Fracture characteristics and stress disturbance analysis for well optimization of Silurian in Shunbei area, central Tarim Basin
-
摘要: 塔里木盆地中部顺北地区复杂构造应力造成了多层系断裂样式的差异性。当钻井钻至志留系断裂破碎带，地层压力小于钻井液液柱压力时，易发生漏失现象。为保障钻井的高效钻进，亟需开展志留系断裂特征与应力场扰动分析以指导井位设计。通过志留系断裂增强解释性处理及空间解释，结合断裂生长指数，开展断裂综合解析。研究区断裂整体特征为下伏陡直走滑与上覆雁列正断层分层变形，志留系断裂样式以加里东晚期至海西早期活动的雁列式负花状正断层组合排列为主，呈右阶雁列式展布，走滑伸展作用强烈。基于已钻井SHZ1等偶极阵列声波测井等资料，确定了顺北中部地区志留系主应力方向为北东向54°。结合研究区三维地震资料综合解释，建立地质模型，开展迭代边界元数值模拟，明确研究区现今地应力的平面分布规律，包括最大、最小和中间主应力，并将应力场模拟结果与实际测井资料解释结果进行对比分析。受断裂产状和断距的影响，平面上应力扰动带宽度不同，同一断裂的上、下盘应力扰动范围呈现出非对称分布。通过对志留系断裂空间立体雕刻及应力扰动分析，避开志留系断裂强度大、倾角大的雁列单元边界断裂、断裂应力集中部位及强能量异常断裂、裂缝发育区，结合目的层靶点空间特征，优选井位及其井轨迹设计。志留系断裂综合解析与应力场扰动分析为井位优选中规避志留系严重漏失、保障钻井高效钻进提供了保障。Abstract: The complex tectonic stress in the Shunbei area of the central Tarim Basin results in varied patterns of multilayered fractures. When drilling into the Silurian fracture zone and the formation pressure is lower than the drilling fluid column pressure, leakage easily occurs. To ensure efficient drilling, it is crucial to conduct an analysis of Silurian fracture characteristics and stress field disturbances to guide well design. Through enhanced interpretation and spatial analysis of Silurian faults, a comprehensive analysis of fractures was conducted in conjunction with the fault growth index. The overall characteristics of fractures in the study area included steeply dipping strike-slip faults and overlying en echelon normal faults with layered deformation. The Silurian fracture patterns primarily consist of echelon negative flower-like normal fault combinations, reflecting activity from late Caledonian to early Hercynian. The principal stress direction of the Silurian is 54° NE based on dipole array acoustic logging data from well SHZ1. By integrating three-dimensional seismic data interpretation with geological modeling and iterative boundary element numerical simulations, the current spatial distribution of stress fields, including maximum, minimum, and intermediate principal stresses, was established. The results of the stress field simulation were compared with interpretations derived from actual logging data. Due to the influence of fault occurrence and spacing, the width of stress disturbance zones varies on the plane, and stress disturbances above and below the fault plates show an asymmetric distribution. Through spatial sculpting of Silurian fractures and analysis of stress disturbances, optimal well locations and trajectories were selected to avoid areas with high fracture intensity, large dip angles, concentrated stress zones, strong energy anomaly fractures, and developed crack zones. The comprehensive analysis of Silurian fractures and stress field disturbance ensures efficient drilling and mitigates risks of significant Silurian leakage during well optimization.
-
Key words:
- principal stress /
- strike-slip fault /
- stress disturbance /
- well optimization /
- Shunbei area /
- Tarim Basin
-
图 1 塔里木盆地顺北地区构造位置及断裂分布
Figure 1. Structural location and fracture distribution of Shunbei area in Tarim Basin
图 2 塔中顺北地区志留系突出断面特征的解释性增强处理
a.原始地震资料；b.断裂增强解释性处理；c.精细断裂解释；d.柯坪塔格组顶界面断裂平面展布。
Figure 2. Enhanced processing of prominent fracture characteristics of Silurian in Shunbei area, central Tarim Basin
图 3 塔中顺北地区志留系雁列断裂空间精细解释及分布
a.志留系断裂检测相干属性及雁列断裂特征；b.剖面断裂特征；c.“丝带效应”特征；d.志留系断裂空间特征。
Figure 3. Detailed spatial interpretation and distribution of en echelon fractures in Silurian section, Shunbei area, central Tarim Basin
图 4 塔中顺北地区志留系各组地层变化
a.不同层断裂相干检测属性及剖面位置(a1.克孜尔塔格组顶；a2.柯坪塔格组顶)；b.断裂解释及地层变化规律；c.志留系不同地层生长指数。
Figure 4. Stratigraphic variation of Silurian strata in Shunbei area, central Tarim Basin
图 5 塔中顺北地区走滑断裂带特征
剖面位置图见图 1的a—a’。
Figure 5. Characteristics of strike-slip fault zone in Shunbei area, central Tarim Basin
图 6 塔中顺北地区SHZ1井基于偶极阵列声波测井数据志留系波速各向异性方向分析
Figure 6. Anisotropic directions of Silurian velocity based on dipole array acoustic data from well SHZ1, Shunbei area, central Tarim Basin
图 7 塔中顺北4号断裂带志留系三维地质模型
Figure 7. Three-dimensional geological model of Silurian in Shunbei No.4 fault belt, central Tarim Basin
图 8 塔中顺北地区SHB4号走滑断裂带志留系迭代边界元法应力场模拟结果
Figure 8. Stress field simulation of Silurian in SHB4 strike-slip fault zone in Shunbei area of central Tarim Basin using iterative boundary element method
表 1 塔中顺北地区志留系相关地层格架及地震波组综合划分
Table 1. Comprehensive division of Silurian-related stratigraphic framework and seismic wave groups in Shunbei area, central Tarim Basin
-
[1] 马永生, 蔡勋育, 云露, 等. 塔里木盆地顺北超深层碳酸盐岩油气田勘探开发实践与理论技术进展[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2022, 49(1): 1-17. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202201001.htmMA Yongsheng, CAI Xunyu, YUN Lu, et al. Practice and theoretical and technical progress in exploration and development of Shunbei ultra-deep carbonate oil and gas field, Tarim Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2022, 49(1): 1-17. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202201001.htm [2] 云露, 邓尚. 塔里木盆地深层走滑断裂差异变形与控储控藏特征: 以顺北油气田为例[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(6): 770-787. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB202206003.htmYUN Lu, DENG Shang. Structural styles of deep strike-slip faults in Tarim Basin and the characteristics of their control on reservoir formation and hydrocarbon accumulation: a case study of Shunbei oil and gas field[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(6): 770-787. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB202206003.htm [3] 何登发, 贾承造, 赵文智, 等. 中国超深层油气勘探领域研究进展与关键问题[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2023, 50(6): 1162-1172. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202306006.htmHE Dengfa, JIA Chengzao, ZHAO Wenzhi, et al. Research progress and key issues of ultra-deep oil and gas exploration in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2023, 50(6) : 1162-1172. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202306006.htm [4] 李小波, 魏学刚, 刘学利, 等. 顺北油田超深断控缝洞型油藏注水开发实践[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2023, 44(6): 702-710. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD202306009.htmLI Xiaobo, WEI Xuegang, LIU Xueli, et al. Practice of water injection development in ultra-deep fault-controlled fractured-vuggy reservoirs in Shunbei oilfield[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2023, 44(6): 702-710. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD202306009.htm [5] 刘彪, 潘丽娟, 王沫. 顺北油气田二区断控体油气藏井身结构设计及配套技术[J]. 断块油气田, 2023, 30(4): 692-697.LIU Biao, PAN Lijuan, WANG Mo. Well structure design and supporting technology of fault-controlled reservoir of No. 2 block in Shunbei oil-gas field[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2023, 30(4): 692-697. [6] 李海英, 韩俊, 陈平, 等. 塔里木盆地顺北4号走滑断裂带变形特征及有利区评价[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2023, 44(2): 127-135. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD202302001.htmLI Haiying, HAN Jun, CHEN Ping, et al. Deformation and favorable area evaluation of Shunbei No. 4 strike-slip fault zone in Tarim Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2023, 44(2): 127-135. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD202302001.htm [7] 刘学利, 谭涛, 陈勇, 等. 顺北一区断溶体油藏溶解气驱开发特征[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2023, 44(2): 195-202. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD202302009.htmLIU Xueli, TAN Tao, CHEN Yong, et al. Development characte-ristics of solution-gas drive in fault-karst reservoirs in Shunbei-1 block[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2023, 44(2): 195-202. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD202302009.htm [8] 陈勇, 朱乐乐, 刘学利. 顺北一区超深断控油藏注天然气开发的可行性[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2023, 44(2): 203-209. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD202302010.htmCHEN Yong, ZHU Lele, LIU Xueli. Feasibility of natural gas miscible flooding in ultra-deep fault-controlled reservoirs in Shunbei-1 block[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2023, 44(2): 203-209. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD202302010.htm [9] 康弘男. 塔里木盆地顺北地区油气地球化学及油气成藏期研究[D]. 北京: 中国石油大学(北京), 2019: 1-75.KANG Hongnan. The geochemical characteristics and accumulation period of oil and gas in the north Shuntuoguole of Tarim Basin[D]. Beijing: China University of Petroleum, Beijing, 2019: 1-75. [10] 肖雷. 断裂输导形成上覆油气藏有利部位预测方法及其应用[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(1): 22-28. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ202301003.htmXIAO Lei. Method for predicting the favorable site of overlying oil and gas reservoir formed by fault conduit and its application[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2023, 30(1): 22-28. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ202301003.htm [11] 陈平, 能源, 吴鲜, 等. 塔里木盆地顺北5号走滑断裂带分层分段特征及构造演化[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2023, 44(1): 33-42. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD202301005.htmCHEN Ping, NENG Yuan, WU Xian, et al. Stratification and segmentation characteristics and tectonic evolution of Shunbei No. 5 strike-slip fault zone in Tarim Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2023, 44(1): 33-42. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD202301005.htm [12] 贾承造, 马德波, 袁敬一, 等. 塔里木盆地走滑断裂构造特征、形成演化与成因机制[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(8): 81-91. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202108012.htmJIA Chengzao, MA Debo, YUAN Jingyi, et al. Structural characteristics, formation & evolution and genetic mechanisms of strike-slip faults in the Tarim Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(8): 81-91. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202108012.htm [13] 云露. 顺北东部北东向走滑断裂体系控储控藏作用与突破意义[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2021, 26(3): 41-52. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY202103004.htmYUN Lu. Controlling effect of NE strike-slip fault system on reservoir development and hydrocarbon accumulation in the eastern Shunbei area and its geological significance, Tarim Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2021, 26(3): 41-52. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY202103004.htm [14] 卜旭强, 王来源, 朱莲花, 等. 塔里木盆地顺北油气田奥陶系断控缝洞型储层特征及成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 152-160. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YANX202303013.htmBU Xuqiang, WANG Laiyuan, ZHU Lianhua, et al. Characteristics and reservoir accumulation model of Ordovician fault controlled fractured-vuggy reservoirs in Shunbei oil and gas field, Tarim Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(3): 152-160. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YANX202303013.htm [15] 刘军, 廖茂辉, 王来源, 等. 顺北油田顺北4号断裂带中段断控储集体连通性评价[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2023, 44(4): 456-464. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD202304010.htmLIU Jun, LIAO Maohui, WANG Laiyuan, et al. Static connectivity evaluation on fault-controlled reservoir system in the middle section of Shunbei no. 4 fault zone, Shunbei oilfield[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2023, 44(4): 456-464. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD202304010.htm [16] 徐珂, 杨海军, 张辉, 等. 塔里木盆地克拉苏构造带超深层致密砂岩气藏一体化增产关键技术与实践[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2022, 27(5): 106-115. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY202205009.htmXU Ke, YANG Haijun, ZHANG Hui, et al. Key technology and practice of the integrated well stimulation of ultra-deep tight sand stone gas reservoir in Kelasu structural belt, Tarim Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2022, 27(5): 106-115. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY202205009.htm [17] 何登发, 周新源, 杨海军, 等. 塔里木盆地克拉通内古隆起的成因机制与构造类型[J]. 地学前缘, 2008, 15(2): 207-221. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY200802029.htmHE Dengfa, ZHOU Xinyuan, YANG Haijun, et al. Formation mechanism and tectonic types of intracratonic paleo-uplifts in the Tarim Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2008, 15(2): 207-221. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY200802029.htm [18] 杨海军, 李勇, 唐雁刚, 等. 塔里木盆地克深气田成藏条件及勘探开发关键技术[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(3): 399-414. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB202103012.htmYANG Haijun, LI Yong, TANG Yangang, et al. Accumulation conditions, key exploration and development technologies for Keshen gas field in Tarim Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(3): 399-414. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB202103012.htm [19] 江同文, 张辉, 徐珂, 等. 超深层裂缝型储层最佳井眼轨迹量化优选技术与实践: 以克拉苏构造带博孜A气藏为例[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2021, 26(4): 149-161. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY202104012.htmJIANG Tongwen, ZHANG Hui, XU Ke, et al. Technology and practice of quantitative optimization of borehole trajectory in ultra- deep fractured reservoir: a case study of Bozi A gas reservoir in Kelasu structural belt, Tarim Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2021, 26(4): 149-161. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY202104012.htm [20] 邓兴梁, 闫婷, 张银涛, 等. 走滑断裂断控碳酸盐岩油气藏的特征与井位部署思路: 以塔里木盆地为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(3): 21-29. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202103004.htmDENG Xingliang, YAN Ting, ZHANG Yintao, et al. Characteristics and well location deployment ideas of strike-slip fault controlled carbonate oil and gas reservoirs: a case study of the Tarim Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(3): 21-29. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG202103004.htm [21] 田军, 杨海军, 朱永峰, 等. 塔里木盆地富满油田成藏地质条件及勘探开发关键技术[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(8): 971-985. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB202108001.htmTIAN Jun, YANG Haijun, ZHU Yongfeng, et al. Geological conditions for hydrocarbon accumulation and key technologies for exploration and development in Fuman oilfield, Tarim Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(8): 971-985. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB202108001.htm [22] 刘敬寿, 丁文龙, 杨海盟, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地华庆地区天然裂缝与岩石力学层演化: 基于数值模拟的定量分析[J]. 地球科学, 2023.48(7): 2572-2588. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX202307010.htmLIU Jingshou, DING Wenlong, YANG Haimeng, et al. Natural fractures and rock mechanical stratigraphy evaluation in Huaqing area, Ordos Basin: a quantitative analysis based on numerical simulation[J]. Earth Science, 2023, 48(7): 2572-2588. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX202307010.htm [23] 刘敬寿, 丁文龙, 肖子亢, 等. 储层裂缝综合表征与预测研究进展[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2019, 34(6): 2283-2300. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWJ201906019.htmLIU Jingshou, DING Wenlong, XIAO Zikang, et al. Advances in comprehensive characterization and prediction of reservoir fractures[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2019, 34(6): 2283-2300. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWJ201906019.htm [24] MAERTEN L, MAERTEN F. Chronologic modeling of faulted and fractured reservoirs using geomechanically based restoration: technique and industry applications[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2006, 90(8): 1201-1226. doi: 10.1306/02240605116 [25] 李勇, 徐珂, 张辉, 等. 塔里木盆地超深层油气钻探工程的特殊地质因素[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2022, 27(3): 88-98. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY202203007.htmLI Yong, XU Ke, ZHANG Hui, et al. Special geological factors in drilling engineering of ultra-deep oil and gas reservoir in Tarim Baisn[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2022, 27(3): 88-98. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY202203007.htm [26] 李文哲, 于兴川, 赖燕, 等. 深层脆性页岩井钻井液漏失机理及主控因素[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(3): 162-169. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ202203024.htmLI Wenzhe, YU Xingchuan, LAI Yan, et al. Lost circulation mechanism and main controlling factors in deep brittle shale wells[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2022, 29(3): 162-169. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ202203024.htm [27] 曾联波, 漆家福, 王成刚, 等. 构造应力对裂缝形成与流体流动的影响[J]. 地学前缘, 2008, 15(3): 292-298. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY200803029.htmZENG Lianbo, QI Jiafu, WANG Chenggang, et al. The influence of tectonic stress on fracture formation and fluid flow[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2008, 15(3): 292-298. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY200803029.htm [28] 赵腾. 顺北5断裂带现今应力场数值模拟[D]. 北京: 中国石油大学(北京), 2020: 1-92.ZHAO Teng. Current stress field simulation of Shunbei 5 fault zone[D]. Beijing: China University of Petroleum, Beijing, 2020: 1-92. [29] 李映涛, 汝智星, 邓尚, 等. 塔里木盆地顺北特深碳酸盐岩储层天然裂缝实验评价及油气意义[J]. 石油实验地质, 2023, 45(3): 422-433. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202303422LI Yingtao, RU Zhixing, DENG Shang, et al. Experimental evaluation and hydrocarbon significance of natural fractures in Shunbei ultra-deep carbonate reservoir, Tarim Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2023, 45(3): 422-433. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202303422 [30] 宋刚, 李海英, 叶宁, 等. 塔里木盆地顺托果勒低隆起顺北4号走滑断裂带成岩流体类型及活动特征[J]. 石油实验地质, 2022, 44(4): 603-612. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202204603SONG Gang, LI Haiying, YE Ning, et al. Types and features of diagenetic fluids in Shunbei no. 4 strike-slip fault zone in Shun-tuoguole Low Uplift, Tarim Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2022, 44(4): 603-612. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202204603 -
下载:
图(8) / 表(1)
计量
- 文章访问数: 242
- HTML全文浏览量: 101
- PDF下载量: 50
- 被引次数: 0
苏公网安备32021102000780号