海陆过渡相超深层页岩储层特征——以川东北普光气田Y4井上二叠统龙潭组下段为例

李进; 王学军; 周凯; 王运所; 李宁朝; 吴颖; 王美格

doi:10.11781/sysydz202201071

海陆过渡相超深层页岩储层特征——以川东北普光气田Y4井上二叠统龙潭组下段为例

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202201071

1.
中国石化中原油田分公司勘探开发研究院, 河南濮阳 457000
2.
中国石化中原油田分公司勘探管理部, 河南濮阳 457000
3.
中国石化中原油田分公司物探研究院, 河南濮阳 457000

基金项目:

中石化油田事业部项目“中原探区页岩油气勘探潜力评价与目标优选“ YTBXD-02-01-2021-VI

详细信息

作者简介:
李进(1989-), 男, 工程师, 从事页岩油气地质评价。E-mail: lijincugb@126.com

中图分类号: TE122.2
计量
- 文章访问数: 955
- HTML全文浏览量: 340
- PDF下载量: 68
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-02-02
- 修回日期: 2021-12-28
- 刊出日期: 2022-01-28

Characteristics of ultra-deep shale reservoir of marine-continental transitional facies: a case study of lower member of Upper Permian Longtan Formation in well Y4, Puguang Gas Field, northeastern Sichuan Basin

1.
Exploration and Development Research Institute of SINOPEC Zhongyuan Oilfield, Puyang, Henan 457000, China
2.
Exploration Management Department of SINOPEC Zhongyuan Oilfield, Puyang, Henan 457000, China
3.
Geophysical Exploration Institute of SINOPEC Zhongyuan Oilfield, Puyang, Henan 457000, China

摘要

摘要: 为探索超深层条件下海陆过渡相页岩储层特征，针对川东北地区普光气田Y4井上二叠统龙潭组泥页岩开展了有机地球化学、矿物组成、孔隙结构、物性等分析测试。龙潭组泥页岩具有高有机碳含量（主峰区间3.77%~10.72%），Ⅱ₂—Ⅲ型干酪根及过成熟特征（R_o介于3.82%~3.97%）；总孔体积均值为0.047 mL/g，比表面积均值为31.8 m²/g，孔隙度均值为6.64%；储集空间类型以有机孔、黏土矿物层片间孔、脆性矿物溶蚀孔及微裂缝为主，形态多为平行板状与两端开放管状。深水潟湖环境下泥页岩孔隙度与有机碳、黄铁矿、石英含量呈正相关，说明缺氧还原、水体稳定的沉积环境控制着原始矿物组成与结构，同时刚性矿物颗粒与有机质、黏土矿物有效络合，为有机孔保存提供了必要条件。受碾平式改造作用影响的扁平状有机质大孔与密集发育的有机质微—介孔、黏土矿物晶间孔缝、脆性矿物孔缝组成储集网络，最终形成深水潟湖微相超深层泥页岩储层。
- 超深层过渡相泥页岩 /
- 储集空间 /
- 扁平状有机质大孔 /
- 碾平式改造 /
- 龙潭组 /
- 上二叠统 /
- 普光地区 /
- 川东北
Abstract: In order to explore the characteristics of marine-continental transitional shale reservoir under overburden conditions, studies of organic geochemistry, mineral composition, parameters of pore structure and physical properties of shale in well Y4 of the Upper Permian Longtan Formation in the Puguang exploration area of northeastern Sichuan Basin were carried out. The shale of the Longtan Formation is characterized by high abundance of organic matter (ranging from 3.77% to 10.72%), humic and sapropelic organic matter (kerogen type of Ⅱ₂ to Ⅲ) and post stage of maturation (%R_o values ranging from 3.82% to 3.97%). The average pore volume, specific surface area and porosity of shale are 0.047 mL/g, 31.8 m²/g and 6.64%, respectively. Reservoir space is mainly composed of organic pores, interlayer pores of clay minerals, dissolution pores of brittle minerals and micro fractures. The main pore structure is parallel plate-shaped pores and open tubular pores at both ends. The porosity of shale is positively correlated with the contents of TOC, pyrite and quartz in deep-water lagoon environment, which indicated that the original mineral composition and structure were controlled by anoxic reduction and stable water environment. Meanwhile, the effective complexation of rigid mineral particles with organic matter and clay minerals provided necessary conditions for the preservation of organic pores. Reservoir network is consisted of flat organic macropores affected by flattening transformation, densely-developed organic pores, intergranular pores and fractures of brittle minerals, and finally formed ultra-deep shale reservoir deposited in deep-water lagoon microfacies.
- ultra-deep transitional shale /
- reservoir space /
- macro-pores of flat organic matter /
- flattening transformation /
- Longtan Formation /
- Upper Permian /
- Puguang area /
- northeastern Sichuan Basin

HTML全文

图 1 四川盆地二叠系龙潭组沉积期岩相古地理

修自参考文献[17]。

Figure 1. Paleography of Permian Longtan period in Sichuan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 四川盆地普光地区典型井Y4井综合柱状图(a)及龙潭组岩心和薄片照片(b)

b.岩心及薄片：(1)5861.53~5 861.74 m，凝灰质混积岩；(2)5861.08~5 861.29 m，上部菱铁矿质泥岩，下部黏土质泥岩；(3)5863.12~5 863.30 m，碳质泥岩与煤互层；(4)5871.57~5 871.72 m，黑色薄层状硅质泥岩；(5)5 870.05 m，菱铁矿质泥岩；(6)5 861.74 m，凝灰质混积岩

Figure 2. Comprehensive histogram of typical well Y4(a) and its core and thin section photos of Longtan Formation(b), Puguang area, Sichuan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 四川盆地普光地区Y4井二叠系龙潭组泥页岩矿物特征

Figure 3. Mineral characteristics of shale in Permian Longtan Formation, well Y4, Puguang area, Sichuan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 四川盆地普光地区Y4井二叠系龙潭组有机地球化学特征

Figure 4. Organic geochemical characteristics of Permian Longtan Formation, well Y4, Puguang area, Sichuan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 四川盆地普光地区二叠系龙潭组无机孔镜下特征及典型裂缝照片

a.Y4井，5 861.27 m，黄铁矿晶间残余孔；b.Y4井，5 856.81 m，黏土矿物层片间缝；c.Y4井，5 869.94 m，白云石晶体发育溶蚀孔和解理缝；d.Y4井，5 860.54 m，白云石胶结物放大，解理缝发育；e.Y4井，5 870.54 m，石英颗粒可见碎裂缝，边缘见少量微孔隙；f.Y4井，5 861.74 m，保存完好的植物结构孔，结构孔中蒙脱石微孔隙发育；g.M1井，4 957.5 m，生烃超压缝，方解石全充填；h.M1井，4 955.9 m，构造缝与生烃超压缝

Figure 5. Typical crack photos and microscopic characteristics of inorganic pores of Permian Longtan Formation, Puguang area, Sichuan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 四川盆地普光地区Y4井二叠系龙潭组有机孔镜下特征

a.5 859.41 m，TOC为0.56%，镜质体内孔隙不发育；b.5 864.34 m，TOC为6.45%，结构镜质体内发育少量纳米孔隙；c.5 868.34 m，有机质碎片内发育少量针状气孔；d.5 872.54 m，黄铁矿晶体与密集发育的纳米—微米级有机孔隙，黄铁矿晶体表面见少量棒状石膏、有机孔隙，晶体边缘见大型有机孔隙网络；e.5 873.14 m，有机孔密集发育，有机质大孔定向分布排列并呈扁平状；f.5 873.84 m，相比样品点e有机孔定向性及扁平状特点更显著；g.样品X1，5 860.94 m，植物结构孔中胶结大量黄铁矿晶粒与黏土矿物蒙脱石，残余少量微孔隙；h.样品X2，5 868.34 m，被黏土矿物包裹的分散有机质，发育星散状有机孔；i.5 873.14 m，被碳酸盐矿物颗粒包裹的有机质内普遍发育1~11 μm的扁平状有机孔隙，近水平定向排列

Figure 6. Microscopic characteristics of organic pores of Permian Longtan Formation, well Y4, Puguang area, Sichuan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 四川盆地普光地区二叠系龙潭组不同孔体积与比表面积相关性

Figure 7. Correlation between different pore volume and specific surface area of Permian Longtan Formation, Puguang area, Sichuan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 川东北地区二叠系龙潭组页岩储层特征随成熟度(R_o)的变化

Figure 8. Variation of porosity with maturity (R_o) of shale in Permian Longtan Formation, northeastern Sichuan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 四川盆地普光地区Y4井二叠系龙潭组黏土矿物特征及与储层参数相关性分析

Figure 9. Characteristics of clay minerals in Permian Longtan Formation of well Y4 and its correlation with reservoir parameters, Puguang area, Sichuan Basi

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 四川盆地普光地区二叠系龙潭组TOC与储层参数相关性图版

Figure 10. Correlation between TOC and reservoir parameters of Permian Longtan Formation, Puguang area, Sichuan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 四川盆地普光地区二叠系龙潭组黏土矿物与储层参数相关性图版

Figure 11. Correlation between clay mineral content and reservoir parameters of Permian Longtan Formation, Puguang area, Sichuan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 四川盆地普光地区二叠系龙潭组黄铁矿、石英与储层参数相关性图版

Figure 12. Correlation between pyrite and quartz contents and reservoir parameters of Permian Longtan Formation, Puguang area, Sichuan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13 四川盆地普光地区二叠系龙潭组不同沉积微相下泥页岩储层演化模式

Figure 13. Evolution model of shale reservoir in different sedimentary microfacies of Permian Longtan Formation, Puguang area, Sichuan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

参考文献(33)

[1]	邹才能, 杨智, 王红岩, 等. "进源找油": 论四川盆地非常规陆相大型页岩油气田[J]. 地质学报, 2019, 93(7): 1551-1562. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2019.07.001 ZOU Caineng, YANG Zhi, WANG Hongyan, et al. "Exploring petroleum inside source kitchen": Jurassic unconventional continental giant shale oil & gas field in Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Journal of Geology, 2019, 93(7): 1551-1562. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2019.07.001
[2]	杨智, 邹才能. "进源找油": 源岩油气内涵与前景[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(1): 173-184. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201901018.htm YANG Zhi, ZOU Caineng. "Exploring petroleum inside source kitchen": connotation and prospects of source rock oil and gas[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(1): 173-184. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201901018.htm
[3]	郭彤楼. 中国式页岩气关键地质问题与成藏富集主控因素[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43(3): 317-326. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201603002.htm GUO Tonglou. Key geological issues and main controls on accumulation and enrichment of Chinese shale gas[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43(3): 317-326. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201603002.htm
[4]	郭旭升, 李宇平, 刘若冰, 等. 四川盆地焦石坝地区龙马溪组页岩微观孔隙结构特征及其控制因素[J]. 天然气工业, 2014, 34(6): 9-16. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201406002.htm GUO Xusheng, LI Yuping, LIU Ruobing, et al. Characteristics and controlling factors of micro-pore structures of Longmaxi shale play in the Jiaoshiba area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2014, 34(6): 9-16. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201406002.htm
[5]	胡宗全, 杜伟, 彭勇民, 等. 页岩微观孔隙特征及源-储关系: 以川东南地区五峰组-龙马溪组为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2015, 36(6): 1001-1008. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201506017.htm HU Zongquan, DU Wei, PENG Yongmin, et al. Microscopic pore characteristics and the source-reservoir relationship of shale: a case study from the Wufeng and Longmaxi formations in southeast Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2015, 36(6): 1001-1008. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201506017.htm
[6]	郭旭升, 胡东风, 刘若冰, 等. 四川盆地二叠系海陆过渡相页岩气地质条件及勘探潜力[J]. 天然气工业, 2018, 38(10): 11-18. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2018.10.002 GUO Xusheng, HU Dongfeng, LIU Ruobing, et al. Geological conditions and exploration potential of Permian marine-continent transitional facies shale gas in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2018, 38(10): 11-18. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2018.10.002
[7]	包书景, 林拓, 聂海宽, 等. 海陆过渡相页岩气成藏特征初探: 以湘中坳陷二叠系为例[J]. 地学前缘, 2016, 23(1): 44-53. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201601006.htm BAO Shujing, LIN Tuo, NIE Haikuan, et al. Preliminary study of the transitional facies shale gas reservoir characteristics: taking Permian in the Xiangzhong Depression as an example[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2016, 23(1): 44-53. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201601006.htm
[8]	王威, 石文斌, 付小平, 等. 川北二叠系大隆组页岩气勘探潜力及方向[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(6): 892-899. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202006892 WANG Wei, SHI Wenbin, FU Xiaoping, et al. Shale gas exploration potential and target of Permian Dalong Formation in northern Sichuan[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(6): 892-899. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202006892
[9]	翟刚毅, 王玉芳, 刘国恒, 等. 中国二叠系海陆交互相页岩气富集成藏特征及前景分析[J]. 沉积与特提斯地质, 2020, 40(3): 102-117. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TTSD202003011.htm ZHAI Gangyi, WANG Yufang, LIU Guoheng, et al. Enrichment and accumulation characteristics and prospect analysis of the Permian marine continental multiphase shale gas in China[J]. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 2020, 40(3): 102-117. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TTSD202003011.htm
[10]	郭旭升, 胡东风, 黄仁春, 等. 四川盆地深层-超深层天然气勘探进展与展望[J]. 天然气工业, 2020, 40(5): 1-14. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202005002.htm GUO Xusheng, HU Dongfeng, HUANG Renchun, et al. Deep and ultra-deep natural gas exploration in the Sichuan Basin: progress and prospect[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2020, 40(5): 1-14. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202005002.htm
[11]	陈斐然, 魏祥峰, 刘珠江, 等. 四川盆地二叠系龙潭组页岩孔隙发育特征及主控因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2020, 31(11): 1593-1602. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX202011008.htm CHEN Feiran, WEI Xiangfeng, LIU Zhujiang, et al. Pore development characteristics and main controlling factors of the Permian marine-continent transitional shale in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural gas Geosciences, 2020, 31(11): 1593-1602. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX202011008.htm
[12]	刘光祥, 金之钧, 邓模, 等. 川东地区上二叠统龙潭组页岩气勘探潜力[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2015, 36(3): 481-487. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201503019.htm LIU Guangxiang, JIN Zhijun, DENG Mo, et al. Exploration potential for shale gas in the Upper Permian Longtan Formation in eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2015, 36(3): 481-487. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201503019.htm
[13]	刘虎, 曹涛涛, 戚明辉, 等. 四川盆地东部华蓥山地区龙潭组页岩气储层特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(1): 11-26. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201901002.htm LIU Hu, CAO Taotao, QI Minghui, et al. Reservoir characteristics of Longtan Formation shale gas in Huayingshan area, eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2019, 30(1): 11-26. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201901002.htm
[14]	王强, 魏祥峰, 魏富彬, 等. 川东南涪陵地区五峰组-龙马溪组页岩气藏中的超压作用[J]. 石油实验地质, 2019, 41(3): 333-340. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201903333 WANG Qiang, WEI Xiangfeng, WEI Fubin, et al. Overpressure in shale gas reservoirs of Wufeng-Longmaxi formations, Fuling area, southeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2019, 41(3): 333-340. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201903333
[15]	王玉满, 王宏坤, 张晨晨, 等. 四川盆地南部深层五峰组-龙马溪组裂缝孔隙评价[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2017, 44(4): 531-539. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201704008.htm WANG Yuman, WANG Hongkun, ZHANG Chenchen, et al. Fracture pore evaluation of the Upper Ordovician Wufeng to Lower Silurian Longmaxi formations in southern Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44(4): 531-539. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201704008.htm
[16]	焦堃, 叶玥豪, 刘树根, 等. 四川盆地超深层泥页岩纳米孔隙特征及其地质意义[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 44(2): 129-138. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CDLG201702001.htm JIAO Kun, YE Yuehao, LIU Shugen, et al. Nanopore characteristics of super-deep buried mudstones in Sichuan Basin and its geological implication[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition), 2017, 44(2): 129-138. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CDLG201702001.htm
[17]	邓宾. 四川盆地中-新生代盆-山结构与油气分布[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2013. DENG Bin. Meso-Cenozoic architecture of basin-mountain system in the Sichuan Basin and its gas distribution[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2013.
[18]	邬立言. 生油岩热解快速定量评价[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1986: 23-24. WU Liyan. Rapid quantitative evaluation of source rock pyrolysis[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1986: 23-24.
[19]	XI Zhaodong, TANG Shuheng, ZHANG Songhang, et al. Pore structure characteristics of marine-continental transitional shale: a case study in the Qinshui Basin, China[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2017, 31(8): 7854-7866.
[20]	徐旭辉, 申宝剑, 李志明, 等. 页岩气实验地质评价技术研究现状及展望[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2020, 10(1): 1-8. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202001002.htm XU Xuhui, SHEN Baojian, LI Zhiming, et al. Status and prospect of experimental technologies of geological evaluation for shale gas[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(1): 1-8. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202001002.htm
[21]	罗鹏, 刘晓雪, 郭宇衡, 等. 不同沉积类型富有机质页岩孔隙结构差异特征[J]. 能源与环保, 2019, 41(12): 53-60. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZZMT201912013.htm LUO Peng, LIU Xiaoxue, GUO Yuheng, et al. Characteristics of pore structure differences of organic-rich shale in different sedimentary types[J]. China Energy and Environmental Protection, 2019, 41(12): 53-60. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZZMT201912013.htm
[22]	刘伟新, 卢龙飞, 魏志红, 等. 川东南地区不同埋深五峰组-龙马溪组页岩储层微观结构特征与对比[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(3): 378-386. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202003378 LIU Weixin, LU Longfei, WEI Zhihong, et al. Microstructure characteristics of Wufeng-Longmaxi shale gas reservoirs with different depth, southeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geo-logy and Experiment, 2020, 42(3): 378-386. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202003378
[23]	张吉振, 李贤庆, 郭曼, 等. 川南地区二叠系龙潭组页岩微观孔隙特征及其影响因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(8): 1571-1578. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201508019.htm ZHANG Jizhen, LI Xianqing, GUO Man, et al. Microscopic pore characteristics and its influence factors of the Permian Longtan Formation shales in the southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015, 26(8): 1571-1578. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201508019.htm
[24]	李娟, 于炳松, 夏响华, 等. 黔西北地区上二叠统龙潭组泥页岩储层特征[J]. 地学前缘, 2015, 22(1): 301-311. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201501029.htm LI Juan, YU Bingsong, XIA Xianghua, et al. The characteristics of the Upper Permian shale reservoir in the northwest of Guizhou Province, China[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2015, 22(1): 301-311. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201501029.htm
[25]	邓恩德, 金军, 王冉, 等. 黔北地区龙潭组海陆过渡相页岩微观孔隙特征及其储气性[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2017, 17(24): 190-195. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXJS201724032.htm DENG Ende, JIN Jun, WANG Ran, et al. Characteristics of microscopic pore and gas storage on shale in Permian Longtan Formation, northern Guizhou[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2017, 17(24): 190-195. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXJS201724032.htm
[26]	杨超. 页岩有机质孔隙发育特征及主控因素[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2017. YANG Chao. The developmental characteristics and controlling factors of organic-associated pores in organic-rich shales[D]. Beijing: China University of Geology (Beijing), 2017.
[27]	王运海. 四川盆地平桥地区五峰-龙马溪组页岩微观孔隙特征研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2018, 40(3): 337-344. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201803337 WANG Yunhai. Micro-pore characteristics of shale from Wufeng-Longmaxi formations in Pingqiao area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2018, 40(3): 337-344. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201803337
[28]	柳宇柯. 高演化阶段页岩有机质纳米孔隙、化学结构与力学性能研究[D]. 广州: 中国科学院大学(中国科学院广州地球化学研究所), 2019. LIU Yuke. Nanopore development, chemical structure and mechanical properties of organic matter in highly matured shale[D]. Guangzhou: Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2019.
[29]	孟凡晋, 肖丽华, 谢玉洪, 等. 莺歌海盆地黏土矿物异常转化及其地质意义[J]. 沉积学报, 2012, 30(3): 469-476. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB201203008.htm MENG Fanjin, XIAO Lihua, XIE Yuhong, et al. Abnormal transformation of the clay minerals in Yinggehai Basin and its significances[J]. Acta sedimentologica Sinica, 2012, 30(3): 469-476. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB201203008.htm
[30]	LI Jin, TANG Shuheng, ZHANG Songhang, et al. Paleo-environmental conditions of the Early Cambrian Niutitang Formation in the Fenggang area, the southwestern margin of the Yangtze Platform, southern China: evidence from major elements, trace elements and other proxies[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2018, 159: 81-97.
[31]	翟常博, 邓模, 曹清古, 等. 川东地区上二叠统龙潭组泥页岩基本特征及页岩气勘探潜力[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(6): 921-932. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202106921 ZHAI Changbo, DENG Mo, CAO Qinggu, et al. Basic characte-ristics and exploration potential of shale gas in Longtan Formation of Upper Permian in eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(6): 921-932. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202106921
[32]	郭少斌, 王子龙, 马啸. 中国重点地区二叠系海陆过渡相页岩气勘探前景[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(3): 377-385. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202103377 GUO Shaobin, WANG Zilong, MA Xiao. Exploration prospect of shale gas with Permian transitional facies of some key areas in China[J]. Petroleum Geology and Experiment, 2021, 43(3): 377-385. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202103377
[33]	何治亮, 聂海宽, 李双建, 等. 特提斯域板块构造约束下上扬子地区二叠系龙潭组页岩气的差异性赋存[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 1-15. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202101002.htm HE Zhiliang, NIE Haikuan, LI Shuangjian, et al. Differential occurence of shale gas in the Permian Longtan Formation of Upper Yangtze region constrained by plate tectonics in the Tethyan domain[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(1): 1-15. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202101002.htm