冀北坳陷中元古界洪水庄组页岩油勘探前景探讨

李志明; 孙中良; 鲍云杰; 徐二社; 周勇水; 张云献

doi:10.11781/sysydz202301029

冀北坳陷中元古界洪水庄组页岩油勘探前景探讨

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202301029

李志明^{1, 2, 3,},
孙中良^{1, 2, 3},
鲍云杰^{1, 2, 3},
徐二社^{1, 2, 3},
周勇水⁴,
张云献⁴

1.
中国石化石油勘探开发研究院无锡石油地质研究所, 江苏无锡 214126
2.
页岩油气富集机理与有效开发国家重点实验室, 江苏无锡 214126
3.
中国石化油气成藏重点实验室, 江苏无锡 214126
4.
中国石化中原油田分公司勘探开发研究院, 河南濮阳 457001

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目 42090022

中国石化科技开发部项目 P18084

中国石化科技开发部项目 P20049-1

详细信息

作者简介:
李志明(1968-), 男, 博士, 研究员, 从事油气地球化学、页岩油气地质研究。E-mail: lizm.syky@sinopec.com

中图分类号: TE122
计量
- 文章访问数: 735
- HTML全文浏览量: 279
- PDF下载量: 60
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-01-03
- 修回日期: 2022-11-10
- 刊出日期: 2023-01-28

Discussion on prospecting shale oil potential of Mesoproterozoic Hongshuizhuang Formation in the Jibei Depression

LI Zhiming^{1, 2, 3
,},
SUN Zhongliang^{1, 2, 3},
BAO Yunjie^{1, 2, 3},
XU Ershe^{1, 2, 3},
ZHOU Yongshui⁴,
ZHANG Yunxian⁴

1.
Wuxi Research Institute of Petroleum Geology, SINOPEC, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214126, China
2.
State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Effective Development, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214126, China
3.
SINOPEC Key Laboratory of Petroleum Accumulation Mechanisms, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214126, China
4.
Exploration and Production Research Institute of Zhongyuan Oilfield Branch Company, SINOPEC, Puyang, Henan 457001, China

摘要

摘要: 为评价冀北坳陷中元古界洪水庄组页岩油勘探前景，对钻井岩心和露头剖面典型样品开展热解、基质孔隙度与渗透率、压汞+氮吸附、氩离子抛光+扫描电镜、X衍射全岩矿物等分析，综合前人分析与研究成果，剖析了洪水庄组页岩油形成条件，估算了页岩油资源潜力并探讨勘探前景。冀北坳陷洪水庄组中部潟湖相黑色泥页岩厚度主要介于35~55 m，有机质类型以Ⅱ₁、Ⅱ₂型为主，为一套富有机质的好—极好烃源岩，等效镜质体反射率处于0.80%~1.25%；基质孔隙度主要介于1.0%~8.0%，基质渗透率介于(2~100)×10^-6 μm²，孔隙以孔径大于50 nm的无机孔缝为主；恢复后热解游离烃S₁主要介于1.60~6.50 mg/g，残余气态烃介于0.13~0.24 m³/t，具有较好的含油气性；脆性矿物含量平均介于61.9%~72.3%，具备良好的可压裂改造性。冀北坳陷洪水庄组富有机质页岩型页岩油地质资源量约为12×10⁸ t，可采资源量为0.72×10⁸ t，具备针对洪水庄组富有机质泥页岩开展页岩油勘探的资源基础，具有较好的基质型页岩油勘探前景。
- 资源潜力 /
- 勘探前景 /
- 页岩油 /
- 洪水庄组 /
- 中元古界 /
- 冀北坳陷
Abstract: In order to evaluate the shale oil prospecting potential of the Mesoproterozoic Hongshuizhuang Formation in the Jibei Depression, the analyses of routine Rock-Eval pyrolysis, matrix porosity and permeability, mercury intrusion and nitrogen adsorption, argon ion polishing SEM and X-ray diffraction of bulk rock of typical core samples were carried out in this study. The shale oil forming conditions of the Hongshuizhuang Formation were studied, the shale oil resource was assessed, and the prospecting potential was discussed based on previous results. The results show that the lagoon facies black shale in the middle section of the Hongshuizhuang Formation is mainly 35-55 m thick with organic matter types of Ⅱ₁ and Ⅱ₂, and is a set of good- to excellent-quality source rock. The equivalent vitrinite reflectance of organic-rich black shale is 0.80%-1.25%. The matrix porosity is mainly 1.0%-8.0%, and the matrix permeability is (2-100)×10^-6 μm². The pores are dominated by inorganic pores and fissures with the diameter of pore larger than 50 nm. The values of S₁ after recovery is mainly 1.60-6.50 mg/g, and the content of residual hydrocarbon gas distributes 0.13-0.24 m³/t, indicating good hydrocarbon potential. The average content of brittle minerals is 61.9%-72.3%, with good frangibility. The shale oil geological resource is about 12×10⁸ t, and the shale oil recoverable resource is about 0.72×10⁸ t for organic matter rich shale of the Hongshuizhuang Formation. These suggested that the organic matter rich shale of the Hongshuizhuang Formation in the Jibei Depression has a resource basis for shale oil exploration with good prospecting potential.
- resource potential /
- prospecting potential /
- shale oil /
- Hongshuizhuang Formation /
- Mesoproterozoic /
- Jibei Depression

HTML全文

图 1 燕辽裂陷带地层构造单元与冀北坳陷构造位置简图

据文献[6]修编。

Figure 1. Tectonic units of Yanliao fault belt and tectonic location of Jibei Depression

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 冀北坳陷构造沉积演化简图

Figure 2. Tectonic and sedimentary evolutions of Jibei Depression

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 冀北坳陷冀浅1井洪水庄组岩性与地球化学综合柱状图

Figure 3. Lithological and geochemical columns of Mesoproterozoic Hongshuizhuang Formation, well Jiqian 1, Jibei Depression

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 冀北坳陷中元古界洪水庄组富有机质页岩厚度与等效镜质体反射率等值线图

Figure 4. Contours of thickness and equivalent vitrinite reflectance of organic matter rich shale of Mesoproterozoic Hongshuizhuang Formation in Jibei Depression

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 冀北坳陷中元古界洪水庄组泥页岩总有机碳含量(TOC)和生烃潜量(S₁+S₂)的关系

Figure 5. TOC vs. PG (S₁+S₂) of mudstone and shale from Mesoproterozoic Hongshuizhuang Formation in Jibei Depression

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 冀北坳陷中元古界洪水庄组富有机质页岩有机质类型图解

Figure 6. Organic matter types of organic rich shale of Mesoproterozoic Hongshuizhuang Formation in Jibei Depression

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 冀北坳陷中元古界洪水庄组典型富有机质页岩基质孔渗图解

Figure 7. Matrix porosity and permeability of typical organic matter rich shale of Mesoproterozoic Hongshuizhuang Formation in Jibei Depression

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 冀北坳陷中元古界洪水庄组典型富有机质页岩孔隙结构

a.冀浅1井，127.23 m，黑色页岩；b.冀浅1井，131.10 m，黑色页岩；c.冀浅1井，137.28 m，黑色页岩；d.冀浅1井，155.00 m，黑色页岩；e.冀浅1井，172.80 m，黑色页岩；f.冀浅1井，189.58 m，黑色硅质岩

Figure 8. Pore structure of typical organic matter rich shale of Mesoproterozoic Hongshuizhuang Formation in Jibei Depression

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 冀北坳陷中元古界洪水庄组典型富有机质页岩游离烃S₁恢复前后与TOC的关系

Figure 9. TOC vs. S₁ before and after recovery of typical organic matter rich shale of Mesoproterozoic Hongshuizhuang Formation in Jibei Depression

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 冀北坳陷钻井与露头剖面洪水庄组与富有机质页岩厚度

Table 1. Thickness of Mesoproterozoic Hongshuizhuang Formation

钻井/剖面	地层总厚度/m	富有机质页岩厚度/m	备注
冀浅1井	142	43
冀元1井	71	35	参考文献[18]
元基2井	109	42	参考文献[16]
宽1井	109	42	参考文献[18]
化1井	145	46	参考文献[17]
双洞	140	48
龙潭沟	112	43
宋杖子	110	42
清河	130	43	参考文献[12]
孙家庄—北仗子	102	41
柳树底	105	40	参考平泉幅1∶20万地质图说明书
二道杖子	99	43	参考平泉幅1∶20万地质图说明书
北水泉	125	46	参考兴隆幅1∶20万地质图说明书

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 冀北坳陷中元古界洪水庄组富有机质页岩矿物组成

Table 2. Mineral compositions of organic matter rich shale of Mesoproterozoic Hongshuizhuang Formation in Jibei Depression

样品来源	样品数	矿物成分含量/%
样品来源	样品数	黏土矿物	石英	钾长石	斜长石	方解石	白云石	菱铁矿	黄铁矿	石膏	硬石膏	钙芒硝
冀浅1井岩心	27	13.2~35.0	31.7~77.0	0~4.0	0~1.7	0.1~2.5	1.5~36.5	0.6~4.3	1.0~13.9	0~0.3	0~3.2	0
冀浅1井岩心	27	27.2	54.4	2.1	0.5	1.1	7.0	2.3	4.9	0.1	0.4	0
野外露头	25	23.5~52.5	38.9~73.1	0.9~3.8	0~1.2	0.1~4.8	0.2~3.5	0.2~1.8	0.1~1.5	0~0.2	0~0.8	0~5.7
野外露头	25	36.2	55.2	2.1	0.4	0.8	1.9	1.1	0.4	0.0	0.2	1.7
注：表中分式的意义为$\frac{\text { 最小值~最大值 }}{\text { 平均值 }}$。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(45)

[1]	赵文智, 王晓梅, 胡素云, 等. 中国元古宇烃源岩成烃特征及勘探前景[J]. 中国科学(地球科学), 2019, 49(6): 939-964. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDXK201906003.htm ZHAO Wenzhi, WANG Xiaomei, HU Suyun, et al. Hydrocarbon generation characteristics and exploration prospects of Proterozoic source rocks in China[J]. Science China (Earth Science), 2019, 62(6): 909-934. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDXK201906003.htm
[2]	王铁冠, 韩克猷. 论中-新元古界的原生油气资源[J]. 石油学报, 2011, 32(1): 1-7. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201101002.htm WANG Tieguan, HAN Keyou. On Meso-Neoproterozoic primary petroleum resources[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2011, 32(1): 1-7. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201101002.htm
[3]	秦婧, 钟宁宁, 齐雯, 等. 华北北部洪水庄组有机岩石学[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2010, 31(3): 367-374. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201003019.htm QIN Jing, ZHONG Ningning, QI Wen, et al. Organic petrology of the Hongshuizhuang Formation in northern North China[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2010, 31(3): 367-374. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201003019.htm
[4]	方杰, 刘宝泉, 金凤鸣, 等. 华北北部中-上元古界生烃潜力与勘探前景分析[J]. 石油学报, 2002, 23(4): 18-23. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB200204003.htm FANG Jie, LIU Baoquan, JIN Fengming, et al. Source potential for generating hydrocarbon and exploration prospects of Middle-Upper Proterozoic in the Northern China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2002, 23(4): 18-23. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB200204003.htm
[5]	王丽娟, 杨树杰. 华北中新元古界海相碳酸盐岩烃源岩评价[J]. 海洋科学集刊, 2010(50): 111-119. WANG Lijuan, YANG Shujie. Evaluation marine carbonate source rocks of Middle-Upper Proterozoic in North China[J]. Studia Marina Sinica, 2010(50): 111-119.
[6]	王铁冠, 钟宁宁, 王春江, 等. 冀北坳陷下马岭组底砂岩古油藏成藏演变历史与烃源剖析[J]. 石油科学通报, 2016, 1(1): 24-37. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYKE201601003.htm WANG Tieguan, ZHONG Ningning, WANG Chunjiang, et al. Source beds and oil entrapment-alteration histories of fossil-oil-reservoirs in the Xiamaling Formation basal sandstone, Jibei Depression[J]. Petroleum Science Bulletin, 2016, 1(1): 24-37. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYKE201601003.htm
[7]	荆铁亚, 杨光, 林拓, 等. 中国中上元古界页岩气地质特征及有利区预测[J]. 特种油气藏, 2015, 22(6): 5-9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2015.06.002 JING Tieya, YANG Guang, LIN Tuo, et al. Geological characte-ristics and prospective zone prediction of Meso-Epiproterozoic shale gas in China[J]. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs, 2015, 22(6): 5-9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2015.06.002
[8]	刘静, 周志, 刘喜恒, 等. 燕山地区中元古界页岩气成藏地质条件[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(3): 268-278. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201903002.htm LIU Jing, ZHOU Zhi, LIU Xiheng, et al. Geological conditions of the Mesoproterozoic shale gas accumulation in Yanshan area, North China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2019, 40(3): 268-278. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201903002.htm
[9]	牛露, 朱如凯, 王莉森, 等. 华北地区北部中-上元古界泥页岩储层特征及页岩气资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(6): 664-672. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201506003.htm NIU Lu, ZHU Rukai, WANG Lisen, et al. Characteristics and evaluation of the Meso-Neoproterozoic shale gas reservoir in the northern North China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(6): 664-672. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201506003.htm
[10]	王浩. 燕山地区中-新元古界页岩气成藏地质条件研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2019: 1-53. WANG Hao. Study of accumulation conditions of the Meso-Neoproterozoic shale gas in Yanshan area, North China[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences (Beijing), 2019: 1-53.
[11]	罗情勇, 钟宁宁, 朱雷, 等. 华北北部中元古界洪水庄组埋藏有机碳与古生产力的相关性[J]. 科学通报, 2013, 58(11): 1036-1047. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXTB201311012.htm LUO Qingyong, ZHONG Ningning, ZHU Lei, et al. Correlation of burial organic carbon and paleoproductivity in the Mesoproterozoic Hongshuizhuang Formation, northern North China[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2013, 58(11): 1299-1309. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXTB201311012.htm
[12]	马奎, 肖南, 蒲钰龙, 等. 华北北部中元古界洪水庄组物源和沉积环境分析[J]. 中国地质, 2021, 48(1): 309-321. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI202101022.htm MA Kui, XIAO Nan, PU Yulong, et al. Provenance and sedimentary environment of the Mesoproterozoic Hongshuizhuang Formation in northern part of North China[J]. Geology in China, 2021, 48(1): 309-321. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI202101022.htm
[13]	刘岩, 钟宁宁, 田永晶, 等. 中国最老古油藏——中元古界下马岭组沥青砂岩古油藏[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2011, 38(4): 503-512. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201104017.htm LIU Yan, ZHONG Ningning, TIAN Yongjing, et al. The oldest oil accumulation in China: Meso-Proterozoic Xiamaling Formation bituminous sandstone reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2011, 38(4): 503-512. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201104017.htm
[14]	潘建国, 曲永强, 马瑞, 等. 华北地块北缘中新元古界沉积构造演化[J]. 高校地质学报, 2013, 19(1): 109-122. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXDX201301014.htm PAN Jianguo, QU Yongqiang, MA Rui, et al. Sedimentary and tectonic evolution of the Meso-Neoproterozoic strata in the northern margin of the North China block[J]. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2013, 19(1): 109-122. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXDX201301014.htm
[15]	彭钰洁. 燕山地区下马岭组泥页岩孔隙结构特征研究[D]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2017: 1-124. PENG Yujie. Research on pore structure characteristics of shale in Xiamaling Formation of Yanshan[D]. Xuzhou: China University of Mining & Technology, 2017: 1-124.
[16]	王雪琪. 中元古代河北燕辽裂陷槽洪水庄组有机质来源和赋存环境[D]. 西安: 西安石油大学, 2019: 1-44. WANG Xueqi. Sources of organic matter and environment of the Hongshuizhuang Formation of the Yanliao gully in the Middle Proterozoic of Hebei province[D]. Xi'an: Xi'an Shiyou University, 2019: 1-44.
[17]	孙枢, 王铁冠. 中国东部中-新元古界地质学与油气资源[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2016. SUN Shu, WANG Tieguan. Meso-Neoproterozoic geology and petroleum resources in Eastern China[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2016.
[18]	高渐珍, 李泽斌. 承德地区冀元1井综合地质研究[R]. 濮阳: 中石化中原油田分公司勘探开发科学研究院, 2014. GAO Jianzhen, LI Zebin. Comprehensive geological study on Jiyuan-1 well in Chengde area[R]. Puyang: Research Institute of Exploration and Development, Zhongyuan Oilfield Branch, SINOPEC, 2014.
[19]	张新生, 于海成, 张华. 河北省页岩分布及页岩气前景[J]. 中国煤炭地质, 2019, 31(1): 59-65. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGMT201901011.htm ZHANG Xinsheng, YU Haicheng, ZHANG Hua. Shale distribution in Hebei province and shale gas prospect[J]. Coal Geology of China, 2019, 31(1): 59-65. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGMT201901011.htm
[20]	杨智, 侯连华, 陶士振, 等. 致密油与页岩油形成条件与"甜点区评价"[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42(5): 555-565. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201505002.htm YANG Zhi, HOU Lianhua, TAO Shizhen, et al. Formation conditions and "sweet spot" evaluation of tight oil and shale oil[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(5): 555-565. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201505002.htm
[21]	钟宁宁, 张枝焕, 黄志龙, 等. 燕山地区中-新元古界热演化生烃与油气成藏史[R]. 北京: 中国石油大学(北京), 2010. ZHONG Ningning, ZHANG Zhihuan, HUANG Zhilong, et al. The histories of hydrocarbon generation and oil and gas reservoir for Meso-Neoproterozoic in Yanshan area[R]. Beijing: China Petroleum University (Beijing), 2010.
[22]	王茂林, 程鹏, 田辉, 等. 页岩油储层评价指标体系[J]. 地球化学, 2017, 46(2): 178-190. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQHX201702007.htm WANG Maolin, CHENG Peng, TIAN Hui, et al. Evaluation index system of shale oil reservoirs[J]. Geochimica, 2017, 46(2): 178-190. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQHX201702007.htm
[23]	郝石生, 高耀斌, 张有成, 等. 华北北部中-上元古界石油地质学[M]. 北京: 石油大学出版社, 1990: 131-132. HAO Shisheng, GAO Yaobin, ZHANG Youcheng, et al. Petroleum geology of Meso-Neoproterozoic in the northern of North China[M]. Beijing: Petroleum University Press, 1990: 131-132.
[24]	崔景伟, 朱如凯, 杨智, 等. 国外页岩层系石油勘探开发进展及启示[J]. 非常规油气, 2015, 2(4): 68-82. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FCYQ201504013.htm CUI Jingwei, ZHU Rukai, YANG Zhi, et al. Progresses and enlightenment of overseas shale oil exploration and development[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2015, 2(4): 68-82. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FCYQ201504013.htm
[25]	郭小波, 黄志龙, 陈旋, 等. 马朗凹陷芦草沟组泥页岩储层含油性特征与评价[J]. 沉积学报, 2014, 32(1): 166-173. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB201401019.htm GUO Xiaobo, HUANG Zhilong, CHEN Xuan, et al. The oil-bearing property characteristics and evaluation of Lucaogou Formation shale reservoirs in Malang Sag[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2014, 32(1): 166-173. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB201401019.htm
[26]	李志明, 钱门辉, 黎茂稳, 等. 中-低成熟湖相富有机质泥页岩含油性及赋存形式: 以渤海湾盆地渤南洼陷罗63井和义21井沙河街组一段为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(3): 448-456. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201703004.htm LI Zhiming, QIAN Menhui, LI Maowen, et al. Oil content and occurrence in low-medium mature organic-rich lacustrine shales: a case from the 1st member of the Eocene-Oligocene Shahejie Formation in well Luo-63 and Yi-21, Bonan Subsag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2017, 38(3): 448-456. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201703004.htm
[27]	JARVIE D M. Shale resource systems for oil and gas: part 2-shale-oil resource systems[M]//BREYER J A. Shale reservoirs: giant resources for the 21st century. Tulsa: AAPG, 2012: 89-119.
[28]	卢双舫, 黄文彪, 陈方文, 等. 页岩油气资源分级评价标准探讨[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(2): 249-256. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201202018.htm LU Shuangfang, HUANG Wenbiao, CHEN Fangwen, et al. Classification and evaluation criteria of shale oil and gas resources: discussion and application[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(2): 249-256. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201202018.htm
[29]	李志明, 刘鹏, 钱门辉, 等. 湖相泥页岩不同赋存状态油定量对比: 以渤海湾盆地东营凹陷页岩油探井取心段为例[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2018, 47(6): 1252-1263. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKD201806010.htm LI Zhiming, LIU Peng, QIAN Menhui, et al. Quantitative comparison of different occurrence oil for lacustrine shale: a case from cored interval of shale oil special drilling wells in Dongying Depression, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2018, 47(6): 1252-1263. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKD201806010.htm
[30]	陶国亮, 刘鹏, 钱门辉, 等. 潜江凹陷潜江组盐间页岩含油性及其勘探意义[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2019, 48(6): 1256-1265. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKD201906011.htm TAO Guoliang, LIU Peng, QIAN Menhui, et al. Oil-bearing characteristics and exploration significance of inter-salt shale in Qianjiang Formation, Qianjiang Depression, Jianghan Basin[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2019, 48(6): 1256-1265. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKD201906011.htm
[31]	罗超, 张焕旭, 张纪智, 等. 岩石密闭热释方法评价页岩含油性特征: 以四川盆地侏罗系大安寨段为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2022, 44(4): 712-719. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202204712 LUO Chao, ZHANG Huanxu, ZHANG Jizhi, et al. Evaluation of oil content in shale by sealed thermal desorption: a case study of Jurassic Da'anzhai Member, Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geo-logy & Experiment, 2022, 44(4): 712-719. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202204712
[32]	钱门辉, 王绪龙, 黎茂稳, 等. 玛页1井风城组页岩含油性与烃类赋存状态[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(6): 693-703. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD202206007.htm QIAN Menhui, WANG Xulong, LI Maowen, et al. Oil-bearing properties and hydrocarbon occurrence states of Fengcheng formation shale in Well Maye-1, Mahu sag[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2022, 43(6): 693-703. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD202206007.htm
[33]	彭君, 周勇水, 李红磊, 等. 渤海湾盆地东濮凹陷盐间细粒沉积岩岩相与含油性特征[J]. 断块油气田, 2021, 28(2): 212-218. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202102013.htm PENG Jun, ZHOU Yongshui, LI Honglei, et al. Lithofacies and oil-bearing characteristics of fine-grained sedimentary rocks of salt-layers in Dongpu Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2021, 28(2): 212-218. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202102013.htm
[34]	李志明, 蒋启贵, 钱门辉, 等. 东部古近系页岩层系含油性评价[R]. 北京: 中国石化石油勘探开发研究院, 2017. LI Zhiming, JIANG Qigui, QIAN Menhui, et al. Oiliness evauation of Paleogene shales in eastern area of China[R]. Beijing: Petroleum Exploration and Production Research Institute of SINOPEC, 2017.
[35]	钱门辉, 黎茂稳, 蒋启贵, 等. 页岩岩心样品烃类散失特征与地质意义[J]. 石油实验地质, 2022, 44(3): 497-504. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202203497 QIAN Menhui, LI Maowen, JIANG Qigui, et al. Evaluation of evaporative loss of hydrocarbon in shale samples and its geological implications[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2022, 44(3): 497-504. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202203497
[36]	李志明, 梁世友, 杨振恒, 等. 苏北盆地阜宁组烃源岩评价与致密油资源潜力研究[R]. 北京: 中国石化石油勘探开发研究院, 2016. LI Zhiming, LIANG Shiyou, YANG Zhenheng, et al. Study on source rock evaluation and tight oil resource potential of Funing Formation in Subei Basin[R]. Beijing: Petroleum Exploration and Production Research Institute of Sinopec, 2016.
[37]	姚红生, 昝灵, 高玉巧, 等. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系阜宁组二段页岩油富集高产主控因素与勘探重大突破[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(5): 776-783. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202105776 YAO Hongsheng, ZAN Ling, GAO Yuqiao, et al. Main controlling factors for the enrichment of shale oil and significant discovery in second member of Paleogene Funing Formation, Qintong Sag, Subei Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(5): 776-783. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202105776
[38]	吴迪. 冀元1井及邻区中元古界流体包裹体与油气运移期次研究[D]. 北京: 核工业北京地质研究院, 2015. WU Di. Study on Mesoproterozoic fluid inclusion and oil and gas migration stages in Jiyuan 1 well and adjacent area[D]. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Geology of Nuclear Industry, 2015.
[39]	郭旭升, 赵永强, 张文涛, 等. 四川盆地元坝地区千佛崖组页岩油气富集特征与主控因素[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(5): 749-757. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202105749 GUO Xusheng, ZHAO Yongqiang, ZHANG Wentao, et al. Accumulation conditions and controlling factors for the enrichment of shale oil and gas in the Jurassic Qianfoya Formation, Yuanba area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(5): 749-757. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202105749
[40]	曹小朋. 矿物组成对页岩油渗流机理的影响[J]. 断块油气田, 2021, 28(5): 609-613. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202105007.htm CAO Xiaopeng. Influence of mineral composition on shale oil seepage mechanism[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2021, 28(5): 609-613. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202105007.htm
[41]	吕照, 刘叶轩, 陈希, 等. 页岩油储层可压性分析及指数预测[J]. 断块油气田, 2021, 28(6): 739-744. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202106005.htm LÜ Zhao, LIU Yexuan, CHEN Xi, et al. The fracability analysis and index prediction of shale oil reservoir[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2021, 28(6): 739-744. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202106005.htm
[42]	白国平, 邱海华, 邓舟舟, 等. 美国页岩油资源分布特征与主控因素研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(4): 524-532. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202004524 BAI Guoping, QIU Haihua, DENG Zhouzhou, et al. Distribution and main controls for shale oil resources in USA[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(4): 524-532. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202004524
[43]	李倩文, 马晓潇, 高波, 等. 美国重点页岩油区勘探开发进展及启示[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2021, 42(5): 630-640. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD202105019.htm LI Qianwen, MA Xiaoxiao, GAO Bo, et al. Progress and Enlightenment of Exploration and Development of Major Shale Oil Zones in the USA[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2021, 42(5): 630-640. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD202105019.htm
[44]	邱振, 卢斌, 施振生, 等. 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组页岩油滞留聚集机理及资源潜力探讨[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(1): 1817-1827. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201610007.htm QIU Zhen, LU Bin, SHI Zhensheng, et al. Residual accumulation and resource assessment of shale oil from the Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimusar Sag[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27(10): 1817-1827. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201610007.htm
[45]	王韶华, 聂惠, 马胜钟, 等. 江汉盆地潜江凹陷古近系潜江组盐间页岩油资源评价与甜点区预测[J]. 石油实验地质, 2022, 44(1): 94-101. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202201094 WANG Shaohua, NIE Hui, MA Shengzhong, et al. Resource evaluation and sweet-spot prediction of inter-salt shale oil of Paleogene Qianjiang Formation, Qianjiang Sag, Jianghan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2022, 44(1): 94-101. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202201094