构造抬升区泥页岩脆性破裂泄压特征及对页岩油富集的影响——以延安地区延长组长7<sub>3</sub>亚段为例

张凤奇; 孙越; 刘思瑶; 李艳霞; 孙建博; 王凤琴; 刘刚; 陈红果

doi:10.11781/sysydz202305936

构造抬升区泥页岩脆性破裂泄压特征及对页岩油富集的影响——以延安地区延长组长7₃亚段为例

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202305936

张凤奇^{1, 2,},
孙越^{1, 2},
刘思瑶^{1, 2},
李艳霞^{1, 2},
孙建博³,
王凤琴^{1, 2},
刘刚³,
陈红果^{1, 2}

1.
西安石油大学地球科学与工程学院, 西安 710065
2.
西安石油大学陕西省油气成藏地质学重点实验室, 西安 710065
3.
陕西延长石油(集团)有限责任公司研究院, 西安 710075

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金 42172164

国家科技重大专项 2017ZX05039-001

西安石油大学创新与实践能力培养计划 YCS22214209

详细信息

作者简介:
张凤奇(1981—), 男, 博士, 教授, 本刊青年编委, 从事油气形成机制与油气成藏动力学研究。E-mail: zhangfq@xsyu.edu.cn

中图分类号: TE122.3
计量
- 文章访问数: 556
- HTML全文浏览量: 181
- PDF下载量: 54
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-07-21
- 修回日期: 2023-08-25
- 刊出日期: 2023-09-28

Characteristics of pressure relief induced by shale brittle fracture in tectonic uplift area and its influence on shale oil enrichment: a case study of Chang 7₃ sub-member of Yanchang Formation in Yan'an area

ZHANG Fengqi^{1, 2
,},
SUN Yue^{1, 2},
LIU Siyao^{1, 2},
LI Yanxia^{1, 2},
SUN Jianbo³,
WANG Fengqin^{1, 2},
LIU Gang³,
CHEN Hongguo^{1, 2}

1.
School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Xi'an Shiyou University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710065, China
2.
Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Petroleum Accumulation Geology, Xi'an Shiyou University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710065, China
3.
Research Institute of Shaanxi Yanchang Petroleum (Group) Co., Ltd., Xi'an, Shaanxi 710075, China

摘要

摘要: 为深入认识大幅度构造抬升引起的泥页岩脆性破裂泄压特征及对页岩油富集的影响，以鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区延长组长7₃亚段为研究对象，运用改进的超压判识图版和数值模拟技术，综合考虑构造抬升过程中温度降低、孔隙回弹、超压泥页岩脆性破裂泄压等作用，定量分析了研究区目的层不同岩性地层由异常高压转变为异常低压或近常压的演化过程，进一步总结了其对页岩油富集的影响规律。研究区长7₃亚段早白垩世末期超压成因主要为生烃作用和欠压实作用，砂岩层超压主要来源于邻近烃源岩的超压传递；晚白垩世以来构造抬升引起的孔隙回弹和温度降低主导了研究区长7₃亚段砂岩异常低压的形成，脆性破裂泄压和温度降低使得长7₃亚段泥页岩形成弱超压或近常压。研究区长7₃亚段顶底两套富有机质泥页岩脆性破裂泄压时间不同步，使得顶、底2套富有机质泥页岩与其夹持的砂岩间具有较大的油气运移动力(源储过剩压力差)，其大小为16~22 MPa；同时，油气保存过程中裂缝已闭合的顶部泥页岩封盖层仍与其下覆砂岩保持着约1.42~6.80 MPa的过剩压力差，一定程度上加强了页岩层系油气的封闭能力，不同源储配置下地层压力的差异演化对页岩油的富集起到了重要控制作用。
- 构造抬升 /
- 脆性破裂 /
- 孔隙回弹 /
- 页岩油 /
- 延长组 /
- 三叠系 /
- 延安地区 /
- 鄂尔多斯盆地
Abstract: In order to gain a deeper understanding of the pressure relief characteristics of shale brittle fracture caused by large-scale tectonic uplift and its impact on shale oil enrichment, this paper, taking the Chang 7₃ sub-member of Yanchang Formation in Yan'an area of Ordos Basin as the research object, quantitatively analyzes the evolution of different lithological properties from overpressure to underpressure or near normal pressure, and further summarizes its influence on the enrichment of shale oil by utilizing the modified overpressure identification plate and numerical simulation techniques and taking into account the effects of temperature reduction, elastic rebound, and brittle rupture of overpressured shale in the process of tectonic uplift. The results show that the origins of overpressure at the end of the Early Cretaceous in the Chang 7₃ sub-member in the study area are mainly hydrocarbon generation and disequilibrium compaction, and the overpressure of the sandstone layer mainly originates from the overpressure transference from the neighboring source rocks; elastic rebound and temperature reduction due to tectonic uplift since the Late Cretaceous dominates the formation of underpressure in the Chang 7₃ sub-member sandstones in the study area, and brittle fracture pressure relief and temperature reduction lead to the formation of weak overpressure or near normal pressure in the Chang 7₃ sub-member shale. The timing of brittle fracture pressure relief of the top and bottom sets of organic-rich shale in the Chang 7₃ sub-member of the study area is not synchronized, resulting in large transport dynamics (source-reservoir excess pressure difference) between the top and bottom sets of organic-rich shale and their intercalated sandstones with magnitudes ranging from 16 to 22 MPa. Meanwhile, fractures in the top shale have closed during oil and gas preservation, and there is an excess pressure differential of about 1.42-6.80 MPa between it and the underlying sandstone, which strengthens the hydrocarbon containment capacity of the shale. Differential evolution of formation pressure under different source-reservoir configurations plays an important role in controlling shale oil enrichment.
- tectonic uplift /
- brittle fracture /
- elastic rebound /
- shale oil /
- Yanchang Formation /
- Triassic /
- Yan'an area /
- Ordos Basin
注释:

利益冲突声明/Conflict of Interests

所有作者声明不存在利益冲突。

All authors disclose no relevant conflict of interests.

作者贡献/Authors’Contributions

张凤奇和孙越参与实验设计和论文写作；刘思瑶、陈红果完成实验操作；李艳霞、孙建博、王凤琴、刘刚参与论文修改。所有作者均阅读并同意最终稿件的提交。

The manuscript was designed and written by ZHANG Fengqi and SUN Yue. The experimental operation was completed by LIU Siyao and CHEN Hongguo. The manuscript was revised by LI Yanxia, SUN Jianbo, WANG Fengqin and LIU Gang. All the authors have read the last version of paper and consented for submission.

HTML全文

图 1 鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区构造位置(a)及研究井位分布(b)

Figure 1. Tectonic location of Yan'an area in Ordos Basin (a) and well location distribution (b)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区岩性柱状图

Figure 2. Histogram of lithology in Yan'an area, Ordos Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区延长组长7₃亚段岩性组合类型

Figure 3. Types of lithologic assemblages of Chang 7₃ submember of Yanchang Formation in Yan'an area, Ordos Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区古热流随时间演化图修改自参考文献[48]。

Figure 4. Evolution of heat flow over time in Yan'an area, Ordos Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区储层压力系数与深度关系

Figure 5. Reservoir pressure coefficient versus depth in Yan'an area, Ordos Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区代表井泥岩压实特征

Figure 6. Mudstone compaction characteristics of representative well in Yan'an area, Ordos Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区单井泥岩声波速度—密度交会图

Figure 7. Acoustic velocity-density cross plots of mudstone from a single well in Yan'an area, Ordos Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 碳质泥岩校正声波速度—密度交会图版

Figure 8. Corrected acoustic velocity-density cross plots of carbonaceous mudstone

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区YY22井埋藏史和热史模拟结果实测TOC和实测R_o来自于参考文献[65]。

Figure 9. Simulation results of burial history and thermal history of well YY22 in Yan'an area, Ordos Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区YY22井长7₃亚段早白垩世末期之前的地层压力演化史

a.顶部富有机质泥页岩；b.底部富有机质泥页岩。

Figure 10. Formation pressure evolution of Chang 7₃ sub-member of well YY22 before the end of Early Cretaceous in Yan'an area, Ordos Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区长7₃亚段泥页岩TOC与OCR门限时间关系

Figure 11. Plots of TOC versus OCR threshold time of mud shale in Chang 7₃ sub-member in Yan'an area, Ordos Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区代表井长7₃亚段富有机质泥页岩晚白垩世以来的地层压力演化

a.YY1井顶部富有机质泥页岩；b.YY1井底部富有机质泥页岩；c.YY22井顶部富有机质泥页岩；d.YY22井底部富有机质泥页岩；e.YS2井顶部富有机质泥页岩；f.YS2井底部富有机质泥页岩。

Figure 12. Formation pressure evolution of organic-rich shale in Chang 7₃ sub-member of representative well in Yan'an area, Ordos Basin since Late Cretaceous

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13 鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区代表井(YY22)长7₃亚段砂岩地层压力演化示意

Figure 13. Schematic diagram of formation pressure evolution of sandstone in Chang 7₃ sub-member of representative well (well YY22) in Yan'an area, Ordos Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 14 鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区长7₃亚段页岩油富集模式

Figure 14. Map of shale oil enrichment pattern of Chang 7₃ sub-member in Yan'an area, Ordos Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区代表井地层剥蚀量

Table 1. Erosion thickness in representative well in Yan'an area, Ordos Basin

井名	不同时期剥蚀厚度/m
井名	晚三叠世末期	早侏罗世末	晚侏罗世末	早白垩世末
YY1	60	160	220	1 150
YY22	100	135	220	1 100
YS2	155	140	200	900

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区代表井长7₃亚段模拟参数及其地层压力模拟结果

Table 2. Simulation parameters of Chang 7₃ sub-member of representative well and its pressure simulation results in Yan'an area, Ordos Basin

井名	岩层	ω(TOC)/%	有机质类型	岩性厚度/m	最大埋深时期生烃增压/MPa	最大埋深时期欠压实增压/MPa
YY1	顶部泥页岩	8.49	Ⅱ₁	13.8	21.48	1.52
YY1	底部泥页岩	3.26	Ⅱ₁	27.3	11.45	1.49
YY22	顶部泥页岩	4.90	Ⅱ₁	26.0	14.63	2.53
YY22	底部泥页岩	4.70	Ⅱ₁	8.0	7.94	2.46
YS2	顶部泥页岩	3.59	Ⅱ₁	11.0	13.78	2.56
YS2	底部泥页岩	3.97	Ⅱ₁	20.0	16.07	1.95

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区长7₃亚段不同岩性孔隙回弹和温度降低引起的降压量

Table 3. Pressure reduction due to elastic rebound and temperature reduction in Chang 7₃ sub-member in Yan'an area, Ordos Basin

井名	岩层	温度变化量/℃	温度降低引起的降压量/MPa	抬升量/m	孔隙回弹引起的降压量/MPa	计算压力系数
YY1	顶部泥页岩	88.11	4.37	1 150		1.68
YY1	底部泥页岩	89.78	4.45	1 150		1.86
YY22	顶部泥页岩	86.00	4.26	1 100		2.75
	砂岩层	86.15	12.31	1 100	10.60	0.15
	底部泥页岩	86.63	4.29	1 100		1.65
YS2	顶部泥页岩	86.73	4.30	900		1.80
	砂岩层	86.85	12.41	900	8.67	0.32
	底部泥页岩	88.20	4.37	900		1.59

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区长7₃亚段富有机质泥页岩OCR门限时间及脆性破裂泄压量计算结果

Table 4. Calculation results of OCR threshold time and brittle rupture pressure relief of organic-rich shale in Chang 7₃ sub-member in Yan'an area, Ordos Basin

井名	岩层	ω(TOC)/%	抬升量/m	温度降低引起的降压量/MPa	最大埋深时期古压力/MPa	OCR门限值时间/Ma	脆性破裂泄压量/MPa
YY1	顶部泥页岩	8.49	1 150	4.37	47.34	76.50	25.24
YY1	底部泥页岩	3.26	1 150	4.45	37.55	51.74	17.08
YY22	顶部泥页岩	4.90	1 100	4.26	41.04	62.51	20.32
YY22	底部泥页岩	4.70	1 100	4.29	34.44	45.16	14.82
YS2	顶部泥页岩	3.59	900	4.30	40.87	33.49	20.06
YS2	底部泥页岩	3.97	900	4.37	42.81	38.49	21.19

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(68)

[1]	杨阳, 郑兴范, 肖毓祥, 等. 中国石油中高成熟度页岩油勘探开发进展[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2023, 28(3): 23-33. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY202303003.htm YANG Yang, ZHENG Xingfan, XIAO Yuxiang, et al. Progress in exploration and development of high-mature shale oil of PetroChina[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2023, 28(3): 23-33. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY202303003.htm
[2]	郭秋麟, 米石云, 张倩, 等. 中国页岩油资源评价方法与资源潜力探讨[J]. 石油实验地质, 2023, 45(3): 402-412. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202303402 GUO Qiulin, MI Shiyun, ZHANG Qian, et al. Assessment methods and potential of shale oil resources in China[J]. Petroleum Geo-logy & Experiment, 2023, 45(3): 402-412. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202303402
[3]	邹才能, 杨智, 张国生, 等. 非常规油气地质学理论技术及实践[J]. 地球科学, 2023, 48(6): 2376-2397. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX202306021.htm ZOU Caineng, YANG Zhi, ZHANG Guosheng, et al. Theory, technology and practice of unconventional petroleum geology[J]. Earth Science, 2023, 48(6): 2376-2397. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX202306021.htm
[4]	付锁堂, 姚泾利, 李士祥, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地中生界延长组陆相页岩油富集特征与资源潜力[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(5): 698-710. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202005698 FU Suotang, YAO Jingli, LI Shixiang, et al. Enrichment characteristics and resource potential of continental shale oil in Mesozoic Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(5): 698-710. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202005698
[5]	付金华, 李士祥, 郭芪恒, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地陆相页岩油富集条件及有利区优选[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(12): 1702-1716. doi: 10.7623/syxb202212003 FU Jinhua, LI Shixiang, GUO Qiheng, et al. Enrichment conditions and favorable area optimization of continental shale oil in Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(12): 1702-1716. doi: 10.7623/syxb202212003
[6]	付金华, 牛小兵, 李明瑞, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组7段3亚段页岩油风险勘探突破与意义[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(6): 760-769. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB202206002.htm FU Jinhua, NIU Xiaobing, LI Mingrui, et al. Breakthrough and significance of risk exploration in the 3rd sub-member, 7th member of Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(6): 760-769. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB202206002.htm
[7]	王香增. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长探区低渗致密油气成藏理论进展及勘探实践[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(1): 143-155. doi: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2022.8.30 WANG Xiangzeng. Low permeability tight oil and gas in Yanchang area, Ordos Basin: advances in accumulation theory and exploration practice[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2023, 30(1): 143-155. doi: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2022.8.30
[8]	HUNT J M. Generation and migration of petroleum from abnormally pressured fluid compartments[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1990, 74(1): 1-12.
[9]	UNGERER P, BURRUS J, DOLIGEZ B, et al. Basin evaluation by integrated two-dimensional modeling of heat transfer, fluid flow, hydrocarbon generation, and migration[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1990, 74(3): 309-335.
[10]	张焕旭. 生烃增压与致密油成藏动力: 以鄂尔多斯盆地延长组致密油为例[D]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2017. ZHANG Huanxu. Overpressure by hydrocarbon generation as the dynamic for tight oil migration: a case of Yangchang tight oil from Ordos Basin[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2017.
[11]	王帅. 延长油田长7段致密油生烃增压及其对成藏的控制[D]. 北京: 中国石油大学(北京), 2018. WANG Shuai. Overpressure evolution caused by hydrocarbon generation of Chang 7 section in Yanchang oilfield and its control effect on accumulation[D]. Beijing: China University of Petroleum (Beijing), 2018.
[12]	陈瑞银, 罗晓容, 陈占坤, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地埋藏演化史恢复[J]. 石油学报, 2006, 27(2): 43-47. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB200602008.htm CHEN Ruiyin, LUO Xiaorong, CHEN Zhankun, et al. Restoration of burial history of four periods in Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2006, 27(2): 43-47. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB200602008.htm
[13]	XU Hao, ZHANG Junfeng, TANG Dazhen, et al. Controlling factors of underpressure reservoirs in the Sulige gas field, Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(1): 70-74. doi: 10.1016/S1876-3804(12)60016-0
[14]	李士祥, 施泽进, 刘显阳, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地中生界异常低压成因定量分析[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2013, 40(5): 528-533. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201305004.htm LI Shixiang, SHI Zejin, LIU Xianyang, et al. Quantitative analysis of the Mesozoic abnormal low pressure in Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2013, 40(5): 528-533. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201305004.htm
[15]	刘显阳, 施泽进, 李士祥, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组异常低压与成藏关系[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 43(5): 601-608. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9727.2016.05.10 LIU Xianyang, SHI Zejin, LI Shixiang, et al. Relationship between petroleum accumulation and abnormal low pressure of the Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition), 2016, 43(5): 601-608. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9727.2016.05.10
[16]	INGRAM G M, URAI J L, NAYLOR M A. Sealing processes and top seal assessment[J]. Norwegian Petroleum Society Special Publications, 1997, 7: 165-174.
[17]	INGRAM G M, URAI J L. Top-seal leakage through faults and fractures: the role of mudrock properties[J]. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 1999, 158(1): 125-135. doi: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1999.158.01.10
[18]	袁玉松, 方志雄, 何希鹏, 等. 彭水及邻区龙马溪组页岩气常压形成机制[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2020, 10(1): 9-16. doi: 10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2020.01.002 YUAN Yusong, FANG Zhixiong, HE Xipeng, et al. Normal pressure formation mechanism of Longmaxi shale gas in Pengshui and its adjacent areas[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(1): 9-16. doi: 10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2020.01.002
[19]	鲁雪松, 柳少波, 田华, 等. 深层背斜圈闭中泥岩盖层完整性评价方法及其应用: 以四川盆地川中地区震旦系气藏为例[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(4): 415-427. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB202104001.htm LU Xuesong, LIU Shaobo, TIAN Hua, et al. An evaluation method for the integrity of mudstone caprock in deep anticlinal traps and its application: a case study of the Sinian gas reservoirs in the central Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(4): 415-427. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB202104001.htm
[20]	ZHOU Yong, JI Youliang, XU Liming, et al. Controls on reservoir heterogeneity of tight sand oil reservoirs in Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation in Longdong area, southwest Ordos Basin, China: implications for reservoir quality prediction and oil accumulation[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2016, 78: 110-135. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2016.09.006
[21]	王建民, 张三. 鄂尔多斯盆地伊陕斜坡上的低幅度构造特征及成因探讨[J]. 地学前缘, 2018, 25(2): 246-253. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201802031.htm WANG Jianmin, ZHANG San. Exploring the characteristics and genesis of low amplitude structures on the Yishaan Slope, Ordos Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2018, 25(2): 246-253. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201802031.htm
[22]	李江涛. 庆南地区中生界构造演化及勘探前景浅析[J]. 天然气工业, 2001(S1): 30-34. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG2001S1008.htm LI Jiangtao. Tectonic evolution and exploration prospects of Mesozoic at the region on the south of Qingyang[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2001(S1): 30-34. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG2001S1008.htm
[23]	屈童, 高岗, 梁晓伟, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地长7段致密油成藏机理分析[J]. 地质学报, 2022, 96(2): 616-629. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2022.02.017 QU Tong, GAO Gang, LIANG Xiaowei, et al. Analysis of tight oil accumulation mechanism of Chang 7 member in the Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2022, 96(2): 616-629. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2022.02.017
[24]	杨华, 李士祥, 刘显阳. 鄂尔多斯盆地致密油、页岩油特征及资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34(1): 1-11. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201301000.htm YANG Hua, LI Shixiang, LIU Xianyang. Characteristics and resource prospects of tight oil and shale oil in Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(1): 1-11. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201301000.htm
[25]	杨华, 牛小兵, 徐黎明, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系长7段页岩油勘探潜力[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43(4): 511-520. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201604003.htm YANG Hua, NIU Xiaobing, XU Liming, et al. Exploration potential of shale oil in Chang7 Member, Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43(4): 511-520. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201604003.htm
[26]	付金华, 李士祥, 牛小兵, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系长7段页岩油地质特征与勘探实践[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(5): 870-883. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202005005.htm FU Jinhua, LI Shixiang, NIU Xiaobing, et al. Geological characteristics and exploration of shale oil in Chang 7 Member of Triassic Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(5): 870-883. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202005005.htm
[27]	郭芪恒, 李士祥, 金振奎, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长7₃亚段页岩油特征及勘探方向[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2023, 50(4): 767-781. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202304009.htm GUO Qiheng, LI Shixiang, JIN Zhenkui, et al. Characteristics and exploration targets of Chang 7 shale oil in Triassic Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2023, 50(4): 767-781. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202304009.htm
[28]	孙建博, 孙兵华, 赵谦平, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地富县地区延长组长7湖相页岩油地质特征及勘探潜力评价[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2018, 23(6): 29-37. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201806004.htm SUN Jianbo, SUN Binghua, ZHAO Qianping, et al. Geological characteristics and exploration potential evaluation of Chang 7 lacustrine shale oil in Yanchang Formation, Fuxian area, Ordos Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2018, 23(6): 29-37. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201806004.htm
[29]	WANG Xiangzeng, GAO Shengli, GAO Chao. Geological features of Mesozoic lacustrine shale gas in south of Ordos Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(3): 326-337.
[30]	JI Wenming, SONG Yan, JIANG Zhenxue, et al. Geological controls and estimation algorithms of lacustrine shale gas adsorption capacity: a case study of the Triassic strata in the southeastern Ordos Basin, China[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2014, 134-135: 61-73.
[31]	TANG Xuan, ZHANG Jinchuan, WANG Xiangzeng, et al. Shale characteristics in the southeastern Ordos Basin, China: implications for hydrocarbon accumulation conditions and the potential of continental shales[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2014, 128-129: 32-46.
[32]	LIU Xiangjun, XIONG Jian, LIANG Lixi. Investigation of pore structure and fractal characteristics of organic-rich Yanchang formation shale in central China by nitrogen adsorption/desorption analysis[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Enginee-ring, 2015, 22: 62-72.
[33]	TINGAY M R P, HILLIS R R, SWARBRICK R E, et al. Origin of overpressure and pore-pressure prediction in the Baram province, Brunei[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2009, 93(1): 51-74.
[34]	TINGAY M R P, MORLEY C K, LAIRD A, et al. Evidence for overpressure generation by kerogen-to-gas maturation in the northern Malay Basin[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2013, 97(4): 639-672.
[35]	FAN Changyu, WANG Gang. The significance of a piecemeal geometric model of mudstone compaction: Pinghu Slope, Xihu Depression, Eastern China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2021, 131: 105138.
[36]	HANTSCHEL T, KAUERAUF A I. Fundamentals of basin and petroleum systems modeling[M]. Dordrecht: Springer, 2009: 1-136.
[37]	张凤奇, 王震亮, 钟红利, 等. 沉积盆地主要超压成因机制识别模式及贡献[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2013, 24(6): 1151-1158. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201306008.htm ZHANG Fengqi, WANG Zhenliang, ZHONG Hongli, et al. Recognition model and contribution evaluation of main overpressure formation mechanisms in sedimentary basins[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2013, 24(6): 1151-1158. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201306008.htm
[38]	HAKIMI M H, NAJAF A A, ABDULA R A, et al. Generation and expulsion history of oil-source rock (Middle Jurassic Sargelu Formation) in the Kurdistan of north Iraq, Zagros folded belt: implications from 1D basin modeling study[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2018, 162: 852-872.
[39]	AL-KHAFAJI A J, HAKIMI M H, MOHIALDEEN I M J, et al. Geochemical characteristics of crude oils and basin modelling of the probable source rocks in the Southern Mesopotamian Basin, South Iraq[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2021, 196: 107641.
[40]	SWEENEY J J, BURNHAM A K. Evaluation of a simple model of vitrinite reflectance based on chemical kinetics[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1990, 74(10): 1559-1570.
[41]	刘可禹, 刘建良. 盆地和含油气系统模拟(BPSM)研究现状及发展趋势[J]. 石油科学通报, 2017, 2(2): 161-175. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYKE201702001.htm LIU Keyu, LIU Jianliang. Current status and future development trends of Basin and Petroleum System Modeling (BPSM)[J]. Petroleum Science Bulletin, 2017, 2(2): 161-175. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYKE201702001.htm
[42]	郭小文, 何生, 郑伦举, 等. 生油增压定量模型及影响因素[J]. 石油学报, 2011, 32(4): 637-644. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201104013.htm GUO Xiaowen, HE Sheng, ZHENG Lunju, et al. A quantitative model for the overpressure caused by oil generation and its influential factors[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2011, 32(4): 637-644. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201104013.htm
[43]	郭小文, 何生, 刘可禹, 等. 烃源岩生气增压定量评价模型及影响因素[J]. 地球科学(中国地质大学学报), 2013, 38(6): 1263-1270. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX201306010.htm GUO Xiaowen, HE Sheng, LIU Keyu, et al. A quantitative estimation model for the overpressure caused by natural gas generation and its influential factors[J]. Earth Science(Journal of China University of Geosciences), 2013, 38(6): 1263-1270. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX201306010.htm
[44]	田刚, 宋立军. 鄂尔多斯盆地中元古界烃源岩热演化史模拟[J]. 石油实验地质, 2017, 39(4): 520-526. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201704520 TIAN Gang, SONG Lijun. Thermal evolution modeling of Mesoproterozoic source rocks in the Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Geo-logy & Experiment, 2017, 39(4): 520-526. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201704520
[45]	陈瑞银, 罗晓容, 赵文智, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地中生代热异常及烃源岩热演化特征[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2007, 34(6): 658-663. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK200706005.htm CHEN Ruiyin, LUO Xiaorong, ZHAO Wenzhi, et al. Thermal anomaly and thermal evolution of source rocks in Mesozoic, Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2007, 34(6): 658-663. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK200706005.htm
[46]	郭秋麟, 米敬奎, 王建, 等. 改进的烃源岩生烃潜力模型及关键参数模板[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(5): 661-669. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201905013.htm GUO Qiulin, MI Jingkui, WANG Jian, et al. An improved hydrocarbon generation model of source rocks and key parameter templates[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(5): 661-669. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201905013.htm
[47]	胡慧婷, 卢双舫, 刘超, 等. 测井资料计算源岩有机碳含量模型对比及分析[J]. 沉积学报, 2011, 29(6): 1199-1205. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB201106023.htm HU Huiting, LU Shuangfang, LIU Chao, et al. Models for calculating organic carbon content from logging information: comparison and analysis[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2011, 29(6): 1199-1205. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB201106023.htm
[48]	任战利, 祁凯, 李进步, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地热动力演化史及其对油气成藏与富集的控制作用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(5): 1030-1042. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202105003.htm REN Zhanli, QI Kai, LI Jinbu, et al. Thermodynamic evolution and hydrocarbon accumulation in the Ordos Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(5): 1030-1042. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202105003.htm
[49]	姜光政, 高堋, 饶松, 等. 中国大陆地区大地热流数据汇编(第四版)[J]. 地球物理学报, 2016, 59(8): 2892-2910. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX201608015.htm JIANG Guangzheng, GAO Peng, RAO Song, et al. Compilation of heat flow data in the continental area of China (4th edition)[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2016, 59(8): 2892-2910. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX201608015.htm
[50]	RUSSELL W L. Pressure-depth relations in Appalachian region[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1972, 56(3): 528-536.
[51]	LI Shuangjian, YUAN Yusong, SUN Wei, et al. Formation and destruction mechanism as well as major controlling factors of the Silurian shale gas overpressure in the Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 1(4): 287-294.
[52]	马德文, 邱楠生, 许威. 鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田异常低压成因机制研究[J]. 地质科学, 2011, 46(4): 1055-1067. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKX201104012.htm MA Dewen, QIU Nansheng, XU Wei. Analysis on mechanism of abnormal low pressure in Sulige gas field, Ordos Basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 2011, 46(4): 1055-1067. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKX201104012.htm
[53]	HODGMAN C D. Handbook of chemistry and physics[M]. Cleveland, Ohio: Chemical Rubber Pub Co, 1957: 3213.
[54]	王凤琴, 王香增, 张丽霞, 等. 页岩气资源量计算: 以鄂尔多斯盆地中生界三叠系延长组长7为例[J]. 地学前缘, 2013, 20(3): 240-246. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201303029.htm WANG Fengqin, WANG Xiangzeng, ZHANG Lixia, et al. The shale gas resources estimation: an example from Mesozoic Triassic Yanchang Formation Member Chang 7, Ordos Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2013, 20(3): 240-246. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201303029.htm
[55]	王香增, 张丽霞, 姜呈馥, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地差异抬升对长7页岩孔隙的影响: 以东南部甘泉地区和南部渭北隆起地区为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 597-605. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201805001.htm WANG Xiangzeng, ZHANG Lixia, JIANG Chengfu, et al. The effect of differential uplift on pore development of Chang 7 shale in Ordos Basin: case studies of Ganquan area and Weibei uplift area[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2018, 29(5): 597-605. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201805001.htm
[56]	OISON J E, LAUBACH S E, LANDER R H. Natural fracture characterization in tight gas sandstones: integrating mechanics and diagenesis[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2009, 93(11): 1535-1549.
[57]	DING Wenlong, LI Chao, LI Chunyan, et al. Fracture development in shale and its relationship to gas accumulation[J]. Geoscience Frontiers, 2012, 3(1): 97-105.
[58]	NOBAKHT M, CLARKSON C R, KAVIANI D. New type curves for analyzing horizontal well with multiple fractures in shale gas reservoirs[C]//Proceedings of the Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference. Calgary: SPE, 2011: SPE-149397-MS.
[59]	WANG Xiangzeng, ZHANG Lixia, JIANG Chengfu, et al. Hydrocarbon storage space within lacustrine gas shale of the Triassic Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin, China[J]. Interpretation, 2015, 3(2): SJ15-SJ23.
[60]	GAO Ruimin, WANG Xiangzeng, JING Feng. Fracability evaluation of lacustrine shale in the Yanchang Formation of southeastern Ordos Basin[J]. Energy Exploration & Exploitation, 2015, 33(3): 363-374.
[61]	SHI Hui, LUO Xiaorong, XU Hui, et al. Identification and distribution of fractures in the Zhangjiatan shale of the Mesozoic Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin[J]. Interpretation, 2017, 5(2): SF167-SF176.
[62]	丁超, 郭顺, 郭兰, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部延长组长8油藏油气充注期次[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(4): 21-31. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YANX201904003.htm DING Chao, GUO Shun, GUO Lan, et al. Hydrocarbon charging time of Chang 8 reservoir of Yanchang Formation in southern Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(4): 21-31. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YANX201904003.htm
[63]	张润合, 郑兴平, 徐献高, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地上三叠统延长组四、五段泥岩生烃潜力评价[J]. 西安石油学院学报(自然科学版), 2003, 18(2): 9-13. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XASY200302003.htm ZHANG Runhe, ZHENG Xingping, XU Xiangao, et al. Evaluation of hydrocarbon-generating potential of the fourth and fifth member mudstone of Yanchang Formation of upper Triassic series in Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Xi'an Petroleum Institute (Natural Science Edition), 2003, 18(2): 9-13. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XASY200302003.htm
[64]	李超, 张立宽, 罗晓容, 等. 泥岩压实研究中有机质导致声波时差异常的定量校正方法[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 40(3): 77-87. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYDX201603010.htm LI Chao, ZHANG Likuan, LUO Xiaorong, et al. A quantitative method for revising abnormally high sonic data in rich-organic rock during compaction study[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum, 2016, 40(3): 77-87. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYDX201603010.htm
[65]	赵卫卫, 李富康, 单长安, 等. 延安地区延长组长7段陆相泥页岩孔隙类型及其吸附特征研究[J]. 非常规油气, 2023, 10(1): 32-43. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FCYQ202301005.htm ZHAO Weiwei, LI Fukang, SHAN Chang'an, et al. Pore types and adsorption characteristics of continental mud shale in Chang 7 member of Yanchang Formation of Yan'an area[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2023, 10(1): 32-43. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FCYQ202301005.htm
[66]	刘润川, 任战利, 马侃, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部延长组油气成藏期次研究[J]. 现代地质, 2019, 33(6): 1263-1274. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ201906014.htm LIU Runchuan, REN Zhanli, MA Kan, et al. Classification of hydrocarbon accumulation phases of Yanchang Formation in southern Ordos Basin[J]. Geoscience, 2019, 33(6): 1263-1274. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ201906014.htm
[67]	郭彦如, 刘俊榜, 杨华, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组低渗透致密岩性油藏成藏机理[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(4): 417-425. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201204005.htm GUO Yanru, LIU Junbang, YANG Hua, et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation mechanism of low permeable tight lithologic oil reservoirs in the Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin, China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(4): 417-425. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201204005.htm
[68]	张凤奇, 王震亮, 武富礼, 等. 低渗透致密砂岩储层成藏期油气运移的动力分析[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 36(4): 32-38. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYDX201204008.htm ZHANG Fengqi, WANG Zhenliang, WU Fuli, et al. Dynamic analysis on hydrocarbon migration of accumulation periods in low permeability-tight sandstone reservoir[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum, 2012, 36(4): 32-38. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYDX201204008.htm

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计

图(14) / 表(4)

计量

文章访问数: 556
HTML全文浏览量: 181
PDF下载量: 54
被引次数: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

留言板

构造抬升区泥页岩脆性破裂泄压特征及对页岩油富集的影响——以延安地区延长组长7₃亚段为例

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202305936

作者简介:
张凤奇(1981—), 男, 博士, 教授, 本刊青年编委, 从事油气形成机制与油气成藏动力学研究。E-mail: zhangfq@xsyu.edu.cn

计量

Characteristics of pressure relief induced by shale brittle fracture in tectonic uplift area and its influence on shale oil enrichment: a case study of Chang 7₃ sub-member of Yanchang Formation in Yan'an area

计量

目录

留言板

构造抬升区泥页岩脆性破裂泄压特征及对页岩油富集的影响——以延安地区延长组长73亚段为例

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202305936

作者简介: 张凤奇(1981—), 男, 博士, 教授, 本刊青年编委, 从事油气形成机制与油气成藏动力学研究。E-mail: zhangfq@xsyu.edu.cn

计量

出版历程

Characteristics of pressure relief induced by shale brittle fracture in tectonic uplift area and its influence on shale oil enrichment: a case study of Chang 73 sub-member of Yanchang Formation in Yan'an area

计量

出版历程

目录

构造抬升区泥页岩脆性破裂泄压特征及对页岩油富集的影响——以延安地区延长组长7₃亚段为例

作者简介:
张凤奇(1981—), 男, 博士, 教授, 本刊青年编委, 从事油气形成机制与油气成藏动力学研究。E-mail: zhangfq@xsyu.edu.cn

Characteristics of pressure relief induced by shale brittle fracture in tectonic uplift area and its influence on shale oil enrichment: a case study of Chang 7₃ sub-member of Yanchang Formation in Yan'an area