Volume 45 Issue 1
Jan.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
ZHANG Qingyu, JI Shaocong, ZENG Tao, XIA Wenqian, BA Junjie, DONG Hongqi, LIANG Bin. Experimental dissolution and karst strata association of Middle Permian Maokou carbonate rocks in the northern part of Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2023, 45(1): 175-184. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202301175
Citation: ZHANG Qingyu, JI Shaocong, ZENG Tao, XIA Wenqian, BA Junjie, DONG Hongqi, LIANG Bin. Experimental dissolution and karst strata association of Middle Permian Maokou carbonate rocks in the northern part of Sichuan Basin[J]. PETROLEUM GEOLOGY & EXPERIMENT, 2023, 45(1): 175-184. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202301175

Experimental dissolution and karst strata association of Middle Permian Maokou carbonate rocks in the northern part of Sichuan Basin

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202301175
  • Received Date: 2022-03-24
  • Rev Recd Date: 2022-11-25
  • Publish Date: 2023-01-28
  • Kart reservoir is important for the Middle Permian Maokou Formation in the northern part of Sichuan Basin. Based on field outcrops and drilling core data, combining both macro and micro methods, the characteristics of karst strata association of the Maokou Formation in this area was studied by the means of thin section observation, scanning electron microscope, major and trace elements and experimental dissolution. The first member of the Maokou Formation is dominated by marl and bioclastic micritic limestone, and the content of acid insoluble matter is high. The second and third members of the Maokou Formation are dominated by micritic bioclastic limestone and bright crystal bioclastic limestone, and the content of acid insoluble matter is low. The results of dissolution experiments show that the mineral type and chemical composition of carbonate rock are the main factors affecting the solubility of rock. The change characteristics of the dissolution rate of samples, solution ion concentration and micro dissolution are as follows: bioclastic limestone>micrite limestone>dolomite>argillaceous limestone. The karst strata association types of the Maokou Formation can be divided into 2 groups, 3 types and 9 subtypes. The karstification conditions and rock dissolution degree of different karst formation types are different, and the development scale of fracture cave karst reservoir is also different.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    袁道先. 中国岩溶学[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1994.

    YUAN Daoxian. Chinese karst science[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 1994.
    [2]
    翁金桃. 桂林岩溶与碳酸盐岩[M]. 重庆: 重庆出版社, 1987.

    Weng Jintao. Karst and carbonate rocks in Guilin[M]. Chongqing: Chongqing Publishing, 1987.
    [3]
    《中国北方岩溶地下水资源及大水矿区岩溶水的预测、利用与管理的研究》项目综合组. 中国北方寒武-奥陶系岩溶层组类型及其区域变化规律[J]. 中国岩溶, 1991, 10(2): 116-125. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGYR199102003.htm

    The working Group of the Research on Karst Groundwater-Resources in the North China and Prediction Utilization and Management of Karst Water in Mine Area. Karst strata association types of the Cambrian-Ordovician in North China and regularity of their regional variation[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 1991, 10(2): 116-125. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGYR199102003.htm
    [4]
    淡永, 梁彬, 曹建文, 等. 塔北哈拉哈塘地区奥陶系碳酸盐岩岩溶层组特征与溶蚀强度分析[J]. 石油实验地质, 2015, 37(5): 582-590. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201505582

    DAN Yong, LIANG Bin, CAO Jianwen, et al. Characteristics and solution intensity of karst formations in Ordovician carbonates in the Halahatang area of the northern Tarim Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2015, 37(5): 582-590. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201505582
    [5]
    郭旭升, 胡东风, 段金宝. 中国南方海相油气勘探展望[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(5): 675-686. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202005675

    GUO Xusheng, HU Dongfeng, DUAN Jinbao. Marine petroleum exploration in South China[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(5): 675-686. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202005675
    [6]
    胡东风. 四川盆地元坝地区茅口组台缘浅滩天然气勘探的突破与启示[J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39(3): 1-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201903001.htm

    HU Dongfeng. Breakthrough in natural gas exploration in the platform margin shoal at the Maokou Fm in the Yuanba area, Sichuan Basin, and its implications[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(3): 1-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201903001.htm
    [7]
    段金宝. 普光与元坝礁滩气田天然气成藏特征对比[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 38(4): 9-18. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNSY201604002.htm

    DUAN Jinbao. The comparative study of natural gas accumulation characteristics between Puguang and Yuanba reef-bank gas field[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2016, 38(4): 9-18. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNSY201604002.htm
    [8]
    施泽进, 张瑾, 李文杰, 等. 四川盆地Guadalupian统碳酸盐岩稀土元素和碳-锶同位素特征及地质意义[J]. 岩石学报, 2019, 35(4): 1095-1106. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201904008.htm

    SHI Zejin, ZHANG Jin, LI Wenjie, et al. Characteristics of rare earth element and carbon-strontium isotope and their geological significance of Guadalupian carbonate in Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2019, 35(4): 1095-1106. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201904008.htm
    [9]
    霍飞, 杨西燕, 王兴志, 等. 川西北地区茅口组储层特征及其主控因素[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 45(1): 45-52. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CDLG201801004.htm

    HUO Fei, YANG Xiyan, WANG Xingzhi, et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors of the Middle Permian Maokou Formation reservoir in northwestern Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition), 2018, 45(1): 45-52. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CDLG201801004.htm
    [10]
    张本健, 谢继容, 尹宏, 等. 四川盆地西部龙门山地区中二叠统碳酸盐岩储层特征及勘探方向[J]. 天然气工业, 2018, 38(2): 33-42. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201802006.htm

    ZHANG Benjian, XIE Jirong, YIN Hong, et al. Characteristics and exploration direction of the Middle Permian carbonate reservoirs in the Longmenshan mountain areas, western Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2018, 38(2): 33-42. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201802006.htm
    [11]
    钟原, 杨跃明, 文龙, 等. 四川盆地西北部中二叠统茅口组岩相古地理、古岩溶地貌恢复及其油气地质意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2021, 48(1): 81-93. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202101009.htm

    ZHONG Yuan, YANG Yueming, WEN Long, et al. Reconstruction and petroleum geological significance of lithofacies paleogeography and paleokarst geomorphology of the Middle Permian Maokou Formation in northwestern Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(1): 81-93. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202101009.htm
    [12]
    王兴志, 李博, 杨西燕, 等. 四川盆地北部中二叠世晚期"广元-旺苍"海槽特征及其油气地质意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2021, 48(3): 562-574. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202103012.htm

    WANG Xingzhi, LI Bo, YANG Xiyan, et al. Characteristics of "Guangyuan-Wangcang" trough during late Middle Permian and its petroleum geological significance in northern Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(3): 562-574. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202103012.htm
    [13]
    李乾, 徐胜林, 陈洪德, 等. 川北旺苍地区茅口组地球化学特征及古环境记录[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 45(3): 268-281. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CDLG201803002.htm

    LI Qian, XU Shenglin, CHEN Hongde, et al. Geochemical characte-ristics and palaeo-environmental implication of Middle Permian Maokou Formation in Wangcang region, Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition), 2018, 45(3): 268-281. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CDLG201803002.htm
    [14]
    何斌, 徐义刚, 王雅玫, 等. 东吴运动性质的厘定及其时空演变规律[J]. 地球科学, 2005, 30(1): 89-96. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX200501012.htm

    HE Bin, XU Yigang, WANG Yamei, et al. Nature of the Dongwu Movement and its temporal and spatial evolution[J]. Earth Science, 2005, 30(1): 89-96. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX200501012.htm
    [15]
    姚倩颖, 刘一锋, 江青春, 等. 川北—川东地区中二叠世晚期地层划分新认识及地质意义[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(2): 276-287. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202102276

    YAO Qianying, LIU Yifeng, JIANG Qingchun, et al. Geological significance of late Mid-Permian stratigraphy in northern and eastern Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(2): 276-287. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202102276
    [16]
    佘敏, 蒋义敏, 胡安平, 等. 碳酸盐岩溶蚀模拟实验技术进展及应用[J]. 海相油气地质, 2020, 25(1): 12-21. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HXYQ202001002.htm

    SHE Min, JIANG Yimin, HU Anping, et al. The progress and application of dissolution simulation of carbonate rock[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2020, 25(1): 12-21. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HXYQ202001002.htm
    [17]
    蒋小琼, 王恕一, 范明, 等. 埋藏成岩环境碳酸盐岩溶蚀作用模拟实验研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2008, 30(6): 643-646. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200806643

    JIANG Xiaoqiong, WANG Shuyi, FAN Ming, et al. Study of simulation experiment for carbonate rocks dissolution in burial diagenetic environment[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2008, 30(6): 643-646. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200806643
    [18]
    吴群, 彭金宁. 川东北地区埋藏史及热史分析: 以普光2井为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2013, 35(2): 133-138. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201302133

    WU Qun, PENG Jinning. Burial and thermal histories of northeastern Sichuan Basin: a case study of well Puguang 2[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2013, 35(2): 133-138. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201302133
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(8)  / Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (582) PDF downloads(43) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return