四川盆地北部灯影组四段台内地区油气来源及成藏过程

杨毅; 朱祥; 张雷; 徐祖新; 代林呈

doi:10.11781/sysydz2025020384

四川盆地北部灯影组四段台内地区油气来源及成藏过程

doi: 10.11781/sysydz2025020384

杨毅^{1, 2,},
朱祥^{1, 2},
张雷^{1, 2},
徐祖新^{1, 2},
代林呈^{1, 2}

1.
深层油气全国重点实验室，成都 610041
2.
中国石化勘探分公司，成都 610041

基金项目:

深层油气全国重点实验室开放课题 SKLDOG2024-KFYB-04

中国石化科技部项目 P23221

详细信息

作者简介:
杨毅(1996—)，男，硕士，工程师，从事海相油气成藏与目标评价研究。E-mail: 576170139@qq.com

中图分类号: TE122.1
计量
- 文章访问数: 88
- HTML全文浏览量: 34
- PDF下载量: 20
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2024-04-17
- 修回日期: 2025-02-08
- 刊出日期: 2025-03-28

Hydrocarbon sources and accumulation processes in intra-platform of the fourth member of Dengying Formation in northern Sichuan Basin

YANG Yi^{1, 2
,},
ZHU Xiang^{1, 2},
ZHANG Lei^{1, 2},
XU Zuxin^{1, 2},
DAI Lincheng^{1, 2}

1.
State Key Laboratory of Deep Oil and Gas, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China
2.
SINOPEC Exploration Company, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China

摘要

摘要: 四川盆地上震旦统灯影组四段台内地区是天然气勘探的重要接替领域。为落实川北灯四段台内地区油气成藏富集规律及分布特征，基于台内和台缘地区天然气和沥青地球化学特征、薄片鉴定以及流体包裹体等分析化验资料，开展了川北灯四段台内地区油气来源与成藏过程研究。研究表明：(1)与台缘地区相比，川北灯四段台内地区具有储层沥青碳同位素重，天然气甲烷、乙烷碳同位素重，甲烷氢同位素轻的特征，说明台内地区油气主要来源于筇竹寺组和震旦系烃源岩的混源，且震旦系烃源岩贡献较大；(2)川北灯四段台内地区油气藏存在2期油充注和2期天然气充注，第一期低熟油充注发生在加里东晚期，第二期规模原油充注发生在晚二叠世—中三叠世，第三期原油裂解气充注发生在中侏罗世—晚侏罗世，第四期天然气调整充注发生在白垩纪；(3)通南巴地区从油藏期到气藏期长期处于古构造低部位，古油气藏原油和天然气持续向米仓山前高部位调整运移，导致通南巴地区古气藏调整散失，现今含气性较差。南江地区源储配置关系好，在主要生油生气期均处于古构造高部位，能持续接受天然气充注，且断层封闭性好，有利于气藏保存与油气富集，是川北灯四段台内地区下一步有利勘探区。
- 油气来源 /
- 油气成藏 /
- 灯影组四段 /
- 上震旦统 /
- 台内地区 /
- 四川盆地北部
Abstract: The intra-platform of the fourth member of the Dengying Formation in the Upper Sinian of the Sichuan Basin is an important area for gas exploration. To clarify the hydrocarbon accumulation and enrichment patterns and distribution characteristics in this region, a study was conducted on the hydrocarbon sources and accumulation processes based on geochemical characteristics of natural gas and bitumen, thin-section observation, and fluid inclusion analysis of the intra-platform and platform margin areas. The results indicated that: (1) Compared to the platform margin areas in the fourth member of the Dengying Formation in northern Sichuan Basin, the intra-platform exhibited higher amounts of carbon isotopes in bitumen and natural gas methane and ethane, with smaller amounts of isotopes in hydrogen. This indicated that the oil and gas in the intra-platform mainly originated from a mixed source of the Qiongzhusi Formation and Sinian hydrocarbon source rocks, with a larger contribution from the Sinian source rocks. (2) There were two phases of oil charging and two phases of natural gas charging in the oil and gas reservoirs in the intra-platform of the fourth member of the Dengying Formation in northern Sichuan Basin. The first phase of low-maturity oil charging occurred in the Late Caledonian, the second phase of large-scale crude oil charging took place from the Late Permian to the Middle Triassic, the third phase involved crude oil pyrolysis gas charging during the Middle to Late Jurassic, and the fourth phase was natural gas adjustment charging in the Cretaceous. (3) The Tongnanba area has long been located in the lower part of the paleostructure from the oil accumulation to the gas accumulation period. The crude oil and natural gas from the paleo-oil and gas reservoirs continuously adjusted and migrated towards a higher position in the front of Micang Mountain, resulting in the loss of paleo-gas reservoirs in the Tongnanba area, which now has relatively poor gas content. The Nanjiang area had a more favorable source and reservoir configuration, remaining in the higher part of the paleostructure during the main oil and gas generation periods. It continuously received natural gas charging, and the fault sealing was good, which was conducive to gas reservoir preservation and oil and gas accumulation. Therefore, the Nanjiang area in the intra-platform is the next favorable exploration zone in the fourth member of the Dengying Formation in northern Sichuan Basin.
- hydrocarbon sources /
- oil and gas accumulation /
- the fourth member of Dengying Formation /
- Upper Sinian /
- intra-platform /
- northern Sichuan Basin
注释:

利益冲突声明/Conflict of Interests

所有作者声明不存在利益冲突。

All authors declare no relevant conflict of interests.

作者贡献/Authors’Contributions

杨毅负责论文写作和修改；朱祥、张雷参与论文的讨论和修改；徐祖新、代林呈参与论文校对。所有作者均阅读并同意最终稿件的提交。

The manuscript was drafted and revised by YANG Yi. ZHU Xiang and ZHANG Lei participated in the discussion and revision process. XU Zuxin and DAI Lincheng were involved in proofreading. All authors have read the final version of the paper and consented to its submission.

HTML全文

图 1 四川盆地北部筇竹寺组烃源岩厚度和灯四段台缘—台内丘滩分布(a)及地层综合柱状图(b)

Figure 1. Source rock thickness distribution in Qiongzhusi Formation and mound distribution in intra-platform and platform margin areas of the fourth member of Dengying Formation in northern Sichuan Basin (a) and comprehensive stratigraphic column (b)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 四川盆地天然气成因类型判识

底图据谢增业等^[25]，有修改。

Figure 2. Identification of natural gas genesis types in Sichuan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 四川盆地震旦系天然气、沥青与烃源岩干酪根碳同位素分布

干酪根碳同位素部分数据来自魏国齐等^[7]；高磨地区沥青数据来自帅燕华等^[28]、天然气数据来自谢增业等^[11]。

Figure 3. Distribution of carbon isotopes of natural gas, bitumen, and kerogen from source rocks in Sinian of Sichuan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 四川盆地震旦系—寒武系天然气乙烷碳同位素与甲烷氢同位素的关系

部分数据据参考文献[10]。

Figure 4. Relationship between ethane carbon isotope and methane hydrogen isotope in natural gas from Sinian to Cambrian formations of Sichuan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 四川盆地北部灯影组四段台内地区储层成岩—成藏序列、流体包裹体及激光拉曼特征

a.RT1井，8 135 m，孔洞依次充填早期石英(Qtz1)→早期沥青(Bit1)→中—粗晶石英(Qtz2)→晚期沥青(Bit2)；b.RT1井，8 134.73 m，孔洞中依次充填早期白云石(Dol1)→早期沥青(Bit1)→中—粗晶石英(Qtz2)；c.RT1井，8 131.12 m，孔洞中依次充填中—粗晶石英(Qtz2)→晚期沥青(Bit2)；d.RT1井，8 129.58 m，赋存在石英中的沥青包裹体；e.RT1井，8 130 m，赋存在石英中的早期甲烷包裹体和伴生盐水包裹体；f.RT1井，8 164.65 m，赋存在石英中的晚期甲烷包裹体；g.图d中沥青包裹体的激光拉曼谱图；h.图e中甲烷包裹体的激光拉曼谱图；i.图f中甲烷包裹体的激光拉曼谱图。

Figure 5. Diagenesis and accumulation sequence of reservoirs, characteristics of fluid inclusions and laser Raman spectroscopy of intra-platform in the fourth member of Dengying Formation, northern Sichuan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 四川盆地北部RT1井包裹体均一温度分布

Figure 6. Homogenization temperature distribution of fluid inclusions in well RT1, northern Sichuan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 四川盆地北部RT1井灯影组四段油气成藏事件及成藏时间

Figure 7. Hydrocarbon accumulation events and timing in the fourth member of Dengying Formation in well RT1, northern Sichuan Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 四川盆地北部灯影组四段台内地区油气成藏演化过程

剖面位置见图 1。

Figure 8. Evolution process of oil and gas accumulation in intra-platform of the fourth member of Dengying Formation, northern Sichuan Basi

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 四川盆地灯影组四段天然气组成、碳氢同位素数据

Table 1. Composition and carbon-hydrogen isotope data of natural gas from the fourth member of Dengying Formation, Sichuan Basin

井号	领域	天然气组成/%					天然气同位素/‰
井号	领域	CH₄	C₂H₆	N₂	CO₂	H₂S	δ¹³C₁	δ¹³C₂	δ¹³C_CO2	δD_CH4
RT1	川北台内	47.20	0.04	2.85	47.30	2.43	-27.0	-24.8	-3.2	-155
RT1	川北台内	59.90	0.05	3.32	35.30	0.99	-26.5	-24.1	-2.9	-155
GS125	高磨台内	79.15	0.03	1.43	18.80	0.50	-31.2	-27.7		-149
GS128	高磨台内	81.66	0.02	3.47	14.20	0.54	-32.1	-27.4		-157
GS18	高磨台内	92.15	0.04	1.10	6.04	0.60	-32.8	-29.6		-144
MX11	高磨台内	92.75	0.05	0.68	4.29	1.88	-33.9	-27.6		-138
MX122	高磨台内	92.46	0.04	0.79	5.14	1.50	-33.6	-27.8		-138
MX123	高磨台内	85.63	0.04	1.04	12.15	1.08	-33.4	-28.2		-140
MX126	高磨台内	92.32	0.03	0.56	5.90	0.49	-33.1	-29.6		-136
MX129H	高磨台内	92.71	0.02	2.00	4.11	0.79	-32.4	-28.7		-150
MX146	高磨台内	89.90	0.02	1.04	7.64	1.21	-32.3	-27.4		-147
MX17	高磨台内	92.45	0.03	1.09	5.42		-33.5	-28.9		-142
MX18	高磨台内	92.36	0.04	1.42	4.74	1.38	-33.7	-27.4		-146
MX23	高磨台内	88.54	0.04	8.50	2.33	0.34	-32.6	-28.6		-152
MX8	高磨台内	91.40	0.04	1.65	5.87	0.97	-32.8	-28.3		-147
GS1	高磨台缘	91.22	0.18	1.35	6.35	1.00	-32.3	-28.1		-137
GS10	高磨台缘	90.04	0.03	0.81	8.15	0.87	-33.4	-28.2		-144
GS101	高磨台缘	91.98	0.03	0.78	6.15	0.95	-32.5	-27.9		-140
GS102	高磨台缘	92.29	0.04	0.61	5.86	1.15	-33.2	-28.9		-138
GS103	高磨台缘	92.77	0.03	0.82	5.36	0.87	-33.4	-29.6		-139
GS120	高磨台缘	87.90	0.04	1.86	10.88	0.24	-32.5	-28.4		-139
GS133	高磨台缘	75.56	0.03	1.08	22.82	0.42	-32.1	-26.1		-145
GS2	高磨台缘	92.14	0.04	0.70	5.72	1.05	-33.1	-27.6		-139
GS3	高磨台缘	91.38	0.04	0.73	7.30	1.45	-33.1	-28.2		-138
GS6	高磨台缘	90.12	0.04	0.81	8.36		-33.0	-27.8		-139
GS7	高磨台缘	93.11	0.04	0.84	4.69	1.05	-33.0	-29.1		-140
GS8	高磨台缘	92.49	0.03	0.92	5.85		-32.8	-27.7		-144
GS9	高磨台缘	89.63	0.03	0.67	8.09	0.63	-33.5	-28.4		-142
MX102	高磨台缘	93.28	0.04	0.70	4.32	1.63	-33.7	-28.4		-136
MX103	高磨台缘	93.68	0.01	0.41	4.15	1.60	-33.4	-29.6		-137
MX105	高磨台缘	93.24	0.04	0.37	4.46	1.65	-32.0	-27.3		-138
MX108	高磨台缘	92.62	0.06	0.74	5.22	1.34	-33.8	-30.1		-137
MX12	高磨台缘	92.74	0.04	0.56	4.77	1.50	-33.1	-29.4		-137
MX13	高磨台缘	90.47	0.04	1.00	7.52	0.88	-32.9	-29.5		-141
注：高磨地区数据据参考文献[11]。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 四川盆地北部筇竹寺组干酪根碳同位素与灯影组四段储层沥青碳同位素数据

Table 2. Carbon isotope data of kerogen from Qiongzhusi Formation and bitumen in reservoirs of the fourth member of Dengying Formation, northern Sichuan Basin

井号或剖面	领域	岩性	类型	井深/m	地层	干酪根、沥青碳同位素/‰
RT1井	川北台内	深灰色泥岩	干酪根	8 065.66	筇竹寺组	-31.5
RT1井	川北台内	深灰色泥岩	干酪根	8 068.40	筇竹寺组	-31.5
RT1井	川北台内	深灰色泥岩	干酪根	8 070.85	筇竹寺组	-31.7
MS1井	川北台内	深灰色泥岩	干酪根	7 953.00	筇竹寺组	-29.4
MS1井	川北台内	深灰色泥岩	干酪根	8 020.00	筇竹寺组	-30.4
MS1井	川北台内	深灰色泥岩	干酪根	8 040.00	筇竹寺组	-30.7
南江贾郭山	川北台内	深灰色泥岩	干酪根		筇竹寺组	-33.1
旺苍民建村	川北台内	深灰色泥岩	干酪根		筇竹寺组	-34.1
宁强胡家坝	川北台内	灰色泥岩	干酪根		筇竹寺组	-33.1
RT1井	川北台内	藻白云岩	沥青	8 130.00	灯四段	-27.8
RT1井	川北台内	藻白云岩	沥青	8 130.34	灯四段	-27.9
RT1井	川北台内	藻白云岩	沥青	8 131.19	灯四段	-27.7
南江贾郭山	川北台内	藻白云岩	沥青		灯四段	-26.4
南江桥亭	川北台内	藻白云岩	沥青		灯四段	-27.4
南江杨坝	川北台内	藻白云岩	沥青		灯四段	-26.8
旺苍民建村	川北台内	藻白云岩	沥青		灯四段	-24.6
旺苍民建村	川北台内	藻白云岩	沥青		灯四段	-27.7
YS1井	川北台缘	藻云岩	沥青		灯四段	-31.2
YS1井	川北台缘	藻云岩	沥青		灯四段	-32.2
宁强胡家坝	川北台缘	藻白云岩	沥青		灯四段	-35.7
宁强胡家坝	川北台缘	藻白云岩	沥青		灯四段	-36.0

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(32)

[1]	戴金星. 威远气田成藏期及气源[J]. 石油实验地质, 2003, 25(5): 473-480. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200305473 DAI Jinxing. Pool-forming periods and gas sources of Weiyuan gasfield[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2003, 25(5): 473-480. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200305473
[2]	刘树根, 马永生, 孙玮, 等. 四川盆地威远气田和资阳含气区震旦系油气成藏差异性研究[J]. 地质学报, 2008, 82(3): 328-337. LIU Shugen, MA Yongsheng, SUN Wei, et al. Studying on the differences of Sinian natural gas pools between Weiyuan gas field and Ziyang gas-brone area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2008, 82(3): 328-337.
[3]	陈宗清. 四川盆地震旦系灯影组天然气勘探[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2010, 15(4): 1-14. CHEN Zongqing. Gas exploration in Sinian Dengying Formation, Sichuan Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2010, 15(4): 1-14.
[4]	邹才能, 杜金虎, 徐春春, 等. 四川盆地震旦系—寒武系特大型气田形成分布、资源潜力及勘探发现[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2014, 41(3): 278-293. ZOU Caineng, DU Jinhu, XU Chunchun, et al. Formation, distribution, resource potential and discovery of the Sinian-Cambrian giant gas field, Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(3): 278-293.
[5]	孙自明, 刘光祥, 卞昌蓉, 等. 四川盆地东部寒武系油气跨层成藏及天然气勘探意义[J]. 石油实验地质, 2023, 45(3): 504-516. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202303504 SUN Ziming, LIU Guangxiang, BIAN Changrong, et al. Cross-formational hydrocarbon accumulation of Cambrian sequences and its significance for natural gas exploration in eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2023, 45(3): 504-516. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202303504
[6]	帅燕华, 张水昌, 胡国艺, 等. 四川盆地高石梯—磨溪地区震旦系—寒武系天然气TSR效应及气源启示[J]. 地质学报, 2019, 93(7): 1754-1766. SHUAI Yanhua, ZHANG Shuichang, HU Guoyi, et al. Thermochemical sulphate reduction of Sinian and Cambrian natural gases in the Gaoshiti-Moxi area, Sichuan Basin, and its enlightment for gas sources[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2019, 93(7): 1754-1766.
[7]	魏国齐, 谢增业, 宋家荣, 等. 四川盆地川中古隆起震旦系—寒武系天然气特征及成因[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42(6): 702-711. WEI Guoqi, XIE Zengye, SONG Jiarong, et al. Features and origin of natural gas in the Sinian-Cambrian of central Sichuan paleo-uplift, Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(6): 702-711.
[8]	赵文智, 谢增业, 王晓梅, 等. 四川盆地震旦系气源特征与原生含气系统有效性[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2021, 48(6): 1089-1099. ZHAO Wenzhi, XIE Zengye, WANG Xiaomei, et al. Sinian gas sources and effectiveness of primary gas-bearing system in Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(6): 1089-1099.
[9]	谢增业, 李剑, 杨春龙, 等. 川中古隆起震旦系—寒武系天然气地球化学特征与太和气区的勘探潜力[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(7): 1-14. XIE Zengye, LI Jian, YANG Chunlong, et al. Geochemical characteristics of Sinian-Cambrian natural gas in central Sichuan paleo-uplift and exploration potential of Taihe gas area[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(7): 1-14.
[10]	魏国齐, 谢增业, 杨雨, 等. 四川盆地中部北斜坡震旦系—寒武系大型岩性气藏形成条件[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2022, 49(5): 835-846. WEI Guoqi, XIE Zengye, YANG Yu, et al. Formation conditions of Sinian-Cambrian large lithologic gas reservoirs in the north slope area of central Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2022, 49(5): 835-846.
[11]	谢增业, 魏国齐, 李剑, 等. 四川盆地川中隆起带震旦系—二叠系天然气地球化学特征及成藏模式[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2021, 26(6): 50-67. XIE Zengye, WEI Guoqi, LI Jian, et al. Geochemical characteristics and accumulation pattern of gas reservoirs of the Sinian-Permian in central Sichuan uplift zone, Sichuan Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2021, 26(6): 50-67.
[12]	张本健, 周刚, 宋泽章, 等. 川中古隆起北斜坡蓬莱气区上震旦统—下寒武统海相碳酸盐岩天然气多层系立体成藏[J]. 海相油气地质, 2023, 28(4): 401-412. ZHANG Benjian, ZHOU Gang, SONG Zezhang, et al. Multi-layers three-dimensional natural gas accumulation of the Upper Sinian-Lower Cambrian marine carbonate rocks in Penglai gas area, north slope of central Sichuan paleo-uplift[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2023, 28(4): 401-412.
[13]	牛思琪, 柳广弟, 王云龙, 等. 川中地区震旦系灯影组—寒武系龙王庙组储层焦沥青赋存特征与成因机制[J]. 石油实验地质, 2024, 46(5): 1039-1049. doi: 10.11781/sysydz2024051039 NIU Siqi, LIU Guangdi, WANG Yunlong, et al. Occurrence characteristics and genesis mechanism of pyrobitumen in Sinian Dengying to Cambrian Longwangmiao reservoirs in central Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2024, 46(5): 1039-1049. doi: 10.11781/sysydz2024051039
[14]	杨毅, 朱祥, 金民东, 等. 川北地区灯四段台内丘滩储层特征及主控因素[J]. 天然气技术与经济, 2023, 17(3): 24-31. YANG Yi, ZHU Xiang, JIN Mindong, et al. Intra-platform mound and shoal reservoirs of Dengying 4 Member, northern Sichuan Basin: characteristics and main influential factors[J]. Natural Gas Technology and Economy, 2023, 17(3): 24-31.
[15]	张宇慧, 朱正平, 罗文军, 等. 四川盆地高石梯地区震旦系灯影组四段微生物碳酸盐岩微相组合发育特征与储层主控因素分析[J]. 现代地质, 2023, 37(5): 1282-1292. ZHANG Yuhui, ZHU Zhengping, LUO Wenjun, et al. Development characteristics and reservoir controlling factors of microbial carbonate microfacies longitudinal assemblage in the Dengying Formation (the 4th member) of Sinian system in Gaoshiti area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(5): 1282-1292.
[16]	段金宝, 代林呈, 李毕松, 等. 四川盆地北部上震旦统灯影组四段储层特征及其控制因素[J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39(7): 9-20. DUAN Jinbao, DAI Lincheng, LI Bisong, et al. Reservoir characteristics and their controlling factors of the fourth member of Upper Sinian Dengying Fm in the northern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(7): 9-20.
[17]	陈泓位, 王时林, 和源, 等. 四川盆地中北部DB1井区灯影组四段沉积相及储层特征[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2024, 31(3): 31-41. CHEN Hongwei, WANG Shilin, HE Yuan, et al. Sedimentary facies and reservoir characteristics of fourth member of Dengying Formation in well DB1 area, north-central Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2024, 31(3): 31-41.
[18]	金民东, 李毕松, 朱祥, 等. 四川盆地东北部元坝地区及周缘震旦系灯影组四段储集层特征及主控因素[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(6): 1090-1099. JIN Mindong, LI Bisong, ZHU Xiang, et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors of reservoirs in the fourth member of Sinian Dengying Formation in Yuanba and its peripheral area, northeastern Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(6): 1090-1099.
[19]	李毕松, 代林呈, 朱祥, 等. 四川盆地震旦系灯影组沉积储层特征与勘探前景[J]. 地球科学, 2023, 48(8): 2915-2932. LI Bisong, DAI Lincheng, ZHU Xiang, et al. Sedimentary and characteristics of the Denying Formation and its exploration prospect in Sichuan Basin[J]. Earth Science, 2023, 48(8): 2915-2932.
[20]	李毕松, 金民东, 朱祥, 等. 川东北地区灯四段储层成岩作用及孔隙演化[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(6): 32-44. LI Bisong, JIN Mindong, ZHU Xiang, et al. Reservoir diagenesis and porosity evolution of the 4th member of the Dengying Formation in northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2023, 30(6): 32-44.
[21]	熊亮, 邓虎成, 吴冬, 等. 四川盆地及其周缘下寒武统筇竹寺组细粒沉积特征与影响因素[J]. 石油实验地质, 2023, 45(5): 857-871. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202305857 XIONG Liang, DENG Hucheng, WU Dong, et al. Fine-grained sedimentary characteristics and influencing factors of the Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation in Sichuan Basin and on its periphery[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2023, 45(5): 857-871. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202305857
[22]	魏国齐, 王志宏, 李剑, 等. 四川盆地震旦系、寒武系烃源岩特征、资源潜力与勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(1): 1-13. WEI Guoqi, WANG Zhihong, LI Jian, et al. Characteristics of source rocks, resource potential and exploration direction of Sinian and Cambrian in Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2017, 28(1): 1-13.
[23]	DAI Jinxing, SONG Yan, DAI Chunsen, et al. Geochemistry and accumulation of carbon dioxide gases in China[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1996, 80(10): 1615-1625.
[24]	吴小奇, 戴金星, 廖凤蓉, 等. 四川盆地东部天然气中CO₂的成因和来源[J]. 中国科学(地球科学), 2013, 43(4): 503-512. WU Xiaoqi, DAI Jinxing, LIAO Fengrong, et al. Origin and source of CO₂ in natural gas from the eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Science China (Earth Sciences), 2013, 56(8): 1308-1317.
[25]	谢增业, 李志生, 魏国齐, 等. 腐泥型干酪根热降解成气潜力及裂解气判识的实验研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(6): 1057-1066. XIE Zengye, LI Zhisheng, WEI Guoqi, et al. Experimental research on the potential of sapropelic kerogen cracking gas and discrimination of oil cracking gas[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27(6): 1057-1066.
[26]	TISSOT B P, WELTE D H. Petroleum formation and occurrence: a new approach to oil and gas exploration[M]. Heidelberg: Springer, 1978.
[27]	TISSOT B P, WELTE D H. Petroleum formation and occurrence[M]. 2nd ed. Heidelberg: Springer, 1984.
[28]	帅燕华, 刘可禹, 胡国艺, 等. 四川盆地深层前寒武系天然气超晚期成藏及勘探意义[J]. 地质学报, 2021, 95(11): 3400-3412. SHUAI Yanhua, LIU Keyu, HU Guoyi, et al. Gas accumulation mechanisms of the Sinian reservoir in the Sichuan Basin and their significance for deep gas exploration[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2021, 95(11): 3400-3412.
[29]	黄士鹏, 段书府, 汪泽成, 等. 烷烃气稳定氢同位素组成影响因素及应用[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(3): 496-508. HUANG Shipeng, DUAN Shufu, WANG Zecheng, et al. Affecting factors and application of the stable hydrogen isotopes of alkane gases[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(3): 496-508.
[30]	李剑, 杨春龙, 谢武仁, 等. 四川盆地安岳气田震旦系台缘带和台内地区天然气成藏差异性及勘探领域[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(1): 34-45. LI Jian, YANG Chunlong, XIE Wuren, et al. Differences of natural gas accumulation and play fairways in the marginal zone and interior of Sinian platform in Anyue gas field, Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(1): 34-45.
[31]	宋嘉琦, 肖晖. 川中古隆起震旦系灯二段流体包裹体特征与成藏过程[J]. 断块油气田, 2024, 31(5): 762-770. SONG Jiaqi, XIAO Hui. Characteristics of fluid inclusions and accumulation process in the second member of Dengying Formation of the Sinian in central Sichuan paleo-uplift[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2024, 31(5): 762-770.
[32]	杨毅, 王斌, 曹自成, 等. 塔里木盆地顺托果勒低隆起北部中下奥陶统储层方解石脉成因及形成时间[J]. 地球科学, 2021, 46(6): 2246-2257. YANG Yi, WANG Bin, CAO Zicheng, et al. Genesis and formation time of calcite veins of Middle-Lower Ordovician reservoirs in northern Shuntuoguole low-uplift, Tarim Basin[J]. Earth Science, 2021, 46(6): 2246-2257.