩油藏成藏主控因素及油气富集规律[J]. 江汉石油职工大学学报, 2018, 31(3): 8-11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-301X.2018.03.003 FEI Anguo. On main accumulation controlling factors and oil-gas accumulation regularity of inter-salt argillaceous dolomite reservoir[J]. Journal of Jianghan Petroleum University of Staff and Workers, 2018, 31(3): 8-11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-301X.2018.03.003
[11]	方志雄, 陈开远, 杨香华, 等. 潜江盐湖盆地层序地层特征[J]. 盐湖研究, 2003, 11(2): 14-23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-858X.2003.02.003 FANG Zhixiong, CHEN Kaiyuan, YANG Xianghua, et al. Sequence stratigraphy characteristic of Qianjiang Saline Sub-Basin[J]. Journalof Salt Lake Research, 2003, 11(2): 14-23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-858X.2003.02.003
[12]	郑有恒. 江汉盆地潜江凹陷潜江组岩性油藏勘探方向及对策[J]. 石油实验地质, 2010, 32(4): 330-333. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6112.2010.04.005 ZHENG Youheng. Exploration direction and strategy for lithologic accumulations in Qianjiang Formation of the Qianjiang Sag, Jianghan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2010, 32(4): 330-333. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6112.2010.04.005
[13]	戴世昭. 江汉盐湖盆地石油地质[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1997: 22-45. DAI Shizhao. Petroleum geology of Jianghan Saline Lake Basin[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 1997: 22-45.
[14]	方志雄. 潜江盐湖盆地盐间沉积的石油地质特征[J]. 沉积学报, 2002, 20(4): 608-613. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0550.2002.04.012 FANG Zhixiong. Hydrocarbon exploration significance of intersalt sediments in Qianjiang Saline Lake Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2002, 20(4): 608-613. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0550.2002.04.012
[15]	张永生, 杨玉卿, 漆智先, 等. 江汉盆地潜江凹陷古近系潜江组含盐岩系沉积特征与沉积环境[J]. 古地理学报, 2003, 5(1): 29-35. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1505.2003.01.003 ZHANG Yongsheng, YANG Yuqing, QI Zhixian, et al. Sedimentary characteristics and environments of the salt-bearing series of Qianjiang Formation of the Paleogene in Qianjiang Sag of Jianghan Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2003, 5(1): 29-35. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1505.2003.01.003
[16]	王芙蓉, 何生, 郑有恒, 等. 江汉盆地潜江凹陷潜江组盐间页岩油储层矿物组成与脆性特征研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2016, 38(2): 211-218. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201602211 WANG Furong, HE Sheng, ZHENG Youheng, et al. Mineral composition and brittleness characteristics of the inter-salt shale oil reservoirs in the Qianjiang Formation, Qianjiang Sag[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2016, 38(2): 211-218. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201602211
[17]	黄春菊, 陈开远, 杨香华. 盐湖盆地层序地层特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2002, 23(2): 134-138. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9985.2002.02.006 HUANG Chunju, CHEN Kaiyuan, YANG Xianghua. Characteristics of sequence stratigraphy in the saline lake basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2002, 23(2): 134-138. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9985.2002.02.006
[18]	徐二社, 陶国亮, 李志明, 等. 江汉盆地潜江凹陷盐间页岩油储层不同岩相微观储集特征: 以古近系潜江组三段4亚段10韵律为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(2): 193-201. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202002193 XU Ershe, TAO Guoliang, LI Zhiming, et al. Microscopic reservoir characteristics of different lithofacies from inter-salt shale oil reservoir in Qianjiang Sag, Jianghan Basin: a case study of Paleogene Eq₃⁴-10 rhythm[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(2): 193-201. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202002193
[19]	JARVIE D M. Shale resource systems for oil and gas: part 2: shale-oil resource systems[C]//BREYER J A. Shale reservoirs: giant resources for the 21st century: AAPG memoir 97. Houston: AAPG, 2012: 89-119.
[20]	张道伟, 薛建勤, 伍坤宇, 等. 柴达木盆地英西地区页岩油储层特征及有利区优选[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(5): 1-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YANX202004001.htm ZHANG Daowei, XUE Jianqin, WU Kunyu, et al. Shale oil reservoir characteristics and optimization of prospective area in Yingxi area, Qaidam Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(5): 1-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YANX202004001.htm
[21]	李贤庆, 熊波, 黄光辉, 等. 低熟源岩中矿物沥青基质的特征与成因[J]. 江汉石油学院学报, 1997, 19(2): 29-35. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JHSX199702005.htm LI Xianqing, XIONG Bo, HUANG Guanghui, et al. Characteristics and origins of mineral-bituminous groundmass in immature and low matural source rocks[J]. Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute, 1997, 19(2): 29-35. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JHSX199702005.htm
[22]	王柯, 叶加仁, 郭飞飞, 等. 潜江凹陷蚌湖向斜带烃源岩特征及生排烃史[J]. 地质科技情报, 2011, 30(5): 83-88. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201105015.htm WANG Ke, YE Jiaren, GUO Feifei, et al. Characteristics and hydrocarbon generation-expulsion history of source rocks of Banghu syncline in Qianjiang Depression[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2011, 30(5): 83-88. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201105015.htm
[23]	李乐, 王自翔, 郑有恒, 等. 江汉盆地潜江凹陷潜三段盐韵律层页岩油富集机理[J]. 地球科学(中国地质大学学报), 2019, 44(3): 1012-1023. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX201903028.htm LI Le, WANG Zixiang, ZHENG Youheng, et al. Mechanism of shale oil enrichment from the salt cyclotherm in Qian3 Member of Qianjiang Sag, Jianghan Basin[J]. Earth Science(Journal of China University of Geosciences), 2019, 44(3): 1012-1023. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX201903028.htm
[24]	黎茂稳, 马晓潇, 蒋启贵, 等. 北美海相页岩油形成条件、富集特征与启示[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2019, 26(1): 13-28. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201901002.htm LI Maowen, MA Xiaoxiao, JIANG Qigui, et al. Enlightenment from formation conditions and enrichment characteristics of marine shale oil in North America[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2019, 26(1): 13-28. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201901002.htm
[25]	高辉, 何梦卿, 赵鹏云, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地长7页岩油与北美地区典型页岩油地质特征对比[J]. 石油实验地质, 2018, 40(2): 133-140. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201802133 GAO Hui, HE Mengqing, ZHAO Pengyun, et al. Comparison of geological characteristics of Chang 7 shale oil in Ordos Basin and typical shale oil in North America[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2018, 40(2): 133-140. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201802133
[26]	付鑫, 叶加仁, 朱红涛, 等. 潜江凹陷潜江组地温-地压系统特征及其与油气成藏关系[J]. 地球科学(中国地质大学学报), 2012, 37(4): 860-868. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX201204026.htm FU Xin, YE Jiaren, ZHU Hongtao, et al. Characteristics of geotemperature-geopressure system of the Qianjiang Formation in the Qianjiang Depression and their relationship with petroleum accumulation[J]. Earth Science(Journal of China University of Geosciences), 2012, 37(4): 860-868. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX201204026.htm
[27]	李志明, 秦建中, 徐旭辉, 等. 镜质体反射率抑制与烃源岩质量关系: 以渤海湾盆地东营凹陷烃源岩为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2008, 30(3): 276-280. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200803276 LI Zhiming, QIN Jianzhong, XU Xuhui, et al. The relationship between vitrinite reflectance suppression and source rock quality: a case study on source rocks from the Dongying Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2008, 30(3): 276-280. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200803276
[28]	马中良, 郑伦举, 李志明, 等. 盐类物质对泥质烃源岩生排烃过程的影响[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 35(1): 43-51. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNSY201301005.htm MA Zhongliang, ZHENG Lunju, LI Zhiming, et al. The effect of salts on hydrocarbon generation and expulsion of argillaceous source rock[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2013, 35(1): 43-51. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNSY201301005.htm
[29]	潘银华, 黎茂稳, 孙永革, 等. 江汉盆地潜江凹陷盐间云质页岩热压生排烃模拟实验研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2018, 40(4): 551-558. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201804551 PAN Yinhua, LI Maowen, SUN Yongge, et al. Thermo-compression simulation of hydrocarbon generation and expulsion of inter-salt dolomitic shale, Qianjiang Sag, Jianghan Basin[J]. Petro-leum Geology & Experiment, 2018, 40(4): 551-558. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201804551
[30]	李志明, 郑伦举, 蒋启贵, 等. 湖相富有机质泥质白云岩生排烃模拟及其对页岩油勘探的启示[J]. 地球科学(中国地质大学学报), 2018, 43(2): 566-576. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX201802017.htm LI Zhiming, ZHENG Lunju, JIANG Qigui, et al. Simulation of hydrocarbon generation and expulsion for lacustrine organic-rich argillaceous dolomite and its implications for shale oil exploration[J]. Earth Science (Journal of China University of Geosciences), 2018, 43(2): 566-576. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX201802017.htm
[31]	曹婷婷, 马媛媛, 黎茂稳, 等. 江汉盆地潜江凹陷潜三段盐间烃类特征及其指示意义[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 34(2): 25-30. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XASY201902004.htm CAO Tingting, MA Yuanyuan, LI Maowen, et al. Hydrocarbon characteristics of inter-salt system in Qian 3 Member of Qianjiang Sag, Jianghan Basin and their indication[J]. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 34(2): 25-30. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XASY201902004.htm
[32]	陶国亮, 刘鹏, 钱门辉, 等. 潜江凹陷潜江组盐间页岩含油性及其勘探意义[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2019, 48(6): 1256-1265. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKD201906011.htm TAO Guoliang, LIU Peng, QIAN Menhui, et al. Oil-bearing charac-teristics and exploration significance of inter-salt shale in Qianjiang Formation, Qianjiang Depression, Jianghan Basin[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2019, 48(6): 1256-1265. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKD201906011.htm
[33]	赵文智, 胡素云, 侯连华, 等. 中国陆相页岩油类型、资源潜力及与致密油的边界[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(1): 1-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202001002.htm ZHAO Wenzhi, HU Suyun, HOU Lianhua, et al. Types and resource potential of continental shale oil in China and its boundary with tight oil[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(1): 1-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202001002.htm
[34]	孙中良, 王芙蓉, 何生, 等. 潜江凹陷古近系盐间典型韵律层页岩孔隙结构[J]. 深圳大学学报理工版, 2019, 36(3): 289-297. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SZDL201903010.htm SUN Zhongliang, WANG Furong, HE Sheng, et al. The pore structures of the shale about typical inter-salt rhythm in the Paleogene of Qianjiang Depression[J]. Journal of Shenzhen University Science and Engineering, 2019, 36(3): 289-297. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SZDL201903010.htm
[35]	WARREN J K. Evaporite: sediments, resources and hydrocarbons[M]. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 2016.
[36]	WARREN J K. Salt usually seals, but sometimes leaks: implications for mine and cavern stabilities in the short and long term[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2017, 165: 302-341.
[37]	DOWNEY M W. Evaluating seals for hydrocarbon accumulations[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1984, 68(11): 1752-1763.
[38]	李志明, 刘鹏, 钱门辉, 等. 湖相泥页岩不同赋存状态油定量对比: 以渤海湾盆地东营凹陷页岩油探井取心段为例[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2018, 47(6): 1252-1263. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKD201806010.htm Zhiming, LIU Peng, QIAN Menhui, et al. Quantitative comparison of different occurrence oil for lacustrine shale: a case from cored interval of shale oil special drilling wells in Dongying Depression, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Techno-logy, 2018, 47(6): 1252-1263. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKD201806010.htm
[39]	黎茂稳, 李志明, 李政, 等. 陆相页岩油形成演化与赋存机理[R]. 北京: 中国石化石油勘探开发研究院, 2018: 51-52. LI Maowen, LI Zhiming, LI Zheng, et al. Formation, evolution and occurrence mechanism of continental shale oil[R]. Beijing: SINOPEC Exploration and Production Research Institute, 2018: 51-52.
[40]	邹才能, 杨智, 张国生, 等. 常规-非常规油气"有序聚集"理论认识及实践意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2014, 41(1): 14-26. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201401002.htm ZOU Caineng, YANG Zhi, ZHANG Guosheng, et al. Conventional and unconventional petroleum "orderly accumulation": concept and practical significance[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Deve-lopment, 2014, 41(1): 14-26. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201401002.htm
[41]	杨智, 侯连华, 陶士振, 等. 致密油与页岩油形成条件与"甜点区"评价[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42(5): 555-565. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201505002.htm YANG Zhi, HOU Lianhua, TAO Shizhen, et al. Formation conditions and "sweet spot" evaluation of tight oil and shale oil[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(5): 555-565. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201505002.htm
[42]	孟祥振, 刘聃, 孟旺才, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部延长组长7段致密油地质"甜点"评价[J]. 特种油气藏, 2018, 25(6): 90-95. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ201806016.htm MENG Xiangzhen, LIU Dan, MENG Wangcai, et al. Geological "sweet-pot" evaluation of Chang-7 Member tight oil in the Yanchang Formation of southwestern Ordos Basin[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2018, 25(6): 90-95. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ201806016.htm
[43]	李锦锋, 杨连如, 张凤博, 等. 下寺湾油田延长组长8段致密油富集主控因素及"甜点"模式[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2019, 9(6): 1-9. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ201906001.htm LI Jinfeng, YANG Lianru, ZHANG Fengbo, et al. Main controlling factors of enrichment and sweet spot mode of tight sandstone oil reservoir in Chang-8 Member of Yanchang Formation in Xiasiwan Oilfield[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(6): 1-9. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ201906001.htm
[44]	郭旭光, 何文军, 杨森, 等. 准噶尔盆地页岩油"甜点区"评价与关键技术应用: 以吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(8): 1168-1179. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201908010.htm GUO Xuguang, HE Wenjun, YANG Sen, et al. Evaluation and application of key technologies of "sweet area" of shale oil in Junggar Basin: case study of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimusar Depression[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2019, 30(8): 1168-1179. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201908010.htm
[45]	胡英杰. 湖相碳酸盐岩致密油主控因素及"甜点"刻画[J]. 特种油气藏, 2018, 25(6): 6-11. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ201806002.htm HU Yingjie. Main-controlling factor and "sweet-spot" characte-rization of lacustrine carbonate tight oil reservoir[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2018, 25(6): 6-11. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ201806002.htm
[46]	崔景伟, 朱如凯, 杨智, 等. 国外页岩层系石油勘探开发进展及启示[J]. 非常规油气, 2015, 2(4): 68-82. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FCYQ201504013.htm CUI Jingwei, ZHU Rukai, YANG Zhi, et al. Progresses and enligh-tenment of overseas shale oil exploration and development[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2015, 2(4): 68-82. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FCYQ201504013.htm
[47]	陆益祥. 页岩油地质要素及甜点预测: 以潜江凹陷为例[D]. 荆州: 长江大学, 2017. LU Yixiang. Geological factors of shale oil and prediction of sweet spot-taking Qianjiang Sag as an example[D]. Jingzhou: Yangtze University, 2017.