陆相页岩层系岩心中气态烃井场测定技术初步应用及展望

贾梦瑶; 鲍云杰; 李志明; 申宝剑; 曹婷婷; 刘鹏; 杨振恒; 卢龙飞; 黎茂稳

doi:10.11781/sysydz202401183

陆相页岩层系岩心中气态烃井场测定技术初步应用及展望

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202401183

贾梦瑶^{1, 2, 3, 4,},
鲍云杰^{1, 2, 3, 4, ,},
李志明^{1, 2, 3, 4},
申宝剑^{3, 5},
曹婷婷^{1, 2, 3, 4},
刘鹏^{1, 2, 3, 4},
杨振恒^{1, 2, 3, 4},
卢龙飞^{1, 2, 3, 4},
黎茂稳^{3, 5}

1.
中国石化石油勘探开发研究院无锡石油地质研究所, 江苏无锡 214126
2.
中国石化油气成藏重点实验室, 江苏无锡 214126
3.
页岩油气富集机理与高效开发全国重点实验室, 江苏无锡 214126
4.
国家能源页岩油研发中心, 江苏无锡 214126
5.
中国石化石油勘探开发研究院, 北京 102206

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目 42090022

中国石化科技部项目 KLP23017

详细信息

作者简介:
贾梦瑶(1994-), 女, 硕士, 工程师, 从事页岩油气评价研究。E-mail: jiamy975.syky@sinopec.com

通讯作者:
鲍云杰(1963-), 男, 研究员, 从事测试技术与页岩油气评价研究。E-mail: baoyj.syky@sinopec.com

中图分类号: TE135
计量
- 文章访问数: 294
- HTML全文浏览量: 99
- PDF下载量: 33
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-04-17
- 修回日期: 2023-12-17
- 刊出日期: 2024-01-28

Preliminary application and prospect of well site determination technology of gaseous hydrocarbon in continental shale cores

JIA Mengyao^{1, 2, 3, 4
,},
BAO Yunjie^{1, 2, 3, 4
, ,},
LI Zhiming^{1, 2, 3, 4},
SHEN Baojian^{3, 5},
CAO Tingting^{1, 2, 3, 4},
LIU Peng^{1, 2, 3, 4},
YANG Zhenheng^{1, 2, 3, 4},
LU Longfei^{1, 2, 3, 4},
LI Maowen^{3, 5}

1.
Wuxi Research Institute of Petroleum Geology, SINOPEC, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214126, China
2.
SINOPEC Key Laboratory of Petroleum Accumulation Mechanisms, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214126, China
3.
State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Efficient Development, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214126, China
4.
State Energy Center for Shale Oil Research and Development, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214126, China
5.
SINOPEC Petroleum Exploration & Production Research Institute, Beijing 102206, China

摘要

摘要: 陆相页岩层系的流体分析是页岩油甜点评价的重要基础，针对岩心样品中气态烃易于散失的特性和页岩油钻井现场的需求，研发了井场岩心气态烃快速采集测定装置及方法，探讨了基于岩心气态烃分析和热解含油性分析资料快速计算视气油比和估算游离油损失的方法。研究表明，该装置适用于全直径岩心和块状样品的气态烃检测，既可以实现全直径岩心在常温、常压下逸散气态烃的采集测定，也可以测定块状岩心样品的气态烃总量，气态烃检测相对误差10%，测试结果可以转换为单位质量岩样气态烃含量。全直径岩心逸散气分析可实现岩心气态烃的非破坏式采集和测定，反映了页岩层系垂向上含油气性及其非均质性的变化特征。视气油比可反映页岩层系含油气性和可流动性的趋势，视气油比越大，代表相应页岩层系页岩油可流动性越好。利用视气油比可估算岩心经历降压降温脱气过程中游离烃的损失量，在建立岩心降温降压脱气过程的热解游离烃损失恢复方法中具有较大应用潜力。岩心气态烃井场测定技术丰富了适用于井场的岩心流体分析实验技术手段和方法，为陆相页岩层系流体评价及甜点确定提供数据支撑。
- 气态烃含量 /
- 视气油比 /
- 游离油损失恢复 /
- 可流动性评价 /
- 页岩油气 /
- 陆相页岩
Abstract: Fluid analysis of continental shale formations is an important basis for the evaluation of shale oil sweet spots. In view of the characteristics that gaseous hydrocarbons in core samples are easy to lose and the needs of shale oil drilling site, a device and method for rapid collection and determination of gaseous hydrocarbons in cores at well site are developed, and a rapid method for calculating apparent gas-oil ratio (AGOR) and estimating free oil loss based on gaseous hydrocarbon analysis and pyrolysis oil content analysis data of cores is discussed. The research shows that the device is suitable for the detection of gaseous hydrocarbons in full-diameter cores and bulk samples. It can not only realize the collection and determination of gaseous hydrocarbons in full-diameter cores at normal temperature and pressure, but also determine the total amount of gaseous hydrocarbons in bulk core samples. The relative error of gaseous hydrocarbon determination is 10%, and the test results can be converted into gaseous hydrocarbon content per unit mass of rock samples. The full-diameter core escape gas analysis can realize the non-destructive collection and determination of gaseous hydrocarbons in the cores, which reflects the change characteristics of vertical oil and gas bearing and heterogeneity of shale formations. AGOR can reflect the trend of oil-gas bearing and flowability of shale formations, and the higher AGOR, the better the flowability of shale oil of corresponding shale formations. AGOR can be used to estimate the loss of free hydrocarbon in the process of pressure and temperature reduction degassing, which has great application potential in establishing the recovery method of the loss of free hydrocarbon in the process of core temperature and pressure reduction degas-sing. The core gas hydrocarbon determination technology enriches the experimental technical means and methods of core fluid analysis suitable for well sites, and provides data support for fluid evaluation and sweet spot determination of continental shale formations.
- gaseous hydrocarbon content /
- apparent gas-oil ratio /
- free oil loss recovery /
- flowability evaluation /
- shale oil and gas /
- continental shale
注释:

利益冲突声明/Conflict of Interests

所有作者声明不存在利益冲突。

All authors disclose no relevant conflict of interests.

作者贡献/Authors’Contributions

贾梦瑶、鲍云杰参与实验设计；贾梦瑶、鲍云杰、曹婷婷、刘鹏、杨振恒完成实验操作；贾梦瑶、鲍云杰、李志明、申宝剑、曹婷婷、刘鹏、杨振恒、卢龙飞、黎茂稳参与论文写作和修改。所有作者均阅读并同意最终稿件的提交。

The study was designed by JIA Mengyao and BAO Yunjie. The experimental operation was completed by JIA Mengyao, BAO Yunjie, CAO Tingting, LIU Peng, and YANG Zhenheng. The manuscript was drafted and revised by JIA Mengyao, BAO Yunjie, LI Zhiming, SHEN Baojian, CAO Tingting, LIU Peng, YANG Zhenheng, LU Longfei, and LI Maowen. All the authors have read the last version of paper and consented for submission.

HTML全文

图 1 岩心气态烃采集测定仪组成示意

Figure 1. Composition of core gaseous hydrocarbon collection and measurement instrument

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 红外全烃气体检测仪及其原理

Figure 2. Infrared total hydrocarbon gas detector and schematic diagram

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷A1井气态烃与热解参数综合评价

YSQ为岩心出筒后放置于分段密封筒中，在常温常压下放置1 h测得的单位质量岩心的逸散气含量。

Figure 3. Comprehensive evaluation of gaseous hydrocarbon and pyrolysis parameters in well A1, Zhanhua Sag, Bohai Bay Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷A1井气态烃与热解、油饱和指数相关关系

Figure 4. Correlation between gaseous hydrocarbon and pyrolysis and oil saturation index of well A1 in Zhanhua Sag, Bohai Bay Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 视气油比评价图版

Figure 5. Evaluation of apparent gas-oil ratio

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 气态烃测试井基本数据

Table 1. Basic data of gas hydrocarbon test wells

井号	层位	视气油比/(cm³/g)		样品数量/ 件	热解游离油平均值/(mg/g)	压裂求产情况/ (t/d)
井号	层位	范围	平均值	样品数量/ 件	热解游离油平均值/(mg/g)	压裂求产情况/ (t/d)
苏北盆地B1井	阜二段	35~71	51	8	2.20	22
苏北盆地B2井	阜二段	9~398	58	28	2.72	30
渤海湾盆地A1井	沙河街组	14~268	74	13	2.28	150
渤海湾盆地A2井	沙河街组	11~149	53	37	4.51	求产未稳
南襄盆地C井	核三段	4~79	14	48	2.67	未求产

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 渤海湾盆地A1井沙河街组游离油损失恢复数据

Table 2. Loss and recovery data of free oil in Shahejie Formation, well A1, Bohai Bay Basin

样号	气态烃总量/ (cm³/g)	游离油量/ (mg/g)	视气油比/ (cm³/g)	折算视气油比/ (cm³/cm³)	游离油损失量/ (mg/g)	恢复后游离油量/ (mg/g)	游离油损失量占比/%	油饱和度/ %	恢复后油饱和度/%	油饱和度差值/%
1	0.147	1.75	83.9	71.3	2.07	3.82	54.1	10.50	22.90	12.40
2	0.139	1.50	92.6	78.7	1.81	3.31	54.7	9.00	19.88	10.88
3	0.178	1.49	119.6	101.6	1.93	3.42	56.4	8.94	20.50	11.56
4	0.111	2.58	43.0	36.6	2.72	5.30	51.3	15.48	31.77	16.29
5	0.088	2.37	37.2	31.6	2.45	4.82	50.8	14.22	28.93	14.71
6	1.070	4.00	267.6	227.4	7.03	11.03	63.8	24.00	66.21	42.21
7	0.234	2.91	80.5	68.4	3.41	6.32	53.9	17.46	37.89	20.43
8	0.304	2.80	108.5	92.3	3.52	6.32	55.7	16.80	37.94	21.14
9	0.140	3.00	46.6	39.6	3.19	6.19	51.5	18.00	37.15	19.15
10	0.105	1.76	59.5	50.6	1.94	3.70	52.5	10.56	22.22	11.66
11	0.052	1.84	28.4	24.1	1.85	3.69	50.2	11.04	22.15	11.11

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(30)

[1]	国家市场监督管理总局, 国家标准化管理委员会. 页岩油地质评价方法: GB/T 38718-2020[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2020. State Administration for Market Regulation, State Standardization Administration. Geological evaluating methods for shale oil: GB/T 38718-2020[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2020.
[2]	黎茂稳, 马晓潇, 蒋启贵, 等. 北美海相页岩油形成条件、富集特征与启示[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2019, 26(1): 13-28. LI Maowen, MA Xiaoxiao, JIANG Qigui, et al. Enlightenment from formation conditions and enrichment characteristics of marine shale oil in North America[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2019, 26(1): 13-28.
[3]	马永生, 蔡勋育, 赵培荣, 等. 中国陆相页岩油地质特征与勘探实践[J]. 地质学报, 2022, 96(1): 155-171. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2022.01.013 MA Yongsheng, CAI Xunyu, ZHAO Peirong, et al. Geological characteristics and exploration practices of continental shale oil in China[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2022, 96(1): 155-171. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2022.01.013
[4]	孙焕泉, 蔡勋育, 周德华, 等. 中国石化页岩油勘探实践与展望[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(5): 569-575. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2019.05.004 SUN Huanquan, CAI Xunyu, ZHOU Dehua, et al. Practice and prospect of SINOPEC shale oil exploration[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(5): 569-575. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2019.05.004
[5]	付金华, 李士祥, 牛小兵, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系长7段页岩油地质特征与勘探实践[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(5): 870-883. FU Jinhua, LI Shixiang, NIU Xiaobing, et al. Geological characteristics and exploration of shale oil in Chang 7 Member of Triassic Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(5): 870-883.
[6]	赵贤正, 周立宏, 蒲秀刚, 等. 歧口凹陷歧北次凹沙河街组三段页岩油地质特征与勘探突破[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(6): 643-657. ZHAO Xianzheng, ZHOU Lihong, PU Xiugang, et al. Geological characteristics and exploration breakthrough of shale oil in member 3 of Shahejie Formation of Qibei Subsag, Qikou Sag[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(6): 643-657.
[7]	刘惠民. 济阳坳陷页岩油勘探实践与前景展望[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2022, 27(1): 73-87. LIU Huimin. Exploration practice and prospect of shale oil in Jiyang Depression[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2022, 27(1): 73-87.
[8]	邹才能, 马锋, 潘松圻, 等. 全球页岩油形成分布潜力及中国陆相页岩油理论技术进展[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(1): 128-142. ZOU Caineng, MA Feng, PAN Songqi, et al. Formation and distribution potential of global shale oil and the developments of continental shale oil theory and technology in China[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2023, 30(1): 128-142.
[9]	姚红生, 昝灵, 高玉巧, 等. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系阜宁组二段页岩油富集高产主控因素与勘探重大突破[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(5): 776-783. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202105776 YAO Hongsheng, ZAN Ling, GAO Yuqiao, et al. Main control-ling factors for the enrichment of shale oil and significant discovery in second member of Paleogene Funing Formation, Qintong Sag, Subei Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(5): 776-783. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202105776
[10]	邹才能, 杨智, 王红岩, 等. "进源找油": 论四川盆地非常规陆相大型页岩油气田[J]. 地质学报, 2019, 93(7): 1551-1562. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2019.07.001 ZOU Caineng, YANG Zhi, WANG Hongyan, et al. "Exploring petroleum inside source kitchen": Jurassic unconventional continental giant shale oil & gas field in Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2019, 93(7): 1551-1562. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2019.07.001
[11]	金之钧, 王冠平, 刘光祥, 等. 中国陆相页岩油研究进展与关键科学问题[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(7): 821-835. JIN Zhijun, WANG Guanping, LIU Guangxiang, et al. Research progress and key scientific issues of continental shale oil in China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(7): 821-835.
[12]	黎茂稳, 金之钧, 董明哲, 等. 陆相页岩形成演化与页岩油富集机理研究进展[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(4): 489-505. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202004489 LI Maowen, JIN Zhijun, DONG Mingzhe, et al. Advances in the basic study of lacustrine shale evolution and shale oil accumulation[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(4): 489-505. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202004489
[13]	赵文智, 朱如凯, 刘伟, 等. 我国陆相中高熟页岩油富集条件与分布特征[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(1): 116-127. ZHAO Wenzhi, ZHU Rukai, LIU Wei, et al. Lacustrine medium-high maturity shale oil in onshore China: enrichment conditions and occurrence features[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2023, 30(1): 116-127.
[14]	匡立春, 侯连华, 杨智, 等. 陆相页岩油储层评价关键参数及方法[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(1): 1-14. KUANG Lichun, HOU Lianhua, YANG Zhi, et al. Key parameters and methods of lacustrine shale oil reservoir characterization[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(1): 1-14.
[15]	郭秋麟, 白雪峰, 何文军, 等. 页岩油资源评价方法、参数标准及典型评价实例[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2022, 27(5): 27-41. GUO Qiulin, BAI Xuefeng, HE Wenjun, et al. Shale oil resource assessment methods, parameter standards and typical case studies[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2022, 27(5): 27-41.
[16]	李阳, 赵清民, 吕琦, 等. 中国陆相页岩油开发评价技术与实践[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2022, 49(5): 955-964. LI Yang, ZHAO Qingmin, LÜ Qi, et al. Evaluation technology and practice of continental shale oil development in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2022, 49(5): 955-964.
[17]	郭秋麟, 王建, 陈晓明, 等. 页岩油原地量和可动油量评价方法与应用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(6): 1451-1463. GUO Qiulin, WANG Jian, CHEN Xiaoming, et al. Discussion on evaluation method of total oil and movable oil in-place[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(6): 1451-1463.
[18]	蒋启贵, 黎茂稳, 钱门辉, 等. 页岩油探井现场地质评价实验流程与技术进展[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(3): 571-582. JIANG Qigui, LI Maowen, QIAN Menhui, et al. Experimental procedures of well-site geological evaluation for shale oil and related technological progress[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(3): 571-582.
[19]	国家能源局. 泥页岩含油量热解分析方法: SY/T 7661-2022[S]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2022. National Energy Administration. Method for pyrolysis of oil content in shale: SY/T 7661-2022[S]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2022.
[20]	李志明, 刘鹏, 钱门辉, 等. 湖相泥页岩不同赋存状态油定量对比: 以渤海湾盆地东营凹陷页岩油探井取心段为例[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2018, 47(6): 1252-1263. LI Zhiming, LIU Peng, QIAN Menhui, et al. Quantitative comparison of different occurrence oil for lacustrine shale: a case from cored interval of shale oil special drilling wells in Dongying Depression, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2018, 47(6): 1252-1263.
[21]	范明, 俞凌杰, 蒋启贵, 等. 基于自动化排水集气原理的页岩含气量测试新方法[J]. 分析仪器, 2015(5): 52-55. FAN Ming, YU Lingjie, JIANG Qigui, et al. A new method for measurement of shale gas content based on automated water repelling and gas collecting principle[J]. Analytical Instrumentation, 2015(5): 52-55.
[22]	国家能源局. 页岩含气量测定方法: SY/T 6940-2020[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2020. National Energy Administration. Measurement method of shale gas content: SY/T 6940-2020[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2020.
[23]	鲍云杰, 李志明, 黎茂稳, 等. 岩心分段密封及逸散轻烃采集测定技术与初步应用[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(3): 422-427. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202003422 BAO Yunjie, LI Zhiming, LI Maowen, et al. Segmented sealing of cores and collection and test of escaped light hydrocarbons and its preliminary application[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(3): 422-427. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202003422
[24]	薛海涛, 田善思, 王伟明, 等. 页岩油资源评价关键参数: 含油率的校正[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2016, 37(1): 15-22. XUE Haitao, TIAN Shansi, WANG Weiming, et al. Correction of oil content: one key parameter in shale oil resource assessment[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2016, 37(1): 15-22.
[25]	李进步, 卢双舫, 陈国辉, 等. 热解参数S₁的轻烃与重烃校正及其意义: 以渤海湾盆地大民屯凹陷E₂s⁴⁽²⁾段为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2016, 37(4): 538-545. LI Jinbu, LU Shuangfang, CHEN Guohui, et al. Correction of light and heavy hydrocarbon loss for residual hydrocarbon S₁ and its significance to assessing resource potential of E₂s⁴⁽²⁾ member in Damintun Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geo-logy, 2016, 37(4): 538-545.
[26]	卿忠, 刘俊田, 张品, 等. 三塘湖盆地页岩油资源评价关键参数的校正[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2016, 30(1): 6-9. QING Zhong, LIU Juntian, ZHANG Pin, et al. Correction of key parameters of shale oil resource evaluation in Santanghu Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 2016, 30(1): 6-9.
[27]	谌卓恒, 黎茂稳, 姜春庆, 等. 页岩油的资源潜力及流动性评价方法: 以西加拿大盆地上泥盆统Duvernay页岩为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(3): 459-468. CHEN Zhuoheng, LI Maowen, JIANG Chunqing, et al. Shale oil resource potential and its mobility assessment: a case study of Upper Devonian Duvernay shale in Western Canada Sedimentary Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(3): 459-468.
[28]	刘桂芳. 起钻过程中降压脱气对油水饱和度影响的实验研究[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 1983, 2(2): 117-123. LIU Guifang. Effect of degasing, caused by pressure drop during pulling out, on oil and water saturations: a lab study[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 1983, 2(2): 117-123.
[29]	杨胜来, 胡学军, 李辉, 等. 密闭取心流体饱和度误差的影响因素及修正方法[J]. 石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 28(6): 64-67. YANG Shenglai, HU Xuejun, LI Hui, et al. Influencing factors and correction method for error of fluid saturation calculation during sealed coring[J]. Journal of the University of Petroleum, China, 2004, 28(6): 64-67.
[30]	罗宪波, 李金宜, 段宇, 等. 渤南中深层沙河街层系轻质油密闭取心井饱和度校正实验研究[J], 海洋石油, 2019, 39(2): 67-74. LUO Xianbo, LI Jinyi, DUAN Yu, et al. Experimental study on saturation correction for sealed core wells of light oil reservoir in Shahejie Formation in Bonan[J]. Offshore Oil, 2019, 39(2): 67-74.