江汉盆地潜江凹陷潜江组非砂岩储层改造实验

侯献华; 张永生; 杨玉卿; 张海清

doi:10.11781/sysydz200706617

江汉盆地潜江凹陷潜江组非砂岩储层改造实验

doi: 10.11781/sysydz200706617

1.
中国地质科学院矿产资源研究所, 北京 100037
2. 中国地质科学院盐湖资源与环境研究重点开放实验室, 100037
3. 中国海洋石油总公司测井技术服务公司, 北京 101149
4. 中国石油化工股份有限公司石油勘探开发研究院, 北京 100083

详细信息

作者简介:
侯献华(1972- ),男(汉族),河北宁晋人,博士生,主要从事石油地质研究.

中图分类号: TE135.3
计量
- 文章访问数: 851
- HTML全文浏览量: 97
- PDF下载量: 368
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2007-04-11
- 修回日期: 2007-09-30
- 刊出日期: 2007-11-28

IMPROVEMENT EXPERIMENT OF NONSANDSTONE RESERVOIRS OF QIANJIANG FORMATION IN THE QIANJIANG SAG, THE JIANGHAN BASIN

1.
Institute of Mineral Resources, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China
2. Key Laboratory of Saline Lake Resources and Environment, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China
3. Logging Service Ltd, CNOOC, Beijing 101149, China
4. Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Production, SINOPEC, Beijing 100083, China

摘要

摘要: 组成江汉盆地潜江凹陷潜江组盐间段非砂岩储层的岩石主要为泥晶白云岩、钙芒硝岩、泥岩及其混积岩,孔渗性普遍较差。实验选用饱和盐水、饱和盐水+醋酸及饱和盐水+醋酸+盐酸等3种不同溶液,对王云10—6井潜二段的4号样(含钙芒硝泥晶白云岩)和王平1井潜三段的8号样(含云细—中晶钙芒硝岩)进行处理。由毛管压力曲线分析可知,处理后的岩样排驱压力明显减小,4号岩样降幅达62%,8号岩样达88%;最大孔喉半径显著增加,4号和8号岩样的增幅分别为187%和743%,孔喉分选系数得到明显提高;2个岩样的孔隙度分别增加了1倍多。实验结果表明,处理后的岩样骨架保持完好,孔渗性得到了有效改善。
- 毛管压力曲线 /
- 孔渗性 /
- 改造实验 /
- 非砂岩储层 /
- 潜江凹陷 /
- 江汉盆地
Abstract: Nonsandstone reservoirs between salt beds of Qianjiang Formation in the Qianjiang Sag of the Jianghan Basin are mainly composed of dolomicrite,glauberite rock,mudstone and their peperite.Porosity and permeability are commonly poor.In the experiment,sample No.4 of Member 2 of Qianjiang Formation in Well Wangyun 10-6(glauberite-bearing dolomicrite) and sample No.8 of Member 3 of Qianjiang Formation in Well Wangping 1(dolomite-bearing fine-medium crystalline glauberite) are processed with 3 different solutions:saturated saline water,mixture of saturated saline water and acetic acid,and mixture of saturated saline water,acetic acid and hydrochloric acid.Capillary pressure curves indicate that,expulsion pressures of the processed samples No.4 and No.8 decrease by 62% and 88% respectively.Maximum pore-throat radiuses increase by 187% and 743% respectively.There is obvious improvement in sorting coefficient of pore-throat too.In addition,porosities of both samples increase by over 100%.The experiment shows that,skeleton of the processed samples maintains intact,while porosity and permeability are improved effectively.
- capillary pressure curves /
- porosity and permeability improvement /
- experiment /
- nonsandstone reservoir /
- the Qianjiang Sag /
- the Jianghan Basin

HTML全文

参考文献(16)

[1]	王典敷,汪仕忠.盐湖油田地质[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1998
[2]	李兰斌,孙家振,陈文礼等.舞阳盐湖盆地地层压力特征与成因机理探讨[J].石油实验地质,2000,22(3):265～269
[3]	李兰斌,陈文礼.盐湖盆地的古厚度恢复[J].石油实验地质,2000,22(1):59～63
[4]	蒲秀刚,韩德馨,许怀先等.盐间非砂岩油藏中原油的均质性与非均质性研究[J].石油实验地质,2002,24(4):359～362
[5]	戴贤忠,李玲.江汉盆地下第三系泥岩粘土矿物特征和沉积环境的探讨[J].石油实验地质,1990,12(1):21～29
[6]	韩志刚,陈玉明,宋明雁.潜江凹陷隐蔽油气藏勘探技术[J].油气地质与采收率,2001,8(3):25～27
[7]	罗晓容,陈荷立,王家华等.江汉盆地地层埋藏史研究[J].石油实验地质,1989,11(4):369～378
[8]	王凤琴,陈荷立,罗晓容.江汉盆地新沟咀组排烃量初探[J].石油实验地质,1989,11(2):160～166
[9]	王韶华,宋明雁,李国雄.江汉盆地南部二叠系烃源岩热演化特征[J].油气地质与采收率,2002,9(3):31～33
[10]	蒲秀刚,江继纲.江汉盆地潜江组未熟烃源岩生油预测的化学动力学法[J].石油实验地质,2000,22(3):241～244
[11]	马安来,李贤庆,包建平.江汉盆地下第三系源岩有机岩石学研究[J].石油实验地质,2002,24(4):367～371
[12]	卢明国.江汉盆地江陵凹陷油气成藏期分析[J].石油实验地质,2004,26(1):28～30
[13]	戴世昭.江汉盐湖盆地石油地质[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1997.57～93
[14]	王国力,张永生,杨玉卿等.江汉盆地潜江凹陷古近系潜江组盐间非砂岩储层评价[J].石油实验地质,2004,26(5):462～468
[15]	彭彩珍,李治平.低渗透油藏毛管压力曲线特征分析及应用[J].西南石油学院学报,2002,24(2):21～24
[16]	罗蛰潭,王允诚.油气储集层的空隙结构[M].北京:科学出版社,1986.80～139