川北—川东地区中二叠世晚期地层划分新认识及地质意义

姚倩颖; 刘一锋; 江青春; 郝毅; 李景瑞; 吕学菊; 苏旺; 付小东

doi:10.11781/sysydz202102276

川北—川东地区中二叠世晚期地层划分新认识及地质意义

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202102276

1.
中国石油杭州地质研究院, 杭州 310023
2.
浙江大学, 杭州 310012
3.
中国石油勘探开发研究院, 北京 100083
4.
中国地质科学院岩溶地质研究所, 广西桂林 541004

基金项目:

“十三五”国家油气专项 2017ZX05008005

中国石油天然气股份有限公司重点科技项目 2018A-0105

中国石油天然气股份有限公司项目 KT2018-01-02

详细信息

作者简介:
姚倩颖(1988—)，女，硕士，工程师，从事碳酸盐岩沉积储层研究。E-mail：yaoqy_hz@petrochina.com.cn

通讯作者:
刘一锋(1987—)，男，博士，副教授，从事含油气盆地分析研究。E-mail：liuyf1103@zju.edu.cn

中图分类号: TE121.3
计量
- 文章访问数: 609
- HTML全文浏览量: 157
- PDF下载量: 155
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-09-14
- 修回日期: 2020-12-17
- 刊出日期: 2021-03-28

Geological significance of late Mid-Permian stratigraphy in northern and eastern Sichuan Basin, SW China

1.
PetroChina Hangzhou Research Institute of Geology, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310023, China
2.
Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310012, China
3.
Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, PetroChina, Beijing 100083, China
4.
Institute of Karst Geology, CAGS, Guilin, Guangxi 541004, China

摘要

摘要: 四川盆地中二叠统茅口组具有良好的勘探前景，但目前对川北—川东地区茅口晚期地层划分及相关地质认识存在不足。基于120口井的测井资料分析，并结合3条野外剖面的实测情况，重新识别了川北—川东地区茅口组与吴家坪组界面，进一步明确了茅口晚期沉积格局。取得以下3点认识：（1）自然伽马能谱测井可以有效识别茅口组上部硅质沉积物和吴家坪组底部泥页岩，依据新的地层划分方案，茅口组LHST2段（茅二a亚段—茅三段）尖灭线向东大幅推移至开县附近。（2）构造沉降控制了茅口晚期地层向东减薄和沉积演化。（3）茅口晚期沉积相由碳酸盐岩均斜缓坡相逐渐变为远端变陡缓坡相，最终演化为弱镶边台地相；远端变陡缓坡相控制了茅口组白云岩和硅质沉积物形成，弱镶边台地相控制了茅口组川北台缘带形成。
- 自然伽马能谱测井 /
- 硅质沉积物 /
- 构造沉降 /
- 沉积演化 /
- 吴家坪组 /
- 茅口组 /
- 川北—川东地区
Abstract: The Mid-Permian Maokou Formation in the Sichuan Basin shows good petroleum prospectivity. However, knowledge of the stratigraphy in the northern and eastern Sichuan Basin during the late Maokou period are still unclear. The interface between the Maokou and Wujiaping formations was re-identified, and the sedimentary pattern in the study area during the late Maokou period was clarified based on the logging data from 120 wells combined with the measured data of three field profiles. The results suggest the following. (1) Natural gamma-ray spectral logging can effectively identify the siliceous sediments at the top of Maokou Formation and the mud shale at the bottom of Wujiaping Formation. According to a new stratigraphic division, the erosional edge on LHST2 section of Maokou Formation moved eastward to the Kaixian area. (2) Tectonic subsidence controlled the eastward thinning and the sedimentary evolution in the late Maokou period. (3) The sedimentary evolution in the late Maokou period was from the homoclinal carbonate ramp facies to the distal steepening ramp facies, and then to the weak rimmed platform facies. Distal steepening ramp facies controlled the formation of dolomite and siliceous sediments, while the weak rimmed platform facies controlled the formation of the platform margin.
- natural gamma-ray spectral logging /
- siliceous sediment /
- tectonic subsidence /
- sedimentary evolution /
- Wujiaping Formation /
- Maokou Formation /
- northern and eastern Sichuan Basin

HTML全文

图 1 四川盆地中二叠统层序地层综合柱状图

据文献[14]修改。

Figure 1. Stratigraphic column of Middle Permian in Sichuan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 川北—川东地区构造分区及资料点分布

据文献[18]修改。

Figure 2. Structural zoning and data point distribution in northern and eastern Sichuan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 川北广元地区西北乡剖面茅口组地层柱状图

Figure 3. Stratigraphy of Maokou Formation in Xibeixiang section, Guangyuan area, northern Sichuan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 川北广元地区茅口组顶部与吴家坪组底部地层露头及镜下特征照片

a.西北乡剖面，茅口组—吴家坪组界面；b.XBX-P1样品点，单偏光，泥晶生屑灰岩；c.XBX-P3样品点，单偏光，硅质岩，可见放射虫形骸、海绵骨针和有孔虫；d.XBX-P5样品点，单偏光，硅质岩，可见放射虫和有孔虫；e.XBX-P7样品点，单偏光，泥页岩，纹层发育；f.XBX-P9样品点，单偏光，生屑灰岩，生物发育；g.XBX-P2样品点，黑色硅质岩；h.葛底坝剖面，茅口组—吴家坪组界面；i.屋基坪剖面，茅口组—吴家坪组界面

Figure 4. Outcrops and microscopic characteristics of strata at the top of Maokou Formation and the bottom of Wujiaping Formation, Guangyuan area, northern Sichuan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 川北—川东地区茅口组LHST2段旧地层划分方案

Figure 5. Old stratigraphic division of Maokou Formation LHST2 in northern and eastern Sichuan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 川北—川东地区吴家坪组底部地层测井响应特征

a.LT2井岩心照片，5 977.27 m，单偏光，沉凝灰岩；b.LT2井岩屑照片，6 018 m，正交光，凝灰质泥岩；c.LT2井岩屑照片，6 020 m，单偏光，碳质泥岩

Figure 6. Logging response characteristics of strata at the bottom of Wujiaping Formation in northern and eastern Sichuan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 川北—川东地区茅口组LHST2段新地层划分方案

a.茅口组LHST2段灰岩低GR段；b.茅口组LHST2段硅质沉积物高GR段；c.吴家坪组泥页岩高GR段

Figure 7. New stratigraphic division of Maokou Formation LHST2 in northern and eastern Sichuan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 川北—川东地区茅口组LHST2段3类测井相平面展布特征

Figure 8. Plane distribution of three logging facies of Maokou Formation LHST2 in northern and eastern Sichuan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 四川盆地开江古隆起周缘茅口组—吴家坪组地层对比

剖面位置见图 8。

Figure 9. Stratigraphic correlation of Maokou-Wujiaping formations around Kaijiang Paleouplift, Sichuan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 川北—川东地区茅口组LHST2段层序地层对比

剖面位置见图 8。

Figure 10. Sequence stratigraphic correlation of Maokou Formation LHST2 in northern and eastern Sichuan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 川北—川东地区茅口组LHST2段单因素叠合图

Figure 11. Single factor overlap diagram of Maokou Formation LHST2 in northern and eastern Sichuan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 川北—川东地区茅口组硅质岩与吴家坪组泥页岩自然伽马能谱测井数据

Table 1. Statistics of natural spectral gamma logging of Maokou Formation siliceous rocks and Wujiaping Formation mud shale in northern and eastern Sichuan Basin

井名	深度/m	地层	岩性	GR/API	U/10^-6	Th/10^-6	井名	深度/m	地层	岩性	GR/API	U/10^-6	Th/10^-6
NC1	4 978~5 006	吴家坪组	泥页岩	99.2	4.3	13.7			茅口组	硅质沉积物
YB3	7 128~7 142			123.0	4.7	19.9	YB3	7 178~7 211			117.1	13.4	1.8
TD23	4 733~4 740			114.7	3.7	13.1	TD23	4 740~4 748			192.0	15.5	1.7
TL2	5 500~5 516			108.1	4.9	11.8	TL2	5 579~5 585			102.9	10.0	2.2
JJ1	4 292~4 306			120.9	4.4	18.2	JJ1	4 369~4 372			118.0	13.9	3.1
L8	4 864~4 873			99.5	1.7	9.1	L8	4 957~4 963			84.3	10.6	1.9
PX1	3 756~3 769			92.2	2.9	13.7	PX1	3 769~3 791			157.0	14.5	5.7
HL5	4 878~4 891			104.5	2.8	9.8	HL5	4 891~4 899			129.1	14.1	3.1
MX3	4 779~4 785			100.2	3.2	14.2	MX3	4 785~4 788			115.1	9.6	0.9
TD26	4 314~4 332			120.5	2.6	12.4	TD26	4 385~4 399			96.8	10.4	3.0
CZ1	5 181~5 189			165.3	6.6	19.1	CZ1	5 189~5 192			198.7	20.1	4.9
LT2	6 016~6 021			164.0	7.2	13.7	LT2	6 021~6 037			142.9	13.6	4.8
平均值				117.7	4.1	14.1	平均值				132.2	13.2	3.0

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 高GR段Th/U比值统计

Table 2. Th/U ratios of high GR section

井名	深度/m	地层	岩性	Th/U	沉积环境
NC1	4 978~5 006	吴家坪组	泥页岩	2.0~6.8/3.8	还原—氧化过渡环境
YB3	7 128~7 142	吴家坪组	泥页岩	3.1~19.5/5.5	还原—氧化过渡环境
PX1	3 756~3 769	吴家坪组	泥页岩	2.0~16.7/5.7	还原—氧化过渡环境
TD23	4 733~4 740	吴家坪组	泥页岩	2.1~10.4/4.7	还原—氧化过渡环境
YB3	7 178~7 211	茅口组	硅质沉积物	0.02~0.3/0.1	还原环境
PX1	3 769~3 791	茅口组	硅质沉积物	0.03~1.5/0.4	还原环境
TD23	4 740~4 748	茅口组	硅质沉积物	0.04~0.7/0.1	还原环境
注：表中算式含义为：最小值~最大值/平均值。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(34)

[1]	钟原, 杨跃明, 文龙, 等. 四川盆地西北部中二叠统茅口组岩相古地理、古岩溶地貌恢复及其油气地质意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2021, 48(1): 81-93. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202101009.htm ZHONG Yuan, YANG Yueming, WEN Long, et al. Reconstruction and petroleum geological significance of lithofacies paleogeography and palaeokarst geomorphology of the Middle Permian Maokou Formation in northwestern Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(1): 81-93. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202101009.htm
[2]	胡东风. 四川盆地元坝地区茅口组台缘浅滩天然气勘探的突破与启示[J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39(3): 1-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201903001.htm HU Dongfeng. Breakthrough in natural gas exploration in the platform margin shoal at the Maokou Fm in the Yuanba area, Sichuan Basin, and its implications[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(3): 1-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201903001.htm
[3]	汪泽成, 江青春, 黄士鹏, 等. 四川盆地中二叠统茅口组天然气大面积成藏的地质条件[J]. 天然气工业, 2018, 38(1): 30-38. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201801007.htm WANG Zecheng, JIANG Qingchun, HUANG Shipeng, et al. Geological conditions for massive accumulation of natural gas in the Mid-Permian Maokou Fm of the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2018, 38(1): 30-38. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201801007.htm
[4]	江青春, 胡素云, 姜华, 等. 四川盆地中二叠统茅口组地层缺失量计算及成因探讨[J]. 天然气工业, 2018, 38(1): 21-29. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201801006.htm JIANG Qingchun, HU Suyun, JIANG Hua, et al. Calculation and inducement of lacuna in the Mid-Permian Maokou Fm of the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2018, 38(1): 21-29. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201801006.htm
[5]	汪华, 沈浩, 黄东, 等. 四川盆地中二叠统热水白云岩成因及其分布[J]. 天然气工业, 2014, 34(9): 25-32. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201409006.htm WANG Hua, SHEN Hao, HUANG Dong, et al. Origin and distribution of hydrothermal dolomites of the Middle Permian in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2014, 34(9): 25-32. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201409006.htm
[6]	田景春, 林小兵, 郭维, 等. 四川盆地二叠纪玄武岩喷发事件的油气地质意义[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 44(1): 14-20. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CDLG201701003.htm TIAN Jingchun, LIN Xiaobing, GUO Wei, et al. Geological significance of oil and gas in the Permian basalt eruption event in Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition), 2017, 44(1): 14-20. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CDLG201701003.htm
[7]	胡朝伟, 胡广, 张玺华, 等. 川西北地区茅口组上部黑色岩系的层位、沉积环境及生烃潜力评价[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(2): 202-214. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202002202 HU Chaowei, HU Guang, ZHANG Xihua, et al. Sedimentary environment, hydrocarbon potential and development of black rocks in upper Maokou Formation, northwestern Sichuan[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(2): 202-214. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202002202
[8]	曾臻, 屈大鹏, 李文成, 等. 涪陵地区茅口组热液白云岩储层预测研究[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2019, 33(6): 38-42. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYHN201906010.htm ZENG Zhen, QU Dapeng, LI Wencheng, et al. Prediction of hydrothermal dolomite reservoirs in Maokou Formation in Fuling area[J]. Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 2019, 33(6): 38-42. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYHN201906010.htm
[9]	徐敏, 陆林超, 段杰, 等. 川中—川东地区下二叠统茅口组二段白云岩发育规律研究[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2018, 32(4): 23-27. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYHN201804006.htm XU Min, LU Linchao, DUAN Jie, et al. Dolomite development of Lower Permian Maokou Formation in middle and eastern Sichuan[J]. Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 2018, 32(4): 23-27. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYHN201804006.htm
[10]	杨玉卿, 冯增昭. 华南下二叠统层状硅岩的形成及意义[J]. 岩石学报, 1997, 13(1): 111-120. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB701.009.htm YANG Yuqing, FENG Zengzhao. Formation and significance of the bedded siliceous rocks of the Lower Permian in South China[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 1977, 13(1): 111-120. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB701.009.htm
[11]	邱威挺, 古鸿信. 试论川东北地区下二叠统孤峰组燧石(硅质岩)的沉积环境[J]. 岩相古地理, 1991, (6): 1-8. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TTSD199106000.htm QIU Weiting, GU Hongxin. Sedimentary environments of the chert (siliceous rocks) from the Lower Permian Gufeng Formation in northeastern Sichuan[J]. Sedimentary Facies and Palaeogeo-graphy, 1991, (6): 1-8. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TTSD199106000.htm
[12]	高平, 李双建, 何治亮, 等. 四川盆地广元—梁平古裂陷构造—沉积演化[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(4): 784-799. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202004013.htm GAO Ping, LI Shuangjian, HE Zhiliang, et al. Tectonic-sedimentary evolution of Guangyuan-Liangping paleo-rift in Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(4): 784-799. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202004013.htm
[13]	张玺华, 陈聪, 黄婕, 等. 四川盆地中二叠世广元—巴中拉张槽的发现及其油气地质意义[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(4): 466-475. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201904007.htm ZHANG Xihua, CHEN Cong, HUANG Jie, et al. The discovery of Middle Permian Guangyuan-Bazhong extensional trough in the Sichuan Basin and its petroleum geological significance[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(4): 466-475. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201904007.htm
[14]	周进高, 姚根顺, 杨光, 等. 四川盆地栖霞组—茅口组岩相古地理与天然气有利勘探区带[J]. 天然气工业, 2016, 36(4): 8-15. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201604004.htm ZHOU Jingao, YAO Genshun, YANG Guang, et al. Lithofacies palaeogeography and favorable gas exploration zones of Qixia and Maokou Fms in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2016, 36(4): 8-15. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201604004.htm
[15]	黄士鹏, 江青春, 冯庆付, 等. 川南地区中二叠统茅口组岩溶储集层类型与分布规律[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(2): 281-289. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201902011.htm HUANG Shipeng, JIANG Qingchun, FENG Qingfu, et al. Type and distribution of Mid-Permian Maokou Formation karst reservoirs in southern Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(2): 281-289. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201902011.htm
[16]	李旭兵, 曾雄伟, 王传尚, 等. 东吴运动的沉积学响应—以湘鄂西及邻区二叠系茅口组顶部不整合面为例[J]. 地层学杂志, 2011, 35(3): 299-304. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DCXZ201103011.htm LI Xubing, ZENG Xiongwei, WANG Chuanshang, et al. Sedimentary response to the Dongwu Movement: a case of the unconformity on top of the Permian Maokou Formation in the western Hubei-Hunan and neighboring areas[J]. Journal of Stratigraphy, 2011, 35(3): 299-304. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DCXZ201103011.htm
[17]	杨巍, 张廷山, 刘治成, 等. 地幔柱构造的沉积及环境响应: 以峨眉地幔柱为例[J]. 岩石学报, 2014, 30(3): 835-850. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201403022.htm YANG Wei, ZHANG TingShan, LIU ZhiCheng, et al. Sedimentary and environmental responses to mantle plume: a case study of Emeishan mantle plume[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2014, 30(3): 835-850. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201403022.htm
[18]	LIU Yifeng, QIU Nansheng, XIE Zeng, et al. Overpressure compartments in the central paleo-uplift, Sichuan Basin, southwest China[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2016, 100(5): 867-888.
[19]	郭俊锋, 宋祖晨, 肖良, 等. 陕西汉中梁山二叠系乐平统底部吴家坪组王坡页岩新认识[J]. 地质论评, 2017, 63(5): 1169-1179. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP201705005.htm GUO Junfeng, SONG Zuchen, XIAO Liang, et al. New petrographic and mineralogical analyses of the Wangpo shale, Wujiaping Formation (Basal Lopingian, Permian) in the Liangshan area of Shaanxi[J]. Geological Review, 2017, 63(5): 1169-1179. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP201705005.htm
[20]	曾琪, 田云英, 郑超, 等. 川西北部上二叠统吴家坪组沉凝灰岩分布及地质意义[J]. 天然气技术与经济, 2020, 14(3): 20-26. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRJJ202003007.htm ZENG Qi, TIAN Yunying, ZHENG Chao, et al. Distribution of sedimentary tuff in Wujiaping Formation, northwestern Sichuan Basin and its geological significance[J]. Natural Gas Technology and Economy, 2020, 14(3): 20-26. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRJJ202003007.htm
[21]	张本健, 王宇峰, 裴森奇, 等. 川西北地区上二叠统吴家坪组沉积演化[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(12): 1709-1720. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201912005.htm ZHANG Benjian, WANG Yufeng, PEI Senqi, et al. Sedimentary evolution of the Upper Permian Wujiaping Formation in the northwestern Sichuan[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2019, 30(12): 1709-1720. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201912005.htm
[22]	赵培荣, 高波, 郭战峰, 等. 四川盆地上二叠统海陆过渡相和深水陆棚相页岩气的勘探潜力[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(3): 335-344. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202003335 ZHAO Peirong, GAO Bo, GUO Zhanfeng, et al. Exploration potential of marine-continental transitional and deep-water shelf shale gas in Upper Permian, Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(3): 335-344. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202003335
[23]	马新华, 李国辉, 应丹琳, 等. 四川盆地二叠系火成岩分布及含气性[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(2): 216-225. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201902004.htm MA Xinhua, LI Guohui, YING Danlin, et al. Distribution and gas-bearing properties of Permian igneous rocks in Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(2): 216-225. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201902004.htm
[24]	朱国华, 张杰, 姚根顺, 等. 沉火山尘凝灰岩: 一种赋存油气资源的重要岩类——以新疆北部中二叠统芦草沟组为例[J]. 海相油气地质, 2014, 19(1): 1-7. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HXYQ201401005.htm ZHU Guohua, ZHANG Jie, YAO Genshun, et al. Sedimentary volcanic dust tuff, an important kind of rock storing hydrocarbon resources: disscusion on the lithology of Middle Permian Lucaogou oil-bearing rocks in the north of Xinjiang[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2014, 19(1): 1-7. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HXYQ201401005.htm
[25]	吴煜宇, 赖强, 谢冰, 等. 四川盆地永探1井二叠系火山岩测井岩性识别[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2019, 42(1): 21-27. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRKT201901008.htm WU Yuyu, LAI Qiang, XIE Bing, et al. Logging-based lithologic identifying Permian volcanic rocks of Yongtan 1 well, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2019, 42(1): 21-27. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRKT201901008.htm
[26]	张儒. 自然伽马能谱测井在神木双山区块的地质应用[J]. 国外测井技术, 2018, 39(2): 44-48. ZHANG Ru. Geological application of natural gamma ray spectrometry logging in Shenmu Shuangshan block[J]. World Well Logging Technology, 2018, 39(2): 44-48.
[27]	杨跃明, 文龙, 罗冰, 等. 四川盆地达州—开江古隆起沉积构造演化及油气成藏条件分析[J]. 天然气工业, 2016, 36(8): 1-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201608002.htm YANG Yueming, WEN Long, LUO Bing, et al. Sedimentary tectonic evolution and reservoir-forming conditions of the Dazhou-Kaijiang paleo-uplift, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2016, 36(8): 1-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201608002.htm
[28]	郭春杰, 王迪, 王保军. 自然伽马能谱测井在沉积学中的应用研究[J]. 国外测井技术, 2013, 34(1): 34-36. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZZMT202201006.htm GUO Chunjie, WANG Di, WANG Baojun. Application of natural gamma ray spectrometry logging in sedimentology[J]. World Well Logging Technology, 2013, 34(1): 34-36. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZZMT202201006.htm
[29]	MURCHEY B L, JONES D L. A mid-Permian chert event: widespread deposition of biogenic siliceous sediments in coastal, island arc and oceanic basins[J]. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 1992, 96(1/2): 161-174.
[30]	BEAUCHAMP B, BAUD A. Growth and demise of Permian biogenic chert along northwest Pangea: evidence for end-Permian collapse of thermohaline circulation[J]. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 2002, 184(1/2): 37-63.
[31]	江青春, 胡素云, 汪泽成, 等. 四川盆地茅口组风化壳岩溶古地貌及勘探选区[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(6): 949-960. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201206006.htm JIANG Qingchun, HU Suyun, WANG Zecheng, et al. Paleokarst landform of the weathering crust of Middle Permian Maokou Formation in Sichuan Basin and selection of exploration regions[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(6): 949-960. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201206006.htm
[32]	胡修权, 施泽进, 田亚铭, 等. 川东南地区茅口组岩溶古地貌恢复及特征[J]. 地质通报, 2014, 33(6): 874-882. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD201406010.htm HU Xiuquan, SHI Zejin, TIAN Yaming, et al. The restoration of karst ancient landform of the Maokou Formation in southeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2014, 33(6): 874-882. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD201406010.htm
[33]	胡东风, 王良军, 黄仁春, 等. 四川盆地东部地区中二叠统茅口组白云岩储层特征及其主控因素[J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39(6): 13-21. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201906003.htm HU Dongfeng, WANG Liangjun, HUANG Renchun, et al. Characte-ristics and main controlling factors of the Middle Permian Maokou dolomite reservoirs in the eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(6): 13-21. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201906003.htm
[34]	周进高, 郝毅, 邓红婴, 等. 四川盆地中西部栖霞组—茅口组孔洞型白云岩储层成因与分布[J]. 海相油气地质, 2019, 24(4): 67-78. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HXYQ201904007.htm ZHOU Jingao, HAO Yi, DENG Hongying, et al. Genesis and distribution of vuggy dolomite reservoirs of the Lower Permian Qixia Formation and Maokou Formation, western-central Sichuan Basin[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2019, 24(4): 67-78. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HXYQ201904007.htm