苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系阜宁组二段页岩油形成条件及有利区评价

昝灵; 骆卫峰; 印燕铃; 荆晓明

doi:10.11781/sysydz202102233

苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系阜宁组二段页岩油形成条件及有利区评价

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202102233

中国石化华东油气分公司勘探开发研究院, 南京 210019

基金项目:

国家科技重大专项“溱潼—海安凹陷区页岩油资源潜力与地质评价研究” 2017ZX05049001-004

中国石化科技部项目“东部断陷盆地页岩油目标评价与先导试验” P20049-3

详细信息

作者简介:
昝灵(1984—)，男，博士，高级工程师，从事石油地质综合研究。E-mail: zl442100@163.com

中图分类号: TE122.116
计量
- 文章访问数: 790
- HTML全文浏览量: 220
- PDF下载量: 190
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-04-30
- 修回日期: 2021-02-18
- 刊出日期: 2021-03-28

Formation conditions of shale oil and favorable targets in the second member of Paleogene Funing Formation in Qintong Sag, Subei Basin

Exploration and Development Research Institute, SINOPEC East China Branch Company, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210019, China

摘要

摘要: 通过对苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系阜宁组二段泥页岩段生烃、储集条件及含油性分析，优选了页岩油勘探有利层段；综合岩性、压力、裂缝预测资料，评价出有利区带。溱潼凹陷阜二段有机碳含量大于1.0%的泥页岩厚度为160~260 m，广泛分布；镜质体反射率R_o为0.5%~1.1%，成熟范围广；有机质类型好，有机显微组分以藻类体为主，具备页岩油形成的物质基础。阜二段孔隙度平均为8.9%，储集空间主要为溶孔、黏土矿物和碳酸盐晶间孔，纹层状泥灰岩和粉砂质泥岩微裂缝较发育，裂缝控制了储层渗透性。阜二段③~⑤亚段脆性矿物含量为62%~65%，以石英、方解石和白云石为主，游离烃含量S₁为0.1~2.7 mg/g，平均为0.54 mg/g，为页岩油勘探的最有利层段。溱潼凹陷阜二段页岩油整体评价为Ⅱ类和Ⅲ类，其中时堰和储家楼深凹带是寻找粉砂质泥岩和泥灰岩油藏最有利区，东斜坡是寻找凝灰岩夹层型页岩油藏有利区。
- 页岩油 /
- 形成条件 /
- 裂缝 /
- 阜宁组二段 /
- 古近系 /
- 溱潼凹陷 /
- 苏北盆地
Abstract: The favorable targets of shale oil exploration were optimized based on the analyses of hydrocarbon generation, reservoir conditions and oil content of the shale sections in the second member of Paleogene Funing Formation in the Qintong Sag, Subei Basin. Some favorable zones were predicted according to the properties of lithology, pressure and fractures. The mud shale with an organic carbon content (TOC) greater than 1.0% is widespread in the second member of Funing Formation with the thickness distributed between 160-260 m. The R_o values vary from 0.5% to 1.1%, indicating a wide maturity range. The organic matter type is good, and the organic microscopic maceral is dominated with algae, which provides a substantial potential for generation of shale oil. The average porosity of the second member of Funing Formation is 8.9%. Dissolved pores, clay minerals and carbonate intercrystalline pores act as main reservoir spaces. For the laminar marls and silty mudstones, micro-fractures were well developed, which controlled the permeability of the reservoir. From the third to the fifth section of the second member of Funing Formation, the content of brittle minerals distributed between 62%-65%, mainly composed with quartz, calcite and dolomite. The free hydrocarbon content (S₁) showed a range of 0.1-2.7 mg/g, with an average value of 0.54 mg/g, referring the most favorable layers for shale oil exploration of the sections mentioned above. The shale oil in the second member of Funing Formation in the study area was mainly types Ⅱ and Ⅲ. It has also been indicated that the Shiyan and Chujialou deep depressions are the most favorable areas for silty mudstone and marl reservoirs, while the eastern slope is favorable for tuff mudstone shale reservoirs.
- shale oil /
- hydrocarbon generation condition /
- cracking /
- second member of Funing Formation /
- Paleogene /
- Qintong Sag /
- Subei Basin

HTML全文

图 1 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷阜宁组二段构造单元分布和层序剖面

Figure 1. Structural units in second member of Funing Formation, Qintong Sag, Subei Basin and stratigraphic profile

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷阜宁组二段①—⑤亚段综合柱状图

Figure 2. Comprehensive histogram showing five sections in the second member of Funing Formation, Qintong Sag, Subei Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷阜宁组二段典型泥页岩岩心照片

a.①亚段深灰色块状泥岩；b.②亚段深灰色灰质泥岩；c.③亚段灰黑色纹层状灰质泥岩；d.④~⑤亚段纹层状泥质灰岩

Figure 3. Cores of typical shale in the second member of Funing Formation, Qintong Sag, Subei Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷阜宁组二段泥页岩主要储集空间微观特征

Figure 4. Microscopic characteristics of main reservoir spaces for shale in second member of Funing Formation, Qintong Sag, Subei Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷泥页岩孔隙度随深度变化趋势

Figure 5. Distribution of shale porosity with depth, Qintong Sag, Subei Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷Y201井阜二段泥灰岩孔隙直径分布

Figure 6. Distribution of pore diameters of marl in the second member of Funing Formation, well Yu201, Qintong Sag, Subei Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷MS1井阜二段泥灰岩孔喉半径分布

Figure 7. Distribution of pore throat radius of marl in the second member of Funing Formation, well MS1, Qintong Sag, Subei Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷阜宁组二段烃源岩(S₁+S₂)、S₁与TOC交会图

Figure 8. Cross plots of residual oil S₁+S₂ and free oil(S₁)and TOC in source rocks of the second member of Funing Formation, Qintong Sag, Subei Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷阜宁组二段S₁和OSI随深度变化趋势

Figure 9. Distribution of S₁ and OSI with depth in the second member of Funing Formation, Qintong Sag, Subei Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷阜宁组二段页岩油有利区

Figure 10. Favorable targets for shale oil exploration in the second member of Funing Formation, Qintong Sag, Subei Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷阜宁组二段烃源岩生烃指标

Table 1. Hydrocarbon generation indexes of source rocks in the second member of Funing Formation, Qintong Sag, Subei Basin

层段	腐泥组/%	ω(TOC)/%	(S₁+S₂)/(mg·g^-1)	I_H/(mg·g^-1)
①亚段	(56.5~70.8)/61.6	(1.09~1.98)/1.45	(0.38~9.95)/3.85	(48~547)/287
②亚段	(88.6~96.9)/93.4	(1.56~2.76)/2.17	(3.05~12.12)/8.26	(267~509)/437
③亚段	(65.4~96.9)/85.5	(0.81~3.49)/2.25	(1.25~25.20)/13.98	(185~828)/587
④亚段	(64.0~70.4)/67.2	(1.15~4.91)/2.09	(1.81~41.00)/12.10	(143~822)/488
⑤亚段	(30.8~64.0)/47.5	(0.99~1.04)/1.01	(2.15~3.60)/2.65	(201~313)/259
注：表中数据意义为(最小值~最大值)/平均值。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷阜宁组二段页岩油评价标准

Table 2. Evaluation criteria for shale oil in the second member of Funing Formation, Qintong Sag, Subei Basin

评价指标(权重系数)		页岩油区带分类
评价指标(权重系数)		Ⅰ	Ⅱ	Ⅲ
烃源品质	ω(TOC)＞2.0%的累计厚度/m(0.05)	＞40	30~40	＜30
	成熟度R_o/%(0.1)	＞1.1	0.9~1.1	0.7~0.9
	S₁/(mg·g^-1)(0.1)	＞2.0	2.0~0.5	＜0.5
储层品质	岩相类型(0.1)	粉砂质泥岩、纹层状泥灰岩、凝灰质泥岩	纹层状灰质泥岩或泥灰岩/层状泥灰岩	块状泥岩/灰质泥岩
	孔隙度/%(0.05)	8~12	5~8	＜5
	渗透率/10^-3μm²(0.05)	0.1~1.0	0.01~0.1	＜0.01
	微裂缝、层理缝发育程度(0.1)	异常发育	发育	欠发育
	压力系数(0.15)	＞1.2	1.2~1.0	＜1.0
油藏品质	原油密度/(g·cm^-3)(0.1)	＜0.82	0.82~0.87	0.87~0.92
工程条件	脆性矿物含量/%(0.1)	＞70	60~70	＜60
工程条件	埋深/m(0.1)	＜3 500	3 500~4 000	＞4 000

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(23)

[1]	张金川, 林腊梅, 李玉喜, 等. 页岩油分类与评价[J]. 地学前缘, 2012, 19(5): 322-331. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201205032.htm ZHANG Jinchuan, LIN Lamei, LI Yuxi, et al. Classification and evaluation of shale oil[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2012, 19(5): 322-331. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201205032.htm
[2]	聂海宽, 张培先, 边瑞康, 等. 中国陆相页岩油富集特征[J]. 地学前缘, 2016, 23(2): 55-62. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201602009.htm NIE Haikuan, ZHANG Peixian, BIAN Ruikang, et al. Oil accumulation characteristics of China continental shale[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2016, 23(2): 55-62. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201602009.htm
[3]	孙焕泉, 蔡勋育, 周德华, 等. 中国石化页岩油勘探实践与展望[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(5): 569-575. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201905004.htm SUN Huanquan, CAI Xunyu, ZHOU Dehua, et al. Practice and prospect of Sinopec shale oil exploration[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(5): 569-575. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201905004.htm
[4]	黎茂稳, 金之钧, 董明哲, 等. 陆相页岩形成演化与页岩油富集机理研究进展[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(4): 489-505. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202004489 LI Maowen, JIN Zhijun, DONG Mingzhe, et al. Advances in the basic study of lacustrine shale evolution and shale oil accumulation[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(4): 489-505. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202004489
[5]	蒋启贵, 黎茂稳, 钱门辉, 等. 页岩油探井现场地质评价实验流程与技术进展[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(3): 571-582. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201903013.htm JIANG Qigui, LI Maowen, QIAN Menhui, et al. Experimental procedures of well-site geological evaluation for shale oil and related technological progress[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(3): 571-582. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201903013.htm
[6]	蒋启贵, 黎茂稳, 钱门辉, 等. 不同赋存状态页岩油定量表征技术与应用研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2016, 38(6): 842-849. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201606842 JIANG Qigui, LI Maowen, QIAN Menhui, et al. Quantitative characterization of shale oil in different occurrence states and its application[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2016, 38(6): 842-849. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201606842
[7]	宋明水. 济阳坳陷页岩油勘探实践与现状[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2019, 26(1): 1-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201901001.htm SONG Mingshui. Practice and current status of shale oil exploration in Jiyang Depression[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2019, 26(1): 1-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201901001.htm
[8]	吴宝成, 李建民, 邬元月, 等. 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组页岩油上甜点地质工程一体化开发实践[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(5): 679-690. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201905015.htm WU Baocheng, LI Jianmin, WU Yuanyue, et al. Development practices of geology-engineering integration on upper sweet spots of Lucaogou Formation shale oil in Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(5): 679-690. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201905015.htm
[9]	霍进, 何吉祥, 高阳, 等. 吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组页岩油开发难点及对策[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2019, 40(4): 379-388. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD201904001.htm HUO Jin, HE Jixiang, GAO Yang, et al. Difficulties and countermeasures of shale oil development in Lucaogou formation of Jimsar sag[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2019, 40(4): 379-388. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD201904001.htm
[10]	刘世丽, 段宏亮, 章亚, 等. 苏北盆地阜二段陆相页岩油气勘探潜力分析[J]. 海洋石油, 2014, 34(3): 27-33. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HYSY201403007.htm LIU Shili, DUAN Hongliang, ZHANG Ya, et al. Analysis of oil and gas exploration potential in F2 member continental shale of Subei Basin[J]. Offshore Oil, 2014, 34(3): 27-33. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HYSY201403007.htm
[11]	陆黄生, 秦黎明, 刘军, 等. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷油气运聚模式[J]. 地质论评, 2009, 55(3): 395-405. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP200903014.htm LU Huangsheng, QIN Liming, LIU Jun, et al. Petroleum migration and accumulation in Qintong Sag, North Jiangsu Basin[J]. Geological Review, 2009, 55(3): 395-405. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP200903014.htm
[12]	程海生, 刘世丽, 段宏亮. 苏北盆地阜宁组泥页岩储层特征[J]. 复杂油气藏, 2015, 8(3): 10-16. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FZYQ201503003.htm CHENG Haisheng, LIU Shili, DUAN Hongliang. Shale reservoir characteristics of Funing Formation in Subei Basin[J]. Complex Hydrocarbon Reservoirs, 2015, 8(3): 10-16. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FZYQ201503003.htm
[13]	段宏亮, 刘世丽, 付茜. 苏北盆地古近系阜宁组二段富有机质页岩特征与沉积环境[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(4): 612-617. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202004612 DUAN Hongliang, LIU Shili, FU Qian. Characteristics and sedimentary environment of organic-rich shale in the second member of Paleogene Funing Formation, Subei Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(4): 612-617. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202004612
[14]	王海方. 苏北盆地古近系页岩油储层有效裂缝识别[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 38(3): 21-27. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNSY201603003.htm WANG Haifang. Recognition of effective fractures within the oil shale in the fourth member of Funing Formation in Northern Jiangsu Basin[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2016, 38(3): 21-27. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNSY201603003.htm
[15]	马存飞, 董春梅, 栾国强, 等. 苏北盆地古近系泥页岩有机质孔发育特征及影响因素[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 41(3): 1-13. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYDX201703001.htm MA Cunfei, DONG Chunmei, LUAN Guoqiang, et al. Characteristics and influencing factors of organic-matter pores in Paleogene shale, Subei Basin[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2017, 41(3): 1-13. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYDX201703001.htm
[16]	闫建平, 温丹妮, 司马立强, 等. 基于测井和录井信息相结合的泥页岩储层识别方法以苏北盆地高邮凹陷阜宁组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(4): 89-95. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YANX201504017.htm YAN Jianping, WEN Danni, SIMA Liqiang, et al. Identification method of shale reservoir based on well logging and log information[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2015, 27(4): 89-95. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YANX201504017.htm
[17]	昝灵. 苏北盆地金湖凹陷北港次洼古近系阜宁组二段页岩油富集特征及主控因素[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(4): 618-624. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202004618 ZAN Ling. Enrichment characteristics and main controlling factors of shale oil reservoir in the second member of Paleogene Funing Formation, Beigang Subsag, Jinhu Sag, Subei Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(4): 618-624. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202004618
[18]	昝灵, 骆卫峰, 马晓东. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷阜二段烃源岩生烃潜力及形成环境[J]. 非常规油气, 2016, 3(3): 1-8. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FCYQ201603001.htm ZAN Ling, LUO Weifeng, MA Xiaodong. Hydrocarbon generation potential and genetic environments of second member of Funing Formation in Qintong Sag, Subei Basin[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2016, 3(3): 1-8. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FCYQ201603001.htm
[19]	付茜, 刘启东, 刘世丽, 等. 苏北盆地高邮凹陷古近系阜宁组二段页岩油成藏条件分析[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(4): 625-631. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202004625 FU Qian, LIU Qidong, LIU Shili, et al. Shale oil accumulation conditions in the second member of Paleogene Funing Formation, Gaoyou Sag, Subei Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(4): 625-631. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202004625
[20]	孙伟. 溱潼凹陷西斜坡阜三段储层测井解释方法及应用初探[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2020, 10(3): 121-125. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202003019.htm SUN Wei. Log interpretation method and application for 3rd member of Funing Formation in west slope of Qintong sag[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(3): 121-125. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202003019.htm
[21]	王超, 陆永潮, 杜学斌, 等. 油页岩岩性非均质性特征及地球物理精细刻画以苏北盆地溱潼凹陷阜宁组二段为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2015, 36(5): 814-821. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201505015.htm WANG Chao, LU Yongchao, DU Xuebin, et al. Characteristics and geophysical prediction of lithology heterogeneity of oil shale: taking the 2^nd Member of Funing Formation of Qintong Sag, Subei Basin, as an example[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2015, 36(5): 814-821. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201505015.htm
[22]	王民, 石蕾, 王文广, 等. 中美页岩油、致密油发育的地球化学特征对比[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(3): 67-73. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YANX201403013.htm WANG Min, SHI Lei, WANG Wenguang, et al. Comparative study on geochemical characteristics of shale oil between China and U.S. A[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2014, 26(3): 67-73. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YANX201403013.htm
[23]	李志明, 陶国亮, 黎茂稳, 等. 渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷沾化凹陷L69井古近系沙三下亚段取心段页岩油勘探有利层段[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(2): 236-247. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201902004.htm LI Zhiming, TAO Guoliang, LI Maowen, et al. Favorable interval for shale oil prospecting in coring well L69 in the Paleogene Es^3L in Zhanhua Sag, Jiyang Depression, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(2): 236-247. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201902004.htm