致密储层样品体积测量对孔隙度误差的影响

陈思宇; 田华; 柳少波; 李才喜; 郝加庆; 郑永平

doi:10.11781/sysydz201606850

致密储层样品体积测量对孔隙度误差的影响

doi: 10.11781/sysydz201606850

陈思宇^1,2,3,
田华^2,3,
柳少波^3, ,,
李才喜⁴,
郝加庆^2,3,
郑永平^2,3

1.
中国农业大学, 北京 100083
2. 中国石油天然气集团公司盆地构造与油气成藏重点实验室, 北京 100083
3. 中国石油勘探开发研究院, 北京 100083
4. 北京信桥恒达环保股份有限公司, 北京 100080

基金项目: 中国石油天然气股份有限公司科技攻关项目（2014A-0214，2014E-3209）和国家重大科学仪器设备开发专项（2013YQ17046305）资助。

详细信息

作者简介:
陈思宇(1995-),女,数学与应用数学专业。E-mail:398018114@qq.com。

通讯作者:
柳少波(1967-),男,教授级高级工程师,从事油气成藏研究。E-mail:lsb@petrochina.com.cn。

中图分类号: TE122.23
计量
- 文章访问数: 986
- HTML全文浏览量: 114
- PDF下载量: 284
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2016-06-17
- 修回日期: 2016-10-20
- 刊出日期: 2016-11-28

Influence of bulk volume measurement on porosity error in tight reservoir core plug analysis

Chen Siyu^1,2,3,
Tian Hua^2,3,
Liu Shaobo^{3
, ,},
Li Caixi⁴,
Hao Jiaqing^2,3,
Zheng Yongping^2,3

1.
China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
2. Key Laboratory of Basin Structure and Hydrocarbon Accumulation, CNPC, Beijing 100083, China
3. Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, PetroChina, Beijing 100083, China
4. Beijing Bridge Information Ltd, Beijing 100080, China

摘要

摘要: 非常规油气致密储层孔隙度较低，一般小于10%，页岩储层甚至小于5%，常规方法对这类岩石样品孔隙度测定误差近来受到关注。针对常用的孔隙度测量方法（氦气注入法），对致密储层和常规储层样品建立了孔隙度测量误差计算数学模型，统计样品体积测量的误差来源和误差限，结合数学模型和统计结果，确定孔隙度误差限。研究得出以下结论：①采用游标卡尺测量的致密储层孔隙度绝对偏差为0.59%~2.47%，高精度三维扫描方法孔隙度测量绝对偏差可以减小到0.38%~1.04%，与常规储层不同，致密储层需提高孔隙度测试精度并进行误差分析；②不同精度的测量方法均很难达到行业标准规定（孔隙度绝对偏差小于0.5%），建议将孔隙度误差质量控制标准降低，即孔隙度绝对偏差放宽到小于1%，并给出了相应的体积测量误差要求；③孔隙度测量误差与样品长度成反比，为了提高测量精度，样品长度应尽量大于3 cm。
- 孔隙度 /
- 误差限 /
- 致密储层 /
- 非常规油气
Abstract: Unconventional tight reservoir has a low porosity, which is usually less than 10%, while that of shale reservoir is even less than 5%. The porosity test error of helium injection method has been considered. A mathema-tical model is established for the error of porosity determination and the statistical data of source and error limit was obtained for volume measurement. (1) The error limit of porosity determination of tight reservoir using vernier caliper is 0.59%-2.47%, while that can be reduced to 0.38%-1.04% by using a high-precision 3D laser scanner. Different from conventional reservoirs, the porosity measurement accuracy of tight reservoir should be improved and analyzed. (2) The accuracy of all porosity determination methods cannot reach the industry standard (<0.5%), so a new standard is suggested that reducing the error limit standard (i.e. <1%). The demand of volume measurement was made based on the new standard. (3) An inverse proportion is found between porosity error and core plug length, so sample length should be longer than 3 cm to reduce porosity error.
- porosity /
- error limit /
- tight reservoir /
- unconventional petroleum

HTML全文

参考文献(23)

[1]	匡立春,王霞田,郭旭光,等.吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组致密油地质特征与勘探实践[J].新疆石油地质,2015,36(6):629-634. Kuang Lichun,Wang Xiatian,Guo Xuguang,et al.Geological characteristics and exploration practice of tight oil of Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geo-logy,2015,36(6):629-634.
[2]	汪少勇,王社教,李登华,等.致密油地质风险分析方法与流程初探[J].特种油气藏,2015,22(3):1-7. Wang Shaoyong,Wang Shejiao,Li Denghua,et al.Preliminary geology risk analysis and process in tight oil reservoir[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2015,22(3):1-7.
[3]	张月,文慧俭,白东来,等.松辽盆地大安油田纳米级孔隙研究[J].断块油气田,2015,22(4):440-444. Zhang Yue,Wen Huijian,Bai Donglai,et al.Study on nanopore throat in Da'an Oilfield, Songliao Basin[J].Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field,2015,22(4):440-444.
[4]	陈旋,司学强,刘书强,等.马朗凹陷沉凝灰岩致密储集层特征及主控因素[J].特种油气藏,2015,22(6):40-44. Chen Xuan,Si Xueqiang,Liu Shuqiang,et al.Characteristics and main control factors of sedimentary tuff tight reservoirs in Malang Sag[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2015,22(6):40-44.
[5]	郝情情,孙雨,左银辉.页岩气成藏条件及中国页岩气勘探风险[J].新疆石油地质,2013,34(3):272-276. Hao Qingqing,Sun Yu,Zuo Yinhui.Hydrocarbon accumulation conditions of shale gas and exploration risks in China[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2013,34(3):272-276.
[6]	刘富林,李红星,周建平,等.海底沉积物孔隙度Micro-CT扫描测定方法研究[J].科学技术与工程,2014,14(18):168-172. Liu Fulin,Li Hongxing,Zhou Jianping,et al.Study on seabed sediment porosity measurement method by micro-CT scanning[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2014,14(18):168-172.
[7]	曹永娜.利用CT扫描技术实现对岩心微观驱替过程的研究[J].科学技术与工程,2015,15(6):64-68. Cao Yongna.Study of microscopic blooding process using CT scanning technique[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2015,15(6):64-68.
[8]	韩文学,高长海,韩霞.核磁共振及微、纳米CT技术在致密储层研究中的应用[J].断块油气田,2015,22(1):62-66. Han Wenxue,Gao Changhai,Han Xia.Application of NMR and micrometer and nanometer CT technology in research of tight re-servoir[J].Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field,2015,22(1):62-66.
[9]	罗少成,成志刚,林伟川,等.基于核磁共振测井的致密砂岩储层孔喉空间有效性定量评价[J].油气地质与采收率,2015,22(3):16-21. Luo Shaocheng,Cheng Zhigang,Lin Weichuan,et al.Quantitative evaluation of the effectiveness of pore-throat space in tight sandstone reservoirs based on nuclear magnetic resonance log[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2015,22(3):16-21.
[10]	王胜.用核磁共振分析岩石孔隙结构特征[J].新疆石油地质,2009,30(6):768-770. Wang Sheng.Analysis of rock pore structural characteristic by nuclear magnetic resonance[J] Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2009,30(6):768-770.
[11]	王磊,李克文,赵楠,等.致密油储层孔隙度测定方法[J].油气地质与采收率,2015,22(4):49-53. Wang Lei,Li Kewen,Zhao Nan,et al.Methods research of poro-sity determination for tight oil reservoir[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2015,22(4):49-53.
[12]	中华人民共和国国家发展和改革委员会. 岩心分析方法:SY/T 5336-2006[S].北京:石油工业出版社,2007. National Development and Reform Commission.Practices for core analysis:SY/T 5336-2006[S].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2007.
[13]	Bustin R M,Bustin A,Ross D,et al.Shale gas opportunities and challenges.San Antonio,Texas:AAPG Annual Convention,2008.
[14]	Curtis M E,Ambrose R J,Energy D,et al.Structural characte-rization of gas shales on the micro-and nano-scales[C]//Canadian Unconventional Resources and International Petroleum Conference.Calgary,Alberta,Canada:Society of Petroleum Engineers,2010.
[15]	Sondergeld C H,Ambrose R J,Rai C S,et al.Micro-structural studies of gas shales[C]//SPE Unconventional Gas Confe-rence.Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania,USA:Society of Petroleum Engineers,2010:1-25.
[16]	Bustin R M,Bustin A M M,Cui A,et al.Impact of shale properties on pore structure and storage characteristics[C]//SPE Shale Gas Production Conference.Fort Worth,Texas,USA:So-ciety of Petroleum Engineers,2008:1-28.
[17]	田华,张水昌,柳少波,等.致密储层孔隙度测定参数优化[J].石油实验地质,2012,34(3):334-339. Tian Hua,Zhang Shuichang,Liu Shaobo,et al.Parameter optimization of tight reservoir porosity determination[J].Petroleum Geology and Experiment,2012,34(3):334-339.
[18]	李庆扬,王能超,易大义.数值分析[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1995:3-8. Li Qingyang,Wang Nengchao,Yi Dayi.Numerical analysis[M].Beijing:Higher Education Press,1995:3-8.
[19]	中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.游标、带表和数显卡尺:GB/T 21389-2008[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2008. General Administration of Quality Supervision,Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China,Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China.Vernier dial and digital display calipers:GB/T21389-2008[S].Beijing:Standards Press of China,2008.
[20]	王解先,侯东亚,段兵兵.三维激光扫描仪在堆积物体积计算中的应用[J].测绘通报,2013(7):54-56. Wang Jiexian,Hou Dongya,Duan Bingbing.Applications of three-dimensional laser scanner in accumulation of volume calculation[J].Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping,2013(7):54-56.
[21]	宋振,郝华东,周晓雪,等.基于三维激光扫描仪法的大型立式罐容量的计量[J].油气储运,2013,32(12):1367-1373. Song Zhen,Hao Huadong,Zhou Xiaoxue,et al.Capacity measurement of large vertical tank based on 3D laser scanner method[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2013,32(12):1367-1373.
[22]	韦雪花,王永国,郑君,等.基于三维激光扫描点云的树冠体积计算方法[J].农业机械学报,2013,44(7):235-240. Wei Xuehua,Wang Yongguo,Zheng Jun,et al.Tree crown volume calculation based on 3-D laser scanning point clouds data[J].Transactions of The Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery,2013,44(7):235-240.
[23]	郑德华,沈云中,刘春.三维激光扫描仪及其测量误差影响因素分析[J].测绘工程,2005,14(2):32-34. Zheng Dehua,Shen Yunzhong,Liu Chun.3D laser scanner and its effect factor analysis of surveying error[J].Engineering of Surveying and Mapping,2005,14(2):32-34.