准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组页岩油储层孔隙结构、烃类赋存及其与可动性关系

王剑; 周路; 靳军; 刘金; 陈俊; 蒋欢; 张宝真

doi:10.11781/sysydz202106941

准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组页岩油储层孔隙结构、烃类赋存及其与可动性关系

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202106941

王剑^{1, 2, 3,},
周路^1, ,,
靳军^{2, 3},
刘金^{2, 3},
陈俊^{2, 3},
蒋欢^{2, 3},
张宝真⁴

1.
西南石油大学油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室, 成都 610500
2.
中国石油新疆油田分公司实验检测研究院, 新疆克拉玛依 834000
3.
新疆页岩油勘探开发实验室, 新疆克拉玛依 834000
4.
中国石油新疆油田分公司风城作业区, 新疆克拉玛依 834000

基金项目:

国家科技重大专项 2017ZX05008-004-008

新疆维吾尔自治区重点实验室开放课题 2017D04023

详细信息

作者简介:
王剑(1984-), 男, 硕士, 高级工程师, 从事沉积学与储层地质学研究。E-mail: wangjian_2605@126.com

通讯作者:
周路(1962-), 男, 博士, 教授, 从事地震岩性及储层预测方面的科研与教学工作。E-mail: zhoulu9@126.com

中图分类号: TE311
计量
- 文章访问数: 750
- HTML全文浏览量: 240
- PDF下载量: 99
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-04-29
- 修回日期: 2021-09-30
- 刊出日期: 2021-11-28

Pore structure, hydrocarbon occurrence and their relationship with shale oil production in Lucaogou Formation of Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin

WANG Jian^{1, 2, 3
,},
ZHOU Lu^{1
, ,},
JIN Jun^{2, 3},
LIU Jin^{2, 3},
CHEN Jun^{2, 3},
JIANG Huan^{2, 3},
ZHANG Baozhen⁴

1.
State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China
2.
Research Institute of Experiment and Detection, Xinjiang Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Karamay, Xinjiang 834000, China
3.
Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Shale Oil Exploration and Development, Karamay, Xinjiang 834000, China
4.
Fengcheng Oilfield Operation Area, Xinjiang Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Karamay, Xinjiang 834000, China

摘要

摘要: 为研究页岩油可动性与储层孔隙和含油性的关系，采用场发射扫描电镜、激光共聚焦显微镜、纳米CT、高压压汞法与氮气吸附联合分析、核磁共振分析、分子模拟分析等实验技术，对准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组页岩油储层孔隙全尺度分布特征、烃类赋存特征进行了定量分析。该页岩油储层各类岩性孔隙分布存在较大差异性，优势岩性为砂屑云岩、长石岩屑粉细砂岩和云质粉砂岩，其中长石岩屑粉细砂岩最好，大于300 nm孔隙占比74.1%，主体以粒间（溶）孔、粒内溶孔为主。微纳米尺度流体赋存具有较大的分异性。重质组分在半径300 nm以上孔隙中呈薄膜状附着于矿物、孔隙表面，300 nm以下呈充填状；中质组分赋存于300 nm以上孔隙中央；水含量较少，赋存于300 nm以上孔隙中央，被中质组分包裹。芦草沟组页岩油孔喉动用下限为50 nm；300 nm以上孔喉中烃类易动用，是当前产能主要贡献体系，采出原油为300 nm以上“大孔”中的中质油；50~300 nm孔喉较难动用，是提高采收率的关键。负压和升温可有效提升纳米孔中烃类的可动性。
- 孔隙结构 /
- 赋存特征 /
- 可动性 /
- 页岩油 /
- 芦草沟组 /
- 二叠系 /
- 吉木萨尔凹陷 /
- 准噶尔盆地
Abstract: In order to study the relationship between shale oil production and reservoir porosity or the oil content, experimental approaches including FE-SEM, LSCM, nano CT, high pressure mercury injection and nitrogen adsorption combined analysis, NMR analysis and molecular simulation were used to quantitatively analyze the full-scale distribution and occurrence characteristics of shale oil in Permian Lucaogou Formation of the Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin. There are significant differences in the pore-size distribution of various lithologies in shale oil reservoir of the Jimsar Sag. The dominant lithology are arenaceous dolomite, feldspar lithic siltstone and dolomitic siltstone, and the best one is feldspar lithic fine sand rock, with pores larger than 300 nm accounting for 74.1%, and the main body is intergranular (dissolved) pores and intergranular dissolved pores. Fluid occurs with large heterogeneous in micro-nano scale. Heavy components with fluorescence wavelength between 600 and 800 nm attached to mineral pore surface as thin film in pores with a radius above 300 nm, and filled in pores with a radius below 300 nm. The medium components with fluorescence wavelength between 490 and 600 nm occur in the center of pores above 300 nm. The water content is low, and occurs in the center of the pores above 300 nm wrapped by the medium component. The lower limit of pore throat production of shale oil in the Lucaogou Formation is 50 nm. Above 300 nm, the hydrocarbon in pore throat is easy to be produced and is the main contribution system of current productivity. The recovered crude oil with medium density is mainly from large pore above 300 nm. Pore-throats distributed between 50 to 300 nm are difficult for the shale oil producing, which is the key to enhance oil recovery. Negative pressure and temperature rise can effectively improve the mobility of hydrocarbons in nano-scale pores.
- pore structure /
- characteristics of hydrocarbon occurrence /
- shale oil production /
- shale oil /
- Lucaogou Formation /
- Permian /
- Jimsar Sag /
- Junggar Basin

HTML全文

图 1 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷构造特征(a)及二叠系芦草沟组地层柱状图(b)

Figure 1. Structural characteristics of Jimsar Sag in Junggar Basin (a) and stratigraphic histogram of Permian Lucaogou Formation (b)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组储层孔隙特征

a.长石粒内溶孔，内部板状钠长石和似蜂巢状伊/蒙混层矿物充填，氩离子抛光后扫描电镜观测，J10012井，3 313.99 m；b.白云石晶间孔，氩离子抛光后扫描电镜观测，吉179井，3 334.89 m；c.狭缝形伊/蒙混层矿物晶间孔，氩离子抛光后扫描电镜观测，J10012井，3 313.97 m；d.纳米级—微米级全孔径含油特征，呈“大孔薄膜状，小孔充填状”赋存，氩离子抛光后扫描电镜观测，J10025井，3 549.29 m

Figure 2. Reservoir pore characteristics of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组岩石全孔径分布

Figure 3. Distribution of total pore size of rocks of Lucaogou Formation in Permian Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组不同岩性储层孔隙分布

Figure 4. Pore distribution of different lithological reservoirs of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组页岩油赋存特征

激光共聚焦分析，蓝色为重质组分，紫红色为中质组分，红色为轻质组分

Figure 5. Occurrence characteristics of shale oil of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组储层饱和氯化锰前、后核磁共振T₂谱特征

Figure 6. Characteristics of NMR T₂ spectrum before and after of manganese chloride in Permian Lucaogou Formation reservoir saturation in Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组页岩油储层毛细管压力曲线

Figure 7. Capillary pressure curve of shale oil reservoir of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组页岩储层纳米CT孔隙结构特征

a-b.孔隙分布的球棍模型，红色节点为孔隙，连接线是喉道，吉305井，3 579.36 m，粉细砂岩；c.喉道模型图；d.渗流模拟图，渗流趋势线以平行岩石层理的方向为主，垂直层理分布的趋势线较少

Figure 8. Nano-CT pore structure characteristics of shale reservoir of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组页岩负压和升温下纳米孔中原油随时间变化

云质粉砂岩，吉31井，2 897.90 m

Figure 9. Variation of crude oil in nanopores with time under negative pressure and heating in dolomitic siltstone in Permian Lucaogou Formation, Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷不同岩性及孔喉尺度下的渗透率贡献比例

Table 1. Permeability contribution ratio of different lithology and pore throat scale in Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin

岩性	样品数/块	核磁孔隙度/%	可动流体饱和度/%	＞300 nm		50~300 nm		＜50 nm
岩性	样品数/块	核磁孔隙度/%	可动流体饱和度/%	占比/%	贡献/%	占比/%	贡献/%	占比/%	贡献/%
长石岩屑粉细砂岩	22			74.1	98	21.4	2	4.5	0
云质粉砂岩	18			59.8	82	23.0	18	17.2	0
砂屑云岩	12			40.5	70	52.1	30	7.4	0
注：表中分式为。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(30)

[1]	王小军, 杨智峰, 郭旭光, 等. 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷页岩油勘探实践与展望[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2019, 40(4): 402-413. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD201904003.htm WANG Xiaojun, YANG Zhifeng, GUO Xuguang, et al. Practices and prospects of shale oil exploration in Jimsar Sag of Junggar Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2019, 40(4): 402-413. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD201904003.htm
[2]	高阳, 叶义平, 何吉祥, 等. 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷陆相页岩油开发实践[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(2): 133-141. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY202002013.htm GAO Yang, YE Yiping, HE Jixiang, et al. Development practice of continental shale oil in Jimsar Sag in the Junggar Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2020, 25(2): 133-141. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY202002013.htm
[3]	支东明, 唐勇, 杨智峰, 等. 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷陆相页岩油地质特征与聚集机理[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(3): 524-534. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201903009.htm ZHI Dongming, TANG Yong, YANG Zhifeng, et al. Geological characteristics and accumulation mechanism of continental shale oil in Jimusaer Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(3): 524-534. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201903009.htm
[4]	林会喜, 王圣柱, 杨艳艳, 等. 博格达地区中二叠统芦草沟组页岩油储集特征[J]. 断块油气田, 2020, 27(4): 418-423. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202004004.htm LIN Huixi, WANG Shengzhu, YANG Yanyan, et al. Shale oil reservoir characteristics of Middle Permian Lucaogou Formation in Bogda area[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2020, 27(4): 418-423. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202004004.htm
[5]	李登华, 刘卓亚, 张国生, 等. 中美致密油成藏条件、分布特征和开发现状对比与启示[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(7): 1126-1138. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201707016.htm LI Denghua, LIU Zhuoya, ZHANG Guosheng, et al. Comparison and revelation of tight oil accumulation conditions, distribution characteristics and development status between China and U.S. [J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2017, 28(7): 1126-1138. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201707016.htm
[6]	胡素云, 赵文智, 侯连华, 等. 中国陆相页岩油发展潜力与技术对策[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(4): 819-828. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202004021.htm HU Suyun, ZHAO Wenzhi, HOU Lianhua, et al. Development potential and technical strategy of continental shale oil in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(4): 819-828. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202004021.htm
[7]	杜金虎, 胡素云, 庞正炼, 等. 中国陆相页岩油类型、潜力及前景[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(5): 560-568. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201905003.htm DU Jinhu, HU Suyun, PANG Zhenglian, et al. The types, potentials and prospects of continental shale oil in China[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(5): 560-568. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201905003.htm
[8]	李廷微, 姜振学, 宋国奇, 等. 陆相和海相页岩储层孔隙结构差异性分析[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2019, 26(1): 65-71. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201901007.htm LI Tingwei, JIANG Zhenxue, SONG Guoqi, et al. Analysis of differences in pore structure between continental and marine shale reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2019, 26(1): 65-71. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201901007.htm
[9]	LOUCKS R G, REED R M, RUPPEL S C, et al. Morphology, genesis, and distribution of nanometer-scale pores in siliceous mudstones of the Mississippian Barnett shales[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 2009, 79(12): 848-861. doi: 10.2110/jsr.2009.092
[10]	CHALMERS G R, BUSTIN R M, POWER I M. Characterization of gas shale pore systems by porosimetry, pycnometry, surface area, and field emission scanning electron microscopy/transmission electron microscopy image analyses: examples from the Barnett, Woodford, Haynesville, Marcellus, and Doig units[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2012, 96(6): 1099-1119. doi: 10.1306/10171111052
[11]	AKSNES D W, FØRLAND K, KIMTYS L. Pore size distribution in mesoporous materials as studied by ¹H NMR[J]. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2001, 3(15): 3203-3207. doi: 10.1039/b103228n
[12]	CLARKSON C R, FREEMAN M, HE Lilin, et al. Characterization of tight gas reservoir pore structure using USANS/SANS and gas adsorption analysis[J]. Fuel, 2012, 95: 371-385. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2011.12.010
[13]	徐旭辉, 申宝剑, 李志明, 等. 页岩气实验地质评价技术研究现状及展望[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2020, 10(1): 1-8. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202001002.htm XU Xuhui, SHEN Baojian, LI Zhiming, et al. Status and prospect of experimental technologies of geological evaluation for shale gas[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(1): 1-8. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202001002.htm
[14]	杨峰, 宁正福, 张世栋, 等. 基于氮气吸附实验的页岩孔隙结构表征[J]. 天然气工业, 2013, 33(4): 135-140. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201304031.htm YANG Feng, NING Zhengfu, ZHANG Shidong, et al. Characte-rization of pore structures in shales through nitrogen adsorption experiment[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2013, 33(4): 135-140. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201304031.htm
[15]	宋永, 周路, 郭旭光, 等. 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组湖相云质致密油储层特征与分布规律[J]. 岩石学报, 2017, 33(4): 1159-1170. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201704011.htm SONG Yong, ZHOU Lu, GUO Xuguang, et al. Characteristics and occurrence of lacustrine dolomitic tight-oil reservoir in the Middle Permian Lucaogou Formation, Jimusar Sag, southeastern Junggar Basin[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2017, 33(4): 1159-1170. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201704011.htm
[16]	靳军, 向宝力, 杨召, 等. 实验分析技术在吉木萨尔凹陷致密储层研究中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(3): 18-25. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YANX201503004.htm JIN Jun, XIANG Baoli, YANG Zhao, et al. Application of experimental analysis technology to research of tight reservoir in Jimsar Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2015, 27(3): 18-25. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YANX201503004.htm
[17]	张鹏飞, 卢双舫, 李俊乾, 等. 基于扫描电镜的页岩微观孔隙结构定量表征[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 42(2): 19-28. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYDX201802004.htm ZHANG Pengfei, LU Shuangfang, LI Junqian, et al. Quantitative characterization of microscopic pore structure for shales using scanning electron microscopy[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2018, 42(2): 19-28. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYDX201802004.htm
[18]	李博, 于炳松, 史淼. 富有机质页岩有机质孔隙度研究: 以黔西北下志留统五峰-龙马溪组为例[J]. 矿物岩石, 2019, 39(1): 92-101. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KWYS201901011.htm LI Bo, YU Bingsong, SHI Miao. Pore characteristics of organic-rich shale with high thermal maturity: a case study of the Lower Silurian Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation marine shale in northwestern Guizhou, China[J]. Journal of Mineralogy and Petro-logy, 2019, 39(1): 92-101. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KWYS201901011.htm
[19]	焦堃, 谢国梁, 裴文明, 等. 四川盆地下古生界黑色页岩纳米孔隙形态的影响因素及其地质意义[J]. 高校地质学报, 2019, 25(6): 847-859. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXDX201906005.htm JIAO Kun, XIE Guoliang, PEI Wenming, et al. The control factors and geological implications of the nanopore morphology of the Lower Paleozoic black shales in the Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Geolo-gical Journal of China Universities, 2019, 25(6): 847-859. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXDX201906005.htm
[20]	刘一杉, 东晓虎, 闫林, 等. 吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组孔隙结构定量表征[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2019, 40(3): 284-289. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD201903005.htm LIU Yishan, DONG Xiaohu, YAN Lin, et al. Quantitative characte-rization of pore structure of Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2019, 40(3): 284-289. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD201903005.htm
[21]	许琳, 常秋生, 杨成克, 等. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组页岩油储层特征及含油性[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(3): 535-549. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201903010.htm XU Lin, CHANG Qiusheng, YANG Chengke, et al. Characteristics and oil-bearing capability of shale oil reservoir in the Permian Lucaogou Formation, Jimusaer sag[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(3): 535-549. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201903010.htm
[22]	靳军, 杨召, 依力哈木·尔西丁, 等. 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷致密油储层纳米孔隙特征及其含油性[J]. 地球科学, 2018, 43(5): 1594-1601. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX201805021.htm JIN Jun, YANG Zhao, YILIHAMU Erxiding, et al. Nanopore characteristics and oil-bearing properties of tight oil reservoirs in Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Earth Science, 2018, 43(5): 1594-1601. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX201805021.htm
[23]	何晶, 何生, 刘早学, 等. 鄂西黄陵背斜南翼下寒武统水井沱组页岩孔隙结构与吸附能力[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(1): 27-42. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB202001003.htm HE Jing, HE Sheng, LIU Zaoxue, et al. Pore structure and adsorption capacity of shale in the Lower Cambrian Shuijingtuo Formation in the southern flank of Huangling anticline, western Hubei[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(1): 27-42. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB202001003.htm
[24]	孙超, 姚素平. 页岩油储层孔隙发育特征及表征方法[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2019, 26(1): 153-164. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201901016.htm SUN Chao, YAO Suping. Pore structure and characterization methods of shale oil reservoir[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2019, 26(1): 153-164. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201901016.htm
[25]	王子龙, 郭少斌. 鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区山西组泥页岩孔隙表征[J]. 石油实验地质, 2019, 41(1): 99-107. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201901099 WANG Zilong, GUO Shaobin. Pore characterization of shale in Shanxi Formation, Yan'an area, Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2019, 41(1): 99-107. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201901099
[26]	张天付, 范光旭, 李玉文, 等. 吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组致密油储层微观孔喉结构研究[J]. CT理论与应用研究, 2016, 25(4): 425-434. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CTLL201604008.htm ZHANG Tianfu, FAN Guangxu, LI Yuwen, et al. Pore-throat characterization of tight oil reservoir in the Lucaogou Formation, Jimusar Sag[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2016, 25(4): 425-434. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CTLL201604008.htm
[27]	李佳琦, 陈蓓蓓, 孔明炜, 等. 页岩油储集层数字岩心重构及微尺度下渗流特征: 以吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组页岩油为例[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2019, 40(3): 319-327. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD201903010.htm LI Jiaqi, CHEN Beibei, KONG Mingwei, et al. Digital core reconstruction and research on microscale flow characteristics of shale oil reservoir: a case of the shale oil in Permian Lucaogou Formation, Jimsar Sag[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2019, 40(3): 319-327. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD201903010.htm
[28]	欧阳思琪, 孙卫, 黄何鑫. 多方法协同表征特低渗砂岩储层全孔径孔隙结构: 以鄂尔多斯盆地合水地区砂岩储层为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2018, 40(4): 595-604. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201804595 OUYANG Siqi, SUN Wei, HUANG Hexin. Multi-method synergistic characterization of total pore structure of extra-low permeability sandstone reservoirs: case study of the Heshui area of Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2018, 40(4): 595-604. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201804595
[29]	中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 岩石毛管压力曲线的测定: GB/T 29171-2012[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2013. General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration. Rock capillary pressure measurement: GB/T 29171-2012[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2013.
[30]	吴承美, 郭智能, 唐伏平, 等. 吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组致密油初期开采特征[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2014, 35(5): 570-573. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD201405017.htm WU Chengmei, GUO Zhineng, TANG Fuping, et al. Early exploitation characteristics of Lucaogou tight oil of Permian in Jimusaer Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2014, 35(5): 570-573. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD201405017.htm