威荣页岩气田压裂实践与认识

杨永华; 宋燕高; 王兴文; 刘林; 慈建发; 林立世

doi:10.11781/sysydz2023061143

威荣页岩气田压裂实践与认识

doi: 10.11781/sysydz2023061143

中国石化西南油气分公司石油工程技术研究院, 四川德阳 618000

基金项目:

中国石化“十条龙”科技攻关项目“威远—永川深层页岩气开发关键技术” P18058

详细信息

作者简介:
杨永华(1976—)，男，硕士，高级工程师，从事储层改造工艺技术的研究及应用工作。E-mail: yyh3956@126.com

通讯作者:
宋燕高(1980—)，男，硕士，副研究员，从事储层改造设计和现场应用工作。E-mail: tsz19@163.com

中图分类号: TE37
计量
- 文章访问数: 427
- HTML全文浏览量: 193
- PDF下载量: 61
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-09-10
- 修回日期: 2023-10-23
- 刊出日期: 2023-11-28

Practice and understanding of fracturing in Weirong shale gas field

Research Institute of Petroleum Engineering Co., Ltd., SINOPEC Southwest Oil & Gas Company, Deyang, Sichuan 618000, China

摘要

摘要: 相比于中浅层，威荣深层页岩气工程地质特征更复杂，具有地应力高、水平应力差高、塑性高、地层压力高的“四高”特征，复杂的工程地质特征带来难以形成复杂缝网、人工裂缝难以支撑与保持及套变异常情况频发三大挑战，具体表现结果就是气井压后单井最终可采储量低。为解决上述难题，经过坚持不懈的探索和实践，压裂工艺在不断发现问题、解决问题过程中持续进步，探索形成了一套基于均衡压裂理念的“精细优化+实时预警+控运行节奏+W型井网”的预防套变及提高压后产量的系列措施。采用该工艺推广应用39井次，压裂效果不断提升，单井平均最终可采储量提高了500×10⁴ m³，套变率从2022年的42.4%降低至目前的16.67%。由于邻井老井生产影响新压裂投产井，导致新井压后产量低于前期，现有400 m(一期)/300 m(二期)井距，压裂规模有下降优化的空间。后续新井应该在剩余储量基础上差异化优化，持续做好压裂技术攻关，实现威荣深层页岩气效益开发。
- 压裂工艺 /
- 套变 /
- 效益开发 /
- 气田开发 /
- 威荣页岩气田
Abstract: Compared to the middle and shallow strata, the engineering geological characteristics of Weirong deep shale gas are more complex, with the four characteristics of high ground stress, high horizontal stress difference, high plasticity, and high formation pressure. The complex engineering geological characteristics bring three major challenges: difficulty in forming complex fracture networks, difficulty in supporting and maintaining artificial fractures, and frequent occurrence of abnormal situations such as casing deformation. The specific performance result is the low single well EUR after gas well fracturing. Through unremitting exploration and practice, the fracturing technology has been continuously improved in the process of discovering and solving problems, and a series of measures of "fine optimization, real-time warning, operating pace control, and W-shaped well network" for preventing casing deformation and increasing post fracturing output has been formed based on the concept of balanced fracturing. The technology has been promoted and applied in 39 wells, and the fracturing effect has been continuously improved, with an average EUR increase of 500×10⁴ m³ per well, and a decrease of casing deformation rate from 42.4% in 2022 to 16.67% at present. Due to the impact of the production of adjacent old wells on the production of newly fractured production wells, the output of new wells after fracturing is lower than the previous stage. With the existing well spacing of 400 m (Phase Ⅰ)/300 m (Phase Ⅱ), there is room for reduction and optimization in fracturing scale. Subsequent new wells should be differentiated and optimized based on remaining reserves, and research on fracturing technology shall be carried out continuously, achieving the beneficial development of Weirong deep shale gas.
- fracturing technology /
- casing deformation /
- benefit development /
- gas field development /
- Weirong shale gas field
注释:

利益冲突声明/Conflict of Interests

所有作者声明不存在利益冲突。

All authors disclose no relevant conflict of interests.

作者贡献/Authors’Contributions

杨永华负责论文设计和撰写；王兴文、刘林负责论文审阅与修订；慈建发负责研究资源采集；林立世负责研究项目管理；宋燕高参与论文写作和修改。所有作者均阅读并同意最终稿件的提交。

YANG Yonghua is responsible for designing and writing the paper. WANG Xingwen and LIU Lin are responsible for reviewing and revising the paper. CI Jianfa is responsible for collecting research resources. LIN Lishi is responsible for research project management. SONG Yangao participated in paper writing and revision. All authors have read and agree to the submission of the final manuscript.

HTML全文

图 1 威荣深层页岩气不同年份套变对比

Figure 1. Comparison of casing deformation of Weirong deep shale gas in different years

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 威荣深层页岩气压裂排量与净压力关系模拟

Figure 2. Simulation of the relationship between fracturing output and net pressure of Weirong deep shale gas

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 威荣深层页岩气不同压裂阶段EUR对比

Figure 3. EUR comparison of different fracturing stages of Weirong deep shale gas

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 威荣深层页岩气23平台新老井交替压裂效果对比

Figure 4. Comparison of alternately fracturing effect between old and new wells of Weirong 23 platform for Weirong deep shale gas

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 威荣深层页岩气与邻区浅层页岩气工程地质对比

Table 1. Comparison of engineering geology between deep shale gas in Weirong and shallow shale gas in adjacent areas

对比项目		威荣深层页岩气(中国石化)	威远浅层页岩气(中国石油)
岩石力学特征	埋深/m	3 550~3 880	2 400~3 500
	储层厚度/m	27~39	35~50
	脆性矿物含量/%	60	57.8~60.1
	杨氏模量/GPa	21.6	25~49
	泊松比	0.23	0.19~0.24
	力学脆性指数/%	0.43	0.45~0.54
应力特征	垂向应力/MPa	92.7	51.9~79
	最大水平主应力/MPa	98.6	54.2~89
	最小水平主应力/MPa	86~98	48.3~83
	水平应力差异系数	0.12~0.2	0.11
	水平应力差值/MPa	10~16	5.2
天然裂缝发育程度		相对发育	发育

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 威荣深层页岩气不同阶段压裂主要参数对比

Table 2. Comparison of main fracturing parameters in different stages of Weirong deep shale gas

相关参数	探索阶段 (2019年前)	提升阶段 (2019—2020年)	强化阶段 (2021—2022年6月)	均衡压裂阶段 (2022年6月至今)
单段段长/m	72	77.2	74.5	40~50
簇间距/m	29.4	12.8	10.6	8.6
加砂强度/(m³/m)	0.78	1.24	2.01	2.0
用液强度/(m³/m)	26.5	27.4	25.4	25~28
综合砂比/%	3.0	4.7	8	6~8
支撑剂粒径	70/140+40/70陶粒	100/200石英砂+70/140陶粒+40/70陶粒	100/200石英砂+70/140石英砂+40/70陶粒	100/200石英砂+70/140石英砂+40/70陶粒
施工排量/(m³/m)	13~15	13~15	16~18	18~20
暂堵工艺	无	缝口暂堵	缝口+缝内暂堵	缝口复合暂堵+缝内暂堵
应用井数/口	6	63	38	39

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 威荣深层页岩气不同生产方式生产指标对比

Table 3. Comparison of production indexes of different production modes of Weirong deep shale gas

生产时间	控压生产井			放压生产井
生产时间	压力/MPa	日产量/10⁴ m³	累产量/10⁴ m³	压力/MPa	日产量/10⁴ m³	累产量/10⁴ m³
半年	20.8	6.8	1 409	10.1	4.3	1 605
一年	6.4	5.7	2 550	3.8	1.8	2 123
一年半	3.5	1.9	3 098	3.5	0.9	2 347
二年	3.5	1.1	3 354	3.5	0.6	2 476

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 威荣深层页岩气威荣25平台均衡压裂试验井压裂参数

Table 4. Fracturing parameters of balanced fracturing test wells of Weirong 25 platform for Weirong deep shale gas

井号	改造段长/m	段数	簇数	砂量/m³	加砂强度/(m³/m)	液量/m³	用液强度/(m³/m)	排量/(m³/min)
威页25-1HF	1 372.4	28	157	2 66.7	1.80	39 098.8	28.48	16.5~20.0
威页25-3HF	1 493.0	35	165	2 51.7	1.98	44 873.6	30.05	16.5~19.6
威页25-2HF	1 041.0	11	137	1 10.6	1.36	27 597.0	26.5	13.5~16.5
威页25-4HF	1 334.5	14	168	1 94.0	1.42	37 574.2	25.9	13.5~16.0

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 威荣深层页岩气威荣25平台先导试验裂缝监测结果对比

Table 5. Comparison of fracture monitoring results of pilot test of Weirong 25 platform for Weirong deep shale gas

井号	监测段长/m	解释段数	总MSRV/10⁴m³	总ESRV/10⁴m³
威页25-1HF	1 324.4	27	5 600.0	3 773.5
威页25-3HF	1 405.0	33	5 803.5	4 031.2
威页25-2HF	1 041.0	11	3 497.0	2 262.5
威页25-4HF	1 334.5	14	5 250.2	2 619.0

下载: 导出CSV

表 6 威荣深层页岩气威荣25平台先导试验压裂效果对比

Table 6. Comparison of fracturing effect of pilot test of Weirong 25 platform for Weirong deep shale gas

井名	初期压力/MPa	初期产量/(10⁴ m³/d)	配产6×10⁴ m³/d，预测EUR/10⁸ m³
威页25-1HF	45	10~13	0.83
威页25-2HF	49	9.5~12	0.78
威页25-3HF	46	10~13	0.81
威页25-4HF	48	9~11	0.76
合计/平均	47	9~13	0.80

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(19)

[1]	葛勋, 郭彤楼, 黎茂稳, 等. 深层页岩储层"工程甜点"评价与优选: 以川南永川、丁山地区为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2023, 45(2): 210-221. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202302210 GE Xun, GUO Tonglou, LI Maowen, et al. Evaluation and optimization of "engineering sweet spot" in deep shale reservoir: case study on Yongchuan and Dingshan areas in southern Sichuan[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2023, 45(2): 210-221. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202302210
[2]	郭彤楼, 熊亮, 雷炜, 等. 四川盆地南部威荣、永川地区深层页岩气勘探开发进展、挑战与思考[J]. 天然气工业, 2022, 42(8): 45-59. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202208005.htm GUO Tonglou, XIONG Liang, LEI Wei, et al. Deep shale gas exploration and development in the Weirong and Yongchuan areas, south Sichuan Basin: progress, challenges and prospect[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2022, 42(8): 45-59. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202208005.htm
[3]	苏海琨, 聂海宽, 郭少斌, 等. 深层页岩含气量评价及其差异变化: 以四川盆地威荣、永川页岩气田为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2022, 44(5): 815-824. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202205815 SU Haikun, NIE Haikuan, GUO Shaobin, et al. Shale gas content evaluation for deep strata and its variation: a case study of Weirong, Yongchuan gas fields in Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2022, 44(5): 815-824. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202205815
[4]	王兴文, 何颂根, 林立世, 等. 威荣区块深层页岩气井体积压裂技术[J]. 断块油气田, 2021, 28(6): 745-749. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202106006.htm WANG Xingwen, HE Songgen, LIN Lishi, et al. Volume fracturing technology of deep shale gas well in Weirong block[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2021, 28(6): 745-749. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202106006.htm
[5]	郭旭升, 赵永强, 申宝剑, 等. 中国南方海相页岩气勘探理论: 回顾与展望[J]. 地质学报, 2022, 96(1): 172-182. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE202201011.htm GUO Xusheng, ZHAO Yongqiang, SHEN Baojian, et al. Marine shale gas exploration theory in Southern China: review and prospects[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2022, 96(1): 172-182. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE202201011.htm
[6]	李庆辉, 李少轩, 刘伟洲. 深层页岩气储层岩石力学特性及对压裂改造的影响[J]. 特种油气藏, 2021, 28(3): 130-138. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ202103020.htm LI Qinghui, LI Shaoxuan, LIU Weizhou. Rock mechanical properties of deep shale gas reservoirs and their influence on fracturing stimulation[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2021, 28(3): 130-138. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ202103020.htm
[7]	郝绵柱, 姜振学, 聂舟, 等. 深层页岩储层孔隙连通性发育特征及其控制因素: 以川南地区龙马溪组为例[J]. 断块油气田, 2022, 29(6): 761-768. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202206007.htm HAO Mianzhu, JIANG Zhenxue, NIE Zhou, et al. Development characteristics of pore connectivity in deep shale reservoirs and its controlling factors: a case study of Longmaxi Formation in southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2022, 29(6): 761-768. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202206007.htm
[8]	王强, 穆亚蓬, 陈显, 等. 川东南下志留统龙马溪组深层页岩等温吸附特征及地质意义[J]. 石油实验地质, 2022, 44(1): 180-187. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202201180 WANG Qiang, MU Yapeng, CHEN Xian, et al. Characteristics of methane isothermal adsorption of deep shale from Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in southeastern Sichuan Basin and its geolo-gical significance[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2022, 44(1): 180-187. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202201180
[9]	何骁, 周鹏, 杨洪志, 等. 页岩气地质工程一体化管理实践与展望[J]. 天然气工业, 2022, 42(2): 1-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202202001.htm HE Xiao, ZHOU Peng, YANG Hongzhi, et al. Management practice and prospect of shale gas geology-engineering integration[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2022, 42(2): 1-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202202001.htm
[10]	王光付, 李凤霞, 王海波, 等. 四川盆地非常规气藏地质—工程一体化压裂实践与认识[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(5): 1221-1237. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202205017.htm WANG Guangfu, LI Fengxia, WANG Haibo, et al. Application of an integrated geology-reservoir engineering approach to fracturing in unconventional gas reservoirs, Sichuan Basin and some insights[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(5): 1221-1237. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202205017.htm
[11]	王海涛, 仲冠宇, 卫然, 等. 降低深层页岩气井压裂施工压力技术探讨[J]. 断块油气田, 2021, 28(2): 162-167. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202102005.htm WANG Haitao, ZHONG Guanyu, WEI Ran, et al. Discussion on technology of reducing fracturing operation pressure in deep shale gas well[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2021, 28(2): 162-167. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202102005.htm
[12]	王波, 王佳, 罗兆, 等. 水平井段内多簇清水体积压裂技术及现场试验[J]. 断块油气田, 2021, 28(3): 408-413. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202103024.htm WANG Bo, WANG Jia, LUO Zhao, et al. Multi-cluster clean water volume fracturing technology in horizontal well section and field test[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2021, 28(3): 408-413. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202103024.htm
[13]	王伟, 陈祖华, 梅俊伟, 等. 常压页岩气地质工程一体化压后数值模拟研究: 以DP2井区为例[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2022, 29(3): 153-161. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS202203019.htm WANG Wei, CHEN Zuhua, MEI Junwei, et al. Post-fracturing numerical simulation for geology-engineering integration of normal pressure shale gas: a case study of the well area DP2[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2022, 29(3): 153-161. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS202203019.htm
[14]	童亨茂, 刘子平, 张宏祥, 等. 暂堵大裂缝防治页岩气水平井套管变形的理论与方法[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(5): 92-100. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202105014.htm TONG Hengmao, LIU Ziping, ZHANG Hongxiang, et al. Theory and method of temporary macrofracture plugging to prevent casing deformation in shale gas horizontal wells[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(5): 92-100. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202105014.htm
[15]	孙焕泉, 周德华, 赵培荣, 等. 中国石化地质工程一体化发展方向[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2021, 11(3): 269-280. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202103001.htm SUN Huanquan, ZHOU Dehua, ZHAO Peirong, et al. Geology-engineering integration development direction of SINOPEC[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(3): 269-280. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202103001.htm
[16]	孙焕泉, 周德华, 蔡勋育, 等. 中国石化页岩气发展现状与趋势[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(2): 14-26. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY202002002.htm SUN Huanquan, ZHOU Dehua, CAI Xunyu, et al. Progress and prospect of shale gas development of SINOPEC[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2020, 25(2): 14-26. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY202002002.htm
[17]	陈更生, 吴建发, 刘勇, 等. 川南地区百亿立方米页岩气产能建设地质工程一体化关键技术[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(1): 72-82. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202101009.htm CHEN Gengsheng, WU Jianfa, LIU Yong, et al. Geology-engineering integration key technologies for ten billion cubic meters of shale gas productivity construction in the southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(1): 72-82. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202101009.htm
[18]	蒋廷学, 卞晓冰, 孙川翔, 等. 深层页岩气地质工程一体化体积压裂关键技术及应用[J]. 地球科学, 2023, 48(1): 1-13. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX202301001.htm JIANG Tingxue, BIAN Xiaobing, SUN Chuanxiang, et al. Key technologies in geology-engineering integration volumetric fracturing for deep shale gas wells[J]. Earth Science, 2023, 48(1): 1-13. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX202301001.htm
[19]	聂海宽, 何治亮, 刘光祥, 等. 中国页岩气勘探开发现状与优选方向[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2020, 49(1): 13-35. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKD202001002.htm NIE Haikuan, HE Zhiliang, LIU Guangxiang, et al. Status and direction of shale gas exploration and development in China[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2020, 49(1): 13-35. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKD202001002.htm