An estimation method for hydrocarbon expected value of exploration target group in mature exploration area
-
摘要: 我国的矿业权出让制度改革正在全面推进，合理评价区块期望价值对于油公司的区块进退决策至关重要。对于含有多个勘探目标的成熟探区，简单地将各目标价值相加通常会高估区块期望价值，应综合考虑两方面的因素：一是各勘探目标的地质情况，包括相对空间位置关系、地质成功率、资源规模和地质相关性等；二是油公司的勘探策略，包括干井承受能力、承诺钻井数量、对各目标的钻探次序等。为此，从油公司区块进退决策实际出发，提出一套基于概率论的勘探目标群期望价值估算方法，并通过实例讨论了上述因素对区块期望价值的影响。Abstract: The transfer system reform of mining rights in China is promoted in a comprehensive way. The rational evaluation of the expected value of blocks is crucial to the decision-making of bidding and exiting blocks for oil companies. As to the mature exploration area containing multiple exploration targets, adding up each expected value of each target simply usually over-estimates the expected value of blocks. Two factors should be comprehensively considered. The first one is geological conditions, including relative spatial relation, drilling success rate, resource scale and geological relation, etc. The second one is exploration strategy of oil company, including the bearing capacity of dry well, the number of commitment well and the drilling sorting of each exploration target, etc. Therefore, a set of estimation methods for exploration target group based on probabilistic theory was proposed from the oil company's practical decision-making of bidding and exiting blocks. The effect of the above factors on the expected value of blocks was also discussed using a specific block as an example.
-
Key words:
- expected value /
- exploration target /
- probabilistic method /
- block evaluation
-
图 4 5号目标保存因子(a)和资源量(b)概率分布模型
Figure 4. Probability distribution model of preservation (a) and resources (b) of target No.5
图 5 勘探目标群T期望价值的蒙特卡洛模拟流程
Figure 5. Monte Carlo simulation workflow of expected value of exploration target group T
表 1 勘探目标群S资源量
Table 1. Resources of exploration target group S
目标 圈闭概率 充注概率 储层概率 保存概率 地质成功率 资源量均值/104t A 0.70 0.70 0.80 0.75 0.294 540 B 0.75 0.70 0.80 0.80 0.336 160 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 勘探目标A获得发现条件下的全部情景
Table 2. All scenarios under the discovery of exploration target A
情况 发生概率 资源量/104 t 含油气概率×资源量/104 t A成功、B失败 0.117 6 540 63.504 A、B均成功 0.176 4 700 123.480 合计 0.294 0 186.984 A成功下的资源量：186.984/0.294=636(104 t)
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 不同相对空间位置关系下S的期望价值对比
Table 3. Comparison of expected value of S under different relative spatial relations
空间位置关系 计算方法 钻探成功率 成功条件下资源量/104 t 期望价值/万元 纵向叠置 A、B至少一个成功 0.454 469 2 648 横向展布 优先钻探A并成功 0.294 636 2 099
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 勘探目标群T各目标含油气概率及资源量
Table 4. Hydrocarbon-bearing probability and resources of each target of exploration target group T
勘探目标 圈闭概率 充注概率 储层概率 保存概率 地质成功率 资源量均值/104t 1号 0.7 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.352 8 41 2号 0.7 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.352 8 122 3号 0.7 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.352 8 176 4号 0.7 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.352 8 188 5号 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.345 6 1 637 6号 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.345 6 581 7号 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.345 6 133
下载: 导出CSV
表 5 勘探目标群T在不同干井承受数量下的期望价值
Table 5. Expected value of exploration target group T under different dry well bearing amounts
不同干井承受数量 承诺1口井 承诺2口井 承诺3口井 资源量/104 t 791 946 986 期望价值/万元 11 215 13 861 14 016
下载: 导出CSV
表 6 勘探目标群T在改变钻探次序后，不同干井承受数量下的期望价值
Table 6. Expected value of exploration target group T under different dry well bearing amount after changing the drilling order
不同干井承受数量 承诺1口井 承诺2口井 承诺3口井 资源量/104 t 498 756 878 期望价值/万元 6 830 11 010 11 177
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 毛怡. 我国油气矿权出让制度改革与油气储量价值化研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(4): 728-736. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202104728MAO Yi. Transfer system reform for oil and gas mineral rights and value of reserves in China[J]. Petroleum Geology&Experiment, 2021, 43(4): 728-736. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202104728 [2] 司芗, 景东升, 罗玲, 等. 油气矿业权竞争性出让改革追踪研究[J]. 中国矿业, 2021, 30(S2): 37-41. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKA2021S2011.htmSI Xiang, JING Dongsheng, LUO Ling, et al. Tracking research on the reform of competitive transfer of oil and gas mining rights[J]. China Mining Magazine, 2021, 30(S2): 37-41. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKA2021S2011.htm [3] 陈嘉茹, 陈建荣. 中国油气矿权管理改革对国有石油公司的影响[J]. 世界石油工业, 2020, 27(3): 19-24. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SSYY202003004.htmCHEN Jiaru, CHEN Jianrong. China's oil and gas mineral rights management reform and its impact on state-owned oil companies[J]. World Petroleum Industry, 2020, 27(3): 19-24. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SSYY202003004.htm [4] 龙隆, 陈恭洋, 印森林, 等. 基于不同开发阶段的深层油气田经济评价方法[J]. 长江大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 18(5): 38-47. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJDL202105005.htmLONG Long, CHEN Gongyang, YIN Senlin, et al. Economic evaluation method of deep oil and gas fields based on different development stages[J]. Journal of Yangtze University (Natural Science Edition), 2021, 18(5): 38-47. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJDL202105005.htm [5] 武明辉, 金晓辉, 徐旭辉, 等. 油气区块勘探程度划分方法研究[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 30(4): 18-22. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XASY201504004.htmWU Minghui, JIN Xiaohui, XU Xuhui, et al. Research of division method for exploration degree of oil and gas blocks[J]. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University (Natural Science Edition), 2015, 30(4): 18-22. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XASY201504004.htm [6] 宋明水, 王永诗, 李友强. 成熟探区"层勘探单元"划分与高效勘探[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(3): 520-527. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201803020.htmSONG Mingshui, WANG Yongshi, LI Youqiang. Division of "layer exploration unit" and high-efficiency exploration in mature exploration area[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(3): 520-527. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201803020.htm [7] 张文婧, 包丽, 彭建亮, 等. 成熟探区资源潜力评价: 以松辽盆地敖南地区为例[J]. 世界地质, 2020, 39(1): 98-105. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SJDZ202001008.htmZHANG Wenjing, BAO Li, PENG Jianliang, et al. Evaluation of resource potential in high exploration area: an example in Aonan area of Songliao Basin[J]. Global Geology, 2020, 39(1): 98-105. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SJDZ202001008.htm [8] 刘斌. 油气储量价值评估方法探讨[J]. 石油科技论坛, 2019, 38(6): 29-33. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYKT201906006.htmLIU Bin. Discussion of value-appraising method for oil and gas reserves[J]. Oil Forum, 2019, 38(6): 29-33. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYKT201906006.htm [9] 孟卫工. 辽河高成熟探区持续勘探发现技术及应用[J]. 特种油气藏, 2020, 27(6): 1-11. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ202006001.htmMENG Weigong. Continuous exploration and discovery technology and its application in Liaohe high mature exploration area[J]. Special Oil&Gas Reservoirs, 2020, 27(6): 1-11. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ202006001.htm [10] 耿甜, 吕艳萍, 巫波, 等. 缝洞型油藏储量评价方法及开发对策[J]. 特种油气藏, 2021, 28(6): 129-136. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ202106017.htmGENG Tian, LYU Yanping, WU Bo, et al. Reservoir evaluation method and development countermeasures for fracture-vuggy reservoir[J]. Special Oil&Gas Reservoirs, 2021, 28(6): 129-136. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ202106017.htm [11] 蔡珺君, 彭先, 李骞, 等. 四川盆地重点海相碳酸盐岩气藏产能评价现状及展望[J]. 断块油气田, 2021, (5): 655-660. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202105016.htmCAI Junjun, PENG Xian, LI Qian, et al. Present situation and prospect of productivity evaluation of key marine carbonate gas reservoirs in Sichuan Basin[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2021, (5): 655-660. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202105016.htm [12] 黄飞. SEC储量动态评估方法在页岩气田中的应用: 以南川气田平桥南区块为例[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2021, 11(4): 521-526. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202104007.htmHUANG Fei. SEC estimation by DCA on shale gas fields: a case study of Pingqiao South Block of Nanchuan Gas Field[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(4): 521-526. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202104007.htm [13] 苏映宏. 滩坝砂油藏不同压裂方式下单井控制可采储量预测方法[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(4): 697-703. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202104697SU Yinghong. Prediction of single-well-constrained recoverable reserves in beach bar sand reservoir using different fracturing methods[J]. Petroleum Geology&Experiment, 2021, 43(4): 697-703. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202104697 [14] 李伟忠. 胜利油田稠油未动用储量评价及动用对策[J]. 特种油气藏, 2021, 28(2): 63-71. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ202102009.htmLI Weizhong. Evaluation and development countermeasures for nonproducing reserves of heavy oil reservoirs in Shengli Oilfield[J]. Special Oil&Gas Reservoirs, 2021, 28(2): 63-71. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ202102009.htm [15] YU Shaoyong, 刘玉慧. 页岩及致密地层油气井的生产特征及可采储量计算方法[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2021, 11(2): 146-153. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202102002.htmYU Shaoyong, LIU Yuhui. Production performance and EUR forecast of wells producing from tight/shale reservoirs[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(2): 146-153. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202102002.htm [16] 漆立新, 云露, 曹自成, 等. 顺北油气田地质储量评估与油气勘探方向[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2021, 42(2): 127-135. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD202102001.htmQI Lixin, YUN Lu, CAO Zicheng, et al. Geological reserves assessment and petroleum exploration targets in Shunbei Oil&Gas Field[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2021, 42(2): 127-135. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD202102001.htm [17] 郭鸣黎, 陈艳, 郑振恒, 等. 致密油藏可采储量概率快速评估方法: 以红河油田长8油藏为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(1): 154-160. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202101154GUO Mingli, CHEN Yan, ZHENG Zhenheng, et al. Rapid evaluation of probable recoverable reserves in tight reservoirs: a case study of Chang 8 reservoir (eighth member of Yanchang Formation) in Honghe oil field[J]. Petroleum Geology&Experiment, 2021, 43(1): 154-160. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202101154 [18] 肖玉茹, 黄学斌, 李姝, 等. 基于量化不确定性的储量升级动用潜力评价方法[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(1): 169-175. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202101169XIAO Yuru, HUANG Xuebin, LI Shu, et al. A method for evaluating the potential of reserve upgrading based on quantitative uncertainty[J]. Petroleum Geology&Experiment, 2021, 43(1): 169-175. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202101169 [19] 周亚彤. 延川南煤层气田动态特征和SEC动态储量评估方法研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2020, 10(4): 53-58. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202004009.htmZHOU Yatong. Dynamic characteristics and SEC dynamic reserve assessment of CBM gas field in South Yanchuan[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(4): 53-58. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202004009.htm [20] 张雷, 郝帅, 张伟, 等. 中低煤阶煤层气储量复算及认识: 以鄂尔多斯盆地东缘保德煤层气田为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(1): 147-155. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202001147ZHANG Lei, HAO Shuai, ZHANG Wei, et al. Recalculation and understanding of middle and low rank coalbed methane reserves: a case study of Baode Coalbed Methane Field on the eastern edge of Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology&Experiment, 2020, 42(1): 147-155. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202001147 [21] 徐旭辉, 蔡利学, 刘超英, 等. 油气勘探目标评价与优选系统[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2015, 36(3): 517-524. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201503024.htmXU Xuhui, CAI Lixue, LIU Chaoying, et al. Evaluation and selection system for petroleum exploration targets[J]. Oil&Gas Geology, 2015, 36(3): 517-524. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201503024.htm [22] 陈小梅, 欧奎, 贾霍甫. 风险概率法在油气区块评价中的运用[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2018, 32(6): 64-66. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYHN201806017.htmCHEN Xiaomei, OU Kui, JIA Huopu. Application of risk probability method in oil and gas block evaluation[J]. Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 2018, 32(6): 64-66. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYHN201806017.htm [23] 向立宏. 成熟探区主力含油层系储量空白区勘探目标优选方法: 以渤南洼陷南斜坡沙三段为例[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2020, 27(2): 53-61. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS202002008.htmXIANG Lihong. Method for exploration target optimization in blank region of main oil-bearing beds in mature exploration area: a case study of Es3 Member in South Slope, Bonan Subsag[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2020, 27(2): 53-61. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS202002008.htm [24] DANNER G E. The art and science of bidding for offshore license blocks[C]//Hydrocarbon Economics and Evaluation Symposium. Houston, Texas, USA: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2014. [25] 田军, 王霞, 段晓文, 等. 油气储量资产交易价值评估方法及案例剖析[J]. 国际石油经济, 2020, 28(11): 98-105. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GJJJ202011013.htmTIAN Jun, WANG Xia, DUAN Xiaowen, et al. The analysis on cases and methods of price evaluation for oil and gas reserves asset transactions[J]. International Petroleum Economics, 2020, 28(11): 98-105. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GJJJ202011013.htm [26] RODRIGUEZ M R, SUSLICK S B. Bidding schemes and their impacts on risk assessments by oil companies[C]//The Europec/EAGE Conference and Exhibition. Rome, Italy: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2008. [27] 杨双, 闫相宾, 刘志鹏, 等. 多层圈闭资源量计算方法研究: 以两层圈闭为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2016, 38(5): 698-702. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201605698YANG Shuang, YAN Xiangbin, LIU Zhipeng, et al. Resource calculation methods for multilayer traps: case study of two-layer traps[J]. Petroleum Geology&Experiment, 2016, 38(5): 698-702. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201605698 [28] 李军. 致密油藏储量升级潜力不确定性评价方法及应用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(3): 755-764. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202103021.htmLI Jun. Non-deterministic method for tight oil reserves upgrade potential assessment and its application[J]. Oil&Gas Geology, 2021, 42(3): 755-764. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202103021.htm [29] 魏绍蕾, 黄学斌, 李军, 等. 基于概率法的页岩气单井最终可采量评估: 以焦石坝页岩气田加密井为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(1): 161-168. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202101161WEI Shaolei, HUANG Xuebin, LI Jun, et al. Shale gas EUR estimation based on a probability method: a case study of infill wells in Jiaoshiba shale gas field[J]. Petroleum Geology&Experiment, 2021, 43(1): 161-168. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202101161 [30] LI Dengwei, JIN Feng, YIN Yin. New method of analyzing cost estimation by integrating Monte-Carlo simulation and market investigation[C]//Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference. Abu Dhabi, UAE: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2014. -
图(5) / 表(6)
计量
- 文章访问数: 423
- HTML全文浏览量: 183
- PDF下载量: 35
- 被引次数: 0
苏公网安备32021102000780号