中国东部盆地喜山运动Ⅱ幕研究现状及问题

刘士林; 肖焕钦; 林舸; 鲁国明; 张德圣; 夏永健; 彭美丽

doi:10.11781/sysydz200802121

中国东部盆地喜山运动Ⅱ幕研究现状及问题

doi: 10.11781/sysydz200802121

1.
中国科学院, 广州地球化学研究所, 边缘海地质重点实验室, 广州, 510640
2. 中国科学院, 研究生院, 北京100039
3. 中国石化, 胜利油田有限公司, 山东, 东营, 257000

基金项目: 国家自然基金项目(40773004);中国科学院基金项目(MSGL07-23)

详细信息

作者简介:
刘士林(1982- ),男,博士生,主要从事盆地分析研究工作.E-mail:liushil@163.com.

中图分类号: TE121.2
计量
- 文章访问数: 787
- HTML全文浏览量: 52
- PDF下载量: 568
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2007-05-14
- 修回日期: 2008-02-29
- 刊出日期: 2008-03-28

PROGRESS ON THE SECOND EPISODE OF HIMALAYA MOVEMENT AND PRIMARY DISCUSSION ON THE EXISTING PROBLEMS IN BASINS OF EASTERN CHINA

1.
Key Laboratory of Marginal Sea Geology, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, CAS, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510640, China
2. Graduate School, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China
3. Shengli Oil field Company, SINOPEC, Dongying, Shandong 257000, China

摘要

摘要: 渐新世末至早中新世,喜山运动Ⅱ幕促使中国东部新生代含油气盆地由断陷沉降向整体坳陷转变,造成古/新近系地层的广泛不整合、盆内次级断层发育以及局部地区的正反转构造等特征;并且造成不整合面附近地层的沉积体系发育特征由渐新世末的滨浅湖、冲积扇和河流—三角洲相沉积为主到中新世的冲积扇—辫状河相沉积为主的转变。文中重点探讨了喜山运动Ⅱ幕活动时限、剥蚀程度、对油气成藏影响以及动力学机制等仍需解决的几个关键问题。其中剥蚀恢复研究是解决这些问题的关键,综合利用声波时差、磷灰石裂变径迹以及镜质体反射率等多种剥蚀恢复手段可以有效地研究喜山运动II幕的剥蚀程度。喜山运动II幕的成因主要存在板块碰撞导致的走滑挤压模式和岩石圈弹性回返模式的争议。
- 不整合 /
- 剥蚀 /
- 油气成藏 /
- 动力学机制 /
- 喜山运动Ⅱ幕 /
- 第三纪 /
- 中国东部盆地
Abstract: The change of subsidence model in Cenozoic petroliferous basins of Eastern China which goes from rifting subsidence stage in the Late Oligocene to whole thermal subsidence in the Early Miocene was caused by the second episode of Himalaya Movement.This movement resulted in some typical structure phenomena which are characterized by extensive unconformity in Eogene/Neogene strata,by the formations of secondary faults,and by the positive reverse structures in local areas.Accordingly,it caused the change of sedimentary systems in the up and down strata of E/N unconformity which was characterized by shore-shallow lacustrine facies,alluvial fan and fluvial-deltaic facies in the Oligocene to alluvial fan and braided fluvial facies in the Miocene.Four key problems were mainly discussed to elucidate the movement entirely,including the active period constraints,the denudation degrees,the effect on hydrocarbon reservoirs and its dynamic mechanism.Note that denudation degree research is the most important problem to this movement.Multiple methods(e.g.apatite fission track technique,vitrinite reflectance and acoustic time method) can be effectively used to reconstruct the denudation thickness of the second episode of Himalaya Movement.About this movement,there are chiefly two possible dyna-mic mechanisms.One is the transpressional mechanism related to the collision of plates;the other is the rebound mechanism of lithosphere.
- unconformity /
- denudation /
- hydrocarbon accumulation /
- dynamic mechanism /
- the second episode of Himalaya Movement /
- Tertiary /
- basins of Eastern China

HTML全文

参考文献(34)

[1]	Huang T K.On major tectonic forms of China[A].Geol Memoirs Ser A,1945,20:165
[2]	易明初,李晓.燕山地区喜马拉雅期地壳运动划分及表现特征[J].现代地质,1995,9(3):325 ～336
[3]	贾承造,何登发,陆洁民.中国喜马拉雅运动的期次及其动力学背景[J].石油与天然气地质,2004,25(2):121 ～125
[4]	张树林,费琪,叶加仁.渤海湾盆地边缘凹陷的构造意义[J].石油实验地质,2006,28(5):5～9
[5]	刘士林,林舸,周叶等.南堡凹陷沉积岩化学元素分布特征及多元统计方法研究[J].地质与资源,2006,15(3):212 ～217
[6]	姚益民,梁鸿基,蔡治国.中国油气区第三系Ⅳ渤海湾盆地分册[M].北京:石油工业出版杜,1994.128 ～240
[7]	蔡希源,王根海,迟远林.中国油气区反转构造[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2001.172～185
[8]	高树新,任怀强,杨少春.渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷陈家庄凸起东段北斜坡油源特征及成藏分析[J].石油实验地质,2007,29(1):73～77
[9]	胜利油田石油地质志编辑委员会.中国石油地质志卷六胜利油田[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1993.83～160
[10]	王燮培,宋廷光.从松辽盆地的反转构造看中国东部盆地构造圈闭的形成[J].地球科学,1996,21(4):373～382
[11]	Allen M B,Macdonald D I M,Zhao Xun,et al.Early Cenozoic two-phase extension and late Cenozoic thermal subsidence and inversion of the Bohai Basin,northern China[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,1997,14:951～972
[12]	Green P F,Duddy I R,Bray R J.Applications of thermal history reconstruction in inversion[A].In:Buchanan J G,Buchanan P G,eds.Basin inversion,Geological Society Specifical Publish 88[C].London:Geological Society,1995.149～165
[13]	Hill K C,Hill K A.Inversion around the Bass basin,SE Australia[A].In:Buchanan J G,Buchanan P G,eds.Basin inversion,Geological Society Specifical Publish 88[C].London:Geological Society,1995.525～547
[14]	朱文斌,万景林,舒良树等.裂变径迹定年技术在构造演化研究中的应用[J].高校地质学报,2005,11(4):593～600
[15]	Zhao Mengwei,Hans-Jürgen Behr,Hans Ahrendt,et al.Thermal and tectonic history of the Ordos Basin,China:evidence from apatite fission track analysis,vitrinite reflectance,and K-Ar dating[J].AAPG,1996,80(7):1110～1134
[16]	Zhu Wenbin,Wan Jingling,Shu Liangshu.Mesozoic-Cenozoic thermal history of Turpan-Hami Basin:apatite fission track constrains[J].Progress in Natural Science,2005,15(3):331～336
[17]	韩用兵,王良书,刘绍文.渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷沙四段和孔店组地层剥蚀厚度恢复[J].高校地质学报,2004,10(3):440～450
[18]	吴智平,史卜庆,周瑶琪等.济阳坳陷新老第三纪地层间断面研究[J].石油与天然气地质,1998,19(4):313～317
[19]	吴智平,韩文功.济阳坳陷早晚第三纪沉积间断地层剥蚀量研究[J].中国海上油气(地质),2000,14(5):320～323
[20]	吴智平,刘继国,张卫海等.辽河盆地东部凹陷北部地区新老第三纪界面地层剥蚀量研究[J].高校地质学报,2001,7(1):99～105
[21]	郭随平,施小斌,王良书等.胜利油区东营凹陷热史分析:磷灰石裂变径迹证据[J].石油与天然气地质,1996,17(1):32～36
[22]	杨绪充.济阳坳陷中新生代古地温分析[J].石油大学学报(自然科学版),1998,12(3):23～33
[23]	卢明国,童小兰.江陵凹陷新老第三纪间断面地层剥蚀厚度研究[J].矿物岩石,2004,24(1):93～96
[24]	王子煜,张明利.东海西湖凹陷新生界主要不整合面地层剥蚀厚度恢复[J].地质论评,2005,51(3):309～319
[25]	鲁国明.济阳坳陷第三系地层油藏形成机制研究[D] :[学位论文].广州:中国科学院广州地球化学研究所,2005
[26]	史卜庆,吴智平,王继祥等.渤海湾盆地东营运动的特征及成因分析[J].石油实验地质,1999,21(3):196～200
[27]	田世澄,陈永进,崔刚.中国东部盆地区晚第三纪末抬升剥蚀类型及其石油地质意义[J].现代地质,2003,17(2):202
[28]	陈嘉树.济阳运动的特点及其对济阳坳陷的影响[J].石油实验地质,1993,15(1):86～99
[29]	Northrup C J,Royden L H,Burchfiel B C.Motion of the Pacific plate relative to Eurasia and its potential relation to Cenozoic extension along the eastern margin of Eurasia[J].Geology,1995,23(8):719 ～722
[30]	万天丰.论构造时间的节律性[J].地学前缘,1997,4(3-4):257～262
[31]	吕修祥,张一伟,李德生.从波动观点看渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷油气田分布[J].石油实验地质,1996,18(3):258～266
[32]	李德生.渤海湾含油气盆地的构造特征与油气田分布规律[A].见:张文昭编.中国陆相大油田[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1997.120～134
[33]	陈发景.盆地分析:伸展盆地[M].北京:中国地质大学出版社,1992.82～97
[34]	侯贵廷,钱祥麟,宋新民.渤海湾盆地形成机制研究[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),1998,34(4):503～509