Application of measurement and control technology in deep and normal pressure shale gas exploration and development
-
摘要: 深层、常压页岩气是中国石化页岩气增储上产的重点领域。面临效益开发的困难，对井筒测控技术提出了提速降本、提产增效的更高要求。为了准确评价页岩气储层，开展了储层微观特征定量表征、孔隙压力系数预测、含气量计算、低阻页岩评价和可压性评价研究，形成了比较成熟的页岩气“双甜点”精细评价技术。为了提高深层优质页岩钻遇率，打造了定测录导一体化工作模式，基于多属性地质建模，测录震多专业融合，形成了复杂构造区水平井地质导向技术。针对不同工区工程地质特征的差异，明确了旋转导向和螺杆+MWD两种提速技术的适用范围，实现分类施策提速提效。为了配合大规模体积压裂，研发应用了多级射孔桥塞联作、等孔径射孔、高温井下微地震监测和“牵引器+DAS光纤”压裂监测等多项技术。研究形成的页岩气“双甜点”精细评价技术、提高储层钻遇率技术、钻井提速和压裂提产配套技术，在深层、常压页岩气领域得到广泛应用，较好地支撑了勘探开发。下一步，需要进一步发挥定测录导一体化优势，不断推进测控技术创新，在新层系/新类型页岩气解释评价、高温测控仪器和工具研制、基础资料录取等方向持续攻关，全力保障深层、常压页岩气高质量勘探与效益开发。Abstract: Deep and normal-pressure shale gas is the key field of shale gas exploration and development of SINOPEC. At present, this type of shale gas is faced with difficulties in the beneficial development. In order to increase the productivity of single well and further reduce cost and increase efficiency, higher technical requirements are put forward for wellbore measurement and control technology. In order to accurately evaluate shale gas reservoirs, quantitative characterization of reservoir micro-characteristics, prediction of pore pressure coefficient, calculation of gas content, evaluation of low-resistivity shale, and compressibility evaluation of shale gas reservoirs have been carried out, forming a relatively mature shale gas "double sweet spots" fine evaluation technology. In order to improve the drilling rate of deep high-quality shale, a working model integrating directional drilling, mud logging, logging and steering is created. Based on multi-attribute geological modeling and well-to-seismic integration, the geosteering technology for horizontal wells in complex structural areas is formed. According to the difference of geological characteristics in different blocks, the application scopes of the two drilling speed improvement technologies, namely rotary steering and screw + MWD, are defined, thus realizing targeted measures for speed improvement. To meet the requirements of large-scale volumetric fracturing, a number of technologies such as multi-stage perforating bridge plug combined operation, equal aperture perforation, high temperature underground microseismic monitoring and "tractor + DAS fiber" fracturing monitoring have been developed and applied. The shale gas "double sweet spots" fine evaluation technology, the technology for improving reservoir drilling rate, and the technology for increasing drilling speed and fracturing performance have been widely used in deep and normal-pressure shale gas field, which well support the exploration and development of deep and normal-pressure shale gas. Next, SINOPEC will give full play to its advantages in the technology integrating directional drilling, mud logging, logging and steering, continue to promote measurement and control technology innovation, and continue to solve key problems in the interpretation and evaluation technology of new formations/new types of shale gas, the development of high-temperature measurement and control instruments and tools, and the acquisition of basic data, so as to fully guarantee the high-quality exploration and cost-effective development of deep and normal-pressure shale gas.
-
图 1 多尺度页岩气储层微观表征技术
Figure 1. Multi-scale microscopic characterization technology for shale gas reservoirs
图 2 孔隙压力系数预测技术应用与效果
Figure 2. Application and effect of pore pressure coefficient prediction technology
图 3 四川盆地WY23-1井含气量计算结果对比
Figure 3. Comparison of gas content calculation results of well WY23-1 in Sichuan Basin
图 4 页岩储层电阻率与总有机碳含量、热成熟度的关系
Figure 4. Relationship between resistivity and TOC, Ro in shale reservoirs
图 5 四川盆地S2井可压性评价结果
Figure 5. Compressibility evaluation results of well S2 in Sichuan Basin
图 7 2021年以来四川盆地页岩气领域螺杆施工情况
Figure 7. Application of screw drilling tools in shale gas reservoirs in Sichuan Basin since 2021
表 1 实测压力系数与预测压力系数对比
Table 1. Comparison of measured and predicted pressure coefficients
井名 实测压力系数 预测压力系数 日产能/(104 m3) 备注 SY1 1.30 1.33 7.10 微压测试 JY194-3 1.35 1.41 34.30 微压测试 JY10 1.18 1.21 18.90 微压测试 LY1 1.08 1.03 5.00 微压测试 PY1 0.98 1.04 2.52 微压测试 SY5 1.18 1.23 15.00 微压测试 SY6 1.28 1.21 13.20 微压测试 JY10-10 1.15 1.20 9.01 微压测试 LY3 1.32 1.16 17.19 微压测试 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 复杂构造区微断层的综合识别模式
Table 2. Comprehensive identification method for microfaults in complex structural areas
序号 地层模式 地震属性 伽马值变化率 特征元素图版 判别结果 1 伽马值比较稳定 无异常 0.81~1.25 地层连续 正常地层 2 伽马值突增 有异常或无异常 ＞1.25 钻遇断层 3 伽马值突降 有异常或无异常 ＜0.80 钻遇断层 4 伽马值比较稳定 有异常或无异常 0.92~1.25 地层缺失 钻遇断层
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 四川盆地威荣工区不同钻井方式机械钻速对比
Table 3. Comparison of drilling rate with different drilling methods in Weirong area, Sichuan Basin
年份 平均机械钻速/(m/h) 旋导 常规 2021 8.94 4.02 2022 8.15 6.16 2023 8.53 4.65
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 杨跃明, 陈玉龙, 刘燊阳, 等. 四川盆地及其周缘页岩气勘探开发现状、潜力与展望[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(1): 42-58. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202101006.htmYANG Yueming, CHEN Zhenglong, LIU Shenyang, et al. Status, potential and prospect of shale gas exploration and development in the Sichuan Basin and its periphery[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(1): 42-58. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202101006.htm [2] 聂海宽, 何治亮, 刘光祥, 等. 中国页岩气勘探开发现状与优选方向[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2020, 49(1): 13-35. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKD202001002.htmNIE Haikuan, HE Zhiliang, LIU Guangxiang, et al. Status and direction of shale gas exploration and development in China[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2020, 49(1): 13-35. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKD202001002.htm [3] 孙焕泉, 蔡勋育, 胡德高, 等. 页岩气立体开发理论技术与实践: 以四川盆地涪陵页岩气田为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2023, 50(3): 573-584. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202303012.htmSUN Huanquan, CAI Xunyu, HU Degao, et al. Theory, technology and practice of shale gas three-dimensional development: a case study of Fuling shale gas field in Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2023, 50(3): 573-584. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202303012.htm [4] 汪凯明. 川东南盆缘复杂构造区深层页岩气富集特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2023, 34(2): 334-348. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX202302012.htmWANG Kaiming. Enrichment characteristics of deep shale gas in tectonically complex regions of the southeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2023, 34(2): 334-348. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX202302012.htm [5] 薛冈, 熊炜, 张培先. 常压页岩气藏成因分析与有效开发: 以四川盆地东南缘武隆地区五峰组—龙马溪组页岩气藏为例[J/OL]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023: 1-9. (2023-06-20). http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/32.1825.TE.20230620.0945.002.html .XUE Gang, XIONG Wei, ZHANG Peixian. Genesis analysis and effective development of normal pressure shale gas reservoir: a case of Wufeng-Longmaxi shale gas reservoir in Wulong area, southeast Sichuan Basin[J/OL]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023: 1-9. (2023-06-20).http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/32.1825.TE.20230620.0945.002.html .[6] 杨振恒, 陶国亮, 鲍云杰, 等. 南方海相深层页岩气储集空间差异化发育及保持机理探讨[J]. 石油实验地质, 2022, 44(5): 845-853. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202205845YANG Zhenheng, TAO Guoliang, BAO Yunjie, et al. Differential development and maintenance mechanism of reservoir space for marine shale gas in South China's deep strata[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2022, 44(5): 845-853. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202205845 [7] 聂海宽, 李沛, 孙川翔. 四川盆地龙马溪组深层页岩气勘探开发[J]. 石油知识, 2022(4): 6-7. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYZS202204017.htmNIE Haikuan, LI Pei, SUN Chuanxiang. Exploration and development of deep shale gas in Longmaxi Formation, Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Knowledge, 2022(4): 6-7. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYZS202204017.htm [8] 舒红林, 何方雨, 李季林, 等. 四川盆地大安区块五峰组—龙马溪组深层页岩地质特征与勘探有利区[J]. 天然气工业, 2023, 43(6): 30-43. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202306003.htmSHU Honglin, HE Fangyu, LI Jilin, et al. Geological characteristics and favorable exploration areas of Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation deep shale in the Da'an block, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2023, 43(6): 30-43. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202306003.htm [9] 何希鹏, 何贵松, 高玉巧, 等. 常压页岩气勘探开发关键技术进展及攻关方向[J]. 天然气工业, 2023, 43(6): 1-14. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202306001.htmHE Xipeng, HE Guisong, GAO Yuqiao, et al. Progress in and research direction of key technologies for normal-pressure shale gas exploration and development[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2023, 43(6): 1-14. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202306001.htm [10] 郭彤楼, 蒋恕, 张培先, 等. 四川盆地外围常压页岩气勘探开发进展与攻关方向[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(5): 837-845. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202005837GUO Tonglou, JIANG Shu, ZHANG Peixian, et al. Progress and direction of exploration and development of normally-pressured shale gas from the periphery of Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(5): 837-845. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202005837 [11] 马新华, 李熙喆, 梁峰, 等. 威远页岩气田单井产能主控因素与开发优化技术对策[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(3): 555-563. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202003012.htmMA Xinhua, LI Xizhe, LIANG Feng, et al. Dominating factors on well productivity and development strategies optimization in Weiyuan shale gas play, Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(3): 555-563. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202003012.htm [12] 刘德华, 肖佳林, 关富佳. 页岩气开发技术现状及研究方向[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2011, 33(1): 119-123. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JHSX201101028.htmLIU Dehua, XIAO Jialin, GUAN Fujia. Current situation and research direction of shale gas development[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2011, 33(1): 119-123. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JHSX201101028.htm [13] 李维, 张海杰, 罗彤彤, 等. 渝西地区页岩储层微观孔隙结构对页岩气赋存影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2022, 33(6): 873-885. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX202206003.htmLI Wei, ZHANG Haijie, LUO Tongtong, et al. Influence of micro pore structure of shale reservoir on shale gas occurrence in western Chongqing[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2022, 33(6): 873-885. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX202206003.htm [14] 张金川, 金之钧, 袁明生. 页岩气成藏机理和分布[J]. 天然气工业, 2004, 24(7): 15-18. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG200407004.htmZHANG Jinchuan, JIN Zhijun, YUAN Mingsheng. Reservoiring mechanism of shale gas and its distribution[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2004, 24(7): 15-18. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG200407004.htm [15] 熊亮, 杨振恒, 申宝剑, 等. 川南威荣地区五峰组—龙马溪组深层页岩气微观储集空间发育特征及意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2022, 33(6): 860-872. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX202206002.htmXIONG Liang, YANG Zhenheng, SHEN Baojian, et al. Micro reservoir space characteristics and significance of deep shale gas in Wufeng-Longmaxi formations in Weirong area, south Sichuan[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2022, 33(6): 860-872. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX202206002.htm [16] 巴俊杰, 张庆玉, 莫国宸, 等. 页岩气储层微观表征技术研究[J]. 中国矿业, 2023, 32(S1): 107-109. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKA2023S1022.htmBA Junjie, ZHANG Qingyu, MO Guochen, et al. Analysis on microscopic characterization technology of shale gas reservoir[J]. China Mining Magazine, 2023, 32(S1): 107-109. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKA2023S1022.htm [17] 徐旭辉, 申宝剑, 李志明, 等. 页岩气实验地质评价技术研究现状及展望[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2020, 10(1): 1-8. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202001002.htmXU Xuhui, SHEN Baojian, LI Zhiming, et al. Status and prospect of experimental technologies of geological evaluation for shale gas[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(1): 1-8. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202001002.htm [18] 高键, 李慧莉, 何治亮, 等. 渝东彭水地区常压页岩气压力演化与富集保存[J]. 天然气工业, 2022, 42(8): 124-135. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202208008.htmGAO Jian, LI Huili, HE Zhiliang, et al. Pressure evolution, enrichment and preservation of normal-pressure shale gas in the Pengshui area of eastern Chongqing[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2022, 42(8): 124-135. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202208008.htm [19] 刘向君, 梁利喜. 油气工程测井理论与应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2015.LIU Xiangjun, LIANG Lixi. Theory and application of oil and gas engineering logging[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2015. [20] 游声刚, 郭茜, 耿小烬, 等. 页岩含气量的影响因素分析及含气量测试方法[J]. 中国矿业, 2015, 24(12): 80-85. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKA201512019.htmYOU Shenggang, GUO Qian, Geng Xiaojin, et al. Factors affecting the shale gas content and gas content testing methods[J]. China Mining Magazine, 2015, 24(12): 80-85. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKA201512019.htm [21] 颜磊, 周文, 樊靖宇, 等. 川南深层页岩气储层含气量测井计算方法[J]. 测井技术, 2019, 43(2): 149-154. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJJS201902010.htmYAN Lei, ZHOU Wen, FAN Jingyu, et al. Log evaluation method for gas content of deep shale gas reservoirs in southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2019, 43(2): 149-154. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJJS201902010.htm [22] 苏海琨, 聂海宽, 郭少斌, 等. 深层页岩含气量评价及其差异变化: 以四川盆地威荣、永川页岩气田为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2022, 44(5): 815-824. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202205815SU Haikun, NIE Haikuan, GUO Shaobin, et al. Shale gas content evaluation for deep strata and its variation: a case study of Weirong, Yongchuan gas fields in Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2022, 44(5): 815-824. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202205815 [23] 国家能源局. 页岩气测井资料处理与解释规范: SY/T 6994-2020[S]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2020.National Energy Administration. Specification for shale gas logging data processing and interpretation: SY/T 6994-2020[S]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2020. [24] 石文睿, 张占松, 黄梓桑, 等. 低阻页岩气储层含气饱和度计算方法: 以涪陵地区焦石坝区块为例[J]. 断块油气田, 2022, 29(2): 183-188. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202202007.htmSHI Wenrui, ZHANG Zhansong, HUANG Zisang, et al. Study on calculation method of gas saturation in low-resistivity shale gas reservoir: a case study of Jiaoshiba block in Fuling area[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2022, 29(2): 183-188. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202202007.htm [25] 朱国璋, 何传亮, 樊靖宇. 川南深层页岩气藏含气量及可压性测井评价方法[J]. 测井技术, 2022, 46(4): 433-438. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJJS202204010.htmZHU Guozhang, HE Chuanliang, FAN Jingyu. Log evaluation method for gas bearing and fracability of deep shale gas reservoirs in southern Sichuan[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2022, 46(4): 433-438. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJJS202204010.htm [26] 王良, 杨建, 彭钧亮, 等. 川中地区大安寨段页岩油储层可压性评价实验[J]. 钻采工艺, 2023, 46(1): 163-168. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZCGY202301026.htmWANG Liang, YANG Jian, PENG Junliang, et al. Experimental evaluation on compressibility of shale oil reservoir in Da'anzhai section in central Sichuan area[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2023, 46(1): 163-168. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZCGY202301026.htm -
图(7) / 表(3)
计量
- 文章访问数: 328
- HTML全文浏览量: 129
- PDF下载量: 54
- 被引次数: 0
苏公网安备32021102000780号