渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷湖相泥页岩地球化学特征及有机质富集规律

曹婷婷; 姚威; 李志明; 李政; 黎茂稳

doi:10.11781/sysydz202004558

渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷湖相泥页岩地球化学特征及有机质富集规律

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202004558

曹婷婷^{1, 2, 3, 4,},
姚威^{1, 2, 3, 4},
李志明^{1, 2, 3, 4},
李政⁵,
黎茂稳^{1, 2, 3, 4}

1.
中国石化石油勘探开发研究院无锡石油地质研究所, 江苏无锡 214126
2.
页岩油气富集机理与有效开发国家重点实验室, 江苏无锡 214126
3.
国家能源页岩油研发中心, 江苏无锡 214126
4.
中国石化油气成藏重点实验室, 江苏无锡 214126
5.
中国石化胜利油田分公司勘探开发研究院, 山东东营 257000

基金项目:

国家科技重大专项 2017ZX05049001-001

详细信息

作者简介:
曹婷婷(1986-), 女, 高级工程师, 从事页岩油勘探研究。E-mail: ctt.syky@sinopec.com

中图分类号: TE122.1
计量
- 文章访问数: 709
- HTML全文浏览量: 159
- PDF下载量: 173
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-01-06
- 修回日期: 2020-06-09
- 刊出日期: 2020-07-28

Geochemical characteristics of lacustrine shale and enrichment mechanism of organic matter in Zhanhua Sag, Bohai Bay Basin

CAO Tingting^{1, 2, 3, 4
,},
YAO Wei^{1, 2, 3, 4},
LI Zhiming^{1, 2, 3, 4},
LI Zheng⁵,
LI Maowen^{1, 2, 3, 4}

1.
Wuxi Research Institute of Petroleum Geology, SINOPEC, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214126, China
2.
State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Effective Development, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214126, China
3.
State Energy Center for Shale Oil Research and Development, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214126, China
4.
Key Laboratory of Hydrocarbon Accumulation Mechanism, SINOPEC, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214126, China
5.
Research Institute of Exploration and Development, SINOPEC Shengli Oilfield, Dongying, Shandong 257000, China

摘要

摘要: 以渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷罗69井沙三下亚段湖相泥页岩为研究对象，在层序地层框架下，研究了不同体系域湖相泥页岩的地球化学特征，阐明了沉积环境的演化过程及有机质富集规律，为非常规页岩油有利目标的识别提供理论支持。测井与岩性组合揭示沙三下亚段层序自下而上分为湖侵体系域、早期高位体系域和晚期高位体系域。生产力和保存条件是有机质富集的控制因素，二者缺一不可。较高的生产力和较好的保存条件共同决定了早期高位体系域最有利于有机质富集，也为其成为良好的页岩油开发层系提供了良好的物质基础。
- 湖相泥页岩 /
- 层序 /
- 地球化学特征 /
- 有机质富集 /
- 沾化凹陷 /
- 渤海湾盆地
Abstract: The lacustrine shale in the lower part of the third member of Shahejie Formation (Es₃) in well L69 in the Zhanhua Sag of Bohai Bay Basin was studied. The geochemical characteristics of lacustrine shale in different system tracts were analyzed in a framework of sequence stratigraphy. The evolution process of sedimentary environment and the enrichment mechanism of organic matter were clarified, which provided theoretical support for the identification of favorable targets of unconventional shale oil. The combination of logging and lithology reveals that the sequence of the lower Es³ can be divided into transgression, early highstand and late highstand system tracts from bottom to top. Productivity and preservation conditions are the controlling factors of organic matter enrichment. The higher productivity and better preservation conditions together determine that the early highstand system tract is the most favorable organic matter accumulation interval, which provides a good material basis for a good shale oil development target.
- lacustrine shale /
- sequence /
- geochemical characteristics /
- enrichment of organic matter /
- Zhanhua Sag /
- Bohai Bay Basin

HTML全文

图 1 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷罗69井沙三下亚段层序地层柱状图

Figure 1. Sequence stratigraphic column of lower Es₃ in well L69, Zhanhua Sag, Bohai Bay Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷罗69井取心层段TOC与岩石热解参数分布特征

Figure 2. Distribution characteristics of TOC and rock pyrolysis parameters in coring sections in well L69, Zhanhua Sag, Bohai Bay Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷罗69井沙三下段典型样品中甾、萜类化合物分布特征

Figure 3. Distribution of sterane (m/z=217) and terpane (m/z=191) compounds in typical samples from lower Es₃ in well L69, Zhanhua Sag, Bohai Bay Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷罗69井沙三下亚段岩心样品中无机元素分布特征

Figure 4. Mineral element distribution in cores from lower Es₃ in well L69, Zhanhua Sag, Bohai Bay Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷罗69井沙三下亚段体系域中古水体介质参数分布

Figure 5. Distribution of paleo-water parameters in system tracts of lower Es₃ in well L69, Zhanhua Sag, Bohai Bay Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷罗69井沙三下亚段不同体系域的分子地球化学参数

Table 1. Molecular geochemical parameters of lower Es₃ in well L69, Zhanhua Sag, Bohai Bay Basin

深度/m	主峰碳	OEP	CPI	∑C_21-/∑C₂₂₊	Pr/Ph	体系域
2 930~2 990	C₂₃-C₂₅	$\frac{1.14 \sim 1.67}{1.45}$	$\frac{1.03 \sim 1.45}{1.28}$	$\frac{0.42 \sim 0.62}{0.53}$	$\frac{1.08 \sim 1.79}{1.39}$	晚期高位体系域
2 990~3 040	C₁₇-C₁₈，C₂₅	$\frac{0.77 \sim 0.81}{0.79}$	$\frac{0.64 \sim 0.73}{0.70}$	$\frac{0.62 \sim 1.22}{0.84}$	$\frac{0.46 \sim 0.54}{0.50}$	早期高位体系域
3 040~3 140	C₁₆-C₁₈	$\frac{0.84 \sim 0.90}{0.86}$	$\frac{0.68 \sim 0.78}{0.72}$	$\frac{0.34 \sim 1.10}{0.83}$	$\frac{0.36 \sim 0.53}{0.44}$	湖侵体系域
注：表中分式的意义为$\frac{\text { 最小值} \sim \text {最大值 }}{\text { 平均值 }}$。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(20)

[1]	武晓玲, 高波, 叶欣, 等. 中国东部断陷盆地页岩油成藏条件与勘探潜力[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2013, 34(4): 455-462. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201304007.htm WU Xiaoling, GAO Bo, YE Xin, et al. Shale oil accumulation conditions and exploration potential of faulted basins in the east of China[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2013, 34(4): 455-462. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201304007.htm
[2]	王秀红. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷富林洼陷油气来源及分布规律研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2013, 35(2): 151-156. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201302151 WANG Xiuhong. Hydrocarbon origin and distribution regularity in Fulin sub-Sag, Zhanhua Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2013, 35(2): 151-156. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201302151
[3]	刘惠民, 张守鹏, 王朴, 等. 沾化凹陷罗家地区沙三段下亚段页岩岩学特征[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2012, 19(6): 11-15. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9603.2012.06.003 LIU Huimin, ZHANG Shoupeng, WANG Pu, et al. Petrological characteristics of shale in the lower member of Shahejie Formation in Luojia area, Zhanhua Sag[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2012, 19(6): 11-15. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9603.2012.06.003
[4]	王鸿升, 胡天跃. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷页岩油形成影响因素分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(S1): 141-149. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX2014S1025.htm WANG Hongsheng, HU Tianyue. Analysis of influence factors of shale oil formation in Zhanhua Depression of Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2014, 25(S1): 141-149. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX2014S1025.htm
[5]	张林晔, 李政, 朱日房. 页岩气的形成与开发[J]. 天然气工业, 2009, 29(1): 124-128. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG200901044.htm ZHANG Linye, LI Zheng, ZHU Rifang. The formation and exploitation of shale gas[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2009, 29(1): 124-128. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG200901044.htm
[6]	张善文, 张林晔, 李政, 等. 济阳坳陷古近系页岩油气形成条件[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2012, 19(6): 1-5. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201206005.htm ZHANG Shanwen, ZHANG Linye, LI Zheng, et al. Formation conditions of Paleogene shale oil and gas in Jiyang Depression[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2012, 19(6): 1-5. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201206005.htm
[7]	李钜源. 东营利津洼陷沙四段页岩含油气量测定及可动油率分析与研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2014, 36(3): 365-369. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD201403017.htm LI Juyuan. Oil and gas contents and movable oil amounts of shales in 4th member of Shahejie Formation, Lijin Subsag, Dongying Sag[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2014, 36(3): 365-369. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD201403017.htm
[8]	宋国奇, 张林晔, 卢双舫, 等. 页岩油资源评价技术方法及其应用[J]. 地学前缘, 2013, 20(4): 221-228. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201304021.htm SONG Guoqi, ZHANG Linye, LU Shuangfang, et al. Resource evaluation method for shale oil and its application[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2013, 20(4): 221-228. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201304021.htm
[9]	王永诗, 李政, 巩建强, 等. 济阳坳陷页岩油气评价方法: 以沾化凹陷罗家地区为例[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34(1): 83-91. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201301008.htm WANG Yongshi, LI Zheng, GONG Jianqiang, et al. Discussion on an evaluation method of shale oil and gas in Jiyang Depression: a case study on Luojia area in Zhanhua Sag[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(1): 83-91. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201301008.htm
[10]	张渠, 梁舒, 张志荣, 等. 原油模拟生物降解的饱和烃色谱分析[J]. 石油实验地质, 2005, 27(1): 81-84. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200501081 ZHANG Qu, LIANG Shu, ZHANG Zhirong, et al. Gas chromatographic analysis of simulated biodegraded saturated hydrocarbon[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2005, 27(1): 81-84. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200501081
[11]	马晓潇, 黎茂稳, 庞雄奇, 等. 手持式X荧光光谱仪在济阳坳陷古近系陆相页岩岩心分析中的应用[J]. 石油实验地质, 2016, 38(2): 278-286. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201602278 MA Xiaoxiao, LI Maowen, PANG Xiongqi, et al. Application of hand-held X-ray fluorescence spectrometry in the core analysis of Paleogene lacustrine shales in the Jiyang Depression[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2016, 38(2): 278-286. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201602278
[12]	刘友祥, 俞凌杰, 张庆珍, 等. 川东南龙马溪组页岩的矿物组成与微观储集特征研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2015, 37(3): 328-333. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201503328 LIU Youxiang, YU Lingjie, ZHANG Qingzhen, et al. Mineral composition and microscopic reservoir features of Longmaxi shales in southeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2015, 37(3): 328-333. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201503328
[13]	魏魁生, 李培祝, 龙更生, 等. 孤北地区断阶式坡折沉积层序特征与隐蔽圈闭预测[J]. 现代地质, 2003, 17(3): 303-310. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ200303011.htm WEI Kuisheng, LI Peizhu, LONG Gengsheng, et al. Characteristics of depositional sequence with three fault-stepped breaks and the prediction of subtle traps in the Gubei area[J]. Geoscience, 2003, 17(3): 303-310. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ200303011.htm
[14]	郭来源. 陆相断陷湖盆富有机质页岩非均质性及其控制因素分析: 以泌阳和沾化凹陷为例[D]. 武汉: 中国地质大学, 2017. GUO Laiyuan. Heterogeneity and controlling factors of organic-rich shale in continental rift basin: a case study of Biyang and Zhanhua depressions[D]. Wuhan: China University of Geosciences, 2017.
[15]	彭丽, 陆永潮, 彭鹏, 等. 渤海湾盆地渤南洼陷沙三下亚段泥页岩非均质性特征及演化模式: 以罗69井为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(2): 219-229. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201702003.htm PENG Li, LU Yongchao, PENG Peng, et al. Heterogeneity and evolution model of the Lower Shahejie Member 3 mud-shale in the Bonan Subsag, Bohai Bay Basin: an example from well Luo 69[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2017, 38(2): 219-229. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201702003.htm
[16]	PETERS K E, WALTERS C C, MOLDOWAN J M. The biomarker guide, biomarkers and isotopes in petroleum exploration and earth history[M]. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
[17]	邓宏文, 钱凯. 沉积地球化学与环境分析[M]. 兰州: 甘肃科学技术出版社, 1993: 1-150. DENG Hongwen, QIAN Kai. Sedimentary geochemistry and environmental analysis[M]. Lanzhou: Gansu Science and Techno-logy Press, 1993: 1-150.
[18]	金强, 朱光有. 中国中新生代咸化湖盆烃源岩沉积的问题及相关进展[J]. 高校地质学报, 2006, 12(4): 483-492. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXDX200604009.htm JIN Qiang, ZHU Guangyou. Progress in research of deposition of oil source rocks in saline lakes and their hydrocarbon generation[J]. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2006, 12(4): 483-492. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXDX200604009.htm
[19]	杨万芹, 王学军, 蒋有录, 等. 湖泊古气候的量化恢复及其对细粒沉积的影响: 以东营凹陷沙四段上亚段—沙三段下亚段为例[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2018, 25(2): 29-36. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201802005.htm YANG Wanqin, WANG Xuejun, JIANG Youlu, et al. Quantitative reconstruction of paleoclimate and its effects on fine-grained lacustrine sediments: a case study of the upper Es₄ and lower Es₃ in Dongying Sag[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2018, 25(2): 29-36. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201802005.htm
[20]	尚飞. 泌阳凹陷古近系核三段富有机质页岩非均质性及控制因素分析[D]. 武汉: 中国地质大学, 2015. SHANG Fei. The heterogeneity and controlling factors of organic-rich shale in the third member of Eocene Hetaoyuan Formatino, Biyang Depression[D]. Wuhan: China University of Geosciences, 2015.