不同类型生烃模拟实验方法对比与关键技术

米敬奎; 张水昌; 王晓梅

doi:10.11781/sysydz200904409

不同类型生烃模拟实验方法对比与关键技术

doi: 10.11781/sysydz200904409

米敬奎^1,2,3,
张水昌^1,2,3,
王晓梅^1,2,3

1.
中国石油勘探开发研究院实验研究中心, 北京 100083
2. 中国石油勘探开发研究院有机地球化学重点实验室, 北京 100083
3. 中国石油勘探开发研究院提高石油采收率国家重点实验室, 北京 100083

基金项目: 中国石油天然气股份有限公司2007重大专项项目(07-02Z-01-01)

详细信息

作者简介:
米敬奎(1966- ),男,教授,主要从事有机地球化学和有机岩石学研究.E-mail:jkmi@petrochina.com.cn.

中图分类号: TE135
计量
- 文章访问数: 1478
- HTML全文浏览量: 78
- PDF下载量: 948
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2008-12-22
- 修回日期: 2009-05-31
- 刊出日期: 2009-08-28

COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT HYDROCARBON GENERATION SIMULATION APPROACHES AND KEY TECHNIQUE

1.
Experiment Research Center, Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, PetroChina, Beijing 100083, China
2. Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, PetroChina, Beijing 100083, China
3. State Key Laboratory of Hydrocarbon Recovery Factor Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, PetroChina, Beijing 100083, China

摘要

摘要: 有机源岩生烃模拟实验是油气资源评价、油气源对比等研究中非常重要的技术手段.目前,该实验方法按其体系封闭程度可分为开放、半开放和封闭3种,各具优缺点,可根据不同的研究目的选择不同的模拟实验方法.实验过程中实际反应温度的测定是否准确,主要由实验体系的结构决定,对实验数据的应用效果影响非常大.不同类型样品在同一体系、不同压力条件下的系统实验,对弄清压力对生烃过程的影响具有非常重要的意义.
- 模拟实验 /
- 生气能力 /
- 开放体系 /
- 封闭体系 /
- 半开放体系
Abstract: Hydrocarbon generation simulation experiment is an important approach in resource assessment and confirmation.The experiment system can be divided into 3 types:open,semi-open and closed.Different system has different advantage and disadvantage,and can be chosen to resolve different problems.The accuracy of reaction temperature,mostly determined by the frame of simulation system,has great influence on the application of experiment results.Experiments of different samples under different pressure in the same simulation system are important for researches of influence of pressure on hydrocarbon generation.
- simulation experiment /
- gas generation capacity /
- open system /
- closed system /
- semi-open system

HTML全文

参考文献(35)

[1]	Waples D W.Time and temperature in petroleum exploration[J].AAPG Bulletin,1980,64:916-926
[2]	Lopatian N V.Temperature and geologic time as factors in coalification[J].IZV Akad Nauk SSSR Ser Geol Izvestiya,1971,3:95-106
[3]	Eisma E,Jurg J W.Fundamental aspects of diagenesis of organic matter and the formation of hydrocarbon[A].In:Proceedings of 7th world petroleum congress[C].London:Applied Science Pub,1967
[4]	Henderson W,Eglinton G,Simmods P,et al.Thermal alteration as contributory process to genesis of petroleum[J].Nature,1968,209:1012-1016
[5]	Brooks J D,Smith J W.The diagenesis of plant liquids during the formation of coal,petroleum and natural gas-Ⅱ.Coalification and the formation of oil and gas in Gippsland Basin[J].Geochim et Cosmochim Acta,1969,33:1183-1194
[6]	Tissot B P,Welte D H.Petroleum formation and occurrence:a new approach to oil and gas exploration[M].Berlin:Springer-Verlag,1978
[7]	Hunt J M.Petroleum geochemistry and geology[M].San Francisco:Freeman,1979
[8]	Durand B M,Monin J C.Kerogen[M].Paris:Editions Technip,1980
[9]	汪本善,刘德汉,张丽洁等.渤海湾盆地黄骅拗陷石油演化特征及人工模拟实验研究[J].石油学报,1980,1(1):43-51
[10]	刘德汉,周中毅,贾蓉芬等.碳酸盐生油岩中沥青变质程度和沥青热变质实验[J].地球化学,1982,(3):237-243
[11]	傅家谟,徐世平,盛国英等.抚顺煤树脂体成烃的初步研究(Ⅱ)[A].见:中国科学院地球化学研究所有机地球化学开放研究实验室编.中国科学院地球化学研究所有机地球化学开放研究实验室研究年报[R].北京:科学出版社,1987.13-22
[12]	刘德汉,傅家谟,戴童谟等.煤成气和煤成油产出阶段和特征的初步研究[A].见:中国科学院地球化学研究所编.中国科学院地球化学研究所年报[R].贵阳:贵州人民出版社,1986.185-196
[13]	张惠之,刘德汉,傅家谟等.不同煤岩组分的热解成气实验研究[A].见:中国科学院地球化学研究所编.中国科学院地球化学研究所年报[R].贵阳:贵州人民出版社,1986.150-152
[14]	Cramer B,Faber E,Gerling D,et al.Reaction kinetics of stable carbon isotope in natural gas-insights from dry,open system pyrolysis experiments[J].Energy and Fuels,2001,15:517-532
[15]	Berner U,Faber E,Stahl W.Mathematical simulation of the carbon isotopic fraction between huminitic coals and related methane[J].Chemical Geology,1992,94:315-39
[16]	Berner U,Fabe E,Scheeder G,et al.Primary cracking of algal and landplant kerogens:kinetic models of isotope variations in methane,ethane and propane[J].Chemical Geology,1995,126:233-245
[17]	刘光祥.塔里木盆地S74井稠油热模拟实验研究(一)—模拟产物地球化学特征[J].石油实验地质,2008,30(2):179-185
[18]	刘光祥.塔里木盆地S74井稠油热模拟实验研究(二)—沥青生烃潜力探讨[J].石油实验地质,2008,30 (4):382-385
[19]	胡国艺,李振铎,李志生等.降温热模拟实验中烃源岩成熟度和产气率的变化特征[J].石油与天然气地质,2006,27(2):253-257
[20]	张欣国,缪九军,徐良发等.煤岩二次生烃模拟中生烃潜量损耗量研究[J].石油实验地质,2008,30(4):792-796
[21]	刘全有,刘文汇,王晓锋等.不同烃源岩实验评价方法的对比[J].石油实验地质,2007,29(1):88-93
[22]	田静,王云鹏,刘德汉等.利用全岩热模拟方法研究海相烃源岩生排烃过程及影响因素[J].油气地质与采收率,2008,15(3):29-31
[23]	曹建军,孔凡顺,彭木高.煤成气生气量热模拟实验条件对比综述[J].油气地质与采收率,2004,11(5):14-16
[24]	张守春,张林.压力抑制条件下生烃定量模拟实验研究—以渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷为例[J].石油实验地质,2008,30(5):522-526
[25]	孟庆强,马亮帮.不同藻类热模拟实验的生烃特征对比[J].石油实验地质,2008,30(3):281-285
[26]	刘金钟,唐永春.用干酪根生烃动力学方法预测甲烷生烃量之一例[J].科学通报,1998,43(11):1187-1191
[27]	付少英,彭平安,张文正等.鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界煤的生烃动力学研究[J].中国科学(D辑),2002,32(10):812-818
[28]	Braun R L,Brurnham A K,Reynolds J G,et al.Mathematical model of oil generation,degradation and expulsion[J].Energy &Fuels,1990,4(1):132-146
[29]	刘德汉,付金华,郑聪斌等.鄂尔多斯盆地奥陶系海相碳酸盐岩生烃性能与中部长庆气田气源成因研究[J].地质学报,2004,78(4):542-550
[30]	Monthioux M,Landais P,Durand B.Comparison between extracts from natural and artificial maturation series of Mahakam deltacoals[J].Org Geochem,1986,10(3):299-311
[31]	McTavish R A.Pressure retardation of vitrinite diagenesis,offshore northwest Europe[J].Nature,1978,271:648-650
[32]	Connan J,Montel F,Blanc P H,et al.Experimental study of expulsion of HCs from shaley source rocks[J].Org Geochem,1992,19(2):153-171
[33]	郝芳,姜建群,邹华耀等.超压对有机质热演化的差异抑制作用及层次[J].中国科学(D辑),2004,34(5):443-451
[34]	Price L C,Wenger L M.The influence of pressure on petroleum generation and maturation as suggested by aqueous pyrolysis[J].Org Geochem,1992,19(1):141-159
[35]	Dalla T M,Mahlmann R F,Ernst W G.Experimental study on the pressure dependence of vitrinite maturation[J].Geochem Cosmo Acta,1997,61(14):2921-2928