Reassessment of exploration directions of continental shale oil in Lower Jurassic Da'anzhai Member in northern Sichuan Basin
-
摘要: 川北地区下侏罗统大安寨段是四川盆地产油主力层系之一。近年来，随着非常规勘探理论的发展，开始转变思路针对大安寨段页岩储层开展勘探，川北地区陆相页岩油勘探方向的认识得到提高。基于LY1及YY2等页岩油探井的岩心、实验、钻井、压裂等资料，对其油气形成条件、资源潜力、工程地质条件等3个方面进行了再认识。研究表明：(1)阆中大安寨段二亚段页岩具备良好的资源基础和形成条件，勘探潜力巨大。大二亚段主要发育页岩、介壳灰岩、页岩夹介壳灰岩3种岩性，页岩烃源品质较好，整体处于中成熟—高成熟阶段，生烃强度为(20~90)×104 t/km2，滞留烃量占总生烃量的66%~78%，页岩油资源量为3.26×108 t；(2)研究区大二亚段页岩样品的裂缝网络不发育，具有渗流条件差、可钻性和可压性条件差的特征，基质型页岩油具有原油黏度大、含蜡量高的特征，页岩样品渗流条件和页岩油流动性之间的耦合配置关系是目的层高产的关键；(3)在目前基质型页岩勘探成效不佳的情况下，建议采用常规—非常规结合的勘探思路，对研究区页岩—灰岩互层型储层成藏体系进行研究，将优质页岩与裂缝—孔隙型灰岩的层段作为有利的勘探目标，通过地质—工程一体化研究方法，对可钻性、可压性及排采等方面的技术难题进行攻关，提升工程工艺水平。Abstract: The Da'anzhai Member of the Lower Jurassic in northern Sichuan Basin is one of the major oil-bearing formations in the basin. In recent years, with the development of unconventional exploration theories, exploration efforts have shifted towards the shale reservoirs in the Da'anzhai Member, enhancing the understanding of the exploration directions for continental shale oil in northern Sichuan. Based on the data from shale oil exploration wells LY1 and YY2, including core samples, experiments, drilling, and fracturing data, a reassessment of the oil and gas formation conditions, resource potential, and engineering geological conditions was conducted. The results indicate that: (1) The second submember of the Da'anzhai Member in Langzhong has a good resource base and formation conditions, indicating great exploration potential. The second submember mainly develops three lithologies: shale, shell limestone, and shale interbedded with shell limestone. The shale exhibits good hydro- carbon source quality and is generally in a middle to high-mature stage. Its hydrocarbon production intensity is (20-90)×104 t/km2, and the retained hydrocarbon accounts for 66% to 78% of the total hydrocarbon production, with a shale oil resource amounting to 3.26×108 t. (2) The shale samples from the second submember in the study area have poorly developed fracture networks, characterized by poor permeability conditions, difficult drilling and compressibility conditions. The matrix-type shale oil has high crude oil viscosity and high wax content. The coupling configuration relationship between the permeability of the shale samples and the fluidity of the shale oil is key to achieving high production in target layers. (3) Given the current poor production results in matrix-type shale exploration, it is recommended to adopt a combined conventional and unconventional exploration method to study the formation system of the shale and limestone interlayer reservoirs in the research area, considering high-quality shale and fracture-porosity type limestone as favorable exploration targets. Through the integration of geological and engineering research methods, efforts should be made to tackle technical challenges related to drillability, compressibility, and production, thereby improving engineering and technological levels.
-
Key words:
- shale oil /
- resource potential /
- exploration direction /
- Da'anzhai Member /
- Lower Jurassic /
- northern Sichuan /
- Sichuan Basin
-
图 1 川北地区构造分区(a)及LY1井下侏罗统大安寨段地层综合柱状图(b)
Figure 1. Tectonic zoning in northern Sichuan Basin (a) and comprehensive stratigraphic column of Da'anzhai Member of Lower Jurassic in well LY1 (b)
图 2 川北地区LY1井下侏罗统大安寨段二亚段典型岩性及岩性组合
Figure 2. Typical lithologies and lithological combinations of second submember of Da'anzhai Member of Lower Jurassic in well LY1, northern Sichuan Basin
图 3 川北地区下侏罗统大安寨段二亚段储集空间类型特征
a.黏土矿物层间孔、颗粒粒缘缝、矿物晶间孔、有机质孔发育，大部分孔缝见合金充注，连通性好，LY1井；b.介壳边缘发育缝隙，顺层分布，局部有溶蚀，LY1井；c.黄铁矿晶间孔发育，LY1井；d.有机质内发育丰富孔隙，LY1井；e.有机质碎片内孔隙较为发育，LY1井；f.微米级不规则平缝及高角度缝断续相接，LY1井；g.不规则张性缝，切穿介壳，LY1井；h.沥青颗粒内发育纳米孔隙，YY2井；i.见黄铁矿化介壳、溶蚀作用强烈及高岭石化的介壳，YY2井；j.页岩样品发育纳米—毫米级的微裂缝，YY2井。
Figure 3. Characteristics of reservoir space types in second submember of Da'anzhai Member of Lower Jurassic in northern Sichuan Basin
图 4 川北地区下侏罗统大安寨段二亚段不同岩性储集特征
Figure 4. Reservoir characteristics of different lithologies in second submember of Da'anzhai Member of Lower Jurassic in northern Sichuan Basin
图 5 川北地区LY1井下侏罗统大安寨段二亚段录井含油气显示
Figure 5. Oil and gas display in logging of second submember of Da'anzhai Member of Lower Jurassic in well LY1, northern Sichuan Basin
图 6 川北地区下侏罗统大安寨段二亚段黏土矿物分布特征(a)和不同地区页岩油储层岩石样品岩相分类三角图(b)
Figure 6. Distribution characteristics of clay minerals in second submember of Da'anzhai Member of Lower Jurassic in northern Sichuan Basin (a) and lithofacies classification ternary diagram of rock samples from shale oil reservoirs in different regions (b)
图 7 川北地区支撑剂嵌入实验分析结果
Figure 7. Analysis results of proppant embedding experiments in northern Sichuan Basin
图 8 川北地区裂缝扩展模拟实验结果
Figure 8. Simulation results of fracture propagation experiments in northern Sichuan Basin
图 9 川北地区LY1井应力剖面图(a)和压裂缝缝长数值模拟结果(b)
Figure 9. Stress profile (a) and numerical simulation results of fracture length (b) in well LY1, northern Sichuan Basin
表 1 川北地区下侏罗统大安寨段二亚段岩石样品有机地球化学参数统计
Table 1. Statistics of organic geochemical parameters of rock samples from second submember of Da'anzhai Member of Lower Jurassic in northern Sichuan Basin
岩性 (S1+S2)/(mg/g) ω(TOC)/% IH /(mg/g) 采样井/样品数 有机地球化学特征 有机地球化学评价结论 页岩类 0.2~19.63/6.13 0.23~4.16/1.63 51~304/192.28 YY2井/15，LY1井/40 Pr/Ph为1.0~1.4，有机质成熟度Ro为0.9%~1.5%，有机质类型为Ⅱ2型 中等—好品质烃源岩，中成熟—高成熟阶段 页岩夹
介壳灰岩类0.3~17.08/5.13 0.26~4.19/1.47 51~268/179.95 YY2井/34，LY1井/51 介壳灰岩类 0.33~14.74/3.4 0.26~3.39/1.07 70~253/152.22 YY2井/3，LY1井/7 注：表中数据意义为最小值~最大值/平均值。 
下载: 导出CSV
Table 2. Comparative analysis of shale oil formation conditions in different regions of China
区域 层位 岩性及岩性组合 w(TOC)/% 黏土矿物含量/% 孔隙度/% 孔隙半径/μm 孔喉半径/nm 裂缝特征 含油气性特征 吉木萨尔凹陷 芦草沟组 混积型 白云岩、粉细砂岩 0.15~16.8 5.2~51(15.97) 3.5~12.3 0.1~15 70~200 裂缝发育，但分布不均，多数裂缝被充填 大量可动油填充在储集空间，可动油占比较高 鄂尔多斯盆地 长7亚段 夹层型 页岩、粉砂岩、细砂岩 3.37~26.14 9.3~60.56(30.65) 0.7~15.86 2~8 20~120 裂缝发育，以未充填的构造裂缝为主，裂缝有效性好 有机质与页岩油伴生分布，气油比高、流动性好 沧东凹陷 孔二段 混积型 灰云岩、粉砂岩 0.2~10.12 10.12~55(13.91) 5~10 0.1~10 30~350 构造缝和层理缝最为发育 大量原油生成且富集于有机质网络中，原油黏度适中 济阳坳陷 沙河街组 混积型 灰质泥岩、泥质灰岩、泥质白云岩 0.1~4.8 14~45(17.4) 3.6~9.3 0.1~1 2~12 泥质、碳酸盐纹层呈现韵律互层，纹层密度2000~10 000层/m，微裂缝较为发育 具有泥生碳储特征，原油密度相对较小，游离油与吸附油共存，游离油为主 古龙地区 青一段 页岩型 长英质页岩 1.4~2.5 2~52(32.64) 0.5~14.2 0.01~0.03 4~7 宏观页理缝密度1 000~ 3 000条/m 页岩油在孔隙中呈繁星状均匀分布 川东地区 凉高山组 混积型 灰黑色页岩、含介壳页岩及粉砂岩 0.22~3.29 7.2~65.4(36.7) 1.27~10 0.1~10 20~300 暗色泥页岩页理缝密度10 ~50条/m，发育高角度构造裂缝 页岩油密度0.78 g/cm3、黏度8.18 mPa·s和含蜡量3.67%；优于川北大二亚段 川北地区 大二亚段 页岩型 黏土质页岩 0.14~3.71 37~62.5(51) 3~9.2 0.01~0.03 2~5 纹层欠发育，页理缝密度小于20条/m，以层状、块状为主，岩心可见页理 页岩油密度0.83 g/cm3、黏度24.2 mPa·s、含蜡量30.4%、沥青和胶质含量5.82%；具有高黏度、高含蜡、较高的沥青和胶质含量的特点，可动性差 注：表中数据含义为最小值~最大值(平均值)。
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 邹才能, 杨智, 王红岩, 等. "进源找油": 论四川盆地非常规陆相大型页岩油气田[J]. 地质学报, 2019, 93(7): 1551-1562.ZOU Caineng, YANG Zhi, WANG Hongyan, et al. "Exploring petroleum inside source kitchen": Jurassic unconventional continental giant shale oil & gas field in Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2019, 93(7): 1551-1562. [2] 高阳, 叶义平, 何吉祥, 等. 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷陆相页岩油开发实践[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(2): 133-141.GAO Yang, YE Yiping, HE Jixiang, et al. Development practice of continental shale oil in Jimsar Sag in the Junggar Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2020, 25(2): 133-141. [3] 马永生, 蔡勋育, 赵培荣, 等. 中国陆相页岩油地质特征与勘探实践[J]. 地质学报, 2022, 96(1): 155-171.MA Yongsheng, CAI Xunyu, ZHAO Peirong, et al. Geological characteristics and exploration practices of continental shale oil in China[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2022, 96(1): 155-171. [4] 刘惠民. 济阳坳陷页岩油勘探实践与前景展望[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2022, 27(1): 73-87.LIU Huimin. Exploration practice and prospect of shale oil in Jiyang Depression[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2022, 27(1): 73-87. [5] 方志坚, 巴晶, 熊繁升, 等. 利用机器学习与改进岩石物理模型预测页岩油层系横波速度[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2024, 59(3): 381-391.FANG Zhijian, BA Jing, XIONG Fansheng, et al. Shear wave velo-city prediction of shale oil formations based on machine learning and improved rock physics model[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2024, 59(3): 381-391. [6] 丁佳彤, 陈孔全, 汤济广, 等. 页岩气富集与保存条件差异研究: 以焦石坝—武隆地区为例[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2023, 58(6): 1472-1480.DING Jiatong, CHEN Kongquan, TANG Jiguang, et al. A study on differences of shale gas enrichment and preservation conditions: taking the Jiaoshiba-Wulong area as an example[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2023, 58(6): 1472-1480. [7] 崔航, 朱世发, 施振生, 等. 川北侏罗系大安寨段湖相混积层系沉积特征与发育模式[J]. 古地理学报, 2022, 24(6): 1099-1113.CUI Hang, ZHU Shifa, SHI Zhensheng, et al. Sedimentary characteristics and development model of lacustrine fine-grained hybrid sedimentary rocks in the Jurassic Da'anzhai Member, northern Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2022, 24(6): 1099-1113. [8] 杨跃明, 黄东. 四川盆地侏罗系湖相页岩油气地质特征及勘探开发新认识[J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39(6): 22-33.YANG Yueming, HUANG Dong. Geological characteristics and new understandings of exploration and development of Jurassic lacustrine shale oil and gas in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(6): 22-33. [9] 鄢彬, 舒能益, 杨雷, 等. 川北石龙场—柏垭油田油气层开发潜力评价方法及应用[J]. 地质力学学报, 2005, 11(3): 235-244.YAN Bin, SHU Nengyi, YANG Lei, et al. A method for evaluating the production potential of reservoirs in the Shilongchang-Baiya oilfield in northern Sichuan and its application[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 2005, 11(3) : 235-244. [10] 周德华, 孙川翔, 刘忠宝, 等. 川东北地区大安寨段陆相页岩气藏地质特征[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(5): 32-42.ZHOU Dehua, SUN Chuanxiang, LIU Zhongbao, et al. Geological characteristics of continental shale gas reservoir in the Jurassic Da'anzhai Member in the northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2020, 25(5): 32-42. [11] 杨光, 黄东, 黄平辉, 等. 四川盆地中部侏罗系大安寨段致密油高产稳产主控因素[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2017, 44(5): 817-826.YANG Guang, HUANG Dong, HUANG Pinghui, et al. Control factors of high and stable production of Jurassic Da'anzhai Member tight oil in central Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44(5): 817-826. [12] 黄东, 杨光, 韦腾强, 等. 川中桂花油田大安寨段致密油高产稳产再认识[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 37(5): 23-32.HUANG Dong, YANG Guang, WEI Tengqiang, et al. Recognition of high yield and stable yield factors of Daanzhai tight oil, Guihua oilfield[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2015, 37(5): 23-32. [13] 郭旭升, 胡东风, 李宇平, 等. 海相和湖相页岩气富集机理分析与思考: 以四川盆地龙马溪组和自流井组大安寨段为例[J]. 地学前缘, 2016, 23(2): 18-28.GUO Xusheng, HU Dongfeng, LI Yuping, et al. Analyses and thoughts on accumulation mechanisms of marine and lacustrine shale gas: a case study in shales of Longmaxi Formation and Da'anzhai Section of Ziliujing Formation in Sichuan Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2016, 23(2): 18-28. [14] 倪楷. 元坝地区大安寨段页岩气藏的形成条件[J]. 天然气技术与经济, 2012, 6(4): 13-16.NI Kai. Shale-gas reservoir-forming conditions in Daanzhai Section, Yuanba area[J]. Natural Gas Technology and Economy, 2012, 6(4): 13-16. [15] 魏祥峰, 黄静, 李宇平, 等. 元坝地区大安寨段陆相页岩气富集高产主控因素[J]. 中国地质, 2014, 41(3): 970-981.WEI Xiangfeng, HUANG Jing, LI Yuping, et al. The main factors controlling the enrichment and high production of Da'anzhai Member continental shale gas in Yuanba area[J]. Geology in China, 2014, 41(3): 970-981. [16] 彭嫦姿, 彭俊, 陈燕辉, 等. 四川盆地元坝地区大安寨段页岩气"甜点"地震预测[J]. 天然气工业, 2014, 34(6): 42-47.PENG Changzi, PENG Jun, CHEN Yanhui, et al. Seismic prediction of sweet spots in the Da'anzhai shale play, Yuanba area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2014, 34(6): 42-47. [17] 冯动军. 四川盆地侏罗系大安寨段陆相页岩油气地质特征及勘探方向[J]. 石油实验地质, 2022, 44(2): 219-230. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202202219FENG Dongjun. Geological characteristics and exploration direction of continental shale gas in Jurassic Daanzhai Member, Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2022, 44(2): 219-230. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202202219 [18] 杨建, 杨斌, 王良, 等. 川中大安寨段页岩油储层基质孔隙压裂液渗吸驱油侵入深度研究[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2023, 30(5): 84-91.YANG Jian, YANG Bin, WANG Liang, et al. Invasion depths of fracturing fluid imbibition displacement in matrix pores of Da'an Zhai shale oil reservoirs in central Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2023, 30(5): 84-91. [19] 刘苗苗, 付小平. 元坝地区陆相页岩气勘探潜力再评价[J]. 四川地质学报, 2020, 40(3): 416-421.LIU Miaomiao, FU Xiaoping. Reevaluation of exploration potential of continental shale gas in the Yuanba area[J]. Acta Geologica Sichuan, 2020, 40(3): 416-421. [20] 刘忠宝, 李倩文, 刘光祥, 等. 川北地区大安寨段页岩油气源、储特征及富集层段优选[J]. 地质学报, 2023, 97(10): 3421-3437.LIU Zhongbao, LI Qianwen, LIU Guangxiang, et al. Source and reservoir characteristics as well as optimization of favorable shale oil and gas enrichment intervals of the Da'anzhai Member in northern Sichuan[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2023, 97(10): 3421-3437. [21] 杨跃明, 文龙, 王兴志, 等. 四川盆地下侏罗统大安寨段页岩油气地质特征及勘探有利区优选[J]. 天然气工业, 2023, 43(4): 32-42.YANG Yueming, WEN Long, WANG Xingzhi, et al. Geological characteristics and favorable exploration area selection of shale oil and gas of the Lower Jurassic Da'anzhai Member in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2023, 43(4): 32-42. [22] 金涛, 白蓉, 郭蕊莹, 等. 四川盆地侏罗系常规与非常规油藏类型探讨[J]. 天然气与石油, 2021, 39(3): 73-81.JIN Tao, BAI Rong, GUO Ruiying, et al. Discussion on conventional and unconventional Jurassic reservoir types in Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas and Oil, 2021, 39(3): 73-81. [23] 杨跃明, 黄东, 杨光, 等. 四川盆地侏罗系大安寨段湖相页岩油气形成地质条件及勘探方向[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2019, 42(2): 1-12.YANG Yue, HUANG Dong, YANG Guang, et al. Geological conditions to form lacustrine facies shale oil and gas of Jurassic Daanzhai Member in Sichuan Basin and exploration directions[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2019, 42(2): 1-12. [24] 黄东, 段勇, 李育聪, 等. 淡水湖相页岩油气有机碳含量下限研究: 以四川盆地侏罗系大安寨段为例[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2018, 23(6): 38-45.HUANG Dong, DUAN Yong, LI Yucong, et al. Study on the TOC lower limit of shale oil and gas of freshwater lake facies: a case study on the Jurassic Da'anzhai Member in the Sichuan Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2018, 23(6): 38-45. [25] 何登发, 李德生, 张国伟, 等. 四川多旋回叠合盆地的形成与演化[J]. 地质科学, 2011, 46(3): 589-606.HE Dengfa, LI Desheng, ZHANG Guowei, et al. Formation and evolution of multi-cycle superposed Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 2011, 46(3): 589-606. [26] 李英强, 何登发. 四川盆地及邻区早侏罗世构造—沉积环境与原型盆地演化[J]. 石油学报, 2014, 35(2): 219-232.LI Yingqiang, HE Dengfa. Evolution of tectonic-depositional environment and prototype basins of the Early Jurassic in Sichuan Basin and adjacent areas[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2014, 35(2): 219-232. [27] 冯荣昌, 吴因业, 杨光, 等. 川中大安寨段风暴沉积特征及分布模式[J]. 沉积学报, 2015, 33(5): 909-918.FENG Rongchang, WU Yinye, YANG Guang, et al. Storm deposition of the Da'anzhai Member (Jurassic) in central Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2015, 33(5): 909-918. [28] 朱彤, 龙胜祥, 王烽, 等. 四川盆地湖相泥页岩沉积模式及岩石相类型[J]. 天然气工业, 2016, 36(8): 22-28.ZHU Tong, LONG Shengxiang, WANG Feng, et al. Sedimentary models and lithofacies types of lacustrine mud shale in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2016, 36(8): 22-28. [29] 李克, 葸克来, 操应长, 等. 湖相细粒沉积岩中晶粒方解石成因及其对火山—热液活动的指示: 以吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2023, 50(3): 541-552.LI Ke, XI Kelai, CAO Yingchang, et al. Genesis of granular calcite in lacustrine fine-grained sedimentary rocks and its indication to volcanic-hydrothermal events: a case study of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimusar Sag, Junggar Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2023, 50(3): 541-552. [30] 辛红刚, 田杨, 冯胜斌, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地典型夹层型页岩油地质特征及潜力评价: 以宁228井长7段为例[J]. 地质科技通报, 2023, 42(3): 114-124.XIN Honggang, TIAN Yang, FENG Shengbin, et al. Geological characteristics and potential evaluation of typical interlayer shale oil in the Ordos Basin: a case study of the Chang 7 Member of well Ning228[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2023, 42(3): 114-124. [31] 王文广, 林承焰, 郑民, 等. 致密油/页岩油富集模式及资源潜力: 以黄骅坳陷沧东凹陷孔二段为例[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2018, 47(2): 332-344.WANG Wenguang, LIN Chengyan, ZHENG Min, et al. Enrichment patterns and resource prospects of tight oil and shale oil: a case study of the second member of Kongdian Formation in the Cangdong Sag Huanghua Depression[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2018, 47(2): 332-344. [32] 刘雅利, 刘鹏. 陆相富有机质泥页岩中夹层特征及其作用: 以济阳坳陷为例[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2019, 26(5): 1-9.LIU Yali, LIU Peng. Interlayer characteristics and their effect on continental facies organic-rich shale: a case study of Jiyang Depression[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2019, 26(5): 1-9. [33] 柯钦, 王雷, 张莹, 等. 松辽盆地南部青一段泥页岩层系地质特征及页岩油有利勘探区带划分[J]. 石油地球物理, 2022, 57 (S1): 97-103.KE Qin, WANG Lei, ZHANG Ying, et al. Geological characteristics of mud shale series in Qing 1 member in southern Songliao Basin and division of favorable zones for shale oil exploration[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2022, 57 (S1): 97-103. [34] 金旭, 李国欣, 孟思炜, 等. 陆相页岩油可动用性微观综合评价[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2021, 48(1): 222-232.JIN Xu, LI Guoxin, MENG Siwei, et al. Microscale comprehensive evaluation of continental shale oil recoverability[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(1): 222-232. [35] 李楠, 洪海涛, 李国辉, 等. 四川盆地高陡构造区凉高山组页岩油气地质特征[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2022, 45(4): 86-95.LI Nan, HONG Haitao, LI Guohui, et al. Geological characteristics of shale oil and gas of Lianggaoshan Formation in high-steep structural zone, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2022, 45(4): 86-95. [36] 赵文智, 卞从胜, 李永新, 等. 陆相页岩油可动烃富集因素与古龙页岩油勘探潜力评价[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2023, 50(3): 455-467.ZHAO Wenzhi, BIAN Congsheng, LI Yongxin, et al. Enrichment factors of movable hydrocarbons in lacustrine shale oil and exploration potential of shale oil in Gulong Sag, Songliao Basin, NE China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2023, 50(3): 455-467. [37] 赵贤正, 金凤鸣, 周立宏, 等. 渤海湾盆地风险探井歧页1H井沙河街组一段页岩油勘探突破及其意义[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(10): 1369-1382.ZHAO Xianzheng, JIN Fengming, ZHOU Lihong, et al. Breakthrough and significance of shale oil exploration in member 1 of Shahejie Formation of well Qiye 1H, a risk exploratory well in Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(10): 1369-1382. [38] 刘惠民, 李军亮, 刘鹏, 等. 济阳坳陷古近系页岩油富集条件与勘探战略方向[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(12): 1717-1729.LIU Huimin, LI Junliang, LIU Peng, et al. Enrichment conditions and strategic exploration direction of Paleogene shale oil in Jiyang Depression[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(12): 1717-1729. [39] 祝海华, 陈琳, 曹正林, 等. 川中地区侏罗系自流井组大安寨段黑色页岩孔隙微观特征及主控因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(5): 1115-1126.ZHU Haihua, CHEN Lin, CAO Zhenglin, et al. Microscopic pore characteristics and controlling factors of black shale in the Da'anzhai Member of Jurassic Ziliujing Formation, central Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(5): 1115-1126. [40] 方锐, 蒋裕强, 杨长城, 等. 四川盆地侏罗系凉高山组页岩油地质特征[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2023, 28(4): 66-78.FANG Rui, JIANG Yuqiang, YANG Changcheng, et al. Geological characteristics of shale oil in the Jurassic Lianggaoshan Formation in Sichuan Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2023, 28(4): 66-78. [41] 梁狄刚, 冉隆辉, 戴弹申, 等. 四川盆地中北部侏罗系大面积非常规石油勘探潜力的再认识[J]. 石油学报, 2011, 32(1): 8-17.LIANG Digang, RAN Longhui, DAI Tanshen, et al. A re-recognition of the prospecting potential of Jurassic large-area and non-conventional oils in the central-northern Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2011, 32(1): 8-17. [42] 汪少勇, 李建忠, 李登华, 等. 川中地区公山庙油田侏罗系大安寨段致密油资源潜力分析[J]. 中国地质, 2013, 40(2): 477-486.WANG Shaoyong, LI Jiangzhong, LI Dengfa, et al. The potential of tight oil resource in Jurassic Da'anzhai Formation of the Gongshanmiao oil field, central Sichuan Basin[J]. Geology in China, 2013, 40(2): 477-486. [43] 韩克猷, 王毓俊, 查全衡. 川中侏罗系勘探潜力及勘探目标再认识[J]. 石油科技论坛, 2015, 34(6): 51-57.HAN Keyou, WANG Yujun, ZHA Quanheng. Exploration potential and targets of Jurassic system in central Sichuan[J]. Petroleum Science and Technology Forum, 2015, 34(6): 51-57. [44] WANG Enze, LIU Guoyong, PANG Xiongqi, et al. An improved hydrocarbon generation potential method for quantifying hydrocarbon generation and expulsion characteristics with application example of Paleogene Shahejie Formation, Nanpu Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2020, 112: 104106. [45] CHEN Zhuoheng, JIANG Chunqing. A data driven model for studying kerogen kinetics with application examples from Canadian sedimentary basins[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2015, 67: 795-803. [46] 刘惠民, 于炳松, 谢忠怀, 等. 陆相湖盆富有机质页岩微相特征及对页岩油富集的指示意义: 以渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷为例[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(12): 1328-1343.LIU Huimin, YU Bingsong, XIE Zhonghuai, et al. Characteristics and implications of micro lithofacies in lacustrine-basin organic-rich shale: a case study of Jiyang Depression, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2018, 39(12) : 1328-1343. [47] 何文渊, 蒙启安, 冯子辉, 等. 松辽盆地古龙页岩油原位成藏理论认识及勘探开发实践[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(1): 1-14.HE Wenyuan, MENG Qi'an, FENG Zihui, et al. In-situ accumulation theory and exploration & development practice of Gulong shale oil in Songliao Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(1): 1-14. -
图(9) / 表(2)
计量
- 文章访问数: 166
- HTML全文浏览量: 68
- PDF下载量: 35
- 被引次数: 0
苏公网安备32021102000780号