Differences in preservation conditions of deep shale gas in high-steep complex tectonic belt: taking Qijiang high-steep complex tectonic belt in southeast Sichuan as an example
-
摘要: 川东南地区是中国页岩气勘探的重点目标之一，现阶段的勘探领域正逐步迈入深层、超深层，但由于受钻井与地震等多种因素的制约，对该地区的构造特征及页岩气保存条件的研究还不够深入。为了查明川东南地区綦江高陡复杂构造带构造变形特征及其对深层页岩气富集规律的影响，为后续勘探部署提供依据，选取典型三维地震剖面，从构造变形特征剖析入手，结合实钻数据分析，建立高陡构造模型，在此基础上开展保存条件差异的主控因素定量评价。结果表明，綦江高陡构造具备“上陡下缓+膏岩主控+前锋变陡”的分层变形特征；綦江地区发育一套大范围的寒武系膏盐层，其塑性形变对上覆构造的隆起起到控制作用；区内影响页岩气保存条件的因素包含主动变形强度、断裂体系、断面正应力、构造与地应力夹角、顶板滑脱层等，各因素相互作用，导致研究区内部保存条件差异明显。据此，建立了綦江高陡构造保存条件评价标准，明确隆盛—桃子荡构造带构造应力单一，主动变形强度低，构造封闭性强，是下一步勘探的主要有利目标。Abstract: The southeastern Sichuan Basin is one of the key targets for shale gas exploration in China. Currently, the exploration has gradually been delved into deep and ultra-deep formation fields. However, due to various constraint factors such as drilling and earthquakes, research on the tectonic characteristics and shale gas preservation conditions in this area is inadequate. In order to find out the tectonic deformation characteristics of Qijiang high-steep complex tectonic belt in southeast Sichuan and its impact on the enrichment law of deep shale gas, and to provide a basis for subsequent exploration deployment, a high-steep structural model is established based on the analysis of tectonic deformation characteristics and practice drilling data, and the quantitative evaluation of the main controlling factors of differences in preservation conditions is carried out on the basis of the model. The research results show that: (1) Qijiang high-steep structure has the layered deformation feature of "steep upper part and flat lower part + dominated by gypsolyte + steep front"; (2)There is a widely developed Cambrian gypsum salt layer in the Qijiang area, whose plastic deformation controls the uplift of the overlying structure; (3) The factors affecting the preservation conditions of shale gas in the study area include active deformation strength, fracture system, normal stress of fault plane, angle between structure and geostress, roof detachment layer and other factors. The interaction of multiple factors leads to obvious differences in the preservation conditions in the study area. According to the analysis results, the evaluation criteria for the preservation conditions of Qijiang high-steep structures are established, and it is defined that the Longsheng-Taozidang tectonic belt has single tectonic stress, low active deformation intensity and well-closed structure, which is the main favorable target for the next exploration.
-
图 1 川东南地区构造单元划分及綦江高陡构造典型地震剖面
a.川东南地区构造隆升迁移变化；b.川东南地区构造分区；c.綦江高陡构造典型地震剖面。
Ⅰ.义和—平桥断褶带；Ⅱ.綦江高陡断褶带；Ⅲ.泸州—赤水低缓褶皱带；Ⅳ.永川帚状断褶带；Ⅱ1.石龙峡构造带；Ⅱ2.中梁山构造带；Ⅱ3.铁厂沟构造带；Ⅱ4.石油沟构造带；Ⅱ5.隆盛构造带；Ⅱ6.桃子荡构造带。Figure 1. Tectonic unit division of southeast Sichuan and typical seismic profile of Qijiang high-steep structure
图 2 川东南綦江地区石龙峡高陡构造几何学模型建立流程示意
Figure 2. Process for establishing the geometric model of Shilongxia high-steep structure in Qijiang area in southeast Sichuan
图 3 川东南綦江地区膏岩层厚度与志留系隆升幅度统计
Figure 3. Gypsolyte thickness and Silurian stratum uplift amplitude in Qijiang area in southeast Sichuan
图 4 川东南綦江地区石油沟高陡构造膏岩主控上覆构造变形模型示意
T.整体隆升幅度，m；D.标志层的变形，m；G1.膏岩纵向变形，m；Δu.主动变形量，m；U.膏岩层顶界以上地层的变形，m；h1.膏岩层底界深度与未变形前的标志层深度的差值，m；h2.未变形前的标志层深度与膏岩层最高点切线的深度的差值，m。
Figure 4. Deformation model of overlying structure dominated by gypsolyte in Qijiang high-steep tectonic belt in southeast Sichuan
图 5 川东南地区过HC1井地震剖面与岩心资料
Figure 5. Seismic profile and core data of well HC1 in southeast Sichuan
图 6 川东南地区过SY1井地震剖面与FMI成像测井
Figure 6. Seismic profile and imaging logging of well SY1 in southeast Sichuan
图 7 鄂西—渝东地区构造物理模拟实验局部放大示意
Figure 7. Partially enlarged diagram of physical simulation experiment of structures in west Hubei and east Chongqing
图 8 川东南綦江高陡构造主动变形强度平面分布
Figure 8. Planar distribution of active deformation intensity of high-steep structures in Qijiang in southeast Sichuan
图 9 川东南綦江地区上奥陶统五峰组底界断裂分布
Figure 9. Distribution of bottom boundary faults of Upper Ordovician Wufeng Formation in Qijiang area in southeast Sichuan
图 10 川东南綦江地区高陡构造志留系断裂正应力平面分布
Figure 10. Normal stress plane distribution of Silurian faults in Qijiang high-steep structure in southeast Sichuan
图 11 川东南地区高陡构造倾角与地应力方向叠合
Figure 11. Superimposed diagram of dip and geostress direction of high-steep structures in southeast Sichuan
图 12 川东南地区XY1井ADS法定量解译剖面
Figure 12. Quantitative interpretation profile of well XY1 in southeast Sichuan by ADS method
表 1 川东南綦江高陡构造带膏岩与上覆构造隆升幅度统计
Table 1. Uplift amplitude of gypsolyte and overlying structure in Qijiang high-steep tectonic belt in southeast Sichuan
石龙峡 中梁山 铁厂沟 石油沟 隆盛 桃子荡 膏盐层变形幅度/ms 290 265 270 310 390 400 上覆构造隆升幅度/ms 530 650 510 630 645 680 总变形幅度/ms 820 915 780 940 1 035 1 280 变化趋势 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 川东南地区主控顶板滑脱层对页岩气目的层保存条件影响能力统计
Table 2. Statistics of influence of main roof detachment layer on preservation conditions of shale gas target stratum in southeast Sichuan
XY1 SY1 FB1 HC1 断层滑移量/km 1.32 1.02 1.12 1.22 距目的层垂直距离/km 0.305 0.192 0.215 0.209 含气量/(m3/t) 6.17 1.88 1.04 0.84
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 川东南綦江高陡构造埋深5 km以浅有利目标评价
Table 3. Evaluation of favorable targets of Qijiang high-steep structure with buried depth less than 5 km, southeast Sichuan
构造名称 构造变形强度 构造封闭性 滑脱层距目
的层距离/km有利面积/km2 资源量/108 m3 优选排队 主要断裂体系 主动变形强度/km 断面正应力/MPa 构造与地应力
夹角/(°)桃子荡 走滑断裂、逆冲断裂 0.03 125.0 75.0 0.35 52.2 443.7 1 370.2 一类 隆盛 逆冲断裂、转换断裂 0.11 120.0 80.0 0.30 109.0 926.5 石油沟 逆冲断裂、转换断裂 0.17 108.0 78.0 0.26 80.0 680.0 725.0 二类 铁厂沟 逆冲断裂、转换断裂 0.20 92.0 25.0 0.25 5.3 45.0 中梁山 先存基底断裂、走滑断裂、转换断裂 0.26 80.0 10.0 0.21 18.3 155.6 399.6 三类 石龙峡 先存基底断裂、走滑断裂、转换断裂 0.24 75.0 5.0 0.19 28.7 244.0 合计 293.5 2 494.8
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 马新华, 谢军. 川南地区页岩气勘探开发进展及发展前景[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(1): 161-169. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201801020.htmMA Xinhua, XIE Jun. The progress and prospects of shale gas exploration and exploitation in southern Sichuan Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(1): 161-169. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201801020.htm [2] 龙胜祥, 冯动军, 李凤霞, 等. 四川盆地南部深层海相页岩气勘探开发前景[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 443-451. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201804001.htmLONG Shengxiang, FENG Dongjun, LI Fengxia, et al. Prospect of the deep marine shale gas exploration and development in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2018, 29(4): 443-451. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201804001.htm [3] HE Dengfa, LI Desheng, WU Xiaozhi, et al. Basic types and structural characteristics of uplifts: an overview of sedimentary basins in China[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica (English Edition), 2009, 83(2): 321-346. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-6724.2009.00043.x [4] DONG Shuwen, ZHANG Yongshuang, GAO R, et al. A possible buried Paleoproterozoic collisional orogen beneath central South China: evidence from seismic-reflection profiling[J]. Precambrian Research, 2015, 264: 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.precamres.2015.04.003 [5] LI Chuanxin, HE Dengfa, SUN Yanpeng, et al. Structural characte-ristic and origin of intra-continental fold belt in the eastern Sichuan basin, South China block[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2015, 111: 206-221. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2015.07.027 [6] 杜贵超, 杨兆林, 尹洪荣, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南部长73段泥页岩储层有机质发育特征及富集模式[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2022, 29(6): 1-11. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS202206001.htmDU Guichao, YANG Zhaolin, YIN Hongrong, et al. Developmental characteristics of organic matter and its enrichment model in shale reservoirs of Chang73 Member in Yanchang Formation of southeast Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2022, 29(6): 1-11. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS202206001.htm [7] 赵圣贤, 刘勇, 冯江荣, 等. 长宁地区富有机质页岩脆性及与裂缝发育关系[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 44(4): 1–13. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNSY202204001.htmZHAO Shengxian, LIU Yong, FENG Jiangrong, et al. Brittleness characteristics of organic-rich shale and its relationship with fracture development of Changning area[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2022, 44(4): 1–13. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNSY202204001.htm [8] 祝庆敏, 卢龙飞, 潘安阳, 等. 湘西地区下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩沉积环境与有机质富集[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(5): 797-809. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202105797ZHU Qingmin, LU Longfei, PAN Anyang, et al. Sedimentary environment and organic matter enrichment of the Lower Cambrian Niutitang Formation shale, western Hunan Province, China[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(5): 797-809. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202105797 [9] 王伟庆, 刘惠民, 刘雅利, 等. 东营凹陷古近系页岩碳酸盐纹层内部结构与成因[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2022, 29(3): 11-19. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS202203002.htmWANG Weiqing, LIU Huimin, LIU Yali, et al. Texture and genesis of Paleogene lacustrine shale carbonate laminae in Dongying Sag, Jiyang Depresion, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2022, 29(3): 11-19. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS202203002.htm [10] 夏宏泉, 赖俊, 李高仁, 等. 基于测井资料的页岩油储层甜点预测[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 43(4): 199-207. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNSY202104024.htmXIA Hongquan, LAI Jun, LI Gaoren, et al. Sweet spot prediction of shale oil reservoir based on logging data[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2021, 43(4): 199-207. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNSY202104024.htm [11] 李英强, 何登发, 文竹. 四川盆地及邻区晚震旦世古地理与构造—沉积环境演化[J]. 古地理学报, 2013, 15(2): 231-245. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GDLX201302009.htmLI Yingqiang, HE Dengfa, WEN Zhu. Palaeogeography and tectonic-depositional environment evolution of the Late Sinian in Sichuan Basin and adjacent areas[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2013, 15(2): 231-245. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GDLX201302009.htm [12] 刘若冰, 田景春, 魏志宏, 等. 川东南地区震旦系—志留系下组合有效烃源岩综合研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2006, 17(6): 824-828. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX200606017.htmLIU Ruobing, TIAN Jingchun, WEI Zhihong, et al. Comprehensive research of effective hydrocarbon source rock of lower strata from Sinian to Silurian system in southeast area of Sichuan province[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2006, 17(6): 824-828. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX200606017.htm [13] 谷志宇, 刘恩涛, 王香增, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南部延长组七段页岩发育特征及勘探潜力[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2021, 28(1): 95-105. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS202101013.htmGU Zhiyu, LIU Entao, Wang Xiangzeng, et al. Development characteristics and exploration potential of shale in Chang7 Member in Southeast of Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2021, 28(1): 95-105. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS202101013.htm [14] 廖崇杰, 陈雷, 郑健, 等. 四川盆地长宁西部地区上奥陶统五峰组—下志留统龙马溪组龙一1亚段页岩岩相划分及意义[J]. 石油实验地质, 2022, 44(6): 1037-1047. doi: 10.11781/sysydz2022061037LIAO Chongjie, CHEN Lei, ZHENG Jian, et al. Classification of shale lithofacies from Ordovician Wufeng Formation to first section of first member of Silurian Longmaxi Formation, western Changning area, Sichuan Basin, and its significance[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, ,2022, 44(6): 1037-1047. doi: 10.11781/sysydz2022061037 [15] 兰叶芳, 吴海枝, 任传建, 等. 黔西北燕子口地区五峰组—龙马溪组泥页岩储层特征[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2021, 28(1): 115-124. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS202101015.htmLAN Yefang, WU Haizhi, REN Chuanjian, et al. Shale reservoir characteristics of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in Yanzikou area, northwestern Guizhou[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2021, 28(1): 115-124. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS202101015.htm [16] 张国伟, 郭安林, 王岳军, 等. 中国华南大陆构造与问题[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2013, 43(10): 1553-1582. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDXK201310003.htmZHANG Guowei, GUO Anlin, WANG Yuejun, et al. Tectonics of South China continent and its implications[J]. Science China Earth Sciences, 2013, 56(11): 1804-1828. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDXK201310003.htm [17] 李英强. 川西南地区构造几何学、运动学与成因机制[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2015.LI Yingqiang. Structural geometrics, kinematics and formation mechanism of southwestern Sichuan Basin[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences(Beijing), 2015. [18] SUPPE J, MEDWEDEFF D A. Geometry and kinematics of fault-propagation folding[J]. Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae, 1990, 83(3): 409-454. [19] SUPPE J, CONNORS C. Critical taper wedge mechanics of fold-and-thrust belts on Venus: initial results from Magellan[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1992, 97(E8): 13545-13561. [20] SUPPE J. Geometry and kinematics of fault-bend folding[J]. American Journal of Science, 2004, 283(7): 684-721. [21] SCHLISCHE R W, GROSHONG R H, WITHJACK M O, et al. Quantifying the geometry, displacements, and subresolution deformation in thrust-ramp anticlines with growth and erosion: from models to seismic-reflection profile[J]. Journal of Structural Geology, 2014, 69: 304-319. [22] 胡东风, 张汉荣, 倪楷, 等. 四川盆地东南缘海相页岩气保存条件及其主控因素[J]. 天然气工业, 2014, 34(6): 17-23. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201406003.htmHU Dongfeng, ZHANG Hanrong, NI Kai, et al. Main controlling factors for gas preservation conditions of marine shales in southeastern margins of the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2014, 34(6): 17-23. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201406003.htm [23] 郭旭升, 胡东风, 魏志红, 等. 涪陵页岩气田的发现与勘探认识[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2016, 21(3): 24-37. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201603003.htmGUO Xusheng, HU Dongfeng, WEI Zhihong, et al. Discovery and exploration of Fuling shale gas field[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2016, 21(3): 24-37. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201603003.htm [24] 何治亮, 聂海宽, 胡东风. 深层页岩气有效开发中的地质问题: 以四川盆地及其周缘五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(4): 379-391. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB202004003.htmHE Zhiliang, NIE Haikuan, HU Dongfeng, et al. Geological problems in the effective development of deep shale gas: a case study of Upper Ordovician Wufeng-Lower Silurian Longmaxi formations in Sichuan Basin and its periphery[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(4): 379-391. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB202004003.htm [25] 郭旭升, 腾格尔, 魏祥峰, 等. 四川盆地深层海相页岩气赋存机理与勘探潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(4): 453-468. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB202204001.htmGUO Xusheng, BORJIGIN Tenger, WEI Xiangfeng, et al. Occurrence mechanism and exploration potential of deep marine shale gas in Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(4): 453-468. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB202204001.htm [26] 王立锋, 李文龙, 沈利霞, 等. 涠西南凹陷低倾角断层封堵能力分析[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2022, 45(3): 34-40. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRKT202203004.htmWANG Lifeng, LI Wenlong, SHEN Lixia, et al. Analysis on sealing capacity of low-angle faults in Weixinan Sag[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2022, 45(3): 34-40. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRKT202203004.htm [27] 马永生, 楼章华, 郭彤楼, 等. 中国南方海相地层油气保存条件综合评价技术体系探讨[J]. 地质学报, 2006, 80(3): 406-417. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE200603013.htmMA Yongsheng, LOU Zhanghua, GUO Tonglou, et al. An exploration on a technological system of petroleum preservation evaluation for marine strata in South China[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2006, 80(3): 406-417. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE200603013.htm -
计量
- 文章访问数: 380
- HTML全文浏览量: 172
- PDF下载量: 82
- 被引次数: 0
苏公网安备32021102000780号