Identification of chief hydrocarbon source rocks in Lishu Fault Depression and their geochemical characteristics
-
摘要: 通过对梨树断陷4套潜在烃源岩生烃潜力特征分析,确定了沙河子组为其主力烃源层,其次为营城组,火石岭组和登娄库组仅在局部地区发育有效烃源岩。采用20余项变量对梨树断陷有机碳含量大于0.5%的烃源岩进行聚类分析,结果表明梨树断陷有效烃源岩可以划分为4类,4类烃源岩的沉积环境、生烃潜力、母质来源及成熟度方面均存在一定的差异,以C类和D类源岩生烃潜力最高,与原油的可比性较好。从平面分布来看,C类源岩主要分布在四五家子、皮家及桑树台深洼深湖相沉积区域;A、B、D类源岩主要分布在苏家屯、双龙次洼及盆地边缘太平庄、七棵树、秦家屯等地区浅湖—半深湖及三角洲平原上的沼泽相沉积区域。Abstract: Based on the hydrocarbon generation potential of 4 sets of source rocks developed in the Lishu Fault Depression, the results illustrated that the chief hydrocarbon source layer is K1sh and the secondary layer is K1yc; meanwhile, the effective source rocks of K1h and K1d formations only developed in some certain areas. We made a cluster analysis to source rock samples (TOC>0.5%) based on more than 20 variables, and the results have shown that the source rock samples can be divided into 4 types and the geochemical characteristics of 4 types of source rocks are different in many respects, such as sedimentary environment, hydrocarbon generation potential, origin of organic matters and maturity stages. Type C and D source rocks have the highest hydrocarbon generation potential and they have good comparability with crude oils. Taking into account the plane distribution of source rocks, type C source rocks mainly distribute in Siwujiazi, Pijia and Sangshutai deep depressions with deep lake facies. Meanwhile, type A, B and D source rocks mainly distribute in Sujiatun sag, Shuanglong sag and Taipingzhuang, Qikeshu, Qinjiatun areas along the basin margins with shallow lake facies, semi-deep lake facies and swamp subfacies within delta plain sedimentary environment.
-
[1] 陈建渝,熊书权,毕研鹏,等.断陷盆地中含油气系统的特征[J].石油学报,2000,21(2):36-41. [2] 罗群,卢宏,刘银河,等.梨树凹陷断裂特征及对油气的控制[J].大庆石油学院学报,1996,20(3):6-10. [3] 陈新军,徐旭辉,朱建辉,等.松辽盆地梨树断陷层序地层研究[J].石油实验地质,2007,29(5):462-465. [4] 宋振响,郜建军,周卓明.十屋断陷天然气成因类型初探[J].天然气地球科学,2012,23(1):167-174. [5] 杜永慧.梨树断陷隐蔽油气藏形成的基本条件:以梨树断陷七棵树油藏为例[J].科技资讯,2010(31):92. [6] 韩娇艳,黄党委,徐红波.梨树断陷苏家屯地区沉积体系及油藏特征研究[J].内蒙古石油化工,2012(15):128-130. [7] 卜翠萍,苏玉山,魏红红,等.松辽盆地南部梨树断陷成藏期次研究[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2007,34(2):147-151. [8] 张玉明.松辽盆地南部梨树断陷北部深层油气成藏条件[J].石油天然气学报,2006,28(3):53-56. [9] 孙大明,李明诚.松辽盆地南部梨树断陷天然气成藏条件定量研究[J].石油勘探与开发,2000,27(4):84-86. [10] 贾宏伟,康立功.梨树断陷构造发育特征及油气分布研究[J].安徽地质,2004,14(3):180-184. [11] 覃素华,袁智广,刘福春.松南盆地梨树断陷油气成藏条件分析[J].天然气勘探与开发,2003,26(2):77-84. [12] 程克明.吐哈盆地油气生成[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1994:64. [13] 张枝焕,关强.新疆三塘湖盆地二叠系油源分析[J].石油实验地质,1998,20(2):174-181. [14] 常向春,王明镇,韩作振.试论适合叠合盆地的油源对比方法[J].地球科学与环境学报,2004,26(4):32-36. [15] 李振广,李景坤,宋桂侠.多元统计分析在油源对比中的应用[J].新疆石油地质,2004,25(3):262-263. [16] 卢鸿,冯小杰.油源对比常规方法的使用误区[J].西安工程学院学报,2000,22(2):56-59. [17] 倪军娥,方度,王冰洁.伊通地堑鹿乡断陷油源对比分析[J].新疆石油天然气,2007,3(4):17-20. [18] Peters K E,Walters C C,Moldowan J M.The biomarker guide:Volume2,Biomarkers and isotopes in petroleum systems and earth history[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2005:525-526,617. [19] 孟仟祥,房嬛,徐永昌,等.柴达木盆地石炭系烃源岩和煤岩生物标志物特征及其地球化学意义[J].沉积学报,2004, 22(4):729-736. [20] Moldowan J M,Seifort W K,Gallegos E J.Relationship between petroleum composition and depositional environment of petroleum source rocks[J].AAPG Bulletin,1985,69:1255-1268. [21] Sinninghe Damste J S,Kenig F, Koopmans M P,et al.Evidence for gammacerane as an indicator of water column stratification.[J].Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta,1995:59(1):1895-1900. [22] 张立平,黄第藩,廖志勤.伽马蜡烷:水体分层的地球化学标志[J].沉积学报,1999,17(1):136-140. -
计量
- 文章访问数: 1559
- HTML全文浏览量: 117
- PDF下载量: 714
- 被引次数: 0
下载:
苏公网安备32021102000780号