Geological characteristics and seismic fine description of different types of sand bodies in Jurassic Shaximiao Formation in central Sichuan Basin
-
摘要: 四川盆地侏罗系湖泊—河流沉积体系中的砂体是目前浅层致密油气勘探开发的现实对象。由于受沉积微相影响，砂体具有类型多样、岩性多变、厚度变化大、非均质性强等特点，因此预测困难。通过对侏罗系沙溪庙组沙一段砂层组类型的划分，开展了不同类型砂体的储层分析，指出了不同类型砂体的测井、地球物理响应特征，分时窗对不同类型砂体进行了精细识别和空间预测。研究表明：①沙一段可划分为5个砂层组，其中第一砂组主要为滨浅湖相席状砂、滩坝砂，2~5砂层组为三角洲前缘—平原相河道砂；②河道砂平均孔隙度为4.68%，明显高于底部席状砂孔隙度的3.1%，且Ⅰ期河道砂物性最好，其次为Ⅳ期、Ⅱ期、Ⅲ期河道砂；③河道砂的预测标准为自然伽马小于65 API，席状砂的预测标准为自然伽马65~75 API。砂体预测中，针对席状砂（滩坝）将研究时窗提取到0~20 ms以内；针对河道砂将研究时窗划分在沙底向上20~100 ms范围内。最终建立起了一套适用湖泊—河流沉积体系中不同类型砂体精细刻画与预测的方法。Abstract: Sand bodies in the Jurassic lacustrine-fluvial sedimentary system in the Sichuan Basin are realistic objects of shallow tight oil and gas exploration and development. Due to the influence of sedimentary microfacies, sand bodies have geological characteristics such as type diverse, variable lithology, significant thickness variation, and strong heterogeneity. Therefore, the fine description and prediction of different types of sand bodies is the current bottleneck for exploration and development. Based on the classification of various sand group types of the 1st member of Jurassic Shaximiao Formation, reservoir analysis was carried out, logging and geophysical response characteristics were concluded, and fine identification and spatial prediction were made by time-sharing window. Results show that: (1) The 1st member of Shaximiao Formation can be divided into 5 sand groups, among which the 1st sand group is mainly littoral-shallow lacustrine sheet sand and beach bar sand, and the 2nd to 5th sand groups are delta front facies channel-plain channel; (2) The average porosity of channel sand is 4.68%, which is significantly higher than that of bottom sheet sand (3.1%). The physical properties of the Ⅰ channel are the best, followed by the Ⅳ, Ⅱ, and Ⅲ channels. (3) The prediction standard of channel sand is: natural gamma < 65 API, and the prediction standard of sheet sand locates between 65 and 75 API. In sand body prediction, for sheet sands (beach bars), the study time window is extracted to be within 0-20 ms, and for river channels, the study time window is in the range of 20-100 ms upwards from the bottom of the Shaximiao Formation. Finally, a set of methods suitable for fine description and prediction of different types of sand bodies in the lacustrine-fluvial sedimentary system was established.
-
图 1 四川盆地侏罗系沙溪庙组沙一段砂层组划分示意
Figure 1. Classification of sand formations in 1st member of Jurassic Shaximiao Formation, Sichuan Basin
图 2 四川盆地公山庙地区侏罗系沙溪庙组沙一段沉积微相连井对比剖面
Figure 2. Sedimentary microfacies of 1st member of Jurassic Shaximiao Formation, Gongshanmiao area, Sichuan Basin
图 3 四川盆地侏罗系沙溪庙组沙一段不同类型砂体储集性能对比
Figure 3. Reservoir properties of different types of sand bodies in 1st member of Jurassic Shaximiao Formation, Sichuan Basin
图 4 四川盆地LG地区侏罗系沙溪庙组沙一段砂体不同标准反演剖面对比
Figure 4. Inversion sections with different standards of sand bodies in 1st member of Jurassic Shaximiao Formation, Sichuan Basin
图 5 四川盆地侏罗系沙溪庙组沙一段不同类型砂体测井曲线参数交会图
Figure 5. Cross plots of logging parameters for different types of sand bodies in 1st member of Jurassic Shaximiao Formation, Sichuan Basin
图 6 不同标准预测四川盆地侏罗系沙溪庙组沙一段砂体效果对比
Figure 6. Prediction with different standards of sand bodies in 1st member of Jurassic Shaximiao Formation, Sichuan Basin
图 7 四川盆地侏罗系沙溪庙组沙一段砂体厚度与测试产量、累计产量关系
Figure 7. Sand body thickness vs. test production and cumulative production of 1st member of Jurassic Shaximiao Formation, Sichuan Basin
图 8 四川盆地侏罗系沙溪庙组沙一段不同类型砂体特征及勘探开发模式
Figure 8. Characteristics and exploration/development patterns of different types of sand bodies in 1st member of Jurassic Shaximiao Formation, Sichuan Basin
表 1 四川盆地侏罗系沙溪庙组沙一段有利砂体测井相特征
Table 1. Logging facies of favorable sand bodies in 1st member of Jurassic Shaximiao Formation, Sichuan Basin
表 2 四川盆地侏罗系沙溪庙组沙一段不同类型砂体勘探开发成果
Table 2. Exploration and development results of different types of sand bodies in 1st member of Jurassic Shaximiao Formation, Sichuan Basin
砂体类型 试油井/口 获油井/口 成功率/% 单井平均测试产量/(t·d-1) 单井平均累计产量/t 累计产量/t 万吨井/口 席状砂、滩坝砂 16 12 75.0 18.1 4 437 53 243.84 3 Ⅰ期河道砂 6 5 83.3 35.9 11 077 55 389.00 3 Ⅱ期河道砂 3 2 66.7 12.3 1 410 4 231.64 0 Ⅲ期河道砂 3 2 66.7 4.1 10 787 21 574.00 1 Ⅳ期河道砂 2 0 0.0 0 
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 梁狄刚, 冉隆辉, 戴弹申, 等. 四川盆地中北部侏罗系大面积非常规石油勘探潜力的再认识[J]. 石油学报, 2011, 32(1): 8-17. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201101003.htmLIANG Digang, RAN Longhui, DAI Danshen, et al. A re-recognition of the prospecting potential of Jurassic large-area and non-conventional oils in the central-northern Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2011, 32(1): 8-17. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201101003.htm [2] 邹才能, 陶士振, 袁选俊, 等. 连续型油气藏形成条件与分布特征[J]. 石油学报, 2009, 30(3): 324-331. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB200903003.htmZOU Caineng, TAO Shizhen, YUAN Xuanjun, et al. The formation conditions and distribution characteristics of continuous petroleum accumulations[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2009, 30(3): 324-331. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB200903003.htm [3] 王毓俊. 四川盆地找到大油田的可能性分析[J]. 石油科技论坛, 2010, 29(1): 28-31. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYKT201001011.htmWANG Yujun. Feasibility analysis of discovering large oilfield in Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil Forum, 2010, 29(1): 28-31. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYKT201001011.htm [4] 蒋裕强, 漆麟, 邓海波, 等. 四川盆地侏罗系油气成藏条件及勘探潜力[J]. 天然气工业, 2010, 30(3): 22-26. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201003009.htmJIANG Yuqiang, QI Lin, DENG Haibo, et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation conditions and exploration potentials of the Jurassic reservoirs in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2010, 30(3): 22-26. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201003009.htm [5] 李智武, 刘树根, 林杰, 等. 川西坳陷构造格局及其成因机制[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 36(6): 645-653. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CDLG200906011.htmLI Zhiwu, LIU Shugen, LIN Jie, et al. Structural configuration and its genetic mechanism of the West Sichuan Depression in China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition), 2009, 36(6): 645-653. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CDLG200906011.htm [6] 蔡开平, 廖仕孟. 川西地区侏罗系气藏气源研究[J]. 天然气工业, 2000, 20(1): 36-41. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG200001008.htmCAI Kaiping, LIAO Shimeng. A research on the gas source of Jurassic gas reservoirs in west Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2000, 20(1): 36-41. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG200001008.htm [7] 廖静, 董兆雄, 翟桂云, 等. 渤海湾盆地歧口凹陷沙河街组一段下亚段湖相白云岩及其与海相白云岩的差异[J]. 海相油气地质, 2008, 13(1): 18-24. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HXYQ200801005.htmLIAO Jing, DONG Zhaoxiong, ZHAI Guiyun, et al. Feature of Oligocene Shahejie lower-1st member lacustrine dolostone in Qikou Depression, Bohaiwan Basin, and difference of it from marine dolostone[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2008, 13(1): 18-24. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HXYQ200801005.htm [8] 杨晓萍, 邹才能, 陶士振, 等. 四川盆地上三叠统-侏罗系含油气系统特征及油气富集规律[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2005, 10(2): 15-22. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY200502002.htmYANG Xiaoping, ZOU Caineng, TAO Shizhen, et al. Characteristics of Upper Triassic-Jurassic oil and gas system in Sichuan Basin and oil and gas abundance law[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2005, 10(2): 15-22. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY200502002.htm [9] 邓康龄, 王信. 四川盆地西部侏罗纪沉积相及油气分布[J]. 沉积与特提斯地质, 2004, 24(3): 90-95. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TTSD200403013.htmDENG Kangling, WANG Xin. The Jurassic sedimentary facies and oil-gas distribution in western Sichuan Basin[J]. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 2004, 24(3): 90-95. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TTSD200403013.htm [10] 唐大海, 陈洪斌, 谢继容, 等. 四川盆地西部侏罗系沙溪庙组气藏成藏条件[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2005, 28(3): 14-19. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRKT200503003.htmTANG Dahai, CHEN Hongbin, XIE Jirong, et al. Reservoir forming conditions of Jurassic Shaximiao Formation, west Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2005, 28(3): 14-19. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRKT200503003.htm [11] 李忠平, 冉令波, 黎华继, 等. 窄河道远源致密砂岩气藏断层特征及天然气富集规律: 以四川盆地中江气田侏罗系沙溪庙组气藏为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2016, 36(7): 1-7. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201607002.htmLI Zhongping, RAN Lingbo, LI Huaji, et al. Fault features and enrichment laws of narrow-channel distal tight sandstone gas reservoirs: a case study of the Jurassic Shaximiao Fm gas reservoir in the Zhongjiang Gas Field, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2016, 36(7): 1-7. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201607002.htm [12] 谢刚平, 叶素娟, 田苗. 川西坳陷致密砂岩气藏勘探开发实践新认识[J]. 天然气工业, 2014, 34(1): 44-53. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201401008.htmXIE Gangping, YE Sujuan, TIAN Miao. New understandings of exploration and development practices in tight sandstone gas reservoirs in Western Sichuan Depression[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2014, 34(1): 44-53. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201401008.htm [13] 龙胜祥, 肖开华, 李秀鹏, 等. 四川盆地陆相层系天然气成藏条件与勘探思路[J]. 天然气工业, 2012, 32(11): 10-17. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201211004.htmLONG Shengxiang, XIAO Kaihua, LI Xiupeng, et al. Gas accumulation conditions and exploration strategies of Mesozoic terrestrial strata in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2012, 32(11): 10-17. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201211004.htm [14] 王丽英, 王琳, 张渝鸿, 等. 川西地区侏罗系沙溪庙组储层特征[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2014, 37(1): 1-4. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRKT201401003.htmWANG Liying, WANG Lin, ZHANG Yuhong, et al. Reservoir characteristics of Jurassic Shaximiao Formation, western Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2014, 37(1): 1-4. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRKT201401003.htm [15] 杜敏, 陈盛吉, 万茂霞, 等. 四川盆地侏罗系源岩分布及地化特征研究[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2005, 28(2): 15-17. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRKT200502004.htmDU Min, CHEN Shengji, WAN Maoxia, et al. Study on distribution and geo-chemical features of Jurassic source rocks in Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Exploration & Development, 2005, 28(2): 15-17. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRKT200502004.htm [16] 李军, 王世谦. 四川盆地平昌-阆中地区侏罗系油气成藏主控因素与勘探对策[J]. 天然气工业, 2010, 30(3): 16-21. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201003007.htmLI Jun, WANG Shiqian. The main factors controlling hydrocarbon accumulation in the Jurassic of Pingchang-Langzhong area in theSichuan Basin and its exploration strategies[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2010, 30(3): 16-21. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201003007.htm [17] 段永明, 曾焱, 刘成川, 等. 窄河道致密砂岩气藏高效开发技术: 以川西地区中江气田中侏罗统沙溪庙组气藏为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2020, 40(5): 58-65. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202005009.htmDUAN Yongming, ZENG Yan, LIU Chengchuan, et al. Technologies for the efficient development of tight sandstone gas reservoirs in narrow channels: a case study of Middle Jurassic Shaximiao Formation gas reservoir in the Zhongjiang gas field of western Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2020, 40(5): 58-65. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202005009.htm [18] 干大勇, 黄天俊, 吕龑, 等. 地震振幅能量表征河道砂体及其储层物性: 以川中地区中侏罗统沙溪庙组为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2020, 40(10): 38-43. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202010007.htmGAN Dayong, HUANG Tianjun, LU Yan, et al. Characterization of channel sand body and its reservoir physical properties based on seismic amplitude energy: a case study of the Middle Jurassic Shaximiao Formation in the central Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2020, 40(10): 38-43. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202010007.htm [19] 姚泾利, 刘晓鹏, 赵会涛, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地盒8段致密砂岩气藏储层特征及地质工程一体化对策[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(2): 186-195. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201902006.htmYAO Jingli, LIU Xiaopeng, ZHAO Huitao, et al. Characteristics of He 8th member tight sandstone gas reservoir and solution based on geology-engineering integration in Ordos Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(2): 186-195. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201902006.htm [20] 伍劲, 刘占国, 朱超, 等. 库车坳陷依奇克里克地区中-下侏罗统深层砂岩储层特征及其物性主控因素[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(6): 58-67. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY202006006.htmWU Jin, LIU Zhanguo, ZHU Chao, et al. Characteristics of deep tight sandstone reservoirs of Middle-Lower Jurassic and the main controlling factors in the Yiqikelike area, Kuqa Depression[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2020, 25(6): 58-67. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY202006006.htm [21] 车国琼, 王立恩, 汪轰静, 等. 断层对致密砂岩气藏甜点区的控制作用: 以四川盆地中部蓬莱地区须二段气藏为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39(9): 22-32. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201909004.htmCHE Guoqiong, WANG Lien, WANG Hongjing, et al. Control action of faults on the sweet spots of tight sandstone gas reservoir: a case study of the second member of Xujiahe gas reservoir in the Penglai area, central Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(9): 22-32. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201909004.htm [22] 杨光, 吴凯佳, 黄东, 等. 源储异位型河道砂致密油气成藏特征及勘探模式研究: 以四川盆地侏罗系沙一段致密油气为例[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 33(S1): 10-15.YANG Guang, WU Kaijia, HUANG Dong, et al. Study on the characteristics and exploration patterns of source reservoir heterotopic channel sand tight oil gas reservoirs: take the tight oil and gas in the Jurassic sedimentary section of Sichuan Basin as an example[J]. Journal of Xi'an Petroleum University (Natural Science Edition), 2018, 33(S1): 10-15. [23] 黄东, 李育聪, 刘敏, 等. 川中地区中侏罗统沙溪庙组一段油气藏特征及勘探潜力评价[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2017, 22(2): 44-49. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201702005.htmHUANG Dong, LI Yucong, LIU Min, et al. Reservoir features and exploration potential of the 1st member of Shaximiao Formation of Middle Jurassic in central Sichuan Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2017, 22(2): 44-49. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201702005.htm [24] 杨光, 吴凯佳, 黄东, 等. 源储异位型河道砂致密油气成藏特征及勘探模式研究: 以四川盆地侏罗系沙一段致密油气为例[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 33(S1): 10-15.YANG Guang, WU Kaijia, HUANG Dong, et al. Study on the characteristics and exploration patterns of source reservoir heterotopic channel sand tight oil gas reservoirs: take the tight oil and gas in the Jurassic sedimentary section of Sichuan Basin as an example[J]. Journal of Xi'an Petroleum University (Natural Science Edition), 2018, 33(S1): 10-15. [25] 曾焱, 黎华继, 周文雅, 等. 川西坳陷东坡中江气田沙溪庙组复杂"窄"河道致密砂岩气藏高产富集规律[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2017, 40(4): 1-8. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRKT201704002.htmZENG Yan, LI Huaji, ZHOU Wenya, et al. High-yield enrichment laws of Shaximiao Formation tight sandstone gas reservoir of complex "narrow" channel in Zhongjiang gas field, in the eastern slope of West Sichuan Depression[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2017, 40(4): 1-8. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRKT201704002.htm -
图(8) / 表(2)
计量
- 文章访问数: 675
- HTML全文浏览量: 208
- PDF下载量: 70
- 被引次数: 0
苏公网安备32021102000780号