Effectiveness of marine carbonate source rocks: a case study of Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation in Western Sichuan Depression
-
摘要: 中三叠统雷口坡组是近年来四川盆地川西坳陷天然气勘探的热点层系，对其海相碳酸盐岩烃源岩有效性认识的分歧制约了对主力气源和勘探方向的认识。对川西坳陷雷口坡组有机岩石学和有机地球化学等方面进行了综合研究，结果表明雷口坡组碳酸盐岩中干酪根显微组分以腐泥无定形体为主；藻纹层与非纹层部分有机碳含量没有明显差异；雷口坡组三段有机碳含量与黏土矿物含量呈正相关，与碳酸盐矿物含量呈负相关；与常规方法测得的有机碳含量相比，包含有机酸盐在内的总有机碳含量略高，但差值多小于0.2%。雷口坡组碳酸盐岩有机质丰度和生烃潜力整体偏低，有效烃源岩达标率仅为6.13%，相对富有机质层段的分布具有较强的局限性。雷口坡组碳酸盐岩单独难以构成主力烃源岩，对气藏的贡献较为有限。因此，气源输导条件是川西坳陷雷口坡组勘探的重要影响因素，寻找规模性的天然气聚集，应重点关注连通下伏上二叠统烃源岩的通源断裂发育区。Abstract: The Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation (T2l) has been regarded as one of the most important strata for natural gas exploration in the Western Sichuan Depression of the Sichuan Basin. The main gas source has not been determined due to the controversy on the effectiveness of the T2l marine carbonate source rocks and exploration direction is breezing. Integrated studies on organic petrology and organic geochemistry indicate that, the organic macerals of kerogen in the T2l carbonate rocks in the Western Sichuan Depression are mainly consisted of sapropelic amorphous bodies. The total organic carbon (TOC) contents of both algal laminae and non-laminae sections insignificantly varied. The TOC content of the 3rd member of T2l is positively correlated with the content of clay minerals and negatively correlated with the content of carbonate minerals. If carboxylate is included to be calculated for these carbonates, the TOC content show increments no more than 0.2%. The T2l carbonate rocks in the Western Sichuan Depression mainly display low organic abundance and hydrocarbon potential, and only6.13% of the studied samples reach the standard values of effective source rocks, moreover, relative organic-rich layers are limitedly distributed. It is concluded that T2l marine carbonate rocks in the Western Sichuan Depression is unlikely to be main source rocks solely, and they can only contribute to the gas accumulation with a limited amount. Therefore, the migrating conditions is an important controlling factor to be considered for the T2l gas exploration, and the exploration of large-scale gas accumulation should focus on the areas with developed faults connecting the underlying Upper Permian source rocks.
-
图 1 川西坳陷构造单元划分(a)及中三叠统雷口坡组四段柱状图(b)
b图据参考文献[20]修改。
Figure 1. Tectonic units of Western Sichuan Depression (a) and stratigraphic column of 4th member of Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation (b)
图 2 不同体系模拟实验中泥灰岩有机碳恢复系数与原始有机碳相关性
Figure 2. Correlation between TOC recovery coefficients and original TOC contents of marlstones in simulation experiments under different systems
图 3 川西坳陷中三叠统雷口坡组四段藻纹层白云岩TOC含量分布
Figure 3. Distribution of TOC contents of algal laminated dolomites in 4th member of Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation, Western Sichuan Depression
图 4 四川盆地雷口坡组三段碳酸盐岩TOC与碳酸盐矿物(a)和黏土矿物(b)含量相关性
Figure 4. Correlation of TOC contents versus contents of carbonates (a) and clay minerals (b) in carbonate rocks from 3rd member of Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation, Sichuan Basin
图 5 川西坳陷中三叠统雷口坡组碳酸盐岩常规TOC与含有机酸盐TOC增加值相关性
数据来自参考文献[18]。
Figure 5. Correlation between conventional TOC and TOC increment by organic acid salt of carbonate rocks in Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation, Western Sichuan Depression
图 6 川西坳陷中三叠统雷口坡组不同层段残余TOC与深度的关系
Figure 6. Correlation diagram between residual TOC content and depth of different members of Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation, Western Sichuan Depression
图 7 川西坳陷中三叠统雷口坡组四段岩心样品中孔隙和裂缝充填特征
a.A-17井，6 256.87~6 256.99 m，白云岩中溶蚀孔洞，未充填沥青；b.A-13井，5 693.96 m，残余藻团块微粉晶白云岩，晶间孔和粒内溶孔中未被充填，铸体薄片，正交偏光；c.A-11井，6 178.40 m，灰质白云岩中的裂缝和窗格孔未被充填，铸体薄片，正交偏光
Figure 7. Filling characteristics of pores and fissures in core samples from 4th member of Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation, Western Sichuan Depression
表 1 川西坳陷中三叠统雷口坡组碳酸盐岩干酪根有机显微组分构成
Table 1. Compositions of organic macerals in kerogen from carbonate rocks in Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation, Western Sichuan Depression
井号 深度/m 层位 腐泥组/% 壳质组/% 镜质组/% 惰性组/% 固体沥青/% 类型指数(TI) 干酪根类型 A-13 5 691.8 T2l43 18 82 -57 Ⅲ A-13 5 701.0 T2l43 46 52 2 -18 Ⅲ A-13 5 707.2 T2l43 52 46 2 -10.5 Ⅲ A-13 5 713.8 T2l43 100 100 Ⅰ A-11 6 153.0 T2l43 55 42 3 -7 Ⅲ A-3 5 766.5 T2l43 98 2 98 Ⅰ A-3 5 809.5 T2l43 96 4 96 Ⅰ A-8 5 524.3 T2l43 95 5 95 Ⅰ A-9 5 506.6 T2l3 93 7 93 Ⅰ A-9 5 846.0 T2l2 95 5 95 Ⅰ 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 川西坳陷中三叠统雷口坡组三段碳酸盐岩TOC含量与矿物组成
Table 2. TOC contents and mineral compositions of carbonate rocks from 3rd member of Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation, Western Sichuan Depression
井号 岩性 ω(TOC)/% 矿物组成/% 黏土 石英 钾长石 斜长石 方解石 白云石 菱铁矿 黄铁矿 石膏 硬石膏 CT1 泥灰岩 1.14 46.5 19.7 3.4 17.7 9.1 1.1 1.6 0.9 CT1 泥灰岩 0.82 34.5 12.0 2.4 46.0 2.2 0.8 1.0 0.1 0.6 CT1 泥灰岩 0.74 34.4 13.6 0.2 2.7 39.4 7.1 0.6 1.0 0.2 0.8 Mo27 灰岩 0.06 6.8 2.4 0.3 0.3 84.2 4.9 0.4 0.3 0.4 Mo27 灰岩 0.09 6.5 2.1 0.7 86.4 3.1 0.4 0.3 0.5 A-18 白云岩 0.08 7.2 1.3 0.4 0.3 0.5 70.3 0.4 0.6 0.1 18.9 A-18 白云岩 0.10 2.8 0.5 0.1 84.5 0.1 0.2 11.8 A-18 白云岩 0.14 8.5 1.0 0.4 0.5 0.3 87.1 0.2 0.7 1.3 A-18 白云岩 0.15 7.3 1.9 0.3 0.5 0.1 83.7 0.2 0.4 5.6 A-18 白云岩 0.12 6.2 2.5 0.4 0.4 0.1 89.4 0.1 0.6 0.1 0.2 A-18 白云岩 0.07 6.3 1.5 0.4 0.1 91.1 0.2 0.4 A-18 白云岩 0.08 4.2 1.5 0.2 0.3 0.1 93.1 0.3 0.3 A-18 白云岩 0.06 4.9 1.6 0.1 0.3 0.1 92.3 0.3 0.3 A-18 白云岩 0.04 4.5 1.4 0.3 0.5 92.2 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.2 A-18 白云岩 0.11 2.9 0.3 0.2 0.3 3.5 80.0 0.5 12.3 A-18 白云岩 0.06 5.4 1.7 0.4 0.2 31.5 59.1 0.1 0.4 1.2
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 川西坳陷中三叠统雷口坡组不同层段碳酸盐岩总有机碳含量统计
Table 3. Statistics of TOC contents for carbonate rocks from different members of Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation, Western Sichuan Depression
TOC统计值 层位 T2l1 T2l2 T2l3 T2l4 TOC最小值/% 0.08 0.05 0.02 0.02 TOC最大值/% 0.62 1.72 0.93 1.08 TOC平均值/% 0.22 0.19 0.15 0.16 样品数/个 127 189 345 694 ω(TOC)≥0.4%的样品数/个 10 13 18 42 达标率/% 7.87 6.88 5.22 6.05 达标样品TOC平均值/% 0.46 0.80 0.67 0.62
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 刘树根, 孙玮, 宋金民, 等. 四川盆地中三叠统雷口坡组天然气勘探的关键地质问题[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(2): 151-167. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201902001.htmLIU Shugen, SUN Wei, SONG Jinmin, et al. The key geological problems of natural gas exploration in the Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation in Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2019, 30(2): 151-167. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201902001.htm [2] 吴小奇, 陈迎宾, 翟常博, 等. 四川盆地中三叠统雷口坡组天然气来源及勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2020, 31(9): 1204-1215. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX202009002.htmWU Xiaoqi, CHEN Yingbin, ZHAI Changbo, et al. Gas source and exploration direction of the Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2020, 31(9): 1204-1215. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX202009002.htm [3] 宋晓波, 袁洪, 隆轲, 等. 川西地区雷口坡组潮坪白云岩气藏成藏地质特征及富集规律[J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39(S1): 54-59. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG2019S1010.htmSONG Xiaobo, YUAN Hong, LONG Ke, et al. Geological characteristics of gas accumulation and enrichment rule of tidal-flat dolomite gas pools in the Leikoupo Formation in western Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(S1): 54-59. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG2019S1010.htm [4] 周凌方, 钱一雄, 宋晓波, 等. 四川盆地西部彭州气田中三叠统雷口坡组四段上亚段白云岩孔隙表征、分布及成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(1): 177-188. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202001017.htmZHOU Lingfang, QIAN Yixiong, SONG Xiaobo, et al. Characte-ristics, distribution and origin of dolomite reservoir in the upper Lei4 member of the Middle Triassic, Pengzhou gas field, western Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(1): 177-188. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202001017.htm [5] 肖开华, 李宏涛, 段永明, 等. 四川盆地川西气田雷口坡组气藏储层特征及其主控因素[J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39(6): 34-44. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201906006.htmXIAO Kaihua, LI Hongtao, DUAN Yongming, et al. Reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors of the Leikoupo gas pools in the western Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(6): 34-44. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201906006.htm [6] 钱一雄, 武恒志, 周凌方, 等. 川西中三叠统雷口坡组三段—四段白云岩特征与成因: 来自于岩相学及地球化学的约束[J]. 岩石学报, 2019, 35(4): 1161-1180. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201904012.htmQIAN Yixiong, WU Hengzhi, ZHOU Lingfang, et al. Characteristic and origin of dolomites in the third and fourth members of Leikoupo Formation of the Middle Triassic in NW Sichuan Basin: constraints in mineralogical, petrographic and geochemical data[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2019, 35(4): 1161-1180. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201904012.htm [7] 李勇, 邓美洲, 李国蓉, 等. 川西龙门山前带雷口坡组四段古表生期大气水溶蚀作用对储集层的影响[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(1): 56-63. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202101056LI Yong, DENG Meizhou, LI Guorong, et al. Palaeokarst characteristics and effects on reservoirs in the fourth member of Leikoupo Formation, Longmen Mountain front, western Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(1): 56-63. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202101056 [8] 何传亮, 康建云, 王辛, 等. 基于沉积微相—储集空间类型的储集层流动单元划分: 以彭州气田雷口坡组碳酸盐岩储集层为例[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2020, 41(4): 435-443. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD202004008.htmHE Chuanliang, KANG Jianyun, WANG Xin, et al. Reservoir flow unit division based on sedimentary microfacies-reservoir space type: a case of carbonate reservoir of Leikoupo formation in Pengzhou gas field[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2020, 41(4): 435-443. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD202004008.htm [9] 孟宪武, 刘勇, 石国山, 等. 四川盆地川西坳陷中段构造演化对中三叠统雷口坡组油气成藏的控制作用[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(6): 986-995. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202106986MENG Xianwu, LIU Yong, SHI Guoshan, et al. The structural evolution of the middle section of the West Sichuan Depression in the Sichuan Basin controlled the hydrocarbon accumulation in the Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(6): 986-995. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202106986 [10] 宋晓波, 隆轲, 王琼仙, 等. 川西地区中三叠统雷口坡组四段上亚段沉积特征[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(6): 976-985. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202106976SONG Xiaobo, LONG Ke, WANG Qiongxian, et al. Sedimentary characteristics of the upper part of the fourth member of Leikoupo Formation of Middle Triassic in western Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(6): 976-985. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202106976 [11] 段金宝, 金民东, 范志伟, 等. 四川盆地东北部中三叠统雷口坡组四段优质储层发育特征及勘探方向[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(4): 898-908. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202104012.htmDUAN Jinbao, JIN Mindong, FAN Zhiwei, et al. Characteristics and favorable plays for high-quality reservoirs in the Middle Triassic Lei 4 Member, Yuanba area, northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(4): 898-908. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202104012.htm [12] 王琼仙, 宋晓波, 王东, 等. 川西龙门山前雷口坡组四段储层特征及形成机理[J]. 石油实验地质, 2017, 39(4): 491-497. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201704491WANG Qiongxian, SONG Xiaobo, WANG Dong, et al. Reservoir characteristics and formation mechanism of the 4th member of the Leikoupo Formation in Longmen Mountain front[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2017, 39(4): 491-497. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201704491 [13] 隆轲, 陈智远, 宋晓波, 等. 川西地区中三叠统雷口坡组气藏气源分析[J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39(S1): 48-53. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG2019S1009.htmLONG Ke, CHEN Zhiyuan, SONG Xiaobo, et al. Gas source analysis of gas pools in the Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation in the western Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(S1): 48-53. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG2019S1009.htm [14] 吴小奇, 陈迎宾, 翟常博, 等. 川西坳陷中三叠统雷口坡组天然气气源对比[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(8): 918-927, 1018. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB202008002.htmWU Xiaoqi, CHEN Yingbin, ZHAI Changbo, et al. Gas-source correlation of natural gas in the Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation in the Western Sichuan Depression[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(8): 918-927, 1018. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB202008002.htm [15] WU Xiaoqi, LIU Quanyou, CHEN Yingbin, et al. Constraints of molecular and stable isotopic compositions on the origin of natural gas from Middle Triassic reservoirs in the Chuanxi large gas field, Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2020, 204: 104589. [16] 孙玮, 刘树根, 曹俊兴, 等. 四川叠合盆地西部中北段深层—超深层海相大型气田形成条件分析[J]. 岩石学报, 2017, 33(4): 1171-1188. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201704012.htmSUN Wei, LIU Shugen, CAO Junxing, et al. Analysis on the formation conditions of large-scale marine deep and super-deep strata gas fields in the middle-northern segments of Western Sichuan Superimposed Basin, China[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2017, 33(4): 1171-1188. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201704012.htm [17] WU Xiaoqi, CHEN Yingbin, LIU Guangxiang, et al. Geochemical characteristics and origin of natural gas reservoired in the 4th member of the Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation in the Western Sichuan Depression, Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Geoscience, 2017, 2(2): 99-108. [18] 杨克明. 四川盆地西部中三叠统雷口坡组烃源岩生烃潜力分析[J]. 石油实验地质, 2016, 38(3): 366-374. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201603366YANG Keming. Hydrocarbon potential of source rocks in the Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation in the Western Sichuan Depression[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2016, 38(3): 366-374. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201603366 [19] 谢刚平. 川西坳陷中三叠统雷口坡组四段气藏气源分析[J]. 石油实验地质, 2015, 37(4): 418-422. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201504418XIE Gangping. Source of gas reservoirs in the fourth member of the Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation in Western Sichuan Depression[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2015, 37(4): 418-422. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201504418 [20] 王琼仙, 宋晓波, 陈洪德, 等. 川西龙门山前雷口坡组四段白云岩储层胶结物对早期孔隙的影响[J]. 石油实验地质, 2018, 40(6): 757-763. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201806757WANG Qiongxian, SONG Xiaobo, CHEN Hongde, et al. Cement characteristics and effects on dolomite reservoir pores in the fourth member of Leikoupo Formation, Longmen Mountain front, western Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2018, 40(6): 757-763. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201806757 [21] 钟宁宁, 卢双舫, 黄志龙, 等. 烃源岩生烃演化过程TOC值的演变及其控制因素[J]. 中国科学(D辑地球科学), 2004, 34(S1): 120-126. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDXK2004S1013.htmZHONG Ningning, LU Shuangfang, HUANG Zhilong, et al. TOC changes in the process of thermal evolution of source rock and its controls[J]. Science in China(Series D Earth Sciences), 2004, 47(S2): 141-149. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDXK2004S1013.htm [22] 张水昌, 梁狄刚, 张大江. 关于古生界烃源岩有机质丰度的评价标准[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2002, 29(2): 8-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK200202001.htmZHANG Shuichang, LIANG Digang, ZHANG Dajiang. Evaluation criteria for Paleozoic effective hydrocarbon source rocks[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2002, 29(2): 8-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK200202001.htm [23] 梁狄刚, 张水昌, 张宝民, 等. 从塔里木盆地看中国海相生油问题[J]. 地学前缘, 2000, 7(4): 534-547. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY200004032.htmLIANG Digang, ZHANG Shuichang, ZHANG Baomin, et al. Understanding on marine oil generation in China based on Tarim Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2000, 7(4): 534-547. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY200004032.htm [24] 陈建平, 梁狄刚, 张水昌, 等. 中国古生界海相烃源岩生烃潜力评价标准与方法[J]. 地质学报, 2012, 86(7): 1132-1142. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE201207009.htmCHEN Jianping, LIANG Digang, ZHANG Shuichang, et al. Evaluation criterion and methods of the hydrocarbon generation potential for China's Paleozoic marine source rocks[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2012, 86(7): 1132-1142. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE201207009.htm [25] 秦建中, 金聚畅, 刘宝泉. 海相不同类型烃源岩有机质丰度热演化规律[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2005, 26(2): 177-184. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT200502008.htmQIN Jianzhong, JIN Juchang, LIU Baoquan. Thermal evolution pattern of organic matter abundance in various marine source rocks[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2005, 26(2): 177-184. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT200502008.htm [26] JARVIE D M. Shale resource systems for oil and gas: part 1—shale-gas resource systems[M]//BREYER J A. Shale reservoirs—giant resources for the 21st century, AAPG memoir 97. Tulsa: AAPG, 2012: 69-87. [27] 王彦青, 陈迎宾, 胡烨, 等. 蒸发环境烃源岩生烃能力探讨: 以川西坳陷雷口坡组为例[J]. 断块油气田, 2018, 25(4): 426-430. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT201804004.htmWANG Yanqing, CHEN Yingbin, HU Ye, et al. Discussion on hydrocarbon generation ability of evaporation environment: a case study of Leikoupo Formation in West Sichuan Depression[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2018, 25(4): 426-430. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT201804004.htm [28] 陈建平, 李伟, 倪云燕, 等. 四川盆地二叠系烃源岩及其天然气勘探潜力(二): 烃源岩地球化学特征与天然气资源潜力[J]. 天然气工业, 2018, 38(6): 33-45. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201806009.htmCHEN Jianping, LI Wei, NI Yunyan, et al. The Permian source rocks in the Sichuan Basin and its natural gas exploration potential (part 2): geochemical characteristics of source rocks and latent capacity of natural gas resources[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2018, 38(6): 33-45. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201806009.htm [29] 黄士鹏, 江青春, 汪泽成, 等. 四川盆地中二叠统栖霞组与茅口组烃源岩的差异性[J]. 天然气工业, 2016, 36(12): 26-34. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201612006.htmHUANG Shipeng, JIANG Qingchun, WANG Zecheng, et al. Differences between the Middle Permian Qixia and Maokou source rocks in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2016, 36(12): 26-34. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201612006.htm [30] 姚威, 许锦, 夏文谦, 等. 四川盆地涪陵地区茅一段酸解气、吸附气特征及气源对比[J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39(6): 45-50. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201906008.htmYAO Wei, XU Jin, XIA Wenqian, et al. A characteristic analysis between acidolysis gas and absorbed gas and its application to gas-source correlation in Mao 1 Member, Fuling area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(6): 45-50. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201906008.htm [31] 胡国艺, 贺飞, 米敬奎, 等. 川西北地区海相烃源岩地球化学特征、分布规律及天然气勘探潜力[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2021, 32(3): 319-333. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX202103001.htmHU Guoyi, HE Fei, MI Jingkui, et al. The geochemical characteristics, distribution patterns, and gas exploration potential of marine source rocks in northwest Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2021, 32(3): 319-333. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX202103001.htm [32] 刘文汇, 赵恒, 刘全有, 等. 膏盐岩层系在海相油气成藏中的潜在作用[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(12): 1451-1462. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201612001.htmLIU Wenhui, ZHAO Heng, LIU Quanyou, et al. Potential role of gypsum strata series in marine hydrocarbon accumulation[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(12): 1451-1462. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201612001.htm [33] 胡素云, 石书缘, 王铜山, 等. 膏盐环境对碳酸盐岩层系成烃、成储和成藏的影响[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2016, 21(2): 20-27. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201602003.htmHU Suyun, SHI Shuyuan, WANG Tongshan, et al. Effect of gypsum-salt environment on hydrocarbon generation, reservoir-forming and hydrocarbon accumulation in carbonate strata[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2016, 21(2): 20-27. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201602003.htm [34] KIRKLAND D W, EVANS R. Perspectives: source-rock potential of evaporitic environment[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1981, 65(2): 181-190. [35] WARREN J K. Shallow-water evaporitic environments and their source rock potential[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 1986, 56(3): 442-454. [36] BUSSON G. Relationship between different types of evaporitic deposits, and the occurrence of organic-rich layers (potential source-rocks)[J]. Carbonates and Evaporites, 1991, 6(2): 177-192. [37] WARREN J K. Evaporitic source rocks: mesohaline responses to cycles of "famine or feast" in layered brines[M]//Quaternary Carbonate and Evaporite Sedimentary Facies and Their Ancient Analogues. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2011: 315-392. [38] 刘鹏, 王晓锋, 房嬛, 等. 碳酸盐岩有机质丰度测试新方法[J]. 沉积学报, 2016, 34(1): 200-206. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB201601019.htmLIU Peng, WANG Xiaofeng, FANG Xuan, et al. A new method to measure the value of organic abundance in carbonate rocks[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2016, 34(1): 200-206. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB201601019.htm [39] 雷天柱, 夏燕青, 邱军利, 等. 烃源岩酸解过程中损失有机质的研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2009, 20(6): 957-960. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX200906021.htmLEI Tianzhu, XIA Yanqing, QIU Junli, et al. Organic matter loss during the acidolysis of hydrocarbon source rocks[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2009, 20(6): 957-960. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX200906021.htm [40] 刘文汇, 腾格尔, 王晓锋, 等. 中国海相碳酸盐岩层系有机质生烃理论新解[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2017, 44(1): 155-164. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201701020.htmLIU Wenhui, TENGER B, WANG Xiaofeng, et al. New knowledge of hydrocarbon generating theory of organic matter in Chinese marine carbonates[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44(1): 155-164. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201701020.htm [41] 雷天柱, 夏燕青, 靳明, 等. 有机酸盐热模拟产物中芳烃馏分特征及其地质意义[J]. 沉积学报, 2010, 28(6): 1250-1253. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB201006025.htmLEI Tianzhu, XIA Yanqing, JIN Ming, et al. The geological significance and characteristics of aromatic fraction during organic acid salt generating hydrocarbon[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2010, 28(6): 1250-1253. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB201006025.htm [42] 刘全有, 金之钧, 刘文汇, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地海相层系中有机酸盐存在以及对低丰度高演化烃源岩生烃潜力评价的影响[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2013, 43(12): 1975-1983. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDXK201312008.htmLIU Quanyou, JIN Zhijun, LIU Wenhui, et al. Presence of carboxylate salts in marine carbonate strata of the Ordos Basin and their impact on hydrocarbon generation evaluation of low TOC, high maturity source rocks[J]. Science China Earth Sciences, 2013, 56(12): 2141-2149. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDXK201312008.htm [43] 郝彬, 赵文智, 胡素云, 等. 川中地区寒武系龙王庙组沥青成因与油气成藏史[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(8): 863-875. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201708002.htmHAO Bin, ZHAO Wenzhi, HU Suyun, et al. Bitumen genesis and hydrocarbon accumulation history of the Cambrian Longwangmiao Formation in central Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2017, 38(8): 863-875. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201708002.htm [44] 吴小奇, 陈迎宾, 翟常博, 等. 川西坳陷中三叠统雷口坡组沥青地球化学特征及气源示踪[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(2): 407-418. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202202013.htmWU Xiaoqi, CHEN Yingbin, ZHAI Changbo, et al. Geochemical characteristics of bitumen and tracing of gas source in the Middle Triassic Leikoupo Formation, Western Sichuan Depression [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(2): 407-418. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202202013.htm [45] 刘文汇, 张建勇, 范明, 等. 叠合盆地天然气的重要来源: 分散可溶有机质[J]. 石油实验地质, 2007, 29(1): 1-6. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200701001LIU Wenhui, ZHANG Jianyong, FAN Ming, et al. Gas generation character of dissipated soluble organic matter[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2007, 29(1): 1-6. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200701001 -
图(7) / 表(3)
计量
- 文章访问数: 842
- HTML全文浏览量: 312
- PDF下载量: 76
- 被引次数: 0
苏公网安备32021102000780号