STUDY ON THE MIDDLE-LOWER PERMIAN SEQUENCE STRATIGRAPHY IN NORTHEASTERN AREA, THE SICHUAN BASIN
-
摘要: 在野外地质剖面实测、岩性地层、沉积相和可容空间变化分析的基础上,运用层序地层学的原理,对川东北地区宣汉县渡口镇羊鼓洞中—下二叠统剖面的层序地层进行研究,识别出3种类型6个层序界面,将中—下二叠统划分为2个Ⅱ级、5个Ⅲ级层序地层,其中在梁山组、栖霞组和茅口组分别识别出1、2和2个Ⅲ级层序地层。在II级层序中,低位体系域主要发育滨岸沼泽相沉积,海侵体系域沉积相主要为局限台地或碳酸盐缓坡,高位体系域主要发育开阔台地沉积。同时,在层序划分的基础上建立了川东北地区中—下二叠统的层序地层格架。将可容空间变化曲线与露头层序地层划分之间进行对比,发现二者之间存在着良好的对应关系,这也佐证了层序地层划分的正确性。Abstract: On the basis of sequence stratigraphic theory and the analysis of sedimentary facies,lithology and lithofacies and change of accommodation of field profile,the Middle-Lower Permian sequences stratigraphy at Yanggudong profile in Dukou town,Xuanhan County,Northeastern of the Sichuan Basin were studied.Three types,six stratigraphic sequence boundaries were discriminated.One grade Ⅱ sequence and five grade Ⅲ sequences in Middle-Lower Permian,one grade Ⅲ sequence in Liangshan Formation,two grade Ⅲ sequences in Qixia Formation and two grade Ⅲ sequences in Maokou Formation were determined.In grade Ⅱ sequence,strand swamp facies was mainly developed in lowstand systems tract,restraint platform facies or carbonate gentle slope facies in transgressive systems tract and open platform facies mainly in highstand systems tract.At the same time sequence stratigraphic framework of the Middle-Lower Permian was built.By the comparison of the change of accommodation curve and outcrop stratigraphic sequence curve,there was a very well corresponding relation between the two curves,which implied the correct of classification of the sequence stratigraphy.
-
[1] 魏魁生,徐怀大,叶淑芬.四川盆地层序地层特征[J].石油与天然气地质,1997,18(2):151~157 [2] 陈洪德,彭军,侯中建等.上扬子克拉通南缘中泥盆统-石炭系高频层序及复合海平面变化[J].沉积学报,2000,18(2):181~189 [3] 陈洪德,庞林,倪新锋等.中上扬子地区海相油气勘探前景[J].石油实验地质,2007,29(1):13~18 [4] 徐强,刘宝珺,何汉漪等.四川晚二叠世生物礁层序地层岩相古地理编图[J].石油学报,2004,25(2):47~50 [5] 王鸿祯,史晓颖,王训练等.中国层序地层研究[M].广州:广东科技出版社,2000.1~30 [6] 汪泽成,赵文治,张林等.四川盆地构造层序与天然气勘探[M].北京:地质出版社,2002.3~26 [7] 马永生,牟传龙,郭彤楼等.四川盆地东北部长兴组层序地层与储层分布[J].地学前缘,2005,12(3):179~185 [8] 张渝昌.中国含油气盆地原型分析[M].南京:南京大学出版社,1997.65~73 [9] 沈守文,彭大钧,颜其彬等.吐哈盆地侏罗系层序地层学研究[J].沉积学报,2001,19(2):261~269 [10] 梅冥相,周洪瑞,杜本明等.雾迷山旋回层的相序组构特征及其在长周期层序中的有序叠加形式:来自前寒武纪的米兰柯维奇旋回[J].现代地质——中国地质大学研究生院学报,1999,13(2):226~227 [11] 张海峰.以米氏旋回为标尺进行高级别层序地层划分与对比[J].油气地质与采收率,2006,13(4):24~26 [12] Read J F,Goldhammer R K.Use of Fischer plots to define third order sea level curses in peritidal cyclic carbonates,Early Ordovician,Appalachians[J].Geology,1988,16:895~899 [13] 李凤杰,王多云,王峰等.坳陷湖盆三角洲前缘储层砂体成因研究[J].石油实验地质,2007,29(1):63~68 [14] 李凤杰,王多云,张庆龙等.鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区延长组沉积相特征与层序地层分析[J].沉积学报,2006,24(4):549~554 [15] 李凤杰,郑荣才,罗清林等.四川盆地东北地区长兴组米兰科维奇周期分析[J].中国矿业大学学报,2007,36(6):805~810 [16] Sadler P M,Osleger D A,Montanez I P.On the labeling,length,and objective basis of Fischer plots[J].Journal of Sedimentary Petrology,1993,63(3):360~368
计量
- 文章访问数: 903
- HTML全文浏览量: 63
- PDF下载量: 282
- 被引次数: 0