Pressure evolution of shale gas reservoirs in Wufeng-Longmaxi formations, Lintanchang area, southeast Sichuan Basin and its geological significance
-
摘要: 川东南林滩场地区的上奥陶统五峰组—下志留统龙马溪组具备较好的勘探开发条件，查明该层系古流体压力演化对揭示页岩气成藏及逸散过程具有重要意义。以林滩场地区五峰组—龙马溪组页岩构造裂缝和流体超压裂缝脉体为研究对象，综合阴极发光观察、包裹体显微测温、激光拉曼分析及盆地模拟等技术手段查明该地区的古流体压力演化过程及其控制作用。研究表明：(1)林滩场地区经历了常压、微超压—常压、超压、泄压4个阶段，其中超压主要来源于生烃作用，泄压主要由页岩气逸散导致，且使气藏泄压54%。(2)五峰组—龙马溪组黑色页岩层系底部的裂缝存在两期脉体充填。第一期形成于沉降埋深阶段，时间在131~118 Ma，形成温度介于178~205 ℃，甲烷包裹体捕获压力为105.6~119.8 MPa；第二期形成于构造抬升阶段，时间在25~18 Ma，形成温度介于150~175 ℃，甲烷包裹体具有相对较低的盐度，其捕获压力介于80.8~92.1 MPa，较低的压力系数(1.37~1.49)指示气藏已发生大量逸散。(3)晚期构造运动，特别是喜马拉雅晚期的快速抬升是造成气藏逸散和泄压的根本原因。有机孔的圆度减弱、孔径减小表明储层物性变差。由于气藏形成和保存时间长，林滩场地区五峰组—龙马溪组页岩仍具备较好的勘探潜力。该研究有助于深化林滩场常压页岩气藏富集规律的认识，可为该地区页岩气勘探有利区的优选提供一定的理论支撑。Abstract: The Upper Ordovician Wufeng Formation-Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in Lintanchang area of the southeastern Sichuan Basin has good exploration and development conditions, and clarifying the paleo-fluid pressure evolution is of great significance for revealing the process of shale gas accumulation and fugitive emission. Taking the shale tectonic fractures and fluid overpressure fracture veins of the Wufeng-Longmaxi formations in Lintanchang area as the research object, the paleo-fluid pressure evolution process in this area and its controlling impact were investigated using cathodoluminescence, inclusion temperature measurement, laser Raman analysis, and basin simulation. The study shows that: (1) Lintanchang area has experienced four stages: normal pressure, mild overpressure to normal pressure, overpressure, and pressure relief. Overpressure is mainly due to hydrocarbon generation. Pressure relief is mainly caused by shale gas fugitive emission. The gas reservoir pressure relief reaches 54% of the initial pressure during the pressure relief stage. (2) There are two stages of vein filling in the fractures at the bottom of the black shale in the Wufeng-Longmaxi formations. The first stage is formed in the sedimentation and burial stage at 131-118 Ma, the temperature is 178-205 ℃, and the trapping pressure of methane inclusions is 105.6-119.8 MPa. The second stage is formed in the tectonic uplift stage at 25-18 Ma, the temperature is 150-175 ℃, the methane inclusions have relatively low salinity and its trapping pressure is 80.8-92.1 MPa. The low pressure coefficient (1.37-1.49) indicates that mass fugitive emission has occurred. (3) The late tectonic movement, especially the rapid uplift in the late Himalayan period, is the root cause of the fugitive emission and pressure relief of the gas reservoirs. The decrease of the roundness and pore size of the organic pores indicates the deterioration of reservoir physical properties. However, due to the long formation and preservation time of the gas reservoirs, the shale in the Wufeng-Longmaxi formations in Lintanchang area still has good exploration potential. This study is helpful to deepen the understanding of the accumulation mechanism of the normal-pressure shale gas reservoirs in Lintanchang area and can provide theoretical guidance for optimal selection of favorable shale gas exploration areas.
-
图 1 川东南林滩场区域位置及下奥陶统龙马溪组底界埋深
Figure 1. Regional location of Lintanchang area in the southeastern Sichuan Basin and the burial depth of the bottom boundary of the Lower Ordovician Longmaxi Formation
图 2 川东南林滩场地区LY3井单井柱状图及取样信息
Figure 2. Histogram and sampling information of well LY3 in Lintanchang area, southeastern Sichuan Basin
图 3 川东南林滩场地区LY3井页岩岩心裂缝脉体特征
a.水平层理缝充填块状方解石，五峰组，4 133.9 m；b.水平层理缝充填的方解石呈网状，五峰组，4 134.1 m；c.网状裂缝，岩心具揉皱破碎现象，龙马溪组一段，4 133.5 m；d.层间滑移缝充填方解石和黄铁矿，龙马溪组一段，4 074.7 m；e.高角度剪切缝充填方解石，龙马溪组一段，4 170.0 m；f.水平流体超压缝充填方解石，龙马溪组一段，4 129.8 m。
Figure 3. Characteristics of fracture veins of shale cores of well LY3 in Lintanchang area, southeastern Sichuan Basin
图 4 川东南林滩场地区LY3井五峰组页岩脉体光学及阴极发光特征
a-c.埋深分别为4 134.0、4 134.1、4 133.9 m；从左至右依次为单偏光、正交偏光、阴极发光；第一期方解石发橘红色光，另一期为暗橘黄色。
Figure 4. Optical and cathodoluminescence characteristics of shale fracture veins in the Wufeng Formation of well LY3 in Lintanchang area, southeastern Sichuan Basin
图 5 川东南林滩场地区LY3井页岩裂缝脉体中流体包裹体的岩相学特征
Figure 5. Petrographic features of fluid inclusions in shale fracture veins of well LY3 in Lintanchang area, southeastern Sichuan Basin
图 6 川东南林滩场地区LY3井流体包裹体均一温度和盐度测试结果
Figure 6. Test results of homogenization temperature and salinity of fluid inclusions of well LY3 in Lintanchang area, southeastern Sichuan Basin
图 7 川东南林滩场地区LY3井方解石脉体中典型包裹体拉曼光谱图
Figure 7. Raman spectrogram of typical inclusions in calcite veins of well LY3 in Lintanchang area, southeastern Sichuan Basin
图 8 川东南林滩场地区LY3井五峰组—龙马溪组一段页岩有机孔形态扫描电镜照片
a.不规则角状、椭圆状的有机孔，4 132.34 m；b.狭缝状、扁平椭圆状有机孔，4 130.7 m；c.不规则角状有机孔，部分孔隙相互结合，连通性变差，4 125.91 m；d.孔隙网络提取结果，4 130.7 m。
Figure 8. FE-SEM observations of shale organic pore morphology in the Wufeng Formation - the 1st member of Longmaxi Formation of well LY3 in Lintanchang area, southeastern Sichuan Basin
图 9 川东南林滩场地区LY3井有机质孔径分布
Figure 9. Organic pore size distribution histogram of well LY3 in Lintanchang area, southeastern Sichuan Basin
图 10 川东南林滩场地区LY3井五峰组—龙马溪组埋藏热演化史
Figure 10. Burial and thermal evolution histories of Wufeng-Longmaxi formations of well LY3 in Lintanchang area, southeastern Sichuan Basin
图 11 川东南林滩场地区LY3井密度与声波速度交会图
Figure 11. Crossplots of density and sound velocity of well LY3 in Lintanchang area, southeastern Sichuan Basin
图 12 川东南林滩场地区LY3井压力演化
Figure 12. Pressure evolution process of well LY3 in Lintanchang area, southeastern Sichuan Basin
表 1 川东南林滩场地区甲烷包裹体捕获压力计算结果
Table 1. Calculation results of trapping pressure of methane inclusions in Lintanchang area, southeastern Sichuan Basin
样品编号 测点数 ν1/cm-1 ρ/(g/cm3) 同期盐水包裹体均一温度/℃ 捕获压力/MPa 范围 平均 BG1 5 2 911.871~2 911.062 0.268~0.276 183~208 198 107.4~116.1 BG2 3 2 910.926~2 910.984 0.271~0.274 184~203 196 109.8~112.5 BG3 4 2 910.743~2 911.045 0.266~0.269 182~205 193 106.7~109.1 BG4 4 2 911.281~2 911.602 0.267~0.282 180~194 196 110.7~119.8 BG5 3 2 911.278~2 912.516 0.244~0.256 150~184 163 80.7~88.7 BG6 3 2 911.203~2 911.381 0.251~0.259 165~179 165 85.8~92.4 BG7 4 2 911.267~2 911.418 0.249~0.256 155~177 163 83.0~88.2 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 川东南林滩场地区LY3井聚焦离子束扫描电镜提取的孔隙参数
Table 2. Pore parameters extracted by FIB-SEM observations of well LY3 in Lintanchang area, southeastern Sichuan Basin
深度/m 有机质/% 孔隙度/% 有机质内孔隙度/% 连通孔隙度/% 孔隙连通率/% 4 132.34 65.3 1.06 3.72 2.09 56.2 4 130.70 41.8 2.87 4.76 2.08 43.7 4 125.91 53.4 1.43 7.05 5.28 74.9
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 王濡岳, 聂海宽, 胡宗全, 等. 压力演化对页岩气储层的控制作用: 以四川盆地五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2020, 40(10): 1-11. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2020.10.001WANG Ruyue, NIE Haikuan, HU Zongquan, et al. Controlling effect of pressure evolution on shale gas reservoirs: a case study of the Wufeng-Longmaxi formation in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2020, 40(10): 1-11. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2020.10.001 [2] 聂海宽, 何治亮, 刘光祥, 等. 中国页岩气勘探开发现状与优选方向[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2020, 49(1): 13-35. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKD202001002.htmNIE Haikuan, HE Zhiliang, LIU Guangxiang, et al. Status and direction of shale gas exploration and development in China[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2020, 49(1): 13-35. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKD202001002.htm [3] 舒志国, 王进. 四川盆地涪陵气田焦石坝区块上部气层地质特征分析及有利区优选[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(1): 34-44. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202101034SHU Zhiguo, WANG Jin. Geological characteristics and optimization of favorable areas in the upper gas reservoir of Jiaoshiba block in the Fuling Shale Gas Field, Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(1): 34-44. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202101034 [4] 胡东风, 王良军, 黄仁春, 等. 四川盆地中国石化探区油气勘探历程与启示[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2021, 42(3): 283-290. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD202103005.htmHU Dongfeng, WANG Liangjun, HUANG Renchun, et al. Petroleum exploration history and enlightenment in Sichuan basin: a case study on SINOPEC exploration areas[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2021, 42(3): 283-290. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD202103005.htm [5] 何治亮, 聂海宽, 蒋廷学. 四川盆地深层页岩气规模有效开发面临的挑战与对策[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2021, 11(2): 135-145. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202102001.htmHE Zhiliang, NIE Haikuan, JIANG Tingxue. Challenges and countermeasures of effective development with large scale of deep shale gas in Sichuan Basin[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(2): 135-145. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202102001.htm [6] 张鹏伟, 张洪安, 王学军, 等. 四川盆地普光和通南巴地区须家河组气藏气源探讨[J]. 断块油气田, 2022, 29(2): 145-151. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202202001.htmZHANG Pengwei, ZHANG Hongan, WANG Xuejun, et al. Origin of natural gas in the Xujiahe Formation in Puguang and Tongnanba area, Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2022, 29(2): 145-151. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202202001.htm [7] 郭彤楼. 深层页岩气勘探开发进展与攻关方向[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2021, 11(1): 1-6. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202101001.htmGUO Tonglou. Progress and research direction of deep shale gas exploration and development[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(1): 1-6. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202101001.htm [8] 邹才能, 赵群, 丛连铸, 等. 中国页岩气开发进展、潜力及前景[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(1): 1-14. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202101002.htmZOU Caineng, ZHAO Qun, CONG Lianzhu, et al. Development progress, potential and prospect of shale gas in China[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(1): 1-14. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202101002.htm [9] 葛勋, 郭彤楼, 马永生, 等. 四川盆地东南缘林滩场地区上奥陶统五峰组—龙马溪组页岩气储层甜点预测[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(3): 633-647. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202203012.htmGE Xun, GUO Tonglou, MA Yongsheng, et al. Prediction of shale reservoir sweet spots of the Upper Ordovician Wufeng-Longmaxi formations in Lintanchang area, southeastern margin of Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(3): 633-647. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202203012.htm [10] 郭彤楼. 涪陵页岩气田发现的启示与思考[J]. 地学前缘, 2016, 23(1): 29-43. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201601005.htmGUO Tonglou. Discovery and characteristics of the Fuling shale gas field and its enlightenment and thinking[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2016, 23(1): 29-43. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201601005.htm [11] 邹才能, 赵群, 董大忠, 等. 页岩气基本特征、主要挑战与未来前景[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(12): 1781-1796. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201712001.htmZOU Caineng, ZHAO Qun, DONG Dazhong, et al. Geological characteristics, main challenges and future prospect of shale gas[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2017, 28(12): 1781-1796. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201712001.htm [12] GAO Jian, HE Sheng, ZHAO Jianxin, et al. Geothermometry and geobarometry of overpressured Lower Paleozoic gas shales in the Jiaoshiba field, Central China: insight from fluid inclusions in fracture cements[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2017, 83: 124-139. [13] WANG Xiaolin, HU Wenxuan, QIU Ye, et al. Fluid inclusion evidence for extreme overpressure induced by gas generation in sedimentary basins[J]. Geology, 2022, 50(7): 765-770. [14] 刘冬冬, 郭靖, 潘占昆, 等. 页岩气藏超压演化过程: 来自四川盆地南部五峰组—龙马溪组裂缝流体包裹体的证据[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(9): 12-22. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202109004.htmLIU Dongdong, GUO Jing, PAN Zhankun, et al. Overpressure evolution process in shale gas reservoir: evidence from the fluid inclusions in the fractures of Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation in the southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(9): 12-22. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202109004.htm [15] 曾宇, 侯宇光, 胡东风, 等. 川东南盆缘常压区页岩裂缝脉体特征及古压力演化[J]. 地球科学, 2022, 47(5): 1819-1833. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX202205020.htmZENG Yu, HOU Yuguang, HU Dongfeng, et al. Characteristics of shale fracture veins and paleo-pressure evolution in normal pressure shale gas zone, southeast margin of Sichuan Basin[J]. Earth Science, 2022, 47(5): 1819-1833. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX202205020.htm [16] WEI Sile, HE Sheng, PAN Zhejun, et al. Models of shale gas storage capacity during burial and uplift: application to Wufeng-Longmaxi shales in the Fuling shale gas field[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2019, 109: 233-244. [17] 邱楠生, 冯乾乾, 腾格尔, 等. 川东南丁山地区燕山期—喜马拉雅期差异构造—热演化与页岩气保存[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(12): 1610-1622. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB202012013.htmQIU Nansheng, FENG Qianqian, TENGER, et al. Yanshanian-Himalayan differential tectono-thermal evolution and shale gas preservation in Dingshan area, southeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(12): 1610-1622. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB202012013.htm [18] 邱楠生, 刘一锋, 刘雯, 等. 沉积盆地地层古压力定量重建方法与研究实例[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2020, 50(6): 793-806. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDXK202006006.htmQIU Nansheng, LIU Yifeng, LIU Wen, et al. Quantitative reconstruction of formation paleo-pressure in sedimentary basins and case studies[J]. Science China Earth Sciences, 2020, 63(6): 808-821. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDXK202006006.htm [19] 高键, 李慧莉, 何治亮, 等. 渝东彭水地区常压页岩气压力演化与富集保存[J]. 天然气工业, 2022, 42(8): 124-135. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202208008.htmGAO Jian, LI Huili, HE Zhiliang, et al. Pressure evolution, enrichment and preservation of normal-pressure shale gas in the Pengshui area of eastern Chongqing[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2022, 42(8): 124-135. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202208008.htm [20] 韦腾强, 吴长江, 黄亚浩, 等. 流体包裹体拉曼定量技术在致密砂岩气藏研究中的应用: 以四川盆地中部侏罗系沙溪庙组为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2021, 32(2): 164-173. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX202102002.htmWEI Tengqiang, WU Changjiang, HUANG Yahao, et al. Application of fluid inclusion Raman quantitative technique to the study of tight sandstone gas reservoirs: case study of Jurassic Shaximiao Formation in central Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2021, 32(2): 164-173. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX202102002.htm [21] NIE Haikuan, HE Zhiliang, WANG Ruyue, et al. Temperature and origin of fluid inclusions in shale veins of Wufeng-Longmaxi formations, Sichuan Basin, South China: implications for shale gas preservation and enrichment[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2020, 193: 107329. [22] WANG Enze, GUO Tonglou, LI Maowen, et al. Exploration potential of different lithofacies of deep marine shale gas systems: insight into organic matter accumulation and pore formation mechanisms[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2022, 102: 104563. [23] 王恩泽, 郭彤楼, 刘波, 等. 四川盆地深层海相页岩地质特征及其含气量主控因素分析[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 53(9): 3615-3627. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGD202209025.htmWANG Enze, GUO Tonglou, LIU Bo, et al. Geological features and key controlling factors of gas bearing properties of deep marine shale in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2022, 53(9): 3615-3627. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGD202209025.htm [24] 邓宾, 刘树根, 覃作鹏, 等. 扬子板内大娄山渐变型盆—山结构带多期构造特征及其对板内—板缘构造的响应[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2015, 39(6): 973-991. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGYK201506001.htmDENG Bin, LIU Shugen, QIN Zuopeng, et al. Mutli-stage structural evolution of intracontinental Daloushan basin-mountain system, Upper Yangtze block: implications for a coupling of deformation events across South China plate and its periphery[J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 2015, 39(6): 973-991. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGYK201506001.htm [25] 邓宾, 刘树根, 杨锁, 等. 林滩场构造多期节理构造特征及其意义[J]. 矿物岩石, 2009, 29(3): 83-90. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KWYS200903012.htmDENG Bin, LIU Shugen, YANG Suo, et al. Structural characteristics of joints and its' implication in the Lingtanchang anticline[J]. Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology, 2009, 29(3): 83-90. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KWYS200903012.htm [26] 唐永, 周立夫, 陈孔全, 等. 川东南构造应力场地质分析及构造变形成因机制讨论[J]. 地质论评, 2018, 64(1): 15-28. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP201801004.htmTANG Yong, ZHOU Lifu, CHEN Kongquan, et al. Analysis of tectonic stress field of southeastern Sichuan and formation mechanism of tectonic deformation[J]. GeologicalReview, 2018, 64(1): 15-28. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP201801004.htm [27] 郭卫星, 唐建明, 欧阳嘉穗, 等. 四川盆地南部构造变形特征及其与页岩气保存条件的关系[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(5): 11-19. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202105003.htmGUO Weixing, TANG Jianming, OUYANG Jiasui, et al. Characteristics of structural deformation in the southern Sichuan Basin and its relationship with the storage condition of shale gas[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(5): 11-19. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202105003.htm [28] 邓宾, 刘树根, 王国芝, 等. 四川盆地南部地区新生代隆升剥露研究—低温热年代学证据[J]. 地球物理学报, 2013, 56(6): 1958-1973. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX201306019.htmDENG Bin, LIU Shugen, WANG Guozhi, et al. Cenozoic uplift and exhumation in southern Sichuan Basin: evidence from low-temperature thermochronology[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2013, 56(6): 1958-1973. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX201306019.htm [29] 陈少伟, 刘建章. 含油气盆地微观裂缝脉体期次、成因与流体演化研究进展及展望[J]. 地质科技通报, 2021, 40(4): 81-92. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ202104008.htmCHEN Shaowei, LIU Jianzhang. Research progress and prospects of the stages, genesis and fluid evolution of micro-fracture veins in petroliferous basins[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2021, 40(4): 81-92. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ202104008.htm [30] ZHAO Gang, JIN Zhijun, DING Wenlong, et al. Developmental characteristics and formational stages of natural fractures in the Wufeng-Longmaxi formation in the Sangzhi block, Hunan province, China: insights from fracture cements and fluid inclusions studies[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2022, 208: 109407. [31] 张庆玉, 李景瑞, 梁彬, 等. 塔里木盆地塔中地区奥陶系古岩溶包裹体特征及古环境意义[J]. 中国岩溶, 2020, 39(6): 894-899. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGYR202006012.htmZHANG Qingyu, LI Jingrui, LIANG Bin, et al. Characteristics and paleoenvironmental significance of Ordovician karst inclusions in the Tazhong area, Tarim Basin[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2020, 39(6): 894-899. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGYR202006012.htm [32] 单云鹏, 王红军, 张良杰, 等. 土库曼斯坦阿姆河右岸卡洛夫—牛津阶储层流体包裹体特征及成藏期[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 2020, 44(3): 14-25. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQSY202003002.htmSHAN Yunpeng, WANG Hongjun, ZHANG Liangjie, et al. Fluid inclusion characteristics and hydrocarbon accumulation period of Callovian-Oxfordian reservoir on the right bank of Amu Darya, Turkmenistan[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2020, 44(3): 14-25. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQSY202003002.htm [33] 刘德汉, 戴金星, 肖贤明, 等. 普光气田中高密度甲烷包裹体的发现及形成的温度和压力条件[J]. 科学通报, 2010, 55(4/5): 359-366. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXTB2010Z1010.htmLIU Dehan, DAI Jinxing, XIAO Xianming, et al. High density methane inclusions in Puguang gas field: discovery and a T-P genetic study[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2009, 54(24): 4714-4723. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXTB2010Z1010.htm [34] FALL A, EICHHUBL P, CUMELLA S P, et al. Testing the basin-centered gas accumulation model using fluid inclusion observations: southern Piceance Basin, Colorado[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2012, 96(12): 2297-2318. [35] BODNAR R J. Revised equation and table for determining the freezing point depression of H2O-NaCl solutions[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1993, 57(3): 683-684. [36] 李文, 何生, 张柏桥, 等. 焦石坝背斜西缘龙马溪组页岩复合脉体中流体包裹体的古温度及古压力特征[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(4): 402-415. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201804004.htmLI Wen, HE Sheng, ZHANG Baiqiao, et al. Characteristics of paleo-temperature and paleo-pressure of fluid inclusions in shale composite veins of Longmaxi Formation at the western margin of Jiaoshiba anticline[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2018, 39(4): 402-415. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201804004.htm [37] DUAN Zhenhao, MØLLER N, WEARE J H. An equation of state for the CH4-CO2-H2O system: Ⅰ. Pure systems from 0 to 1 000 ℃ and 0 to 8 000 bar[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1992, 56(7): 2605-2617. [38] 席斌斌, 腾格尔, 俞凌杰, 等. 川东南页岩气储层脉体中包裹体古压力特征及其地质意义[J]. 石油实验地质, 2016, 38(4): 473-479. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201604473XI Binbin, TENGER, YU Linjie, et al. Trapping pressure of fluid inclusions and its significance in shale gas reservoirs, southeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2016, 38(4): 473-479. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201604473 [39] SIBSON R H. Controls on maximum fluid overpressure defining conditions for mesozonal mineralisation[J]. Journal of Structural Geology, 2004, 26(6/7): 1127-1136. [40] COBBOLD P R, ZANELLA A, RODRIGUES N, etal. Bedding-parallel fibrous veins (beef and cone-in-cone): worldwide occurrence and possible significance in terms of fluid overpressure, hydrocarbon generation and mineralization[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2013, 43: 1-20. [41] OSBORNE M J, SWARBRICK R E. Mechanisms for generating overpressure in sedimentary basins: a reevaluation[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1997, 81(6): 1023-1041. [42] 赵靖舟, 李军, 徐泽阳. 沉积盆地超压成因研究进展[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(9): 973-998. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201709001.htmZHAO Jingzhou, LI Jun, XU Zeyang. Advances in the origin of overpressures in sedimentary basins[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2017, 38(9): 973-998. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201709001.htm [43] TINGAY M R P, MORLEY C K, LAIRD A, et al. Evidence for overpressure generation by kerogen-to-gas maturation in the northern Malay Basin[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2013, 97(4): 639-672. [44] 任丽华, 代俊杰, 林承焰, 等. 松辽盆地扶新隆起带南部青山口组超压特征及油气地质意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(7): 1020-1030. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201707004.htmREN Lihua, DAI Junjie, LIN Chengyan, et al. Characteristics of overpressure and its geological significance for hydrocarbon of Qingshankou Formationin southern Fuxin Uplift, Songliao Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2017, 28(7): 1020-1030. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201707004.htm [45] 刘伟新, 卢龙飞, 叶德燎, 等. 川东南地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组页岩气异常压力封存箱剖析与形成机制[J]. 石油实验地质, 2022, 44(5): 804-814. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202205804LIU Weixin, LU Longfei, YE Deliao, et al. Significance and formation mechanism of abnormally pressured compartments of shale gas in the Ordovician Wufeng-Silurian Longmaxi formations, southeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2022, 44(5): 804-814. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202205804 [46] GUO Xiaowen, HE Sheng, LIU Keyu, et al. Quantitative estimation of overpressure caused by oil generation in petroliferous basins[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 2011, 42(11): 1343-1350. [47] LIU Yifeng, QIU Nansheng, XIE Zengye, et al. Overpressure compartments in the central paleo-uplift, Sichuan Basin, southwest China[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2016, 100(5): 867-888. [48] 刘伟新, 鲍芳, 俞凌杰, 等. 川东南志留系龙马溪组页岩储层微孔隙结构及连通性研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2016, 38(4): 453-459. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201604453LIU Weixin, BAO Fang, YU Lingjie, et al. Micro-pore structure and connectivity of the Silurian Longmaxi shales, southeastern Sichuan area[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2016, 38(4): 453-459. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201604453 [49] 苟启洋, 徐尚, 郝芳, 等. 焦石坝地区页岩孔隙连通性及有效性评价[J]. 沉积学报, 2022, 40(5): 1419-1426. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB202205020.htmGOU Qiyang, XU Shang, HAO Fang, et al. Evaluation of shale pore connectivity and effectiveness in the Jiaoshiba area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2022, 40(5): 1419-1426. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB202205020.htm -
图(12) / 表(2)
计量
- 文章访问数: 713
- HTML全文浏览量: 306
- PDF下载量: 68
- 被引次数: 0
苏公网安备32021102000780号