湖相烃源岩演化全过程中的孔隙演化机理——基于地质样品与模拟实验的认识

黄振凯; 黎茂稳; 郑伦举; 陶国亮; 李志明; 蒋启贵; 钱门辉; 曹婷婷; 李双建; 沃玉进; 孙冬胜

doi:10.11781/sysydz202004639

文章导航 > 石油实验地质 > 2020 > 42(4): 639-645

黄振凯, 黎茂稳, 郑伦举, 陶国亮, 李志明, 蒋启贵, 钱门辉, 曹婷婷, 李双建, 沃玉进, 孙冬胜. 湖相烃源岩演化全过程中的孔隙演化机理——基于地质样品与模拟实验的认识[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(4): 639-645. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202004639

引用本文:

HUANG Zhenkai, LI Maowen, ZHENG Lunju, TAO Guoliang, LI Zhiming, JIANG Qigui, QIAN Menhui, CAO Tingting, LI Shuangjian, WO Yujin, SUN Dongsheng. Pore development in lacustrine source rock evolution: interpretation based on geological samples and simulation experiments: interpretation based on geological samples and simulation experiments[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2020, 42(4): 639-645. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202004639

Citation:

HUANG Zhenkai, LI Maowen, ZHENG Lunju, TAO Guoliang, LI Zhiming, JIANG Qigui, QIAN Menhui, CAO Tingting, LI Shuangjian, WO Yujin, SUN Dongsheng. Pore development in lacustrine source rock evolution: interpretation based on geological samples and simulation experiments: interpretation based on geological samples and simulation experiments[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2020, 42(4): 639-645. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202004639

引用本文:

Citation:

HUANG Zhenkai, LI Maowen, ZHENG Lunju, TAO Guoliang, LI Zhiming, JIANG Qigui, QIAN Menhui, CAO Tingting, LI Shuangjian, WO Yujin, SUN Dongsheng. Pore development in lacustrine source rock evolution: interpretation based on geological samples and simulation experiments: interpretation based on geological samples and simulation experiments[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2020, 42(4): 639-645. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202004639

湖相烃源岩演化全过程中的孔隙演化机理——基于地质样品与模拟实验的认识

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202004639

黄振凯^{1, 2,},
黎茂稳^{1, 2},
郑伦举³,
陶国亮³,
李志明³,
蒋启贵³,
钱门辉³,
曹婷婷³,
李双建^{1, 2},
沃玉进^{1, 2},
孙冬胜^{1, 2}

1.
页岩油气富集机理与有效开发国家重点实验室, 北京 100083
2.
中国石化石油勘探开发研究院, 北京 100083
3.
中国石化石油勘探开发研究院无锡石油地质研究所, 江苏无锡 214126

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金 41702137

中国科学院A类战略性先导科技专项 XDA14010406

国家自然科学基金企业创新发展联合基金项目 U19B6003-01-03

详细信息

作者简介:
黄振凯(1985-), 男, 博士, 从事油气地质与地球化学研究。E-mail: huang_zhenkai@163.com

中图分类号: TE122.1
计量
- 文章访问数: 859
- HTML全文浏览量: 197
- PDF下载量: 149
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-03-18
- 修回日期: 2020-05-22
- 刊出日期: 2020-07-28

Pore development in lacustrine source rock evolution: interpretation based on geological samples and simulation experiments: interpretation based on geological samples and simulation experiments

1.
State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Effective Development, Beijing 100083, China
2.
SINOPEC Petroleum Exploration and Production Research Institute, Beijing 100083, China
3.
Wuxi Research Institute of Petroleum Geology, SINOPEC, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214126, China

摘要

摘要: 通过对比实际自然演化剖面地质样品和模拟实验样品的孔隙定量结果，认为烃源岩演化的整个过程中，不同尺度孔隙的孔容变化规律基本相似。大孔和介孔对孔隙变化的影响较大，二者应该是岩石总孔隙度的主要贡献者，且不同尺寸孔隙之间存在一定的转化关系。成岩演化、构造变化等作用是导致孔隙变化的主要外部因素，生烃—排烃过程是内在因素。处于不同演化阶段的烃源岩形成的烃类产物所赋存的孔隙空间及大小（规模）存在一定差异，该认识有助于明确泥页岩层系中不同演化阶段对应的常规与非常规油气资源的赋存机理。
- 湖相 /
- 烃源岩 /
- 孔隙演化 /
- 地质样品 /
- 模拟实验 /
- 页岩油气
Abstract: By comparing the quantitative pore results of geological samples from natural evolution profiles and simulated experiment samples, it is believed that the volume changes of pores of different scales are basically similar throughout the evolution of source rocks. Macropores and mesopores have a greater impact on pore changes. They should be the main contributors to the total porosity of rocks, and there is a certain conversion relationship between pores of different sizes. Diagenetic evolution and tectonic changes are the main external factors that cause pore changes while hydrocarbon generation and expulsion processes are the internal factors. In addition, there are some differences in the pore space and size (scale) of hydrocarbon products formed by source rocks during different evolutionary stages. This is useful for determining the storage mechanism of conventional and unconventional oil and gas resources corresponding to different evolutionary stages in the shale formation.
- lacustrine /
- source rock /
- pore evolution /
- geological sample /
- simulation experiment /
- shale oil and gas

HTML全文

图 1 渤海湾盆地东营凹陷取样井位分布

Figure 1. Sampling locations in Dongying Sag, Bohai Bay Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 模拟实验条件下泥页岩中不同尺度孔隙的孔容变化特征

Figure 2. Variation of volumes of pores with different sizes in shales in simulation experiments

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 模拟实验条件下泥页岩中不同尺度孔隙占比变化特征

Figure 3. Variation of proportions of pores with different sizes in shales in simulation experiments

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 模拟实验条件下泥页岩成烃演化特征

Figure 4. Hydrocarbon generation of shales in simulation experiments

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 模拟实验条件下泥页岩中气油比变化特征

Figure 5. Variation of gas/oil ratios of shales in simulation experiments

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 模拟实验条件下湖相烃源岩微纳米级孔隙演化特征

Figure 6. Evolution of micro and nano pores in lacustrine source rocks in simulation experiments

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 渤海湾盆地东营凹陷沙三下亚段与沙四上亚段实际地质剖面样品孔容变化特征

Figure 7. Variation of pore volume in actual geological profile samples from the lower third and upper fourth members of Shahejie Formation, Dongying Sag, Bohai Bay Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

参考文献(48)

[1]	黎茂稳, 马晓潇, 蒋启贵, 等. 北美海相页岩油形成条件、富集特征与启示[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2019, 26(1): 13-28. doi: 10.13673/j.cnki.cn37-1359/te.2019.01.002 LI Maowen, MA Xiaoxiao, JIANG Qigui, et al. Enlightenment from formation conditions and enrichment characteristics of marine shale oil in North America[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2019, 26(1): 13-28. doi: 10.13673/j.cnki.cn37-1359/te.2019.01.002
[2]	胡文瑄, 姚素平, 陆现彩, 等. 典型陆相页岩油层系成岩过程中有机质演化对储集性的影响[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(5): 947-956. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201905001.htm HU Wenxuan, YAO Suping, LU Xiancai, et al. Effects of organic matter evolution on oil reservoir property during diagenesis of typical continental shale sequences[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(5): 947-956. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201905001.htm
[3]	邹才能, 赵群, 董大忠, 等. 页岩气基本特征、主要挑战与未来前景[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(12): 1781-1796. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201712001.htm ZOU Caineng, ZHAO Qun, DONG Dazhong, et al. Geological characteristics, main challenges and future prospect of shale gas[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2017, 28(12): 1781-1796. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201712001.htm
[4]	LOUCKS R G, REED R M, RUPPEL S C, et al. Morphology, genesis, and distribution of nanometer-scale pores in siliceous mudstones of the Mississippian Barnett shale[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 2009, 79(12): 848-861. doi: 10.2110/jsr.2009.092
[5]	MONTGOMERY S L, JARVIE D M, BOWKER K A, et al. Mississippian Barnett shale, Fort Worth Basin, north-central Texas: gas-shale play with multi-trillion cubic foot potential[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2005, 89(2): 155-175. doi: 10.1306/09170404042
[6]	MILLIKEN K L, RUDNICKI M, AWWILLER D N, et al. Organic matter-hosted pore system, Marcellus Formation (Devonian), Pennsylvania[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2013, 97(2): 177-200. doi: 10.1306/07231212048
[7]	HAMMES U, HAMLIN H S, EWING T E. Geologic analysis of the Upper Jurassic Haynesville shale in east Texas and west Louisiana[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2011, 95(10): 1643-1666. doi: 10.1306/02141110128
[8]	卢双舫, 黄文彪, 陈方文, 等. 页岩油气资源分级评价标准探讨[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(2): 249-256. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201202018.htm LU Shuangfang, HUANG Wenbiao, CHEN Fangwen, et al. Classification and evaluation criteria of shale oil and gas resources: discussion and application[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(2): 249-256. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201202018.htm
[9]	黄振凯, 陈建平, 薛海涛, 等. 松辽盆地白垩系青山口组泥页岩孔隙结构特征[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2013, 40(1): 58-65. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GJSD202103020.htm HUANG Zhenkai, CHEN Jianping, XUE Haitao, et al. Microstructural characteristics of the Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation shale, Songliao Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Deve-lopment, 2013, 40(1): 58-65. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GJSD202103020.htm
[10]	黄振凯, 陈建平, 王义军, 等. 松辽盆地白垩系青山口组泥岩微观孔隙特征[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34(1): 30-36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4067.2013.01.009 HUANG Zhenkai, CHEN Jianping, WANG Yijun, et al. Characteristics of micropores in mudstones of the Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation, Songliao Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(1): 30-36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4067.2013.01.009
[11]	黄振凯, 陈建平, 王义军, 等. 微米CT在烃源岩微观结构表征方面的应用[J]. 石油实验地质, 2016, 38(3): 418-422. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201603418 HUANG Zhenkai, CHEN Jianping, WANG Yijun, et al. Application of micron CT in the characterization of microstructure in source rocks[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2016, 38(3): 418-422. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201603418
[12]	柳波, 石佳欣, 付晓飞, 等. 陆相泥页岩层系岩相特征与页岩油富集条件: 以松辽盆地古龙凹陷白垩系青山口组一段富有机质泥页岩为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(5): 828-838. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201805009.htm LIU Bo, SHI Jiaxin, FU Xiaofei, et al. Petrological characteristics and shale oil enrichment of lacustrine fine-grained sedimentary system: a case study of organic-rich shale in first member of Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation in Gulong Sag, Songliao Basin, NE China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(5): 828-838. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201805009.htm
[13]	李钜源. 渤海湾盆地东营凹陷古近系泥页岩孔隙特征及孔隙度演化规律[J]. 石油实验地质, 2015, 37(5): 566-574. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201505566 LI Juyuan. Pore characteristics and their evolution in Paleogene mud shales, Dongying Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Experiment, 2015, 37(5): 566-574. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201505566
[14]	张顺, 刘惠民, 王敏, 等. 东营凹陷页岩油储层孔隙演化[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(7): 754-766. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201807003.htm ZHANG Shun, LIU Huimin, WANG Min, et al. Pore evolution of shale oil reservoirs in Dongying Sag[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2018, 39(7): 754-766. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201807003.htm
[15]	LIANG Chao, CAO Yingchang, LIU Keyu, et al. Diagenetic variation at the lamina scale in lacustrine organic-rich shales: implications for hydrocarbon migration and accumulation[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2018, 229: 112-128. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2018.03.017
[16]	孙焕泉. 济阳坳陷页岩油勘探实践与认识[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2017, 22(4): 1-14. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201704001.htm SUN Huanquan. Exploration practice and cognitions of shale oil in Jiyang Depression[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2017, 22(4): 1-14. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201704001.htm
[17]	JIU Kai, DING Wenlong, HUANG Wenhui, et al. Fractures of lacustrine shale reservoirs, the Zhanhua Depression in the Bohai Bay Basin, Eastern China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2013, 48: 113-123. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2013.08.009
[18]	曹茜, 周文, 陈文玲, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部延长组长7段陆相页岩气地层孔隙类型、尺度及成因分析[J]. 矿物岩石, 2015, 35(2): 90-97. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KWYS201502011.htm CAO Qian, ZHOU Wen, CHEN Wenling, et al. Analysis of pore types, sizes and genesis in continental shale gas reservoir of Chang 7 of Yanchang Formation, Odros Basin[J]. Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology, 2015, 35(2): 90-97. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KWYS201502011.htm
[19]	吴松涛, 朱如凯, 崔京钢, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地长7湖相泥页岩孔隙演化特征[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42(2): 167-176. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201502006.htm WU Songtao, ZHU Rukai, CUI Jinggang, et al. Characteristics of lacustrine shale porosity evolution, Triassic Chang 7 Member, Ordos Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Deve-lopment, 2015, 42(2): 167-176. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201502006.htm
[20]	ER Chuang, LI Yangyang, ZHAO Jingzhou, et al. Pore formation and occurrence in the organic-rich shales of the Triassic Chang-7 Member, Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin, China[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 1(6): 435-444.
[21]	黄振凯, 刘全有, 黎茂稳, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地长7段泥页岩层系排烃效率及其含油性[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(3): 513-521. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201803009.htm HUANG Zhenkai, LIU Quanyou, LI Maowen, et al. Hydrocarbon expulsion efficiency and oil-bearing property of the shale system in Chang 7 Member, Ordos Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2018, 39(3): 513-521. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201803009.htm
[22]	黄振凯, 郝运轻, 李双建, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地长7段泥页岩层系含油气性与页岩油可动性评价: 以H317井为例[J]. 中国地质, 2020, 47(1): 210-219. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI202001018.htm HUANG Zhenkai, HAO Yunqing, LI Shuangjian, et al. Oil-bearing potential, mobility evaluation and significance of shale oil in Chang 7 shale system in the Ordos Basin: a case study of well H317[J]. Geology in China, 2020, 47(1): 210-219. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI202001018.htm
[23]	WU Haiguang, HU Wenxuan, CAO Jian, et al. A unique lacustrine mixed dolomitic-clastic sequence for tight oil reservoir within the Middle Permian Lucaogou Formation of the Junggar Basin, NW China: reservoir characteristics and origin[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2016, 76: 115-132.
[24]	WU Haiguang, HU Wenxuan, TANG Yong, et al. The impact of organic fluids on the carbon isotopic compositions of carbonate-rich reservoirs: case study of the Lucaogou Formation in the Jimusaer Sag, Junggar Basin, NW China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2017, 85: 136-150.
[25]	吴世强, 唐小山, 杜小娟, 等. 江汉盆地潜江凹陷陆相页岩油地质特征[J]. 东华理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 36(3): 282-286. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HDDZ201303006.htm WU Shiqiang, TANG Xiaoshan, DU Xiaojuan, et al. Geologic charac-teristics of continental shale oil in the Qianjiang Depression, Jianghan Salt Lake Basin[J]. Journal of East China Institute of Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2013, 36(3): 282-286. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HDDZ201303006.htm
[26]	王芙蓉, 何生, 郑有恒, 等. 江汉盆地潜江凹陷潜江组盐间页岩油储层矿物组成与脆性特征研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2016, 38(2): 211-218. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201602211 WANG Furong, HE Sheng, ZHENG Youheng, et al. Mineral composition and brittleness characteristics of the inter-salt shale oil reservoirs in the Qianjiang Formation, Qianjiang Sag[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2016, 38(2): 211-218. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201602211
[27]	LI Maowen, CHEN Zhuoheng, CAO Tingting, et al. Expelled oils and their impacts on Rock-Eval data interpretation, Eocene Qianjiang Formation in Jianghan Basin, China[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2018, 191: 37-48.
[28]	聂海宽, 马鑫, 余川, 等. 川东下侏罗统自流井组页岩储层特征及勘探潜力评价[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(3): 438-447. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201703003.htm NIE Haikuan, MA Xin, YU Chuan, et al. Shale gas reservoir characteristics and its exploration potential: analysis on the Lower Jurassic shale in the eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geo-logy, 2017, 38(3): 438-447. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201703003.htm
[29]	李志明, 陶国亮, 黎茂稳, 等. 渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷沾化凹陷L69井古近系沙三下亚段取心段页岩油勘探有利层段[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(2): 236-247. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201902004.htm LI Zhiming, TAO Guoliang, LI Maowen, et al. Favorable interval for shale oil prospecting in coring well L69 in the Paleogene Es^3L in Zhanhua Sag, Jiyang Depression, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(2): 236-247. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201902004.htm
[30]	刘惠民, 张顺, 包友书, 等. 东营凹陷页岩油储集地质特征与有效性[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(3): 512-523. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201903008.htm LIU Huimin, ZHANG Shun, BAO Youshu, et al. Geological characte-ristics and effectiveness of the shale oil reservoir in Dongying Sag[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(3): 512-523. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201903008.htm
[31]	宋明水. 济阳坳陷页岩油勘探实践与现状[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2019, 26(1): 1-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201901001.htm SONG Mingshui. Practice and current status of shale oil exploration in Jiyang Depression[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2019, 26(1): 1-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201901001.htm
[32]	聂海宽, 张金川. 页岩气储层类型和特征研究: 以四川盆地及其周缘下古生界为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2011, 33(3): 219-225. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201103219 NIE Haikuan, ZHANG Jinchuan. Types and characteristics of shale gas reservoir: a case study of Lower Paleozoic in and around Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2011, 33(3): 219-225. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201103219
[33]	马勇, 钟宁宁, 程礼军, 等. 渝东南两套富有机质页岩的孔隙结构特征: 来自FIB-SEM的新启示[J]. 石油实验地质, 2015, 37(1): 109-116. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201501109 MA Yong, ZHONG Ningning, CHENG Lijun, et al. Pore structure of two organic-rich shales in southeastern Chongqing area: insight from Focused Ion Beam Scanning Electron Microscope(FIB-SEM)[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2015, 37(1): 109-116. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201501109
[34]	田华, 张水昌, 柳少波, 等. X射线小角散射法研究页岩成熟演化过程中孔隙特征[J]. 石油实验地质, 2016, 38(1): 135-140. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD201601020.htm TIAN Hua, ZHANG Shuichang, LIU Shaobo, et al. Evolution of pores in shale during thermal maturation using Small Angle X-ray Scattering (SAXS)[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2016, 38(1): 135-140. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD201601020.htm
[35]	欧阳思琪, 孙卫, 黄何鑫. 多方法协同表征特低渗砂岩储层全孔径孔隙结构: 以鄂尔多斯盆地合水地区砂岩储层为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2018, 40(4): 595-604. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201804595 OUYANG Siqi, SUN Wei, HUANG Hexin. Multi-method synergistic characterization of total pore structure of extra-low permeability sandstone reservoirs: case study of the Heshui area of Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2018, 40(4): 595-604. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201804595
[36]	郭小文, 何生, 刘可禹, 等. 烃源岩生气增压定量评价模型及影响因素[J]. 地球科学(中国地质大学学报), 2013, 38(6): 1263-1270. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX201306010.htm GUO Xiaowen, HE Sheng, LIU Keyu, et al. A quantitative estimation model for the overpressure caused by natural gas generation and its influential factors[J]. Earth Science (Journal of China University of Geosciences), 2013, 38(6): 1263-1270. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX201306010.htm
[37]	马卫, 王东良, 李志生, 等. 湖相烃源岩生烃增压模拟实验[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34(S1): 65-69. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB2013S1008.htm MA Wei, WANG Dongliang, LI Zhisheng, et al. A simulation experiment of pressurization during hydrocarbon generation from lacustrine source rocks[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(S1): 65-69. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB2013S1008.htm
[38]	赵喆, 钟宁宁, 黄志龙. 碳酸盐岩烃源岩生烃增压规律及其含义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2005, 26(3): 344-348. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT200503015.htm ZHAO Zhe, ZHONG Ningning, HUANG Zhilong. Pattern of pressu-rization from hydrocarbon generation in carbonate source rocks and its significance[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2005, 26(3): 344-348. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT200503015.htm
[39]	BARTH T, BJØRLYKKE K. Organic acids from source rock maturation: generation potentials, transport mechanisms and relevance for mineral diagenesis[J]. Applied Geochemistry, 1993, 8(4): 325-337.
[40]	SEEWALD J S. Organic-inorganic interactions in petroleum-producing sedimentary basins[J]. Nature, 2003, 426(6964): 327-333.
[41]	GILES M R, DE BOER R B. Origin and significance of redistributional secondary porosity[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 1990, 7(4): 378-397.
[42]	SURDAM R C, CROSSEY L J. Organic-inorganic reactions during progressive burial: key to porosity and permeability enhancement and preservation[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1985, 315(1531): 135-156.
[43]	MESHRI I D. On the reactivity of carbonic and organic acids and generation of secondary porosity[C]//AAPG Special Publication of SEPM 38. Tulsa: AAPG, 1986: 123-128.
[44]	MACGOWAN D B, SURDAM R C. Carboxylic acid anions in formation waters, San Joaquin Basin and Louisiana Gulf Coast, USA: implications for clastic diagenesis[J]. Applied Geochemistry, 1990, 5(5/6): 687-701.
[45]	HARRISON W J, THYNEG D. Predictions of diagenetic reactions in the presence of organic acids[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1992, 56(2): 565-586.
[46]	张林晔, 李政, 朱日房, 等. 济阳坳陷古近系存在页岩气资源的可能性[J]. 天然气工业, 2008, 28(12): 26-29. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG200812009.htm ZHANG Linye, LI Zheng, ZHU Rifang, et al. Resource potential of shale gas in Paleogene in Jiyang Depression[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2008, 28(12): 26-29. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG200812009.htm
[47]	张林晔, 包友书, 李钜源, 等. 湖相页岩油可动性: 以渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷东营凹陷为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2014, 41(6): 641-649. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201406001.htm ZHANG Linye, BAO Youshu, LI Juyuan, et al. Movability of lacustrine shale oil: a case study of Dongying Sag, Jiyang Depression, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(6): 641-649. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201406001.htm
[48]	刘庆. 陆相断陷盆地成烃与成藏关系研究: 以东营凹陷为例[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2005. LIU Qing. Research on the relationship between hydrocarbon formation and reservoir formation in continental faulted basins[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2005.