氦气资源的分类、特征及富集主控因素分析

陈新军; 丁一; 易晶晶; 陈刚

doi:10.11781/sysydz202301041

氦气资源的分类、特征及富集主控因素分析

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202301041

陈新军^{1, 2,},
丁一³,
易晶晶³,
陈刚^{1, 2}

1.
中国石化深部地质与资源重点实验室, 北京 100083
2.
中国石化石油勘探开发研究院, 北京 100083
3.
中国石化江汉油田分公司勘探开发研究院, 武汉 430223

基金项目:

中国石化基础前瞻专项 P19024

中国石化基础前瞻专项 P22210-1

详细信息

作者简介:
陈新军(1975-), 男, 博士, 高级工程师, 从事非常规资源研究。E-mail: chenxj.syky@sinopec.com

中图分类号: TE132.5
计量
- 文章访问数: 661
- HTML全文浏览量: 326
- PDF下载量: 94
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-10-12
- 修回日期: 2022-11-10
- 刊出日期: 2023-01-28

Classified characteristics of helium gas resources and controlling factors for the enrichment

CHEN Xinjun^{1, 2
,},
DING Yi³,
YI Jingjing³,
CHEN Gang^{1, 2}

1.
SINOPEC Key Laboratory of Geology and Resources in Deep Stratum, Beijing 100083, China
2.
Petroleum Exploration and Production Research Institute, SINOPEC, Beijing 100083, China
3.
Research Institute of Exploration and Development, SINOPEC Jianghan Oilfield Branch Company, Wuhan, Hubei 430223, China

摘要

摘要: 我国氦气供应量不足，根本原因是氦气资源相对贫乏。加强对富氦天然气的分类研究，明确不同类型氦气藏的特征及富集主控因素，对促进我国氦气勘探开发研究和保障我国用氦安全都具有重要意义。通过研究氦气的成因，同时考虑氦气资源丰度禀赋，铀、钍放射性元素所处空间层位，载体气藏类型，以及成藏主控因素的差别，对含氦气藏进行了细致划分。氦气藏总体分为两类：壳幔混合型和壳源型，壳源型又可细分为壳源远源型(包括烃类伴生型和水溶气型)和壳源近源型(页岩气型)，不同类型氦气资源特征大相径庭。从国内目前发现的氦气藏来看，只有与烃类气藏共同成藏的壳源氦才具有工业利用价值，尽管其资源品位相对较低，但资源潜力较大。壳源远源型和壳源近源型氦气藏富集主控因素大致相同，但在氦源岩和运移通道上存在差异。
- 壳幔混合型 /
- 壳源型 /
- 氦气 /
- 富氦天然气 /
- 中国
Abstract: The lack of helium resources accounts for the limited helium supply in China. It is of great significance to classify of helium-enriched natural gas according to the characteristics of helium reservoirs and the main controlling factors of helium enrichment, thus the exploration and development of helium can be promoted and the safety of helium use in China may be ensured. Based on the origin of helium, this paper classifies the helium reservoirs by the consideration of the abundance of helium resources, the spatial horizon of uranium and thorium radioactive elements, the types of carrier gas reservoirs, and the main controlling factors of helium accumulation. The helium gas resources can be characterized into two types: crust-mantle mixed type and crust-source type. Crust-source type can be further classified into crust-source far-source type (including hydrocarbon associated type and water-soluble gas type) and crust-source near-source type (shale gas type) with different characteristics. In terms of helium reservoirs discovered in China, only crust-source helium which was formed together with hydrocarbon gas reservoirs has industrial utilization value due to the great resource potential, although its resource grade is relatively low. The main controlling factors of helium accumulation in the crust-source far-source type and crust-source near-source type are roughly the same, but there are differences in helium sources and migration pathways.
- crust-mantle mixed type /
- crust-source type /
- helium gas /
- helium-rich natural gas /
- China

HTML全文

图 1 中国石化东部油气区壳幔混合源型氦气中的幔源、壳源氦含量

Figure 1. Contents of mantle- and crust-derived helium in crust-mantle mixed helium gas, eastern oil and gas fields of SINOPEC

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 中国石化油气区壳源型氦气中的幔源氦含量

Figure 2. Contents of mantle-derived helium in crust-source helium gas, oil and gas fields of SINOPEC

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 鄂尔多斯盆地东胜气田氦含量分布

Figure 3. Helium content in Dongsheng gas field, Ordos Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 四川盆地涪陵页岩气田氦气含量分布

Figure 4. Helium content of Fuling shale gas field, Sichuan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 四川盆地涪陵页岩气田焦1井龙马溪组一段测井曲线特征

Figure 5. Logging curves of first member of Silurian Longmaxi Formation in well Jiao 1, Fuling shale gas field, Sichuan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 鄂尔多斯盆地东胜气田氦气成藏模式

Figure 6. Helium accumulation model of Dongsheng gas field, Ordos Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 氦气资源分类及示例

Table 1. Helium resource classification and samples

项目	壳幔混合型	壳源型
项目	壳幔混合型	壳源远源型	壳源近源型
R/Ra	＞1	＜1	＜1
气藏特征	非烃气体伴生氦气	烃类气体伴生氦气	页岩气伴生氦气
氦含量及特征	氦含量相对较高	氦含量较低且分布不均	氦含量低且分布均匀
示例	黄桥气田：氦含量1.1%~1.4%，R/Ra为2.6~3.2；万金塔气田：氦含量平均0.104%，R/Ra最高为5.14；花沟地区：氦含量0.08%~5.11%，R/Ra为3.1~3.2；三水盆地：氦含量0.1%~0.3%，R/Ra为1.2~4.6	威远气田：氦含量平均0.2%，R/Ra为0.01~0.02；东胜气田：氦含量0.14%，R/Ra为0.01~0.02；等等	涪陵页岩气田：氦含量0.044%，R/Ra为0.004~0.03；永川页岩气田：氦含量0.041%，R/Ra为0.003；威荣页岩气田：氦含量0.030%，R/Ra为0.002~0.03；等等
示例		特例：水溶气伴生氦气，氦含量相对较高。渭河盆地水溶氦气，氦气含量0.1%~4.1%，R/Ra为1.2~4.6

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(28)

[1]	陈新军. 典型富氦区资源特征及开发利用前景分析: 以中国石化油气矿业权区为例[J]. 中国国土资源经济, 2021, 34(4): 84-88. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDKJ202104014.htm CHEN Xinjun. Analysis of resource characteristics and exploitation foreground of typical helium rich areas: a case study of SINOPEC's oil and gas mining right area[J]. Natural Resource Economics of China, 2021, 34(4): 84-88. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDKJ202104014.htm
[2]	陈践发, 刘凯旋, 董勍伟, 等. 天然气中氦资源研究现状及我国氦资源前景[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2021, 32(10): 1436-1449. doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2021.08.006 CHEN Jianfa, LIU Kaixuan, DONG Qingwei, et al. Research status of helium resources in natural gas and prospects of helium resources in China[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2021, 32(10): 1436-1449. doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2021.08.006
[3]	张雪, 刘建朝, 李荣西, 等. 中国富氦天然气资源研究现状与进展[J]. 地质通报, 2018, 37(2/3): 476-486. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD2018Z1026.htm ZHANG Xue, LIU Jianchao, LI Rongxi, et al. President situation and progress in the study of helium gas resources in China[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2018, 37(2/3): 476-486. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD2018Z1026.htm
[4]	冯子辉, 霍秋立, 王雪. 松辽盆地北部氦气成藏特征研究[J]. 天然气工业, 2001, 21(5): 27-30. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG200105007.htm FENG Zihui, HUO Qiuli, WANG Xue. A study of helium reservoir formation characteristic in the north part of Songliao Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2001, 21(5): 27-30. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG200105007.htm
[5]	曹忠祥, 车燕, 李军亮, 等. 济阳坳陷花沟地区高含He气藏成藏分析[J]. 石油实验地质, 2001, 23(4): 395-399. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6112.2001.04.007 CAO Zhongxiang, CHE Yan, LI Junliang, et al. Accumulation analysis on a helium-enriched gas reservoir in Huagou area, the Jiyang Depression[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2001, 23(4): 395-399. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6112.2001.04.007
[6]	任以发. 黄桥二氧化碳气田成藏特征与进一步勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2005, 16(5): 632-636. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX200505017.htm REN Yifa. The becoming store character and exploration object about carbon dioxide gas field in Huangqiao[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2005, 16(5): 632-636. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX200505017.htm
[7]	叶先涛. 江苏溪桥地区氦气藏天然气富集规律及资源前景[J]. 江苏地质, 2003, 27(4): 207-210. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JSDZ200304003.htm YE Xiantao. Enrichment and resource foreground of helium natural gas in Xiqiao area, Jiangsu province[J]. Jiangsu Geology, 2003, 27(4): 207-210. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JSDZ200304003.htm
[8]	张文, 李玉宏, 王利, 等. 渭河盆地氦气成藏条件分析及资源量预测[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(2): 236-244. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201802009.htm ZHANG Wen, LI Yuhong, WANG Li, et al. The analysis of helium accumulation conditions and prediction of helium resource in Weihe Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2018, 29(2): 236-244. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201802009.htm
[9]	余琪祥, 史政, 王登高, 等. 塔里木盆地西北部氦气富集特征与成藏条件分析[J]. 西北地质, 2013, 46(4): 215-222. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBDI201304026.htm YU Qixiang, SHI Zheng, WANG Denggao, et al. Analysis on helium enrichment characteristics and reservoir forming conditions in northwest Tarim Basin[J]. Northwestern Geology, 2013, 46(4): 215-222. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBDI201304026.htm
[10]	张晓宝, 周飞, 曹占元, 等. 柴达木盆地东坪氦工业气田发现及氦气来源和勘探前景[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2020, 31(11): 1585-1592. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX202011007.htm ZHANG Xiaobao, ZHOU Fei, CAO Zhanyuan, et al. Finding of the Dongping economic Helium gas field in the Qaidam Basin, and helium source and exploration prospect[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2020, 31(11): 1585-1592. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX202011007.htm
[11]	陶小晚, 李建忠, 赵力彬, 等. 我国氦气资源现状及首个特大型富氦储量的发现: 和田河气田[J]. 地球科学, 2019, 44(3): 1024-1041. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX201903029.htm TAO Xiaowan, LI Jianzhong, ZHAO Libin, et al. Helium resources and discovery of first supergiant helium reserve in China: Hetianhe gas field[J]. Earth Science, 2019, 44(3): 1024-1041. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX201903029.htm
[12]	王江, 张宏, 林东成. 海拉尔盆地乌尔逊含氦CO₂气藏勘探前景[J]. 天然气工业, 2002, 22(4): 109-111. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG200204035.htm WANG Jiang, ZHANG Hong, LIN Dongcheng. Exploration prospect of helium CO₂ gas reservoir in Urxun, Hailaer Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2002, 22(4): 109-111. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG200204035.htm
[13]	杨长清, 姚俊祥. 三水盆地二氧化碳气成藏模式[J]. 天然气工业, 2004, 24(2): 36-39. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG200402013.htm YANG Changqing, YAO Junxiang. Modes of CO₂ gas reservoir formation in Sanshui Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2004, 24(2): 36-39. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG200402013.htm
[14]	韩伟, 刘文进, 李玉宏, 等. 柴达木盆地北缘稀有气体同位素特征及氦气富集主控因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2020, 31(3): 385-392. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX202003009.htm HAN Wei, LIU Wenjin, LI Yuhong, et al. Characteristics of rare gas isotopes and main controlling factors of radon enrichment in the northern margin of Qaidam Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2020, 31(3): 385-392. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX202003009.htm
[15]	卢进才, 魏仙样, 李玉宏, 等. 汾渭盆地富氦天然气成因及成藏条件初探[J]. 西北地质, 2005, 38(3): 82-86. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBDI200503014.htm LU Jincai, WEI Xianyang, LI Yuhong, et al. Preliminary study about genesis and pool formation conditions of rich-helium type natural gas[J]. Northwestern Geology, 2005, 38(3): 82-86. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBDI200503014.htm
[16]	何发岐, 王付斌, 王杰, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东胜气田氦气分布规律及特大型富氦气田的发现[J]. 石油实验地质, 2022, 44(1): 1-10. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202201001 HE Faqi, WANG Fubin, WANG Jie, et al. Helium distribution of Dongsheng gas field in Ordos Basin and discovery of a super large helium-rich gas field[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2022, 44(1): 1-10. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202201001
[17]	徐永昌, 沈平, 陶明信, 等. 中国含油气盆地天然气中氦同位素分布[J]. 科学通报, 1994, 39(16): 1505-1508. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXTB199416018.htm XU Yongchang, SHEN Ping, TAO Mingxin, et al. Distribution of the helium isotopes in natural gases from oil-gas-bearing basins in China[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 1994, 39(22): 1905-1911. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXTB199416018.htm
[18]	徐永昌. 天然气中的幔源稀有气体[J]. 地学前缘, 1996, 3(3/4): 63-71. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY603.006.htm XU Yongchang. The mantle noble gas of natural gases[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 1996, 3(3/4): 63-71. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY603.006.htm
[19]	李玉宏, 卢进才, 李金超, 等. 渭河盆地富氦天然气井分布特征与氦气成因[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2011, 41(S1): 47-53. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ2011S1008.htm LI Yuhong, LU Jincai, LI Jinchao, et al. Distribution of the helium-rich wells and helium derivation in Weihe Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2011, 41(S1): 47-53. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ2011S1008.htm
[20]	李玉宏, 周俊林, 张文, 等. 渭河盆地氦气成藏条件及资源前景[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2018: 6-10. LI Yuhong, ZHOU Junlin, ZHANG Wen, et al. The conditions of hydrocarbon accumulation and resource prospects in the Weihe Basin[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2018: 6-10.
[21]	李子颖, 方锡珩, 陈安平, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东北部砂岩型铀矿叠合成矿模式[J]. 铀矿地质, 2009, 25(2): 65-70. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YKDZ200902001.htm LI Ziying, FANG Xiheng, CHEN Anping, et al. Superposition metallogenic model of sandstone-type uranium deposit in the northeastern Ordos Basin[J]. Uranium Geology, 2009, 25(2): 65-70. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YKDZ200902001.htm
[22]	陈新军. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部X探区砂岩型铀成矿地质条件及成矿机理分析[J]. 世界核地质科学, 2021, 38(1): 57-65. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GWYD202101007.htm CHEN Xinjun. Geological condition and metallogenic mechanism of sandstone type uranium deposit in X exploration area, southern Ordos Basin[J]. World Nuclear Geoscience, 2021, 38(1): 57-65. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GWYD202101007.htm
[23]	吴柏林, 张婉莹, 宋子升, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地北部砂岩型铀矿铀矿物地质地球化学特征及其成因意义[J]. 地质学报, 2016, 90(12): 3393-3407. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE201612009.htm WU Bailin, ZHANG Wanying, SONG Zisheng, et al. Geological and geochemical characteristics of uranium minerals in the sandstone-type uranium deposits in the north of Ordos Basin and their genetic significance[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2016, 90(12): 3393-3407. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE201612009.htm
[24]	刘池洋, 赵红格, 桂小军, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地演化-改造的时空坐标及其成藏(矿)响应[J]. 地质学报, 2006, 80(5): 617-638. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE200605003.htm LIU Chiyang, ZHAO Hongge, GUI Xiaojun, et al. Space-time coordinate of the evolution and reformation and mineralization response in Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2006, 80(5): 617-638. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE200605003.htm
[25]	BROWN A A. Formation of high helium gases: a guide for explorationists[C]//2010 AAPG Conference. New Oleans, LA, USA: AAPG, 2010: 11-14.
[26]	郭旭升, 赵永强, 张文涛, 等. 四川盆地元坝地区千佛崖组页岩油气富集特征与主控因素[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(5): 749-757. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202105749 GUO Xusheng, ZHAO Yongqiang, ZHANG Wentao, et al. Accumulation conditions and controlling factors for the enrichment of shale oil and gas in the Jurassic Qianfoya Formation, Yuanba area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(5): 749-757. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202105749
[27]	胡东风, 王良军, 黄仁春, 等. 四川盆地中国石化探区油气勘探历程与启示[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2021, 42(3): 283-290. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD202103005.htm HU Dongfeng, WANG Liangjun, HUANG Renchun, et al. Petroleum exploration history and enlightenment in Sichuan basin: a case study on Sinopec exploration areas[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2021, 42(3): 283-290. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD202103005.htm
[28]	郭旭升, 胡东风, 文治东, 等. 四川盆地及周缘下古生界海相页岩气富集高产主控因素: 以焦石坝地区五峰组-龙马溪组为例[J]. 中国地质, 2014, 41(3): 893-901. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI201403016.htm GUO Xusheng, HU Dongfeng, WEN Zhidong, et al. Major factors controlling the accumulation and high productivity in marine shale gas in the Lower Paleozoic of Sichuan Basin and its periphery: a case study of the Wufeng-Longmaxi formation of Jiaoshiba area[J]. Geology in China, 2014, 41(3): 893-901. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI201403016.htm