中国与美国致密油形成条件对比研究

罗群; 高阳; 张泽元; 王仕琛; 红兰; 马文彧; 许倩

doi:10.11781/sysydz202202199

中国与美国致密油形成条件对比研究

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202202199

1.
中国石油大学（北京）非常规油气科学技术研究院, 北京 102249
2.
中国石油新疆油田勘探开发研究院, 新疆克拉玛依 834000

基金项目:

中国石油—中国石油大学战略合作科技专项课题 ZLZX2020-01-6

详细信息

作者简介:
罗群(1963—)，男，博士，教授，从事非常规油气成藏与地质评价研究。E-mail: luoqun2002@263.net

中图分类号: TE132.2
计量
- 文章访问数: 820
- HTML全文浏览量: 251
- PDF下载量: 159
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-07-31
- 修回日期: 2022-01-12
- 刊出日期: 2022-03-28

A comparative study of geological conditions of tight oils in China and USA

1.
Institute of Unconventional Oil and Gas Science and Technology, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
2.
Exploration and Development Research Institute, CNPC Xinjiang Oilfield, Karamay, Xinjiang 834000, China

摘要

摘要: 在拟定、完善致密油定义与内涵的基础上，对中国9个、美国6个共15个致密油盆地的成盆、成烃、成储、成藏进行类比研究。结果表明，中国致密油潜力大，但成藏条件复杂多变；中国有9个致密油盆地，分别位于中国大陆的东、中、西部三个构造区，由于受太平洋、西伯利亚、印度三大板块共同作用，导致了这三个构造区致密油盆地类型、规模、成盆、成烃、成储、成藏、富集的差异和有规律的变化趋势。具体表现在，由西部构造区到中部构造区再到东部构造区，致密油分布规模由小到大再到中，分布层位由上二叠统到中侏罗统再到下白垩统，层位数目由多到中再到少；致密油生成条件由差到好再到较好，储集类型由多而复杂到相对复杂再到相对简单，储集性能由相对好到相对差再到相对好，渗透率由相对高到相对低再到相对高；致密油运聚成藏条件由相对差到好再到较好，油藏类型由多到少再到多；致密油勘探开发潜力西部构造区最大，其次是中部构造区，再次是东部构造区。中美致密油盆地及致密油成藏既有共性也具有明显不同，差异的根本原因是构造的稳定性和沉积相的非均质性：中国致密油盆地构造稳定性差，陆相沉积，而美国致密油盆地构造稳定性好，海相沉积，从而导致中国致密油盆地的生烃能力比美国差，但储集条件总体好于美国。中国致密油的成藏机制与富集模式要比美国更为复杂和丰富，美国致密油的品质总体要好于中国致密油，盆地规模与致密油勘探开发潜力比中国大。
- 致密油 /
- 成藏特征 /
- 中国 /
- 美国
Abstract: On the basis of formulating and perfecting the definition and connotation of tight oil, a comparative study was carried out on the basin formation, hydrocarbon generation, hydrocarbon preservation and reservoir formation for 9 tight oil basins of China and 6 of USA. It was concluded that China′s tight oil has great potential, but the accumulation conditions are complex and diverse. There are 9 tight oil basins in China located in 3 tectonic areas in the eastern, middle and western parts of mainland China. Due to the combined action of the 3 plates of the Pacific, Siberia and India, the type, scale and formation of tight oil basins as well as the generation, preservation and enrichment of hydrocarbon are varied and have regular change trends among the three tectonic areas. From the western tectonic area to the central and then to the eastern one, the distribution scale of tight oil changes from small to large and then to middle, and the number of tight oil distribution horizon decreases from the Upper Permian to the Middle Jurassic and finally to the Lower Cretaceous. The generation conditions of tight oil changed from bad to good and to relatively good. The types of tight oil reservoirs change from multiple and complex to relatively complex and then to relatively simple. The reservoir performance of tight oil reservoirs changes from relatively good to relatively poor and to relatively good, while permeability changes from relatively high to relatively low and to relatively high. The conditions of tight oil migration and accumulation change from relatively poor to good and to relatively good, and the types of tight oil reservoirs change from more to less and back to more. The exploration and development potential of tight oil is the largest in the western tectonic area, followed by the central and then the eastern one. The tight oil basins and tight oil accumulations in China and USA have both commonalities and obvious differences. The fundamental reasons for the differences are the stability of structures and the heterogeneity of sedimentary facies. The tight oil basins in China have poorer tectonic stability and continental deposition, while the tight oil basins in USA have better structural stability and marine deposition. As a result, the hydrocarbon generation capacity of tight oil basins in China is worse than that in USA, but the reservoir conditions are generally better than those in USA. The accumulation mechanism and model of tight oil enrichment in China are more complex than those in USA. The quality of tight oil in USA is generally better than that in China. The size of tight oil basins in USA and the exploration and development potential of tight oil are greater than those in China.
- tight oil /
- accumulation feature /
- China /
- USA

HTML全文

图 1 中国主要盆地致密油资源量预测^[5]

Figure 1. Prediction of tight oil resources in main basins in China

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 中国陆上主要致密油盆地和致密油区分布

Figure 2. Main tight oil basins and tight oil area distribution in China continent

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 中国大陆结构、致密油盆地形成机制与分布模式

Figure 3. Structure, formation mechanism and distribution pattern of tight oil basins in China continent

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组致密油源储组合特征及成藏分布综合剖面

Figure 4. Profile showing characteristics of tight oil source-reservoir assemblage and hydrocarbon accumulation and distribution in Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 美国致密油盆地与致密油藏分布

据文献[27]。

Figure 5. Distribution of tight oil basins and favorable areas in USA

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 中美主要致密油盆地致密油藏地层分布

Table 1. Longitudinal distribution of tight oil reservoirs in main tight oil basins in China and USA

表 2 中美主要致密油盆地类型与沉积背景及烃源岩基本特征对比

Table 2. Comparison of types, sedimentary backgrounds and source rock characteristics of major tight oil basins in China and USA

表 3 中美主要致密油盆地储层基本特征对比

Table 3. Correlation of basic reservoir characteristics of major tight oil basins in China and USA

表 4 中国陆相致密油源储组合类型划分与典型致密油藏

Table 4. Classification of continental tight oil source-reservoir assemblages and typical tight reservoirs in China

表 5 中美主要致密油盆地致密油成藏特征对比

Table 5. Comparison of tight oil accumulation characteristics of major tight oil basins in China and USA

参考文献(34)

[1]	贾承造, 邹才能, 李建忠, 等. 中国致密油评价标准、主要类型、基本特征及资源前景[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(3): 343-350. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201203000.htm JIA Chengzao, ZOU Caineng, LI Jianzhong, et al. Assessment criteria, main types, basic features and resource prospects of the tight oil in China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(3): 343-350. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201203000.htm
[2]	CLARKSON C R, PEDERSEN P K. Production analysis of western Canadian unconventional light oil plays[C]//Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference. Calgary: SPE, 2011.
[3]	MADDEN B, VOSSOUGHI S. US shale gas and tight oil boom: the opportunities and risks for America[C]//SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition. Jakarta: SPE, 2013.
[4]	赵政璋, 杜金虎. 致密油气[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2012: 1-199. ZHAO Zhengzhang, DU Jinhu. Tight oil and gas[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2012: 1-199.
[5]	邹才能, 朱如凯, 吴松涛, 等. 常规与非常规油气聚集类型、特征、机理及展望: 以中国致密油和致密气为例[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(2): 173-187. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201202002.htm ZOU Caineng, ZHU Rukai, WU Songtao, et al. Types, characteristics, genesis and prospects of conventional and unconventional hydrocarbon accumulations: taking tight oil and tight gas in China as an instance[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(2): 173-187. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201202002.htm
[6]	胡素云, 朱如凯, 吴松涛, 等. 中国陆相致密油效益勘探开发[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(4): 737-748. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201804021.htm HU Suyun, ZHU Rukai, WU Songtao, et al. Profitable exploration and development of continental tight oil in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(4): 737-748. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201804021.htm
[7]	刘文锋, 张旭阳, 盛舒遥, 等. 致密油产量递减分析新组合方法研究: 以玛湖致密油藏为例[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2021, 11(6): 911-916. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202106017.htm LIU Wenfeng, ZHANG Xuyang, SHENG Shuyao, et al. Research on a new combination method of production decline analysis for tight oil: cases study of Mahu tight reservoir[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(6): 911-916. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202106017.htm
[8]	白军辉. 三肇地区致密油成藏主控因素与成藏模式[J]. 特种油气藏, 2021, 28(3): 54-61. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2021.03.008 BAI Junhui. Main controlling factors and modes of tight oil accumulation in Sanzhao area[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2021, 28(3): 54-61. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2021.03.008
[9]	唐维宇, 尚云志, SHENG James J, 等. 大庆油田敖南区块扶余油层致密油提高采收率潜力评价[J]. 断块油气田, 2021, (1): 51-56. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202101011.htm TANG Weiyu, SHANG Yunzhi, SHENG James J, et al. Evaluation of the EOR potential of the Fuyu tight oil reservoir in Aonan area of Daqing Oilfield[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2021, (1): 51-56. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202101011.htm
[10]	张冬琳, COFFEY Matthew, 唐友军, 等. 致密油/凝析油中的轻烃地球化学特征: 以美国伍德福德—密西西比油气区带为例[J]. 断块油气田, 2020, 27(4): 438-442, 453. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202004007.htm ZHANG Donglin, COFFEY Matthew, TANG Youjun, et al. Geoche-mical characteristics of light hydrocarbons in tight oil /condensate oil: a case study of Woodford-Mississippian oil play in U.S.A. [J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2020, 27(4): 438-442, 453. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202004007.htm
[11]	张君峰, 毕海滨, 许浩, 等. 国外致密油勘探开发新进展及借鉴意义[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(2): 127-137. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201502001.htm ZHANG Junfeng, BI Haibin, XU Hao, et al. New progress and reference significance of overseas tight oil exploration and development[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(2): 127-137. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201502001.htm
[12]	FATTOUH B, SEN A. The US tight oil revolution in a global perspective[M]. Oxford: University of Oxford, 2013: 1-12.
[13]	邹才能, 陶士振, 杨智, 等. 中国非常规油气勘探与研究新进展[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2012, 31(4): 312-322. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KYDH201204002.htm ZOU Caineng, TAO Shizhen, YANG Zhi, et al. New Advance in unconventional petroleum exploration and research in China[J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 2012, 31(4): 312-322. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KYDH201204002.htm
[14]	邹才能, 陶士振, 侯连华, 等. 非常规油气地质[M]. 2版. 北京: 地质出版社, 2013: 1-58. ZOU Caineng, TAO Shizhen, HOU Lianhua, et al. Unconventional petroleum geology[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2013: 1-58.
[15]	杜金虎, 何海清, 杨涛, 等. 中国致密油勘探进展及面临的挑战[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2014, 19(1): 1-9. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201401001.htm DU Jinhu, HE Haiqing, YANG Tao, et al. Progress in China's tight oil exploration and challenges[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2014, 19(1): 1-9. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201401001.htm
[16]	李德生. 中国含油气盆地的构造类型[J]. 石油学报, 1982(3): 1-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB199604001.htm LI Desheng. Tectonic Types of oil and gas basins in China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 1982(3): 1-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB199604001.htm
[17]	罗志立, 李景明, 刘树根. 中国板块构造和含油气盆地分析[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2005: 1-32. LUO Zhili, LI Jingming, LIU Shugen. Plate tectonic analysis of petroliferous basins in China[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2005: 1-32.
[18]	翟光明, 王世洪, 靳久强. 论块体油气地质体与油气勘探[J]. 石油学报, 2009, 30(4): 475-483. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB200904002.htm ZHAI Guangming, WANG Shihong, JIN Jiuqiang. Discussion on block petroliferous geologic body and oil-gas exploration[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2009, 30(4): 475-483. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB200904002.htm
[19]	陈发景, 汪新文. 中国中、新生代含油气盆地成因类型、构造体系及地球动力学模式[J]. 现代地质, 1997, 11(4): 409-424. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ704.000.htm CHEN Fajing, WANG Xinwen. Genetic types, tectonic systems and geodynamic models of Mesozoic and Cenozoic oil- and gas-bearing basins in China[J]. Geoscience, 1997, 11(4): 409-424. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ704.000.htm
[20]	何登发, 李德生, 吕修祥. 中国西北地区含油气盆地构造类型[J]. 石油学报, 1996, 17(4): 8-18. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB199604001.htm HE Dengfa, LI Desheng, LÜ Xiuxiang. Tectonic types of petroli-ferous basins in NW China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 1996, 17(4): 8-18. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB199604001.htm
[21]	杨玉华. 三肇凹陷扶杨油层凹陷区上生下储式源储组合油分布规律及其控制因素[J]. 大庆石油学院学报, 2009, 33(2): 1-5. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQSY200902004.htm YANG Yuhua. Oil distribution law and its influence factors in combination of generation upper and reservoir lower of depression: a example of FY oil layer in Sanzhao Depression[J]. Journal of Daqing Petroleum Institute, 2009, 33(2): 1-5. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQSY200902004.htm
[22]	易立. 库车坳陷前陆冲断带断源储盖组合样式及其对成藏的控制[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2013, 18(5): 10-14. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201305002.htm YI Li. Fault-source-reservoir-cap combinations and their control on accumulation in foreland thrust belt of Kuqa Depression[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2013, 18(5): 10-14. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201305002.htm
[23]	邱振, 李建忠, 吴晓智, 等. 国内外致密油勘探现状、主要地质特征及差异[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(4): 119-126. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YANX201504024.htm QIU Zhen, LI Jianzhong, WU Xiaozhi, et al. Exploration status, main geologic characteristics and their differences of tight oil between America and China[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2015, 27(4): 119-126. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YANX201504024.htm
[24]	白国平, 邱海华, 邓舟舟, 等. 美国页岩油资源分布特征与主控因素研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(4): 524-532. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202004524 BAI Guoping, QIU Haihua, DENG Zhouzhou, et al. Distribution and main controls for shale oil resources in USA[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(4): 524-532. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202004524
[25]	罗群, 付立新, 杨威, 等. 全球典型致密油盆地地质特征[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2021: 126-131. LUO Qun, FU Lixin, YANG Wei, et al. Geological characteristics of typical tight oil basins in the world[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2021: 126-131.
[26]	胡素云, 李建忠, 王铜山, 等. 中国石油油气资源潜力分析与勘探选区思考[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(5): 813-823. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202005813 HU Suyun, LI Jianzhong, WANG Tongshan, et al. CNPC oil and gas resource potential and exploration target selection[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(5): 813-823. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202005813
[27]	EIA. Outlook for U.S. shale oil and gas[R/OL]. 2014. http://www.eia.gov/pressroom/presentations.cfm?year=2014.
[28]	方欣欣, 郭迎春, 王朋, 等. 致密油成藏研究进展与待解决的重要科学问题[J]. 中国地质, 2020, 47(1): 43-56. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI202001005.htm FANG Xinxin, GUO Yingchun, WANG Peng, et al. The progress of research on tight oil accumulation and several scientific issues requiring further study[J]. Geology in China, 2020, 47(1): 43-56. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI202001005.htm
[29]	EIA. Review of emerging resources: U.S. shale gas and shale oil plays[R]. Washington: EIA, 2011.
[30]	MAUGERI L. The shale oil boom: a U.S. phenomenon[R]. Cambridge: Harvard University, 2013: 55-63.
[31]	郭鸣黎, 陈艳, 郑振恒, 等. 致密油藏可采储量概率快速评估方法: 以红河油田长8油藏为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(1): 154-160. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202101154 GUO Mingli, CHEN Yan, ZHENG Zhenheng, et al. Rapid evaluation of probable recoverable reserves in tight reservoirs: a case study of Chang 8 reservoir (eighth member of Yanchang Formation) in Honghe oil field[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(1): 154-160. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202101154
[32]	付小东, 张天付, 吴健平, 等. 二连盆地阿南凹陷白垩系腾格尔组致密油储层特征及主控因素[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(1): 64-76. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202101064 FU Xiaodong, ZHANG Tianfu, WU Jianping, et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors of tight oil reservoirs in Cretaceous Tengger Formation, A'nan Sag, Erlian Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(1): 64-76. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202101064
[33]	夏东领, 伍岳, 夏冬冬, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地南缘红河油田长8致密油藏非均质性表征方法[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(4): 704-712. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202104704 XIA Dongling, WU Yue, XIA Dongdong, et al. Characterization method of heterogeneity for Chang 8 tight reservoir in Honghe oil field, southern margin of Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(4): 704-712. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202104704
[34]	余功铭, 钟文新, 余子牛, 等. 美国油气资源勘探开发潜力分析[J]. 世界石油工业, 2019, 26(4): 24-31. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SSYY201904010.htm YU Gongming, ZHONG Wenxin, YU Ziniu, et al. Analysis on exploration and development of oil and gas resources in the USA[J]. World Petroleum Industry, 2019, 26(4): 24-31. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SSYY201904010.htm