准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷风城组泥页岩生物标志化合物特征与赋存状态研究

支东明; 冷筠滢; 谢安; 唐勇; 何晋译; 何文军; 李志明; 邹阳; 朱涛

doi:10.11781/sysydz202405954

准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷风城组泥页岩生物标志化合物特征与赋存状态研究

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202405954

支东明^1,,
冷筠滢²,
谢安¹,
唐勇³,
何晋译²,
何文军^3, ,,
李志明²,
邹阳³,
朱涛³

1.
怀柔实验室新疆研究院, 乌鲁木齐 830000
2.
中国石化石油勘探开发研究院无锡石油地质研究所, 江苏无锡 214126
3.
中国石油新疆油田分公司勘探开发研究院, 新疆克拉玛依 834000

基金项目:

新疆维吾尔自治区“天山英才”科技创新领军人才支持项目 2022TSYCLJ0070

国家自然科学基金项目 42090022

详细信息

作者简介:
支东明(1971—), 男, 教授级高级工程师, 从事石油地质研究。E-mail: Zhidm@petrochina.com.cn

通讯作者:
何文军(1988—), 男, 硕士, 高级工程师, 从事油气地质研究。E-mail: fchwj@petrochina.com.cn

中图分类号: TE122.113
计量
- 文章访问数: 103
- HTML全文浏览量: 33
- PDF下载量: 29
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2024-04-19
- 修回日期: 2024-08-07
- 刊出日期: 2024-09-28

Characteristics and occurrence states of shale biomarker compounds in Fengcheng Formation, Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin

1.
Xinjiang Research Institute of Huairou Laboratory, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830000, China
2.
Wuxi Research Institute of Petroleum Geology, SINOPEC, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214126, China
3.
Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Xinjiang Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Karamay, Xinjiang 834000, China

摘要

摘要: 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组泥页岩不同层段生物标志化合物特征与赋存状态特征认识较为薄弱，通过采用岩石热解、气相色谱—质谱、荧光薄片和氩离子抛光电镜等实验技术，厘清不同层段烃源岩物质基础、生物标志化合物分布特征及意义、不同赋存状态页岩油，对玛湖凹陷下一步勘探部署具有重要意义。玛湖凹陷风城组泥页岩主要为中等—好烃源岩，有机质类型为Ⅱ型，处于成熟演化阶段；生物标志化合物组成特征表明具有高丰度的Pr和Ph、β-胡萝卜烷及C₂₉重排甾烷，C₂₇-C₂₈-C₂₉规则甾烷呈反“L”型分布，指示有机质以藻类等低等水生生物贡献为主；较低的Pr/Ph比值以及较高的伽马蜡烷指数，反映出沉积环境主要为咸化的还原环境；C₃₁αβ22S/(22S+22R)、C₂₉M/C₂₉H和C₂₉ββ/(ββ+αα)等藿烷类和甾烷类成熟度参数表明烃源岩处于成熟阶段。另外，风城组二段泥页岩相对于风一段、风三段具有更大的生烃潜力，具备更好的烃源岩物质基础，同时C₂₀/C₂₃TT、C₂₁/C₂₃TT、Ga/C₃₀H等生物标志化合物相关参数指示风二段藻类等贡献较多，更偏还原和咸化的环境；结合风二段以游离赋存状态为主，认为烃类赋存于粒间孔和粒内孔中。风二段有利于页岩油富集与保存，展现出更好的页岩油勘探开发前景。
- 生物标志化合物 /
- 游离烃 /
- 页岩油 /
- 泥页岩 /
- 风城组 /
- 二叠系 /
- 玛湖凹陷 /
- 准噶尔盆地
Abstract: The characteristics of biomarker compounds and their occurrence states in different layers of the Permian Fengcheng Formation shale in Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin are poorly understood. By using experimental techniques such as rock pyrolysis, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, fluorescence thin sections, and argon ion polishing electron microscopy, the material basis of hydrocarbon source rocks in different intervals, the distribution characteristics and significance of biomarker compounds, and different occurrence states of shale oil are clarified. This is of great significance for the next step in exploration and deployment in the Mahu Sag. The shale of the Fengcheng Formation in the Mahu Sag is mainly medium to good hydrocarbon source rocks, with type Ⅱ organic matter and in a mature evolutionary stage. The composition characteristics of biomarker compounds show high abundance of Pr and Ph, β-carotane, and C₂₉ rearranged steranes. The C₂₇-C₂₈-C₂₉ regular steranes exhibit an inverted "L" distribution, indicating that the organic matter is mainly contributed by lower aquatic organisms such as algae. Lower Pr/Ph ratios and higher gammacerane indices reflect a saline reducing sedimentary environment. Maturity parameters such as C₃₁αβ22S/(22S+22R), C₂₉M/C₂₉H, and C₂₉ββ/(ββ+αα) for hopanes and steranes indicate that the hydrocarbon source rocks are in the mature stage. In addition, the shale of the second member of the Fengcheng Formation has greater hydrocarbon generation potential and better source rock material basis than that in the first and third members. Meanwhile, biomarker compound parameters such as C₂₀/C₂₃TT, C₂₁/C₂₃TT, and Ga/C₃₀H indicate that the second member has more contributions from algae and other organisms, and a more reducing and saline environment. The hydrocarbons in the second member are mainly in a free occurrence state, residing in intergranular and intragranular pores. The study shows that the second member of the Fengcheng Formation is more favorable for shale oil enrichment and preservation, showing a better prospect for shale oil exploration and development.
- biomarker compound /
- free hydrocarbon /
- shale oil /
- Fengcheng Formation /
- Permian /
- Mahu Sag /
- Junggar Basin /
注释:

利益冲突声明/Conflict of Interests

作者李志明是本刊编委会成员及主办单位员工；冷筠滢、何晋译是本刊主办单位员工。所有作者均未参与本文的同行评审或决策。

Author Ll Zhiming is an Editorial Board Member and an employee of the sponsor of this journal. LENG Junying and HE Jinyi are employees of the sponsor of this journal. They did not take part in peer review or decision making of this article.

作者贡献/Authors’Contributions

支东明负责论文的整体思路规划和结构设计及实施；冷筠滢负责论文的撰写；谢安负责文献综述；唐勇负责实验设计与实验结果综合分析；何晋译负责数据搜集与数据分析；何文军负责技术支持和实验方法选择；李志明负责实验执行和成果数据分析；邹阳负责协助编制附图；朱涛负责论文的修订。所有作者均阅读并同意最终稿件的提交。

ZHI Dongming was responsible for the overall planning, structural design, and implementation of the paper. LENG Yunying was responsible for writing the paper. XIE An was responsible for the literature review. TANG Yong was responsible for the experimental design and comprehensive analysis of experimental results. HE Jinyi was responsible for data collection and analysis. HE Wenjun was responsible for technical support and selection of experimental methods. LI Zhiming was responsible for conducting experiments and analyzing the resulting data. ZOU Yang assisted with figure preparation. ZHU Tao was responsible for revising the paper. All authors have read the last version of the paper and consented to its submission.

HTML全文

图 1 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷大地构造位置与地层柱状图

Figure 1. Geotectonic position and stratigraphic column of Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷玛页1井风城组泥页岩岩石热解(S₁+S₂)与有机碳含量(TOC)的关系

Figure 2. Relationship between rock pyrolysis (S₁+S₂) and TOC contents in shale samples from Fengcheng Formation in well Maye 1, Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷风城组玛页1井泥页岩T_max值与R_o值随深度变化特征

Figure 3. Variation characteristics of T_max and R_o values with depth of shale samples from Fengcheng Formation in well Maye 1, Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷风城组玛页1井泥页岩I_H—T_max和I_H—I_O关系图

Figure 4. I_H vs. T_max and I_H vs. I_O of shale samples from Fengcheng Formation in well Maye 1, Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷玛页1井风城组烃源岩抽提物饱和烃m/z 85和m/z 125质量色谱图

Figure 5. Mass chromatograms of m/z 85 and m/z 125 of saturated hydrocarbons from source rock extracts of Fengcheng Formation in well Maye 1, Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷玛页1井风城组烃源岩样品Ph/nC₁₈—Pr/nC₁₇相关图

Figure 6. Ph/nC₁₈ vs. Pr/nC₁₇ of source rock samples from Fengcheng Formation in well Maye 1, Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷玛页1井风城组烃源岩抽提物饱和烃m/z 191和m/z 217质量色谱图

Figure 7. Mass chromatograms of m/z 191 and m/z 217 of saturated hydrocarbons from source rock extracts of Fengcheng Formation in well Maye 1, Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷玛页1井风城组烃源岩含油性与可动性的相关性

Figure 8. Correlation between oil content and mobility of source rock samples from Fengcheng Formation in well Maye 1, Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷玛页1井风城组泥页岩样品镜下特征

a-c.氩离子抛光电镜，4 671.7 m，主要储集空间类型为黏土矿物片间孔、长石溶孔，可见收缩缝；d-f.氩离子抛光电镜，4 715 m，主要储集空间类型为粒间孔、长石溶孔和白云石溶孔；g-i.氩离子抛光电镜，4 894.3 m，主要储集空间为粒间孔及黏土矿物片间孔，长石溶孔及白云石溶孔；j-k.普通薄片和荧光薄片，4 671.7 m，整体荧光现象明显，白云石胶结、溶蚀处粒间见黄绿色荧光，未被交代的自生碎屑颗粒呈亮绿色荧光；l-m.普通薄片和荧光薄片，4 715 m，整体荧光现象明显，白云石颗粒内部及周缘呈亮黄绿色荧光，粒间见亮绿色荧光，黏土矿物呈暗橙黄色荧光；n-o.普通薄片和荧光薄片，4 894.3 m，整体荧光现象明显，白云石颗粒内部及周缘呈亮黄绿色荧光，粒间见亮绿色荧光。

Figure 9. Microscopic characteristics of shale samples from Fengcheng Formation in well Maye 1, Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷玛页1井风城组烃源岩抽提物萜烷类化合物参数

Table 1. Selected parameters related to terpene hydrocarbons in source rock extracts from Fengcheng Formation in well Maye 1, Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin

地层	深度/m	C₂₀TT/C₂₃TT	C₂₁TT/C₂₃TT	C₂₄TeT/(C₂₄ TeT+C₂₃TT)	C₂₉H/C₃₀H	C₃₁H/C₃₀H	C₂₃TT/C₃₀H	Ga/C₃₀H	Ga/0.5C₃₁H(22R+22S)	C₃₁αβ22S/(22S+22R)	C₂₉M/C₂₉H	C₃₀M/C₃₀H
风三段	4 591.92	0.44	0.78	0.30	0.58	0.22	0.29	0.08	0.32	0.55	0.11	0.14
风三段	4 598.82	0.72	1.05	0.31	0.59	0.22	0.35	0.07	0.31	0.54	0.10	0.15
风二段	4 676.90	0.49	0.75	0.24	0.58	0.21	0.49	0.16	1.65	0.58	0.11	0.13
风二段	4 713.14	0.48	0.73	0.21	0.57	0.20	0.56	0.24	1.98	0.58	0.11	0.15
风二段	4 740.39	0.49	0.66	0.40	0.64	0.19	0.50	0.43	1.92	0.57	0.13	0.15
风二段	4 749.73	0.45	0.66	0.23	0.56	0.21	0.65	0.43	1.69	0.59	0.11	0.14
风一段	4 800.10	0.45	0.72	0.19	0.68	0.20	0.93	0.67	2.55	0.55	0.13	0.15
风一段	4 824.60	0.45	0.73	0.15	0.72	0.20	1.42	0.57	2.25	0.60	0.11	0.14
风一段	4 867.97	0.56	0.69	0.26	0.66	0.15	0.83	0.59	2.05	0.56	0.13	0.13
风一段	4 933.71	0.47	0.70	0.09	0.80	0.18	1.02	0.72	2.65	0.60	0.12	0.15
风一段	4 939.13	0.67	0.79	0.09	0.80	0.16	1.35	0.60	2.53	0.57	0.14	0.14

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(40)

[1]	陈建平, 王绪龙, 邓春萍, 等. 准噶尔盆地南缘油气生成与分布规律: 烃源岩地球化学特征与生烃史[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(7): 767-780. CHEN Jianping, WANG Xulong, DENG Chunping, et al. Geoche-mical features of source rocks in the southern margin, Junggar Basin, northwestern China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(7): 767-780.
[2]	唐勇, 曹剑, 何文军, 等. 从玛湖大油区发现看全油气系统地质理论发展趋势[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2021, 42(1): 1-9. TANG Yong, CAO Jian, HE Wenjun, et al. Development tendency of geological theory of total petroleum system: insights from the discovery of Mahu large oil province[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2021, 42(1): 1-9.
[3]	宋永, 杨智峰, 何文军, 等. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组碱湖型页岩油勘探进展[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2022, 27(1): 60-72. SONG Yong, YANG Zhifeng, HE Wenjun, et al. Exploration progress of alkaline lake type shale oil of the Permian Fengcheng Formation in Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2022, 27(1): 60-72.
[4]	许琳, 常秋生, 冯玲丽, 等. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组页岩油储层特征及控制因素[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(5): 649-660. XU Lin, CHANG Qiusheng, FENG Lingli, et al. The reservoir characteristics and control factors of shale oil in Permian Fengcheng Formation of Mahu sag, Junggar Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(5): 649-660.
[5]	杨帆, 孟鑫, 王先虎, 等. 玛页1井风城组页岩微观孔隙特征及其影响因素[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(1): 1-10. YANG Fan, MENG Xin, WANG Xianhu, et al. Micro-pore characteristics and influencing factors of Fengcheng Formation shale in well Maye-1[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2022, 43(1): 1-10.
[6]	支东明, 唐勇, 郑孟林, 等. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷风城组页岩油藏地质特征与成藏控制因素[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(5): 615-623. ZHI Dongming, TANG Yong, ZHENG Menglin, et al. Geological characteristics and accumulation controlling factors of shale reservoirs in Fengcheng Formation, Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(5): 615-623.
[7]	姜福杰, 黄任达, 胡涛, 等. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷风城组页岩油地质特征与分级评价[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(7): 899-911. JIANG Fujie, HUANG Renda, HU Tao, et al. Geological characteristics and classification evaluation of shale oil in Fengcheng Formation in Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(7): 899-911.
[8]	钱门辉, 王绪龙, 黎茂稳, 等. 玛页1井风城组页岩含油性与烃类赋存状态[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(6): 693-703. QIAN Menhui, WANG Xulong, LI Maowen, et al. Oil-bearing properties and hydrocarbon occurrence states of Fengcheng Formation shale in well Maye-1, Mahu Sag[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2022, 43(6): 693-703.
[9]	金之钧, 梁新平, 王小军, 等. 玛湖凹陷风城组页岩油富集机制与甜点段优选[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(6): 631-639. JIN Zhijun, LIANG Xinping, WANG Xiaojun, et al. Shale oil enrichment mechanism and sweet spot selection of Fengcheng Formation in Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2022, 43(6): 631-639.
[10]	支东明, 唐勇, 何文军, 等. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷风城组常规—非常规油气有序共生与全油气系统成藏模式[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2021, 48(1): 38-51. ZHI Dongming, TANG Yong, HE Wenjun, et al. Orderly coexistence and accumulation models of conventional and unconventional hydrocarbons in Lower Permian Fengcheng Formation, Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Deve-lopment, 2021, 48(1): 38-51.
[11]	张志杰, 袁选俊, 汪梦诗, 等. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组碱湖沉积特征与古环境演化[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(6): 972-984. ZHANG Zhijie, YUAN Xuanjun, WANG Mengshi, et al. Alkaline- lacustrine deposition and paleoenvironmental evolution in Permian Fengcheng Formation at the Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(6): 972-984.
[12]	钱永新, 邹阳, 赵辛楣, 等. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷玛页1井二叠系风城组全井段岩心剖析与油气地质意义[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(1): 204-214. QIAN Yongxin, ZOU Yang, ZHAO Xinmei, et al. Full core analysis and petroleum geological significance of Permian Fengcheng Formation in well-MY1, Mahu Sag[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(1): 204-214.
[13]	邹阳, 韦盼云, 曹元婷, 等. 碱湖型页岩油"甜点"分类与主控因素: 以准噶尔盆地风城组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(3): 458-470. ZOU Yang, WEI Panyun, CAO Yuanting, et al. Classification and main controlling factors of sweet spots of alkaline lake type shale oil: a case study of Fengcheng Formation in Junggar Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(3): 458-470.
[14]	PETERS K E. Guidelines for evaluating petroleum source rock using programmed pyrolysis[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1986, 70(3): 318-329.
[15]	CRANWELL P A, EGLINTON G, ROBINSON N. Lipids of aquatic organisms as potential contributors to lacustrine sediments—Ⅱ[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 1987, 11(6): 513-527.
[16]	DIDYK B M, SIMONEIT B R T, BRASSELL S C, et al. Organic geochemical indicators of palaeoenvironmental conditions of sedimentation[J]. Nature, 1978, 272(5650): 216-222.
[17]	DURAND B, ESPITALIÉ J. Geochemical studies on the organic matter from the Douala Basin (Cameroon)—Ⅱ. Evolution of kerogen[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1976, 40(7): 801-808.
[18]	KOOPMANS M P, DE LEEUW J W, SINNINGHE DAMSTÉ J S. Novel cyclised and aromatised diagenetic products of β-carotene in the Green River shale[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 1997, 26(7/8): 451-466.
[19]	LUO Qingyong, ZHONG Ningning, LIU Yan, et al. Organic geoche-mical characteristics and accumulation of the organic matter in the Jurassic to Cretaceous sediments of the Saihantala Sag, Erlian Basin, China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2018, 92: 855-867.
[20]	HANSON A D, RITTS B D, ZINNIKER D, et al. Upper Oligocene lacustrine source rocks and petroleum systems of the northern Qaidam Basin, northwest China[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2001, 85(4): 601-619.
[21]	XU Huiyuan, GEORGE S C, HOU Dujie. The occurrence of isorenieratane and 24-n-propylcholestanes in Paleogene lacustrine source rocks from the Dongying Depression, Bohai Bay Basin: implications for bacterial sulfate reduction, photic zone euxinia and seawater incursions[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 2019, 127: 59-80.
[22]	ATOYEBI A O, ADEKOLA S A, AKINLUA A. Tricyclic terpane geochemistry of source rocks from northwestern and central Niger Delta[J]. Petroleum Science and Technology, 2017, 35(22): 2094-2101.
[23]	SIMONEIT B R T, LEIF R N, RADLER DE AQUINO NETO F, et al. On the presence of tricyclic terpane hydrocarbons in Permian tasmanite algae[J]. Naturwissenschaften, 1990, 77(8): 380-383.
[24]	AQUINO NETO F R, RESTLE A, CONNAN J, et al. Novel tricyclic terpanes (C₁₉, C₂₀) in sediments and petroleums[J]. Tetrahedron Letters, 1982, 23(19): 2027-2030.
[25]	PHILP R P, GILBERT T D. Biomarker distributions in Australian oils predominantly derived from terrigenous source material[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 1986, 10(1/3): 73-84.
[26]	CLARK J P, PHILP R P. Geochemical characterization of evaporite and carbonate depositional environments and correlation of asso-ciated crude oils in the Black Creek Basin, Alberta[J]. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, 1989, 37(4): 401-416.
[27]	SUMMONS R E, JAHNKE L L, ROKSANDIC Z. Carbon isotopic fractionation in lipids from methanotrophic bacteria: relevance for interpretation of the geochemical record of biomarkers[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1994, 58(13): 2853-2863.
[28]	OURISSON G, ROHMER M, PORALLA K. Prokaryotic hopanoids and other polyterpenoid sterol surrogates[J]. Annual Review of Microbiology, 1987, 41: 301-333.
[29]	张立平, 黄第藩, 廖志勤. 伽马蜡烷: 水体分层的地球化学标志[J]. 沉积学报, 1999, 17(1): 136-140. ZHANG Liping, HUANG Difan, LIAO Zhiqin. Gammacerane geoche-mical indicator of water column stratification[J]. Acta Sedimentolo-gica Sinica, 1999, 17(1): 136-140.
[30]	HOLBA A G, DZOU L I, WOOD G D, et al. Application of tetracyclic polyprenoids as indicators of input from fresh-brackish water environments[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 2003, 34(3): 441-469.
[31]	VOLKMAN J K. A review of sterol markers for marine and terrigenous organic matter[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 1986, 9(2): 83-99.
[32]	HAO Fang, ZHOU Xinhuai, ZHU Yangming, et al. Lacustrine source rock deposition in response to co-evolution of environments and organisms controlled by tectonic subsidence and climate, Bohai Bay Basin, China[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 2011, 42(4): 323-339.
[33]	MICHAEL MOLDOWAN J, SUNDARARAMAN P, SCHOELL M. Sensitivity of biomarker properties to depositional environment and/or source input in the Lower Toarcian of SW-Germany[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 1986, 10(4/6): 915-926.
[34]	STROBL S A I, SACHSENHOFER R F, BECHTEL A, et al. Depositional environment of oil shale within the Eocene Jijuntun Formation in the Fushun Basin (NE China)[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2014, 56: 166-183.
[35]	王小军, 王婷婷, 曹剑. 玛湖凹陷风城组碱湖烃源岩基本特征及其高效生烃[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2018, 39(1): 9-15. WANG Xiaojun, WANG Tingting, CAO Jian. Basic characteristics and highly efficient hydrocarbon generation of alkaline-lacustrine source rocks in Fengcheng Formation of Mahu Sag[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2018, 39(1): 9-15.
[36]	朱扬明, 张春明, 张敏, 等. 沉积环境的氧化还原性对重排甾烷形成的作用[J]. 沉积学报, 1997, 15(4): 103-108. ZHU Yangming, ZHANG Chunming, ZHANG Min, et al. The effect of oxidation-reduction nature of depositional environments on the formation of diasteranes[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1997, 15(4): 103-108.
[37]	包建平, 王志峰, 朱翠山, 等. 柴达木盆地东坪地区一类新的原油及其地球化学特征[J]. 沉积学报, 2018, 36(4): 829-841. BAO Jianping, WANG Zhifeng, ZHU Cuishan, et al. A new kind of crude oils and the geochemical characteristics in the Dongping area, Qaidam Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2018, 36(4): 829-841.
[38]	KUMA R, HASEGAWA H, YAMAMOTO K, et al. Biogenically induced bedded chert formation in the alkaline palaeo-lake of the Green River Formation[J]. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9(1): 16448.
[39]	YU Kuanhong, ZHANG Zhijie, CAO Yingchang, et al. Origin of biogenic-induced cherts from Permian alkaline saline lake deposits in the NW Junggar Basin, NW China: implications for hydrocarbon exploration[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2021, 211: 104712.
[40]	XIA Liuwen, CAO Jian, LEE C, et al. A new constraint on the antiquity of ancient haloalkaliphilic green algae that flourished in a ca. 300 Ma Paleozoic lake[J]. Geobiology, 2021, 19(2): 147-161.