留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

陆相断陷盆地成藏流体动力差异性及表征

张守春 王学军 王秀红 朱日房 邱贻博

张守春, 王学军, 王秀红, 朱日房, 邱贻博. 陆相断陷盆地成藏流体动力差异性及表征[J]. 石油实验地质, 2022, 44(6): 941-949. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202206941
引用本文: 张守春, 王学军, 王秀红, 朱日房, 邱贻博. 陆相断陷盆地成藏流体动力差异性及表征[J]. 石油实验地质, 2022, 44(6): 941-949. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202206941
ZHANG Shouchun, WANG Xuejun, WANG Xiuhong, ZHU Rifang, QIU Yibo. Dynamic difference and characterization of reservoir fluid in continental rift basins[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2022, 44(6): 941-949. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202206941
Citation: ZHANG Shouchun, WANG Xuejun, WANG Xiuhong, ZHU Rifang, QIU Yibo. Dynamic difference and characterization of reservoir fluid in continental rift basins[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2022, 44(6): 941-949. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202206941

陆相断陷盆地成藏流体动力差异性及表征

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202206941
基金项目: 

中国石化科技攻关项目“胜利滩海古近系沉积、成藏规律与目标评价” P21034-2

中国石化科技攻关项目“济阳坳陷近源领域成藏体系评价及目标优选” P22066

详细信息
    作者简介:

    张守春(1970—),男,博士研究生,高级工程师,从事油气地球化学研究。E-mail: zhangsc_slof@163.com

  • 中图分类号: TE122.3

Dynamic difference and characterization of reservoir fluid in continental rift basins

  • 摘要: 通过研究盆地各压力系统(超压带、过渡带及常压带)油藏烃类地球化学特征的差异性,建立地球化学指标变化与动力学条件的关联。以渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷东营、沾化凹陷为例,分析甾烷异构化参数、轻/重比参数随深度的变化,明确由超压充注到常压驱动的过渡。选取东营凹陷博兴洼陷(单一压力结构)和沾化凹陷渤南洼陷(复合压力结构)的典型剖面,分析各区带地球化学参数差异性对应的动力学条件,各指标的变化与超压驱动及浮力驱动表现出良好的对应关系,并对成藏期异常压力的波及范围进行研究,该范围远大于现今油藏异常压力的分布范围,尤其在斜坡断阶带向外围有较大幅度延伸。在对动力条件进行地化表征的基础上,精细刻画成藏体系与供烃范围。

     

  • 图  1  济阳坳陷不同类型烃源岩烃类指标随深度变化

    Figure  1.  Comparison of hydrocarbon indexes in different source rocks with depth in Jiyang Depression

    图  2  济阳坳陷油藏烃类指标随深度变化

    Figure  2.  Hydrocarbon indexes in reservoirs with depth in Jiyang Depression

    图  3  济阳坳陷沾化凹陷渤南洼陷L68—L35—L352井区地球化学参数随运移变化

    Figure  3.  Variation of geochemical parameters related to migration in wells L68, L35 and L352 in Bonan Sub-sag, Zhanhua Sag, Jiyang Depression

    图  4  济阳坳陷沾化凹陷渤南洼陷南坡L10—L9—L321—C312井区地化参数随运移变化

    Figure  4.  Variation of geochemical parameters related to migration in wells L10, L9, L321 and C312 on the southern slope of Bonan Sub-sag, Zhanhua Sag, Jiyang Depression

    图  5  烃类指标随动力区间变化

    Figure  5.  Hydrocarbon index changing with dynamic range

    图  6  济阳坳陷东营凹陷博兴洼陷南北向剖面油气运移动力学差异性的地球化学表征

    F4—F11井区位于洼陷内部压力中心;F32—G80—F105井区位于断阶带内侧过渡带;G39—G26井区位于断阶外侧过渡带;JX103—J8井区位于洼陷边缘常压带。

    Figure  6.  Geochemical characterization of dynamic differences of hydrocarbon migration in a NS profile in Boxing Sub-sag, Dongying Sag, Jiyang Depression

    图  7  济阳坳陷沾化凹陷渤南洼陷南北向剖面油气运移动力学差异性的地球化学表征

    Y104—Y170井区位于洼陷内部压力中心;Y88—Y36井区位于洼陷中心—断阶带内侧两个压力中心之间的过渡带;K5—LG5井区位于断阶外侧过渡带;C40—C4井区位于洼陷边缘常压带。

    Figure  7.  Geochemical characterization of dynamic differences of hydrocarbon migration in a NS profile in Bonan Sub-sag, Zhanhua Sag, Jiyang Depression

    表  1  济阳坳陷东营凹陷博兴洼陷岩性油气藏与周边烃源岩烃类指标对比

    Table  1.   Comparison of hydrocarbon indexes between lithologic reservoirs and surrounding source rocks in Boxing Subsag, Dongying Sag, Jiyang Depression

    井号 样品类型 深度/m 层位 C29S/R C27/C29ββ
    F11 原油 2 550~2 750 Es3 1.08 1.11
    F24 原油 2 959~2 967 Es3 1.02 0.92
    F10 原油 2 973.9~2 979.9 Es3 1.29 0.95
    F14 原油 2 992~3 002 Es3 1.11 1.08
    F23 泥岩 3 058.28 Es3 0.84 0.88
    F101 泥岩 3 169.90 Es3 0.80 0.70
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  济阳坳陷东营凹陷博兴洼陷南北向剖面主要井位烃类参数

    Table  2.   Hydrocarbon parameters of the main wells along NS profile in Boxing Sub-sag, Dongying Sag, Jiyang Depression

    运移分带 井名 样品类型 井深/m 层位 C29S/R C27/C29ββ
    洼陷边缘常压带 JX103 原油 1 090.5~1 099.8 Es1 0.72 1.07
    过渡带 断阶带外侧 G26-5 油砂 1 515 Es2 0.97 0.94
    G39 原油 1 706.4~1 713.1 Es2 1.05 0.93
    断阶带内侧 F32 原油 2 094.5~2 100.8 Es1 0.85 0.78
    F105 原油 2 315.1~2 329.6 Es2 0.81 0.85
    F105 原油 2 329.6~2 315.1 Es2 0.75 0.98
    G80 油砂 2 473.47 Es3 0.82 0.86
    洼陷中心超压带 F11 原油 2 550~2 750 Es3 1.08 1.11
    F24 原油 2 820~2 825 Es3 1.07 0.91
    F10 原油 2 892~2 914 Es3 1.19 1.05
    F31 原油 2 906~2 912 Es3 0.87 0.87
    F24 原油 2 959~2 967 Es3 1.02 0.92
    F10 原油 2 973.9~2 979.9 Es3 1.29 0.95
    F14 原油 2 992~3 002 Es3 1.11 1.08
    F125 原油 3 143.8~3 152.5 Es3 0.74 1.03
    F122 原油 3 145.2~3 147.0 Es3 0.64 1.01
    F181 原油 3 189.4~3 194.0 Es3 0.77 1.20
    F181 原油 3 194.0~3 198.4 Es3 0.68 1.13
    G893 原油 3 195~3 238 Es4 0.83 0.82
    F101 油砂 3 275.56 Es3 0.88 0.92
    F1 油砂 3 311.7 Es4 1.00 0.78
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  济阳坳陷沾化凹陷渤南洼陷南北向剖面主要井位参数

    Table  3.   Hydrocarbon parameters of the main wells along NS profile in Bonan Sub-sag, Zhanhua Sag, Jiyang Depression

    区带 井名 深度/m 样品类型 层位 油源 C29S/R C27/C29ββ
    洼陷边缘常压带 C37 1 201.0~1 213.4 原油 Ng Es4 0.71 1.26
    C40 1 361.0~1 443.8 原油 Ng+Ed Es4 0.42 0.97
    C40-1 1 441.96~1 452.50 原油 Es1 Es4 0.47 1.05
    C40-1 1 445.1~1 453.0 原油 Es1 Es4 0.44 1.19
    过渡带 断阶带外侧 L801-1 1 737~1 745 原油 Es4 Es4 0.64 1.03
    K5 1 839~1 900 原油 Es3—Es4 Es4 0.79 0.91
    L50 2 077.2 油砂 Es3—Es4 Es4 0.86 0.99
    L50 2 086 油砂 Es4 Es4 0.92 0.86
    L50 2 109 油砂 Es4 Es4 0.89 1.03
    断阶带内侧或两个压力中心间隔区域 Y49 2 763.6~2 767.4 原油 Es2 Es3 0.68 0.9
    L48 2 973.12~3 065.00 原油 Es4 Es4 0.93 0.58
    Y88 2 989.7~3 040.0 原油 Es2 Es3 0.54 1.08
    Y123 3 190.6~3 200.4 原油 Es2 Es3 0.64 0.48
    L151 3 036.3~3 062.6 原油 Es3 Es3 0.84 1.21
    Y37 3 121~3 127 原油 Es2 Es3 1.13 1.07
    Y85 3 221~3 223 原油 Es3 Es3 0.59 1.11
    Y36 3 312.4~3 330.0 原油 Es2 Es4 0.68 0.59
    洼陷中心超压带 Y170 3 233.2 油砂 Es3 Es3 0.89 1.22
    Y110 3 644~3 666 原油 Pt Es3 1.27 1.01
    Y17 3 661.1~3 664.7 原油 Es4 Es4 1.21 0.90
    Y170 3 817.4 油砂 Es4 Es4 0.81 1.04
    Y104 4 011.8~4 030.7 原油 Mz Es3 1.7 1.16
    Y173 4 112.0~4 127.7 原油 Es4 Es3 0.8 0.94
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 郝芳, 邹华耀, 姜建群. 油气成藏动力学及其研究进展[J]. 地学前缘, 2000, 7(3): 11-21. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY200003001.htm

    HAO Fang, ZOU Huayao, JIANG Jianqun. Dynamics of petroleum accumulation and its advances[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2000, 7(3): 11-21. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY200003001.htm
    [2] 庞雄奇, 金之钧, 左胜杰. 油气藏动力学成因模式与分类[J]. 地学前缘, 2000, 7(4): 507-514. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY200004029.htm

    PANG Xiongqi, JIN Zhijun, ZUO Shengjie. Dynamics, models and classification of hydrocarbon accumulations[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2000, 7(4): 507-514. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY200004029.htm
    [3] 田世澄, 陈永进, 张兴国, 等. 论成藏动力系统中的流体动力学机制[J]. 地学前缘, 2001, 8(4): 329-336. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY200104018.htm

    TIAN Shicheng, CHEN Yongjin, ZHANG Xingguo, et al. The fluid dynamics mechanism in migration-accumulation dynamics system[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2001, 8(4): 329-336. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY200104018.htm
    [4] 何治亮, 李双建, 刘全有, 等. 盆地深部地质作用与深层资源: 科学问题与攻关方向[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(5): 767-779. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202005767

    HE Zhiliang, LI Shuangjian, LIU Quanyou, et al. Deep geological processes and deep resources in basins: scientific issues and research directions[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(5): 767-779. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202005767
    [5] 张永刚, 许卫平, 王国力, 等. 中国东部陆相断陷盆地油气成藏组合体[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2006: 188-198.

    ZHANG Yonggang, XU Weiping, WANG Guoli, et al. Reservoir assemblages in continental faulted basins in East China[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2006: 188-198.
    [6] CARPENTIER B, UNGERER P, KOWALEWSKI I, et al. Molecular and isotopic fractionation of light hydrocarbons between oil and gas phases[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 1996, 24(12): 1115-1139. doi: 10.1016/S0146-6380(96)00097-6
    [7] VAN GRAAS G W, GILJE A E, ISOM T P, et al. The effects of phase fractionation on the composition of oils, condensates and gases[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 2000, 31(12): 1419-1439. doi: 10.1016/S0146-6380(00)00128-5
    [8] 王建伟, 宋国奇, 宋书君, 等. 油气二次运移的驱动机制转换及其石油地质学意义: 以牛庄洼陷及其南缘为例[J]. 地质学报, 2007, 81(10): 1423-1431. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE200710014.htm

    WANG Jianwei, SONG Guoqi, SONG Shujun, et al. Transformation of driving mechanism for the second petroleum migration and its significance in petroleum geology: taking the Niuzhuang Sag as an example[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2007, 81(10): 1423-1431. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE200710014.htm
    [9] 徐兴友. 东营凹陷含烃流体驱动过程中的地球化学效应[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2012, 32(6): 159-164. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HYDZ201206017.htm

    XU Xingyou. Geochemical effects of the movement of hydrocarbon bearing fluid: a case study in Dongying Sag[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2012, 32(6): 159-164. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HYDZ201206017.htm
    [10] 张守春, 张林晔, 查明, 等. 东营凹陷压力系统发育对油气成藏的控制[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2010, 37(3): 289-296. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201003006.htm

    ZHANG Shouchun, ZHANG Linye, ZHA Ming, et al. Control of pressure system development on reservoir formation in the Dongying Sag, Shengli Oilfield, East China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2010, 37(3): 289-296. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201003006.htm
    [11] 邱贻博. 东营凹陷压力系统与油气成藏[J]. 特种油气藏, 2015, 22(3): 58-61. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ201503014.htm

    QIU Yibo. Pressure system and oil/gas reservoir forming in Dongying Sag[J]. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs, 2015, 22(3): 58-61. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ201503014.htm
    [12] OSBORNE M J, SWARBRICK R E. Mechanisms for generating overpressure in sedimentary basin: a reevaluation[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1997, 81(6): 1023-1041.
    [13] 张守春. 东营凹陷异常压力形成机制及其与成烃成藏关系[D]. 青岛: 中国石油大学(华东), 2010.

    ZHANG Shouchun. The relationship between the mechanism of abnormal pressure formation and hydrocarbon generation and entrapment in the Dongying Depression[D]. Qingdao: China University of Petroleum (East China), 2010.
    [14] 张守春, 王学军, 朱日房, 等. 一种预测异常高压发育范围的新方法: 以东营凹陷为例[J]. 高校地质学报, 2018, 24(1): 139-145. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXDX201801014.htm

    ZHANG Shouchun, WANG Xuejun, ZHU Rifang, et al. A new method for predicting the development range of abnormal high pressure: a case study in the Dongying Sag[J]. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2018, 24(1): 139-145. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXDX201801014.htm
    [15] 谭丽娟, 蒋有录, 苏成义, 等. 东营凹陷博兴地区烃源岩和油源特征[J]. 石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2002, 26(5): 1-4. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYDX200205001.htm

    TAN Lijuan, JIANG Youlu, SU Chengyi, et al. Characteristics of hydrocarbon source rock and oil-source correlation in Boxing area of Dongying Depression[J]. Journal of the University of Petroleum, China, 2002, 26(5): 1-4. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYDX200205001.htm
    [16] 张林晔, 刘庆, 张春荣. 东营凹陷成烃与成藏关系研究[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2005: 83-89.

    ZHANG Linye, LIU Qing, ZHANG Chunrong. Study on the genetic relationships between hydrocarbon occurrence and pools formation in Dongying Depression[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2005: 83-89.
    [17] 曾宪章, 梁狄刚, 王忠然, 等. 中国陆相原油和生油岩中的生物标志物[M]. 兰州: 甘肃科学技术出版社, 1989: 276-291.

    ZENG Xianzhang, LIANG Digang, WANG Zhongran, et al. Biomarkers in continental crude oils and source rocks in China[M]. Lanzhou: Gansu Science & Technology Press, 1989: 276-291.
    [18] 苏爱国, 张水昌, 韩德馨, 等. PVT分馏实验中甾、萜烷分子的行为[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2004, 31(2): 93-95. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK200402025.htm

    SU Aiguo, ZHANG Shuichang, HAN Dexin, et al. Behavior of sterane and terpane molecular components in PVT fractionation experiment[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2004, 31(2): 93-95. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK200402025.htm
    [19] 王兴光, 苗洪波, 李建臣, 等. 原油与其烃源岩中甾萜类化合物指标的差异[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2008, 27(1): 18-21. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQSK200801006.htm

    WANG Xingguang, MIAO Hongbo, LI Jianchen, et al. Differences of terpenoid index in crude oil and its hydrocarbon source rock[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2008, 27(1): 18-21. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQSK200801006.htm
    [20] 杜振京. 油气运移过程中的"高速刹车"稠化机理探讨: 以渤海湾盆地东营凹陷南坡东段为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(1): 126-131. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202001126

    DU Zhenjing. Mechanism of "high-speed braking" effect on heavy oil formation during hydrocarbon migration: a case study of the eastern part of southern slope of Dongying Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(1): 126-131. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202001126
    [21] 梁书义, 蒋有录, 丘东洲. 山东博兴地区压力系统分析及油气成藏动力学机制[J]. 沉积与特提斯地质, 2005, 25(4): 78-82. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TTSD200504012.htm

    LIANG Shuyi, JIANG Youlu, QIU Dongzhou. The pressure systems and dynamic mechanisms for oil and gas accumulation in the Boxing region, Shandong[J]. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 2005, 25(4): 78-82. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TTSD200504012.htm
    [22] 刘建磊, 李野, 吴伟. 东营凹陷博兴地区油气成藏动力学研究[J]. 河南理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 30(5): 547-552. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JGXB201105011.htm

    LIU Jianlei, LI Ye, WU Wei. Hydrocarbon accumulation dynamics study of Boxing area of Dongying Depression[J]. Journal of Henan Polytechnic University (Natural Science), 2011, 30(5): 547-552. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JGXB201105011.htm
    [23] 张林晔, 徐兴友, 刘庆, 等. 济阳坳陷古近系深层成烃与成藏[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2011, 38(5): 530-537. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201105005.htm

    ZHANG Linye, XU Xingyou, LIU Qing, et al. Hydrocarbon formation and accumulation of the deep Palaeogene of the Jiyang Depression[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2011, 38(5): 530-537. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201105005.htm
    [24] 谢启超, 刘震, 白海峰. 渤南洼陷超压形成及演化历史分析[J]. 新疆石油学院学报, 2004, 16(1): 12-15. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSY200401003.htm

    XIE Qichao, LIU Zhen, BAI Haifeng. Analysis of the generation and evolution of overpressure of Bonan Sag[J]. Journal of Xinjiang Petroleum Institute, 2004, 16(1): 12-15. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSY200401003.htm
    [25] 谢启超, 荆海鹏, 白海峰. 渤南洼陷超压发育特征及其形成机理[J]. 小型油气藏, 2004, 9(4): 5-8.

    XIE Qichao, JING Haipeng, BAI Haifeng. The overpressure development characteristics and its genetic mechanism in Bonan Depression[J]. Small Hydrocarbon Reservoirs, 2004, 9(4): 5-8.
    [26] 刘士林, 李原, 郭利果, 等. 渤南洼陷古近系沙四段—沙三段烃源岩地球化学特征[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2006, 13(4): 8-11. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS200604004.htm

    LIU Shilin, LI Yuan, GUO Liguo, et al. Geochemical characteristics of Es3-Es4 source rocks in Eogene of Bonan Subsag[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2006, 13(4): 8-11. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS200604004.htm
    [27] 曹婷婷, 姚威, 李志明, 等. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷湖相泥页岩地球化学特征及有机质富集规律[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(4): 558-564. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202004558

    CAO Tingting, YAO Wei, LI Zhiming, et al. Geochemical characteristics of lacustrine shale and enrichment mechanism of organic matter in Zhanhua Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(4): 558-564. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202004558
    [28] 宫秀梅, 金之钧, 曾溅辉, 等. 渤南洼陷深层油气成藏特征及主控因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2005, 26(4): 473-479. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT200504015.htm

    GONG Xiumei, JIN Zhijun, ZENG Jianhui, et al. Resrvoiring characteristics and main controlling factors for deep hydrocarbon accumulations in Bonan Sag in Jiyang Depression[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2005, 26(4): 473-479. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT200504015.htm
    [29] 张德武. 沾化凹陷罗家地区输导体系及油气运聚特征[J]. 石油天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报), 2008, 30(1): 37-40. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JHSX200801009.htm

    ZHANG Dewu. Transport systems and characters of oil-gas migration and accumulation in Luojia slope of Zhanhua Depression[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology(J. JPI), 2008, 30(1): 37-40. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JHSX200801009.htm
    [30] 刘雅利, 程付启, 庄嘉翠, 等. 渤南洼陷北部陡坡带砂砾岩扇体油气成藏规律[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2010, 17(6): 23-26. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201006007.htm

    LIU Yali, CHENG Fuqi, ZHUANG Jiacui, et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation law of conglomerate bodies on the northern steep slope in Bonan Sub-sag[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2010, 17(6): 23-26. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201006007.htm
  • 加载中
图(7) / 表(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  579
  • HTML全文浏览量:  128
  • PDF下载量:  170
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-02-25
  • 修回日期:  2022-09-21
  • 刊出日期:  2022-11-28

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回