基于返排数据计算页岩气井压裂有效体积的方法及应用

王益民; 李继庆; 万云强; 刘莉; 张谦; 朱朝光; 汤亚顽

doi:10.11781/sysydz2023061215

基于返排数据计算页岩气井压裂有效体积的方法及应用

doi: 10.11781/sysydz2023061215

1.
中国石化江汉油田分公司勘探开发研究院, 武汉 430223
2.
中国石化江汉油田分公司, 湖北潜江 433124

基金项目:

中国石油化工股份有限公司科技部项目“页岩气开发调整区动态分析方法与生产规律研究” P21011

详细信息

作者简介:
王益民(1991—)，男，博士，副研究员，从事非常规油气田开发研究。E-mail: swpuwym@163.com

中图分类号: TE37
计量
- 文章访问数: 376
- HTML全文浏览量: 134
- PDF下载量: 45
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-08-31
- 修回日期: 2023-10-16
- 刊出日期: 2023-11-28

Method of estimating the effective fracture volume of shale gas wells using flowback data and its application

1.
Exploration and Development Research Institute, Jianghan Oilfield Company, SINOPEC, Wuhan, Hubei 430223, China
2.
Jianghan Oilfield Company, SINOPEC, Qianjiang, Hubei 433124, China

摘要

摘要: 页岩气多段压裂水平井的缝网参数通常利用产气数据解释获得。虽然对产气数据进行解释能得到裂缝参数，但很难获得压裂有效体积。为快捷地获取页岩气井压裂有效体积，该研究建立了页岩气多段压裂水平井压裂液返排数学模型，并结合水相物质平衡方程和渗流方程，推导获得了页岩气井多段压裂水平井压裂有效体积表达式。通过分析模型解发现，在边界控制流阶段产量规整化压力与物质平衡时间双对数曲线为单位斜率直线，利用该阶段产量规整化压力及物质平衡时间数据，可以计算页岩气井压裂有效体积，从而形成了一套基于压裂液返排数据计算页岩气井压裂有效体积的方法。实例应用表明：(1)构建的页岩气多段压裂水平井压裂液返排模型能快速地计算页岩气井压裂有效体积，且计算结果可靠；(2)计算页岩气井压裂有效体积不能忽略试气期间的压裂液返排数据，否则计算结果偏小；(3)形成的页岩气井压裂有效体积计算方法还能识别邻井压裂干扰，并定量化表征邻井压裂干扰对页岩气井压裂有效体积的影响。该研究成果为油田现场估算页岩气井压裂有效体积提供了一种新的方法，同时也为油田现场识别邻井压裂干扰提供了新的思路和方法。
- 边界控制流 /
- 双对数诊断图版 /
- 返排数据 /
- 压裂有效体积 /
- 页岩气
Abstract: The fracture network parameters of multiple-fractured horizontal wells in shale gas reservoirs are usually obtained by interpretation of gas production data. However, it is difficult to obtain the effective fracture volume. In order to quickly obtain the effective fracture volume of shale gas wells, a fracturing fluid flowback model for multiple-fractured horizontal wells in shale gas reservoirs was established. Combining the water phase material balance equation and seepage equation, the expression for the effective fracture volume of multiple-fractured horizontal wells in shale gas reservoirs was derived. Analyzing the model solution, it was found that when water flowing enters the boundary dominated flow stage, the curve of the rate-normalized pressure and material balance time is a unit slope line in the double logarithmic coordinate. By using the rate-normalized pressure and material balance time data at this stage, the effective fracture volume of shale gas wells can be estimated. Based on this, a method for estimating the effective fracture volume of shale gas wells using fracturing fluid flowback data was proposed. The application examples showed that: (1) the fracturing fluid flowback model for multiple-fractured horizontal wells in shale gas reservoirs can quickly and reliably estimate the effective fracture volume of shale gas wells, and the results are credible; (2) the fracturing fluid flowback data during the gas testing period should be considered when estimating the effective fracture volume of shale gas wells, otherwise the results would be smaller than the actual results; (3) the proposed method can also be a means of recognizing and quantifying the fracturing interference effect of adjacent wells on the effective fracture volume of shale gas wells. The research results provide a new method for estimating the effective fracture volume of shale gas wells, and also provide a new idea and method for recognizing the fracturing interference of adjacent wells in oilfields.
- boundary dominated flow /
- double logarithmic diagnostic chart /
- flowback data /
- effective fracture volume /
- shale gas
注释:

利益冲突声明/Conflict of Interests

所有作者声明不存在利益冲突。

All authors disclose no relevant conflict of interests.

作者贡献/Authors’Contributions

王益民参与模型建立及推导；王益民、李继庆、万云强、刘莉、张谦、朱朝光、汤亚顽参与论文写作和修改。所有作者均阅读并同意最终稿件的提交。

The model was established and solved by WANG Yimin. The manuscript was drafted and revised by WANG Yimin, LI Jiqing, WAN Yunqiang, LIU Li, ZHANG Qian, ZHU Chaoguang, and TANG Yawan. All the authors have read the last version of paper and consented for submission.

HTML全文

图 1 页岩气多段压裂水平井物理模型

Figure 1. Physical model for multiple-fractured horizontal wells in shale gas reservoirs

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 裂缝内流体流动示意

Figure 2. Fluid flow in fractures

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 涪陵页岩气田X1井产量规整化压力与物质平衡时间双对数诊断图版

Figure 3. Double logarithmic diagnostic chart of rate-normalized pressure and material balance time of well X1 in Fuling shale gas field

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 涪陵页岩气田X1井边界控制流阶段产量规整化压力与物质平衡时间关系曲线

Figure 4. Relationship curves between rate-normalized pressure and material balance time during the boundary dominated flow stage of well X1 in Fuling shale gas field

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 涪陵页岩气田X2井产量规整化压力与物质平衡时间双对数诊断图版

Figure 5. Double logarithmic diagnostic chart of rate-normalized pressure and material balance time of well X2 in Fuling shale gas field

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 涪陵页岩气田X2井边界控制流阶段产量规整化压力与物质平衡时间关系曲线

Figure 6. Relationship curves between rate-normalized pressure and material balance time during the boundary dominated flow stage of well X2 in Fuling shale gas field

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

参考文献(14)

[1]	王永胜. 页岩气水平井产能评价方法研究[D]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2015. WANG Yongshen. Research on productivity evaluation of shale gas horizontal well[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2015.
[2]	纪国法, 张公社, 许冬进, 等. 页岩气体积压裂支撑裂缝长期导流能力研究现状与展望[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2016, 16(14): 78-88. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXJS201614016.htm JI Guofa, ZHANG Gongshe, XU Dongjin, et al. Research and prospect of long-term fracturing conductivity in volumetric fracturing for shale gas reservoir[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2016, 16(14): 78-88. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXJS201614016.htm
[3]	BELLO R O. Rate transient analysis in shale gas reservoirs with transient linear behavior[D]. Texas: Texas A & M University, 2009.
[4]	EL-BANBI A H. Analysis of tight gas well performance[D]. Texas: Texas A & M University, 1998.
[5]	MEDEIROS F, OZKAN E, KAZEMI H. Productivity and drainage area of fractured horizontal wells in tight gas reservoirs[J]. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2008, 11(5): 902-911.
[6]	OZKAN E, RAGHAVAN R, APAYDIN O G. Modeling of fluid transfer from shale matrix to fracture network[C]//SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Florence, Italy: SPE, 2010.
[7]	ABBASI M A, EZULIKE D O, DEHGHANPOUR H, et al. A comparative study of flowback rate and pressure transient behavior in multifractured horizontal wells completed in tight gas and oil reservoirs[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2014, 17: 82-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2013.12.007
[8]	ILK D, ANDERSON D M M, STOTTS G W J, et al. Production data analysis: challenges, pitfalls, diagnostics[J]. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2010: 13(3): 538-552.
[9]	ALKOUH A, WATTENBARGER R A. New advances in shale reservoir analysis using flowback data[C]//SPE Eastern Regional Meeting. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA: SPE, 2013.
[10]	ZOLFAGHARI A, DEHGHANPOUR H, GHANBARI E, et al. Fracture characterization using flowback salt-concentration transient[J]. SPE Journal, 2016, 21(1): 233-244. doi: 10.2118/168598-PA
[11]	CRAFTON J W, GUNDERSON D W. Stimulation flowback mana-gement: keeping a good completion good[C]//SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Anaheim, California, USA: SPE, 2007.
[12]	CLARKSON C R. Modeling 2-phase flowback of multi-fractured horizontal wells completed in shale[C//SPE Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference. Calgary, Alberta, Canada: SPE, 2012.
[13]	ABBASI M A, DEHGHANPOUR H, HAWKES R V. Flowback analysis for fracture characterization[C]//SPE Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference. Calgary, Alberta, Canada: SPE, 2012.
[14]	CLARKSON C R, WILLIAMS-KOVACS J D. A new method for modeling multi-phase flowback of multi-fractured horizontal tight oil wells to determine hydraulic fracture properties[C]//SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. New Orleans, Louisiana, USA: SPE, 2013.