稠油油藏注CO<sub>2</sub>提高采收率影响因素研究

孙焕泉; 王海涛; 吴光焕; 王一平

doi:10.11781/sysydz2020061009

稠油油藏注CO₂提高采收率影响因素研究

doi: 10.11781/sysydz2020061009

1.
中国石油化工股份有限公司, 北京 100728
2.
中国石化石油勘探开发研究院, 北京 100083
3.
中国石化胜利油田分公司, 山东东营 257015

详细信息

作者简介:
孙焕泉(1965-), 男, 博士, 教授级高级工程师, 从事油气田开发研究和管理工作。E-mail: sunhquan@sinopec.com

中图分类号: TE345
计量
- 文章访问数: 871
- HTML全文浏览量: 167
- PDF下载量: 162
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-09-03
- 修回日期: 2020-10-19
- 刊出日期: 2020-11-28

CO₂ EOR factors in heavy oil reservoirs

1.
SINOPEC, Beijing 100728, China
2.
Petroleum Exploration&Production Research Institute(PEPRIS), SINOPEC, Beijing 100083, China
3.
Shengli Oilfield, SINOPEC, Dongying, Shandong 257015, China

摘要

摘要: 与稀油注CO₂提高采收率机理不同，CO₂与稠油无法达到混相，因此影响其开发效果的主要因素差别很大，特别是在热化学复合采油过程中，注入的CO₂主要发挥隔热、降黏、增能的作用。为了进一步研究不同因素对稠油油藏注CO₂驱替效果的影响，在稠油样品物性分析的基础上，利用正交实验方法研究了原油黏度、温度、压力和渗透率对稠油油藏注CO₂提高采收率的影响。温度对采收率影响最大，其他因素由大到小依次为：渗透率、压力、油样类型。根据实验结论及认识，综合考虑地层温度、油藏渗透率等因素，在胜利油田开展了稠油油藏注CO₂吞吐提高采收率矿场试验。从矿场实际生产结果来看，油藏温度增加以及油藏渗透率提高，都有利于注CO₂吞吐开发，都能够有效提高油井产量。
- 稠油 /
- 二氧化碳 /
- 正交实验 /
- 影响因素 /
- 提高采收率
Abstract: Different from the mechanism of improving light oil recovery by CO₂ injection, heavy oil does not mix with CO₂, so the main factors affecting its development are very different. Especially in the process of thermochemical composite oil recovery, the injected CO₂ mainly plays a role in insulating heat, reducing viscosity and increasing energy. The properties of heavy oil were determined in this study in order to systematically investigate the effects of different factors influencing CO₂ displacement. The effect of heavy oil viscosity, temperature, pressure and permeability on recovery were investigated using the orthogonal experimental method. Temperature was the most significant factor, followed by permeability, pressure and heavy oil viscosity. According to the experimental results and considering factors such as reservoir temperature and permeability, the field tests of CO₂ huff and puff in the Shengli Oilfield of SINOPEC were conducted. Production results show that increasing reservoir temperature and permeability is beneficial for CO₂ EOR and can improve oil production.
- heavy oil /
- carbon dioxide /
- orthogonal experiment /
- influencing factors /
- EOR

HTML全文

图 1 CO₂驱替稠油实验中3种类型稠油红外光谱图

Figure 1. Infrared spectra of three types of heavy oil in CO₂ flooding experiment

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 稠油注CO₂驱替压差变化曲线

Figure 2. Pressure difference variation of CO₂ flooding in heavy oil

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 不同因素对驱油效率影响的效应曲线

Figure 3. Effect curves of different factors on oil displacement efficiency

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 温度和渗透率对注CO₂吞吐井增油倍数的影响

Figure 4. Effect of temperature and permeability on oil increment multiple of CO₂ huff and puff process

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 稠油油藏注CO₂提高采收率最佳适用条件的四因素正交实验数据

Table 1. Four-factor orthogonal experiment data for the best conditions for CO₂ injection in heavy oil reservoirs to enhance oil recovery

实验	设计的岩心渗透率/(10^-3 μm²)	油样	实验温度/℃	实验压力/MPa
1	250	1#	40	8
2	250	2#	60	12
3	250	3#	80	16
4	500	3#	40	12
5	500	1#	60	16
6	500	2#	80	8
7	1 000	2#	40	16
8	1 000	3#	60	8
9	1 000	1#	80	12

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 CO₂驱替稠油实验中3种类型稠油黏度与温度的关系

Table 2. Relationship between viscosity and temperature of three types of heavy oil in CO₂ flooding experiment

油样	黏度/(mPa·s)
油样	40 ℃	60 ℃	80 ℃
1#	57 500	8 650	1 760
2#	75 200	9 070	1 910
3#	121 000	24 800	4 570

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 CO₂驱替稠油实验中3种类型稠油四组分分析

Table 3. Four-component analysis of three types of heavy oil in CO₂ flooding experiment

油样	四组分含量/%
油样	饱和分	芳香分	胶质和沥青质
1#	20.78	14.05	65.17
2#	24.97	9.22	65.81
3#	17.36	14.97	67.68

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 正交实验结果极差分析

Table 4. Range analysis of orthogonal experiment results

实验	渗透率/(10^-3 μm²)	温度/℃	压力/MPa	油样	驱油效率/%
1	257	40	8	1#	8.305
2	231	60	12	2#	9.943
3	234	80	16	3#	26.482
4	502	40	12	3#	6.265
5	500	60	16	1#	13.774
6	490	80	8	2#	36.248
7	959	40	16	2#	6.847
8	977	60	8	3#	17.339
9	936	80	12	1#	39.780
极差	6.412	27.031	4.930	3.925

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 正交实验结果方差分析

Table 5. Variance analysis of orthogonal experiment results

因素	偏差平方和	自由度	F比	临界值F(0.10)
渗透率	0.006	2	0.182	3.110
温度	0.119	2	3.606	3.110
压力	0.004	2	0.121	3.110
油样类型	0.003	2	0.091	3.110
误差	0.13	8
注：偏差平方和指一组数据中，各个数与它们的算术平均值之差的平方和；自由度指假设n个数之和的均值为一定值，此时n个数中只有(n-1)个可自由变动，数学上将(n-1)称为自由度；F比指因素水平的改变引起的平均偏差平方和与误差的平均偏差平方和的比值；临界值F(0.1)是指实验的自由度下，信度为0.1时，F比的临界值，F比高于该值，表明实验结果的差异主要是由因素水平的改变所引起的；F比低于该值，表明实验结果的差异主要是由实验误差所引起的。

下载: 导出CSV

表 6 稠油油藏注CO₂吞吐井相关参数

Table 6. Well parameters of CO₂ huff and puff process in heavy oil reservoirs

	地层温度/℃	渗透率/(10^-3 μm²)	注CO₂前日产油/t	注CO₂后日产油/t	增油倍数	年增油/t
井1	59.6	982	1.1	2.2	1.0	229.6
井2	56.0	882	0.8	1.6	1.0	239.4
井3	61.3	455	0.5	1.3	1.6	59.8
井4	62.2	798	0.3	1.1	2.7	173.4
井5	48.8	142	0.6	0.8	0.3	245.0
井6	62.8	358	0.5	1.2	1.4	109.7
井7	51.0	407	2.1	4.1	1.0	600.2
注：增油倍数是指油井注CO₂之后的增油量与注CO₂前日产油的比值。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(16)

[1]	ISSEVER K, PAMIR A N, TIREK A. Performance of a heavy-oil field under CO₂ injection, Bati Raman, turkey[J]. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 1993, 8(4): 256-260. doi: 10.2118/20883-PA
[2]	陈举民, 李进, 曹红燕, 等. 浅薄稠油油藏水平井CO₂吞吐机理及影响因素[J]. 断块油气田, 2018, 25(4): 515-520. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT201804023.htm CHEN Jumin, LI Jin, CAO Hongyan, et al. Mechanism and influence factors for CO₂ huff and puff of horizontal flooding in shallow and thin heavy oil reservoir[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2018, 25(4): 515-520. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT201804023.htm
[3]	钱卫明, 曹力元, 胡文东, 等. 我国CO₂驱油注采工艺技术现状及下步研究方向[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2019, 9(3): 66-72. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ201903015.htm QIAN Weiming, CAO Liyuan, HU Wendong, et al. Present situation and further research direction of CO₂ flooding injection-production technology and in China[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(3): 66-72. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ201903015.htm
[4]	李强, 王彦玲, 李庆超, 等. 压裂用超临界CO₂增稠剂制备及增稠性能评价[J]. 断块油气田, 2018, 25(4): 541-544. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT201804029.htm LI Qiang, WANG Yanling, LI Qingchao, et al. Synthesis and performance evaluation of supercritical CO₂ thickener for fracturing[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2018, 25(4): 541-544. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT201804029.htm
[5]	JHA K N N. A laboratory study of heavy oil recovery with carbon dioxide[J]. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 1986, 25(2): 54-63.
[6]	孙而杰, 彭旭, 朱连忠, 等. 注CO₂提高普通稠油油藏驱油效率物理模拟试验研究[J]. 实验室科学, 2010, 13(3): 90-93. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSKT201003035.htm SUN Erjie, PENG Xu, ZHU Lianzhong, et al. Study on the physical simulation test of injecting CO₂ to improve the flooding efficiency of general heavy oil[J]. Laboratory Science, 2010, 13(3): 90-93. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSKT201003035.htm
[7]	白锋军, 徐骞, 冯星铮. 稠油油藏CO₂驱油机理室内模拟研究[J]. 重庆科技学院学报(自然科学版), 2010, 12(2): 77-79. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CQSG201002024.htm BAI Fengjun, XU Qian, FENG Xingzheng. Lab simulation research of CO₂ oil displacement mechanism in heavy oil reservoir[J]. Journal of Chongqing University of Science and Technology (Natural Sciences Edition), 2010, 12(2): 77-79. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CQSG201002024.htm
[8]	罗瑞兰, 程林松, 李春兰, 等. 稠油油藏注CO₂吞吐适应性研究[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 20(1): 43-46. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XASY200501014.htm LUO Ruilan, CHENG Linsong, LI Chunlan, et al. Research on the adaptability of cyclic CO₂ injection for heavy oil reservoir[J]. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University (Natural Science Edition), 2005, 20(1): 43-46. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XASY200501014.htm
[9]	杨胜来, 李新民, 郎兆新, 等. 稠油注CO₂的方式及其驱油效果的室内实验[J]. 石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2001, 25(2): 62-64. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYDX200102019.htm YANG Shenglai, LI Xinmin, LANG Zhaoxin, et al. Laboratory evaluation on displacement efficiency of seven schemes of CO₂ injection in heavy oil reservoir[J]. Journal of the University of Petroleum, China, 2001, 25(2): 62-64. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYDX200102019.htm
[10]	罗瑞兰, 程林松. 深层稠油油藏注CO₂开采可行性研究: 以辽河油田冷42块稠油油藏为例[J]. 中国海上油气(地质), 2003, 17(5): 312-316. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHSD200305004.htm LUO Ruilan, CHENG Linsong. A feasibility study on exploitation of deep heavy-oil reservoir by CO₂ injection[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas (Geology), 2003, 17(5): 312-316. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHSD200305004.htm
[11]	朱战军, 林壬子, 汪双清. 稠油主要族组分对其粘度的影响[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2004, 25(5): 512-513. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD200405015.htm ZHU Zhanjun, LIN Renzi, WANG Shuangqing. The influence of heavy oil complosition on its viscosity[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2004, 25(5): 512-513. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD200405015.htm
[12]	陈栋, 李季, 黄燕山, 等. 胶质和沥青质对原油流动性影响的红外光谱研究[J]. 应用化工, 2010, 39(7): 1100-1104. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SXHG201007044.htm CHEN Dong, LI Ji, HUANG Yanshan, et al. Influence of the colloid and asphaltene on fluidity of the crude oil by IR spectrum[J]. Applied Chemical Industry, 2010, 39(7): 1100-1104. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SXHG201007044.htm
[13]	文萍, 崔敏, 李传, 等. 稠油及其组分结构参数和红外光谱的考察[J]. 石油化工高等学校学报, 2013, 26(4): 11-15. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYHX201304003.htm WEN Ping, CUI Min, LI Chuan, et al. Research on average structure parameter and infrared spectrum analysis in Venezuela heavy oil and its sub-fractions[J]. Journal of Petrochemical Universities, 2013, 26(4): 11-15. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYHX201304003.htm
[14]	ZHOU Xiang, JIANG Qi, YUAN Qingwang, et al. Determining CO₂ diffusion coefficient in heavy oil in bulk phase and in porous media using experimental and mathematical modeling methods[J]. Fuel, 2020, 263: 116205. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116205
[15]	LÜ Yuling, HAN Jianwei, HE Limin, et al. Flow structure and pressure gradient of extra heavy crude oil solution CO₂[J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2019, 104: 229-237. doi: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2019.02.022
[16]	ZHU Weiyao, MA Qipeng, SONG Zhiyong, et al. The effect of injection pressure on the microscopic migration characteristics by CO₂ flooding in heavy oil reservoirs[J]. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 2019: 1-10.