Development characteristics and oil-gas geological significance of slope break zone of Xujiahe Formation in Sichuan Basin
-
摘要: 前人针对断陷盆地坡折带开展了大量研究，但前陆盆地前渊向前缘隆起方向坡度较缓，大型构造欠发育，地形起伏小，坡折带研究较少。四川盆地晚三叠世须家河组四、五段沉积时期发育前陆盆地，学者们已关注到泸州—开江古隆起西侧川中—川西地区缓坡坡折带对沉积岩相的控制，但其他相关研究较少。通过对四川盆地地震反射剖面坡折带构造解释，结合区域地质已有成果，采用颗粒流数值模拟方法，厘清了川中—川西地区坡折带类型，以及坡折带与重力滑动构造之间的关系，分析了与重力滑动构造相关的新型油气圈闭特征。研究获得如下认识：(1)研究区发育断裂坡折带，以坡折带为界，东、西两侧各发育一套重力滑动形成的“前挤后拉”构造组合，构造变形强度弱于被动大陆边缘重力滑动构造；(2)研究区构造坡折带边缘断裂控制沉积相与砂体类型；(3)缓坡带重力滑动构造拉张区正断层下盘上升形成同沉积背斜发育的砂岩，与同期断陷内富有机质泥岩侧接，形成“旁生侧储”型油气藏；(4)陡坡带重力滑动形成的须五段同沉积背斜，被翼部泥岩以及滑动构造结束后沉积的泥岩所围限，形成源内砂体输导成藏；(5)与重力滑动构造相关的同沉积背斜油气藏是源内成藏新类型，研究区须五段可能存在平行坡折带NE向展布的此类油气藏。Abstract: Previous studies have delved into slope break zones in faulted basins, yet foreland basins, with their gentle slopes toward the forebulge, underdeveloped large-scale structures, and small terrain undulations, have received limited research on slope-fault belts. During the deposition periods of the 4th and 5th members of the Late Triassic Xujiahe Formation, a foreland basin developed in the Sichuan Basin. Scholars have noted the control exerted by the gentle slope break zone on the sedimentary lithofacies in the central and western Sichuan, particularly in the west of the Luzhou-Kaijiang Paleo-uplift, but related studies remain limited. By interpreting the tectonic slope break zones in seismic reflection profiles of the Sichuan Basin and incorporating existing regional geological data, this study employed particle flow numerical simulation to clarify the types of slope break zones in the central and western Sichuan regions, as well as their relationship with gravity sliding structures. It also analyzed the characte-ristics of new types of oil and gas traps associated with gravity-sliding structures. The findings are as follows: (1) The study area developed a fault slope break zone, with each side bounded by a "front squeezing and rear extension" tectonic combinations formed by gravity sliding. The tectonic deformation is weaker than those of gravity-sliding structures at passive continental margins. (2) The edge fault of the tectonic slope break zone controls the sedimentary facies and sand body types. (3) In the gentle slope zone, the stretching area of gravity-sliding structures lead to the uplift of the footwalls of normal faults, forming syndepositional anticlines with developed sandstones. These sandstones, juxtaposed with organic-rich mudstones within the contemporaneous fault depression, form "side-generated and lateral storage" hydrocarbon reservoirs. (4) In the steep slope zone, gravity sliding forms syndepositional anticlines in the 5th member of the Xujiahe Formation, which are bounded by flank mudstones and post-sliding deposited mudstones, forming in-source sand body reservoirs. (5) Syndepositional anticline hydrocarbon reservoirs related to gravity-sliding structures represent a new type of in-source hydrocarbon accumulation. The 5th member of the Xujiahe Formation in the study area likely contains such reservoirs, distributed in a NE-trending pattern parallel to the slope break zone.
-
图 1 四川盆地泸州古隆起西侧研究区位置
研究区内彩图为须家河组时间厚度图，区域构造图修改自参考文献[13]。
Figure 1. Study area location on western side of Luzhou Palaeouplift in Sichuan Basin
图 2 四川盆地须家河组坡折带地震剖面(a)及地质解释(b)
剖面位置见图 1。
Figure 2. Seismic profile (a) and geological interpretation (b) of slope break zone of Xujiahe Formation, Sichuan Basin
图 3 四川盆地须家河组坡折带局部构造地震剖面
剖面位置见图 2b。
Figure 3. Seismic profile of local structure of slope break zone of Xujiahe Formation, Sichuan Basin
图 4 颗粒流数值模拟四川盆地须家河组坡折带重力滑动构造演化
Figure 4. Particle flow numerical simulation of gravity slip structure evolution of slope break zone of Xujiahe Formation, Sichuan Basin
图 5 前陆盆地(a)与被动大陆边缘(b)盐岩层重力滑动构造对比
图b修改自参考文献[28]。
Figure 5. Comparison of gravity sliding structures in salt layers in foreland basin (a) and passive continental margin (b)
图 6 四川盆地须家河组断裂坡折带对沉积相控制的地震剖面
剖面位置见图 1。
Figure 6. Seismic sections of sedimentary facies controlled by fault slope-break zone of Xujiahe Formation, Sichuan Basin
图 7 四川盆地须家河组缓坡带须家河组四段同沉积背斜成藏模式
Figure 7. Syndepositional anticlinal reservoir formation model of 4th member of Xujiahe Formation in gentle slope zone of Xujiahe Formation, Sichuan Basin
图 8 四川盆地须家河组陡坡带须家河组五段同沉积背斜地震剖面(a)与源内成藏模式(b)
剖面位置见图 1。
Figure 8. Seismic profile (a) and reservoir formation model (b) of syndepositional anticline in 5th member of steep slope zone of Xujiahe Formation, Sichuan Basin
表 1 四川盆地须家河组坡折带数值模拟材料参数
Table 1. Material parameters for numerical simulation of slope break zone in Xujiahe Formation, Sichuan Basin
实验材料 密度/(g/cm3) 颗粒半径/mm 法向刚度/(N/m) 切向刚度/(N/m) 摩擦系数 初始孔隙度/% 颗粒总数 石英砂颗粒 2.6 0.09~0.11 3×107 3×107 0.277 12.4 3 058 挡板 2.8 7.7×108 7.7×108 0.2 
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] VAIL P R. Seismic stratigraphy interpretation using sequence stratigraphy: part 1: seismic stratigraphy interpretation procedure[M]//BALLY A W. Atlas of Seismic Stratigraphy. Tulsa: AAPG, 1987: 246-321. [2] 林畅松, 潘元林, 肖建新, 等. "构造坡折带": 断陷盆地层序分析和油气预测的重要概念[J]. 地球科学(中国地质大学学报), 2000, 25(3): 260-266. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB202206005.htmLIN Changsong, PAN Yuanlin, XIAO Jianxin, et al. Structural slope-break zone: key concept for stratigraphic sequence analysis and petroleum forecasting in fault subsidence basins[J]. Earth Science(Journal of China University of Geosciences), 2000, 25(3): 260-266. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB202206005.htm [3] 王英民, 刘豪, 李立诚, 等. 准噶尔大型坳陷湖盆坡折带的类型和分布特征[J]. 地球科学(中国地质大学学报), 2002, 27(6): 683-688. https://cpfd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CPFDTOTAL-ZGSY200309001064.htmWANG Yingmin, LI Hao, LI Licheng, et al. Types and distribution characteristics of slope breaks of large-type down-warped lake basins[J]. Earth Science(Journal of China University of Geosciences), 2002, 27(6): 683-688. https://cpfd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CPFDTOTAL-ZGSY200309001064.htm [4] 王英民, 金武弟, 刘书会, 等. 断陷湖盆多级坡折带的成因类型、展布及其勘探意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2003, 24(3): 199-203. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9985.2003.03.002WANG Yingmin, JIN Wudi, LIU Shuhui, et al. Genetic types, distribution and exploration significance of multistage slope breaks in rift lacustrine basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2003, 24(3): 199-203. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9985.2003.03.002 [5] 冯有良. 断陷湖盆沟谷及构造坡折对砂体的控制作用[J]. 石油学报, 2006, 27(1): 13-16. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2697.2006.01.003FENG Youliang. Control of valley and tectonic slope-break zone on sand bodies in rift-subsidence basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2006, 27(1): 13-16. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2697.2006.01.003 [6] 冯有良, 徐秀生. 同沉积构造坡折带对岩性油气藏富集带的控制作用: 以渤海湾盆地古近系为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2006, 33(1): 22-25. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0747.2006.01.005FENG Youliang, XU Xiusheng. Syndepositional structural slope-break zone controls on lithologic reservoirs: a case from Paleogene Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2006, 33(1): 22-25. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0747.2006.01.005 [7] 和子琛, 刘豪, 林鹤鸣, 等. 断陷湖盆坡折带—古沟谷对沉积的控制作用: 以珠江口盆地海丰33洼陷古近系文昌组为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(2): 441-451. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202302015.htmHE Zichen, LIU Hao, LIN Heming, et al. Controlling effect of slope-break zone and paleovalley on sedimentation in rifted lake basins: a case study of the Paleogene Wenchang Formation in Haifeng 33 Subsag, Pearl River Mouth Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(2): 441-451. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202302015.htm [8] 王辉, 侯文锋, 李婷, 等. 前陆盆地坡折带对沉积相的控制作用: 以准噶尔盆地西北缘玛湖凹陷三工河组为例[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 53(3): 1136-1145. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGD202203025.htmWANG Hui, HOU Wenfeng, LI Ting, et al. Control of slope break on sedimentary facies in foreland basin: a case study of Sangonghe Formation in northwestern margin of Junggar Basin[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2022, 53(3): 1136-1145. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGD202203025.htm [9] LIU Shugen, YANG Yu, DENG Bin, et al. Tectonic evolution of the Sichuan Basin, Southwest China[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2021, 213: 103470. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103470 [10] 黄涵宇, 何登发, 李英强, 等. 四川盆地东南部泸州古隆起的厘定及其成因机制[J]. 地学前缘, 2019, 26(1): 102-120. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201901012.htmHUANG Hanyu, HE Dengfa, LI Yingqiang, et al. Determination and formation mechanism of the Luzhou paleo-uplift in the southeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2019, 26(1): 102-120. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201901012.htm [11] 李楠, 李国辉, 吴长江, 等. 坡折带控制下的砂质碎屑流对油气勘探的意义: 以四川盆地上三叠统须家河组为例[J]. 四川地质学报, 2014, 34(4): 505-509. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0995.2014.04.006LI Nan, LI Guohui, WU Changjiang, et al. The application of sandy debris flow under the control of slope break to oil-gas exploration[J]. Acta Geologica Sichuan, 2014, 34(4): 505-509. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0995.2014.04.006 [12] 贾东, 陈竹新, 贾承造, 等. 龙门山前陆褶皱冲断带构造解析与川西前陆盆地的发育[J]. 高校地质学报, 2003, 9(3): 402-410. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7493.2003.03.010JIA Dong, CHEN Zhuxin, JIA Chengzao, et al. Structural features of the Longmen Shan fold and thrust belt and development of the western Sichuan foreland basin, Central China[J]. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2003, 9(3): 402-410. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7493.2003.03.010 [13] 李英娇. 四川盆地晚三叠世须家河组层序—古地理与聚煤规律[D]. 北京: 中国矿业大学(北京), 2014: 23-119.LI Yingjiao. Sequence-palaeogeography and coal accumulation of the Late Triassic Xujiahe Formation in the Sichuan Basin[D]. Beijing: China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), 2014: 23-119. [14] 魏国齐. 四川盆地构造特征与油气[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2018: 105-106.WEI Guoqi. Structural characteristics and oil and gas in Sichuan Basin[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2018: 105-106. [15] 岳亮, 孟庆强, 刘自亮, 等. 致密砂岩储层物性及非均质性特征: 以四川盆地中部广安地区上三叠统须家河组六段为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(3): 597-609. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202203009.htmYUE Liang, MENG Qingqiang, LIU Ziliang, et al. Physical property and heterogeneity of tight sandstone reservoirs: a case of the Upper Triassic 6th member of Xujiahe Formation, Guang'an, central Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(3): 597-609. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT202203009.htm [16] 李中超, 周勇水, 刘平, 等. 普光地区须家河组致密砂岩储层成岩作用及孔隙演化[J]. 断块油气田, 2023, 30(3): 353-362. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202303001.htmLI Zhongchao, ZHOU Yongshui, LIU Ping, et al. Diagenesis and pore evolution of tight sandstone reservoirs of Xujiahe Formation in Puguang area[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2023, 30(3): 353-362. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202303001.htm [17] 雷越, 黄嵌, 王旭丽, 等. 川西北地区须家河组二段致密砂岩储层特征及其主控因素[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(5): 50-57. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ202305007.htmLEI Yue, HUANG Qian, WANG Xuli, et al. Reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors of tight sandstone in Member 2 of the Xujiabe Formation in northwest Sichuan[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2023, 30(5): 50-57. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ202305007.htm [18] 冯林杰, 蒋裕强, 曹脊翔, 等. 川中北部须家河组烃源岩测井解释及评价[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 45(4): 31-42. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNSY202304003.htmFENG Linjie, JIANG Yuqiang, CAO Jixiang, et al. Log interpretation and evaluation of hydrocarbon source rocks of Xujiahe Formation in the north of central Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2023, 45(4): 31-42. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNSY202304003.htm [19] 任杰, 姜淑霞, 罗周亮, 等. 通南巴气田须家河组致密砂岩储层特征及分类评价[J]. 断块油气田, 2023, 30(6): 914-924. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202306005.htmREN Jie, JIANG Shuxia, LUO Zhouliang, et al. Characteristics and classification evaluation of tight sandstone reservoir in Xujiahe Formation of Tongnanba Gas Field[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2023, 30(6): 914-924. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202306005.htm [20] 张庄, 章顺利, 何秀彬, 等. 川西坳陷须家河组二段裂缝发育特征及形成主控因素: 以合兴场气田为例[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(5): 581-590. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202305005.htmZHANG Zhuang, ZHANG Shunli, HE Xiubin, et al. Development characteristics of fractures in the second member of Xujiahe Formation in Hexingchang Gas Field, western Sichuan Depression and their main control factors of formation: a case study of Hexingchang Gas Field[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 581-590. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ202305005.htm [21] 张鹏伟, 张洪安, 王学军, 等. 四川盆地普光和通南巴地区须家河组气藏气源探讨[J]. 断块油气田, 2022, 29(2): 145-151. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202202001.htmZHANG Pengwei, ZHANG Hongan, WANG Xuejun, et al. Origin of natural gas in the Xujiahe Formation in Puguang and Tongnanba area, Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2022, 29(2): 145-151. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202202001.htm [22] 李勇, 陈世加, 路俊刚, 等. 近源间互式煤系致密砂岩气成藏主控因素: 以川中地区须家河组天然气为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(6): 798-808. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201906004.htmLI Yong, CHEN Shijia, LU Jungang, et al. Main controlling factors of near-source and interbedded-accumulation tight sandstone gas from coal-bearing strata: a case study from natural gas of Xujiahe Formation, central Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2019, 30(6): 798-808. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201906004.htm [23] 段正鑫, 刘一锋, 楼章华, 等. 川西坳陷三叠系须家河组油气富集与地层压力关系[J]. 石油实验地质, 2023, 45(1): 72-79. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202301072DUAN Zhengxin, LIU Yifeng, LOU Zhanghua, et al. Correlation between formation pressure and hydrocarbon enrichment in Triassic Xujiahe Formation, Western Sichuan Depression[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2023, 45(1): 72-79. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202301072 [24] 林世国. 川西北部地区须家河组致密砂岩气成藏地质条件研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2015.LIN Shiguo. The research of reservoir forming condition of Xujiahe Formation in the north area of west Sichuan Basin[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences (Beijing), 2015. [25] 王金琪. 安县构造运动[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 1990, 11(3): 223-234. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT199003000.htmWANG Jinqi. Anxian tectonic movement[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 1990, 11(3): 223-234. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT199003000.htm [26] 吴叶盛. 重力驱动下的颗粒坍塌流动及其与流向内不同介质之间的相互作用研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2022.WU Yesheng. Investigation on granular collapsing flow driven by gravity and its interaction with different media[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2022. [27] MOURGUES R, LECOMTE E, VENDEVILLE B, et al. An experimental investigation of gravity-driven shale tectonics in progradational delta[J]. Tectonophysics, 2009, 474(3/4): 643-656. [28] MASROUHI A, BELLIER O, YOUSSEF M B, et al. Submarine allochthonous salt sheets: gravity-driven deformation of North African Cretaceous passive margin in Tunisia-Bled Dogra case study and nearby salt structures[J]. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 2014, 97: 125-142. [29] 钟延秋, 李勇, 郭洪金, 等. 济阳坳陷古近系同沉积背斜构造及其与油气的关系[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2006, 30(1): 28-40. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGYK200601004.htmZHONG Yanqiu, LI Yong, GUO Hongjin, et al. Study on Palaeogene syndeposition and its relation with hydrocarbon potentials in Jiyang Sag[J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 2006, 30(1): 28-40. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGYK200601004.htm [30] 田杨, 朱宏权, 叶素娟, 等. 川西坳陷源内油气成藏主控因素及模式: 以孝泉—丰谷构造带须家河组五段为例[J]. 地球科学, 2021, 46(7): 2494-2506. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX202107017.htmTIAN Yang, ZHU Hongquan, YE Sujuan, et al. Main controlling factors and models of hydrocarbon accumulation in the source of western Sichuan depression: taking Xu 5th member of Xujiahe Formation in Xiaoquan-Fenggu structural belt as an example[J]. Earth Science, 2021, 46(7): 2494-2506. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX202107017.htm -
图(8) / 表(1)
计量
- 文章访问数: 374
- HTML全文浏览量: 602
- PDF下载量: 44
- 被引次数: 0
苏公网安备32021102000780号