Experimental dissolution and karst strata association of Middle Permian Maokou carbonate rocks in the northern part of Sichuan Basin
-
摘要: 四川盆地北部中二叠统茅口组岩溶储层发育，是该区重要储层类型之一。基于野外露头、钻井岩心资料，采用宏观与微观结合的方法，根据薄片鉴定、扫描电镜、主微量元素等资料、辅于溶蚀模拟实验等技术方法，对四川盆地北部茅口组岩溶层组特征进行了研究。该区茅口组一段以泥质灰岩、生屑泥晶灰岩为主，酸不溶物含量较高；茅二段、茅三段以泥晶生屑灰岩、亮晶生屑灰岩为主，酸不溶物含量较低。溶蚀模拟实验结果表明，碳酸盐矿物类型、化学成分等是影响茅口组岩石可溶性的主要因素，样品溶蚀速率、溶液离子浓度及微观溶蚀变化特征均表现为生屑灰岩＞泥晶灰岩＞白云岩＞泥质灰岩。茅口组岩溶层组类型可划分为2类3型9亚型，不同岩溶层组类型岩溶作用条件、岩溶化程度不同，缝洞型岩溶储层发育规模也存在差异。Abstract: Kart reservoir is important for the Middle Permian Maokou Formation in the northern part of Sichuan Basin. Based on field outcrops and drilling core data, combining both macro and micro methods, the characteristics of karst strata association of the Maokou Formation in this area was studied by the means of thin section observation, scanning electron microscope, major and trace elements and experimental dissolution. The first member of the Maokou Formation is dominated by marl and bioclastic micritic limestone, and the content of acid insoluble matter is high. The second and third members of the Maokou Formation are dominated by micritic bioclastic limestone and bright crystal bioclastic limestone, and the content of acid insoluble matter is low. The results of dissolution experiments show that the mineral type and chemical composition of carbonate rock are the main factors affecting the solubility of rock. The change characteristics of the dissolution rate of samples, solution ion concentration and micro dissolution are as follows: bioclastic limestone>micrite limestone>dolomite>argillaceous limestone. The karst strata association types of the Maokou Formation can be divided into 2 groups, 3 types and 9 subtypes. The karstification conditions and rock dissolution degree of different karst formation types are different, and the development scale of fracture cave karst reservoir is also different.
-
图 1 四川盆地北部地理位置(a)及地层柱状图(b)
Figure 1. Geographical location(a) and stratigraphic histogram(b) of northern Sichuan Basin
图 2 四川盆地北部中二叠统茅口组典型野外和镜下照片
a.眼皮眼球状灰岩，茅一段，pm001；b.生物碎屑灰岩，可见珊瑚化石大量分布，茅一段，pm002；c.含生屑泥晶灰岩，单偏光，茅一段，pm003(g)；d.含生屑泥晶灰岩，溶蚀孔洞发育，茅二段，pm002(g)；e.含生屑泥晶灰岩，方解石、沥青充填溶孔，茅二段，pm003(g)；f.含生屑泥晶灰岩，单偏光，茅二段，pm002(g)；g.硅质岩，茅三段，pm002(g)；h.含燧石结核灰岩，茅三段，pm003；i.泥晶生屑灰岩，单偏光，茅三段，pm002(g)
Figure 2. Typical field and microscopic photos of Middle Permian Maokou Formation in northern Sichuan Basin
图 3 四川盆地北部中二叠统茅口组不同层段岩石成分特征
Figure 3. Characteristics of rock composition in different strata of Middel Permian Maokou Formation in northern Sichuan Basin
图 4 四川盆地北部普光2井热演化及生烃史分析
据文献[18]。
Figure 4. Thermal evolution and hydrocarbon generation history of well Puguang 2 in northern Sichuan Basin
图 5 四川盆地北部碳酸盐岩样品溶蚀速率(a)、(Ca2++Mg2+)浓度增加量(b)随温度、压力变化曲线
Figure 5. Curves of sample corrosion rate(a) and (Ca2++Mg2+) concentration increase(b) with temperature and pressure of carbonate rock samples from northern Sichuan Basin
图 6 四川盆地北部碳酸盐岩样品实验前后典型镜下照片对比
a.实验前，泥晶灰岩，茅一段，pm002(g)；b.实验前，生物碎屑灰岩，茅二段，pm002(g)；c.实验前，泥质灰岩，吴家坪组，pm003；d.实验后，泥晶灰岩，茅一段，pm002(g)；e.实验后，生物碎屑灰岩，茅二段，pm002(g)；f. 实验后，泥质灰岩，吴家坪组，pm003
Figure 6. Comparison of typical microscopic photos before and after experiment of carbonate rock samples from northern Sichuan Basin
图 7 四川盆地北部碳酸盐岩样品溶蚀速率与(CaO+MgO)(a)、SiO2(b)含量相关性
Figure 7. Correlation between sample dissolution rate and (CaO+MgO)(a) and SiO2(b) contents of carbonate rock samples from northern Sichuan Basin
图 8 四川盆地北部旺苍县双汇镇斑竹村王家沟剖面岩溶结构综合柱状图
Figure 8. Comprehensive histogram of karst structure in Wangjiagou section, Banzhu village, Shuanghui Town, Wangcang County, northern Sichuan Basin
表 1 四川盆地北部中二叠统茅口组不同层段岩石主量元素测试结果
Table 1. Test results of major elements in rocks of different layers of Middle Permian Maokou Formation in northern Sichuan Basin
井名 深度/m 层位 CaO/% MgO/% SiO2/% Al2O3/% TFe2O3/% 井名/剖面 深度/m，层号 层位 CaO/% MgO/% SiO2/% Al2O3/% TFe2O3/% YB8 7 257.6 茅三段 54.01 0.28 0.09 0.07 1.28 YB7 6 991.6 茅三段 53.59 0.35 1.05 0.74 0.44 YB8 7 259.5 茅三段 55.19 0.32 0.12 0.07 0.14 YB7 6 998.0 茅三段 55.19 0.19 0.15 0.15 0.07 YB8 7 283.5 茅三段 55.61 0.24 0.03 0.02 0.01 PM001 16 茅二段 54.25 0.70 0.61 0.19 0.11 YB8 7 285.3 茅三段 55.31 0.24 0.08 0.06 0.02 PM001 17 茅二段 42.10 8.51 4.75 0.42 0.16 YB8 7 287.4 茅三段 55.67 0.25 0.01 < 0.01 0.02 PM001 21 茅二段 55.43 0.52 0.18 0.06 0.02 YB8 7 289.3 茅三段 55.67 0.32 0.16 0.05 0.01 PM001 23 茅二段 54.90 0.52 0.17 0.02 0.02 YB8 7 291.0 茅三段 55.31 0.27 0.03 0.03 0.02 PM001 24 茅二段 54.36 1.16 0.61 0.08 0.14 YB8 7 293.0 茅三段 55.55 0.27 0.11 0.10 0.02 PM001 27 茅二段 55.19 0.69 0.06 0.04 0.02 YB8 7 295.0 茅三段 55.43 0.27 0.02 0.03 0.01 PM001 28 茅二段 54.72 0.48 0.75 0.25 0.15 YB8 7 297.0 茅三段 55.19 0.22 0.16 0.07 0.03 PM001 29 茅二段 52.00 0.37 2.67 0.65 0.36 YB8 7 298.9 茅三段 55.43 0.30 0.29 0.16 0.04 PM001G 8 茅二段 55.43 0.29 0.12 0.12 0.07 YB8 7 301.0 茅三段 55.55 0.22 0.05 0.04 0.01 PM001G 8 茅二段 54.66 0.74 0.01 0.04 0.06 YB8 7 303.0 茅三段 55.55 0.30 0.22 < 0.01 0.02 PM002 16 茅二段 55.55 0.41 0.13 0.05 0.02 YB8 7 305.0 茅三段 55.79 0.24 0.02 0.03 0.01 PM002 17 茅二段 54.30 0.70 0.50 0.16 0.06 YB8 7 307.0 茅三段 55.43 0.19 0.03 0.04 0.01 PM002 18 茅二段 55.19 0.44 0.30 0.12 0.04 YB8 7 308.7 茅三段 55.90 0.19 0.01 0.03 0.01 PM002 19 茅二段 54.60 0.54 0.15 0.04 0.03 YB8 7 310.8 茅三段 55.79 0.34 0.06 0.07 0.02 PM002 13 茅二段 50.69 3.06 1.20 0.36 0.11 YB8 7 313.4 茅三段 56.14 0.29 0.02 0.04 0.01 PM002 14 茅二段 55.07 0.36 0.43 0.04 0.02 YB8 7 316.9 茅三段 55.79 0.30 0.01 0.02 0.01 PM003 15 茅二段 53.18 0.79 1.48 0.39 0.19 YB8 7 318.6 茅三段 55.55 0.33 0.03 0.03 0.02 PM003 16 茅二段 53.77 0.95 0.68 0.05 0.04 YB8 7 320.8 茅三段 55.55 0.30 0.00 0.04 0.01 PM003 19 茅二段 54.01 0.80 0.74 0.07 0.04 YB8 7 322.8 茅三段 55.67 0.32 0.00 0.03 0.02 PM003 20 茅二段 54.25 1.02 0.21 0.04 0.13 YB8 7 324.7 茅三段 55.96 0.34 0.00 0.02 0.01 PM003 22 茅二段 52.11 0.72 3.12 0.46 0.21 YB8 7 327.0 茅三段 55.13 0.43 0.10 0.07 0.05 PM003 22 茅二段 49.63 0.88 4.72 1.91 0.59 YB701 6 720.8 茅三段 46.90 0.68 3.07 1.00 5.40 PM001 2 茅一段 54.13 0.99 0.73 0.25 0.14 YB701 6 723.0 茅三段 55.79 0.20 0.03 0.02 0.23 PM001 4 茅一段 53.77 0.81 1.22 0.23 0.06 YB701 6 724.8 茅三段 55.79 0.31 0.00 0.03 0.01 PM001 7 茅一段 54.36 0.71 1.18 0.07 0.03 YB701 6 727.0 茅三段 56.38 0.18 0.02 0.02 0.01 PM001 8 茅一段 54.13 1.00 0.88 0.10 0.06 YB701 6 730.3 茅三段 55.79 0.17 0.01 0.04 0.01 PM001 9 茅一段 50.34 1.99 3.81 0.90 0.33 YB701 6 733.9 茅三段 55.90 0.20 0.03 0.04 0.02 PM001 11 茅一段 53.89 0.95 1.47 0.27 0.13 YB701 6 735.9 茅三段 55.90 0.20 0.01 0.02 0.02 PM001G 2 茅一段 52.11 3.23 0.03 0.04 0.03 YB701 6 737.0 茅三段 55.90 0.20 0.02 0.04 0.02 PM001G 4 茅一段 53.65 1.36 0.18 0.09 0.05 YB701 6 738.5 茅三段 55.55 0.20 0.02 0.02 0.01 PM002 2 茅一段 53.30 1.32 1.82 0.23 0.08 YB701 6 740.0 茅三段 55.67 0.20 0.00 0.04 0.02 PM002 10 茅一段 29.02 4.16 32.22 4.79 1.77 YB701 6 782.6 茅三段 55.90 0.20 0.01 0.02 0.01 PM002G 13 茅一段 54.36 0.84 0.64 0.04 0.03 YB701 6 784.1 茅三段 55.55 0.18 0.13 0.05 0.13 PM002G 17 茅一段 54.48 0.59 0.62 0.11 0.04 YB701 6 785.3 茅三段 55.90 0.18 0.01 0.02 0.01 PM003 2 茅一段 50.10 1.80 4.00 0.34 0.11 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 四川盆地北部碳酸盐岩样品不同温压条件下溶蚀速率、(Ca2++Mg2+)浓度增加量计算结果
Table 2. Calculation results of sample dissolution rate and (Ca2++Mg2+) concentration increase under different temperature and pressure conditions of carbonate rock samples from Middle Permian Maokou Formation in northern Sichuan Basin
温度/℃ 压力/MPa 溶蚀速率/(10-4 g·cm-2·h-1) (Ca2++Mg2+)浓度增加量/(mg·L-1) 茅一段泥晶灰岩PM002G-7 茅二段生屑灰岩PM002G-22 栖霞组白云岩PM003-1 吴家坪组泥质灰岩PM003-23 茅一段泥晶灰岩PM002G-7 茅二段生屑灰岩PM002G-22 栖霞组白云岩PM003-1 吴家坪组泥质灰岩PM003-23 35 5 16.67 18.74 18.06 14.73 30.04 31.10 35.35 26.08 50 10 24.99 33.37 22.53 16.53 41.32 52.24 35.63 24.73 65 15 30.34 59.55 25.33 17.58 50.20 96.99 41.24 29.74 80 20 31.53 31.87 29.57 25.45 52.52 50.52 45.70 39.50 95 25 36.42 35.62 36.77 17.34 62.99 57.94 55.76 31.18 110 30 33.52 35.90 35.89 21.95 55.34 55.98 55.59 37.60
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 四川盆地北部碳酸盐岩样品溶蚀速率计算结果及主量元素测试结果
Table 3. Calculation results of sample dissolution rate and test results of major elements of carbonate rock samples from northern Sichuan Basin
井名 回次/层号 深度/m 层位 溶蚀速率/(10-4 g·cm-2·h-1) 主量元素/% 35 ℃ 50 ℃ 65 ℃ 80 ℃ 95 ℃ 110 ℃ CaO MgO SiO2 YB7 3，17/56 6 933.0 茅口组 15.71 15.98 17.07 15.27 14.27 17.38 50.84 2.34 1.29 YB7 4，7/17 6 990.0 茅口组 18.68 18.81 21.03 24.30 19.89 21.28 55.58 0.26 0.12 YB7 4，6/17 6 991.0 茅口组 18.26 19.65 21.96 19.27 22.25 21.86 55.50 0.19 0.13 YB8 1，37/66 3 159.5 吴家坪组 15.27 15.07 16.44 13.53 14.87 13.95 41.75 3.86 14.82 YB8 6，70/81 7 255.0 茅口组 14.41 14.95 14.21 15.27 15.60 12.30 31.09 0.41 16.56 YB8 11，12/77 7 284.0 茅口组 18.37 19.12 19.42 20.68 21.53 19.06 55.51 0.21 0.07 YB8 11，35/77 7 286.2 茅口组 20.18 19.82 19.64 22.42 23.79 18.43 55.74 0.23 0.05 YB8 14，58/90 7 312.0 茅口组 18.90 20.16 19.05 23.41 22.73 17.93 55.40 0.27 0.12 YB701 5，15/38 6 723.1 茅口组 19.07 22.07 19.72 23.45 23.27 17.52 55.36 0.21 0.00 YB701 8，31/33 6 785.0 茅口组 18.05 20.09 21.24 25.73 21.05 22.04 55.60 0.16 0.01
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 四川盆地北部中二叠统茅口组岩溶层组类型划分
Table 4. Classification of karst formation types in Middle Permian Maokou Formation in northern Sichuan Basin
类 型 亚型 地层 岩性特征 岩溶层组划分 均匀状纯碳酸盐岩类 灰岩连续型 生屑泥晶灰岩亚型 茅三段、茅二段 主要为灰色厚—块状生屑泥晶灰岩，分布较广，厚度稳定 强岩溶化层组 泥晶灰岩亚型 茅三段、茅二段 主要为灰色中薄层、中厚层泥晶灰岩，分布较广 中等—强岩溶化层组 亮晶砂屑灰岩亚型 茅三段、茅二段 灰色中厚层状亮晶砂屑灰岩 强岩溶化层组 白云质灰岩亚型 茅三段、茅二段 发育灰色厚层—块状白云质灰岩 中等—强岩溶化层组 泥质灰岩亚型 茅二段、茅一段 发育灰色、深灰色中薄层、中厚层眼皮眼球状灰岩 弱岩溶化层组 灰岩夹层或互层型 灰岩夹泥质灰岩(泥质灰岩夹灰岩)亚型 茅一段、茅二段 发育深灰色泥晶灰岩夹泥质灰岩 弱—中等岩溶化层组 灰岩夹硅质灰岩(含燧石)亚型 茅二段 发育厚层泥晶灰岩、生屑泥晶灰岩，夹硅质灰岩(含燧石) 弱岩溶化层组 非均匀状纯碳酸盐岩类 灰岩夹碎屑岩型 灰岩夹钙质泥岩亚型 茅一段、茅二段 发育灰色厚层—块状眼皮眼球状灰岩夹灰黑色薄层状钙质泥岩 弱岩溶化层组 灰岩夹碳质泥岩亚型 茅一段 发育灰色中厚层眼皮眼球状灰岩夹黑色薄层状碳质泥岩 弱岩溶化层组
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 袁道先. 中国岩溶学[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1994.YUAN Daoxian. Chinese karst science[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 1994. [2] 翁金桃. 桂林岩溶与碳酸盐岩[M]. 重庆: 重庆出版社, 1987.Weng Jintao. Karst and carbonate rocks in Guilin[M]. Chongqing: Chongqing Publishing, 1987. [3] 《中国北方岩溶地下水资源及大水矿区岩溶水的预测、利用与管理的研究》项目综合组. 中国北方寒武-奥陶系岩溶层组类型及其区域变化规律[J]. 中国岩溶, 1991, 10(2): 116-125. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGYR199102003.htmThe working Group of the Research on Karst Groundwater-Resources in the North China and Prediction Utilization and Management of Karst Water in Mine Area. Karst strata association types of the Cambrian-Ordovician in North China and regularity of their regional variation[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 1991, 10(2): 116-125. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGYR199102003.htm [4] 淡永, 梁彬, 曹建文, 等. 塔北哈拉哈塘地区奥陶系碳酸盐岩岩溶层组特征与溶蚀强度分析[J]. 石油实验地质, 2015, 37(5): 582-590. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201505582DAN Yong, LIANG Bin, CAO Jianwen, et al. Characteristics and solution intensity of karst formations in Ordovician carbonates in the Halahatang area of the northern Tarim Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2015, 37(5): 582-590. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201505582 [5] 郭旭升, 胡东风, 段金宝. 中国南方海相油气勘探展望[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(5): 675-686. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202005675GUO Xusheng, HU Dongfeng, DUAN Jinbao. Marine petroleum exploration in South China[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(5): 675-686. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202005675 [6] 胡东风. 四川盆地元坝地区茅口组台缘浅滩天然气勘探的突破与启示[J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39(3): 1-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201903001.htmHU Dongfeng. Breakthrough in natural gas exploration in the platform margin shoal at the Maokou Fm in the Yuanba area, Sichuan Basin, and its implications[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(3): 1-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201903001.htm [7] 段金宝. 普光与元坝礁滩气田天然气成藏特征对比[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 38(4): 9-18. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNSY201604002.htmDUAN Jinbao. The comparative study of natural gas accumulation characteristics between Puguang and Yuanba reef-bank gas field[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2016, 38(4): 9-18. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNSY201604002.htm [8] 施泽进, 张瑾, 李文杰, 等. 四川盆地Guadalupian统碳酸盐岩稀土元素和碳-锶同位素特征及地质意义[J]. 岩石学报, 2019, 35(4): 1095-1106. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201904008.htmSHI Zejin, ZHANG Jin, LI Wenjie, et al. Characteristics of rare earth element and carbon-strontium isotope and their geological significance of Guadalupian carbonate in Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2019, 35(4): 1095-1106. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201904008.htm [9] 霍飞, 杨西燕, 王兴志, 等. 川西北地区茅口组储层特征及其主控因素[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 45(1): 45-52. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CDLG201801004.htmHUO Fei, YANG Xiyan, WANG Xingzhi, et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors of the Middle Permian Maokou Formation reservoir in northwestern Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition), 2018, 45(1): 45-52. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CDLG201801004.htm [10] 张本健, 谢继容, 尹宏, 等. 四川盆地西部龙门山地区中二叠统碳酸盐岩储层特征及勘探方向[J]. 天然气工业, 2018, 38(2): 33-42. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201802006.htmZHANG Benjian, XIE Jirong, YIN Hong, et al. Characteristics and exploration direction of the Middle Permian carbonate reservoirs in the Longmenshan mountain areas, western Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2018, 38(2): 33-42. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201802006.htm [11] 钟原, 杨跃明, 文龙, 等. 四川盆地西北部中二叠统茅口组岩相古地理、古岩溶地貌恢复及其油气地质意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2021, 48(1): 81-93. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202101009.htmZHONG Yuan, YANG Yueming, WEN Long, et al. Reconstruction and petroleum geological significance of lithofacies paleogeography and paleokarst geomorphology of the Middle Permian Maokou Formation in northwestern Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(1): 81-93. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202101009.htm [12] 王兴志, 李博, 杨西燕, 等. 四川盆地北部中二叠世晚期"广元-旺苍"海槽特征及其油气地质意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2021, 48(3): 562-574. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202103012.htmWANG Xingzhi, LI Bo, YANG Xiyan, et al. Characteristics of "Guangyuan-Wangcang" trough during late Middle Permian and its petroleum geological significance in northern Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(3): 562-574. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202103012.htm [13] 李乾, 徐胜林, 陈洪德, 等. 川北旺苍地区茅口组地球化学特征及古环境记录[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 45(3): 268-281. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CDLG201803002.htmLI Qian, XU Shenglin, CHEN Hongde, et al. Geochemical characte-ristics and palaeo-environmental implication of Middle Permian Maokou Formation in Wangcang region, Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition), 2018, 45(3): 268-281. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CDLG201803002.htm [14] 何斌, 徐义刚, 王雅玫, 等. 东吴运动性质的厘定及其时空演变规律[J]. 地球科学, 2005, 30(1): 89-96. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX200501012.htmHE Bin, XU Yigang, WANG Yamei, et al. Nature of the Dongwu Movement and its temporal and spatial evolution[J]. Earth Science, 2005, 30(1): 89-96. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX200501012.htm [15] 姚倩颖, 刘一锋, 江青春, 等. 川北—川东地区中二叠世晚期地层划分新认识及地质意义[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(2): 276-287. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202102276YAO Qianying, LIU Yifeng, JIANG Qingchun, et al. Geological significance of late Mid-Permian stratigraphy in northern and eastern Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(2): 276-287. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202102276 [16] 佘敏, 蒋义敏, 胡安平, 等. 碳酸盐岩溶蚀模拟实验技术进展及应用[J]. 海相油气地质, 2020, 25(1): 12-21. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HXYQ202001002.htmSHE Min, JIANG Yimin, HU Anping, et al. The progress and application of dissolution simulation of carbonate rock[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2020, 25(1): 12-21. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HXYQ202001002.htm [17] 蒋小琼, 王恕一, 范明, 等. 埋藏成岩环境碳酸盐岩溶蚀作用模拟实验研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2008, 30(6): 643-646. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200806643JIANG Xiaoqiong, WANG Shuyi, FAN Ming, et al. Study of simulation experiment for carbonate rocks dissolution in burial diagenetic environment[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2008, 30(6): 643-646. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200806643 [18] 吴群, 彭金宁. 川东北地区埋藏史及热史分析: 以普光2井为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2013, 35(2): 133-138. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201302133WU Qun, PENG Jinning. Burial and thermal histories of northeastern Sichuan Basin: a case study of well Puguang 2[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2013, 35(2): 133-138. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201302133 -
计量
- 文章访问数: 630
- HTML全文浏览量: 256
- PDF下载量: 44
- 被引次数: 0
苏公网安备32021102000780号