二连盆地阿南凹陷白垩系腾格尔组致密油储层特征及主控因素

付小东; 张天付; 吴健平; 王小芳; 周进高; 江涛; 李彬; 李长新

doi:10.11781/sysydz202101064

二连盆地阿南凹陷白垩系腾格尔组致密油储层特征及主控因素

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202101064

1.
中国石油杭州地质研究院, 杭州 310023
2.
中国石油华北油田分公司勘探开发研究院, 河北任丘 062552

基金项目:

中国石油天然气股份有限公司重大科技专项 2014E-35

详细信息

作者简介:
付小东(1980-), 男, 博士, 高级工程师, 主要从事油气地质研究。E-mail: fuxd_hz@petrochina.com.cn

通讯作者:
王小芳(1980-), 女, 博士, 高级工程师, 主要从事沉积储层研究。E-mail: wangxf_hz@petrochina.com.cn

中图分类号: TE122.2
计量
- 文章访问数: 620
- HTML全文浏览量: 171
- PDF下载量: 77
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-04-16
- 修回日期: 2020-12-24
- 刊出日期: 2021-01-28

Characteristics and main controlling factors of tight oil reservoirs in Cretaceous Tengger Formation, A'nan Sag, Erlian Basin

1.
PetroChina Hangzhou Research Institute of Geology, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310023, China
2.
Exploration and Development Research Institute of Huabei Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Renqiu, Hebei 062552, China

摘要

摘要: 二连盆地阿南凹陷白垩系腾格尔组一段下亚段广泛发育一套与火山活动相关的“特殊岩性”致密储层，是致密油勘探的主要目的层。基于岩石薄片观察和储层物性系统分析，结合扫描电镜、压汞、CT扫描和核磁共振等分析，对该层段不同岩性致密储层特征和“甜点”发育主控因素进行综合研究。结果表明：腾一下亚段主要发育凝灰质岩、砂岩、白云岩和泥岩四大岩类，凝灰质岩和砂岩是致密油储层发育的有利岩性。储层中主要发育溶蚀孔、晶间微孔、残余粒间孔、泄水孔和微裂缝等5类储集空间，其中凝灰岩中以脱玻化晶间孔和溶蚀孔占主导，砂岩中以残余粒间孔和溶蚀孔最有利。储层孔隙结构可划分为3类4亚类，薄层凝灰岩和溶孔发育的细砂岩储层孔隙结构较好，沉凝灰岩与白云岩孔隙结构较差。不同类型储层含油非均质性强，含油量受储层岩性、孔渗条件和孔隙结构控制。凝灰质岩致密储层“甜点”发育主要受火山碎屑沉积方式、脱玻化作用和溶蚀作用控制，砂岩类储层“甜点”发育主要受沉积微相、岩石结构和溶蚀作用共同控制。
- 致密油储层 /
- 地质特征 /
- 主控因素 /
- 阿南凹陷 /
- 二连盆地
Abstract: A set of "special lithology" tight reservoirs related to volcanic activity developed widely in the lower submember of the first member of Cretaceous Tengger Formation (K₁bt^1x) in the A'nan Sag, Erlian Basin, which is the main target for tight oil exploration. Based on section observation, physical property analysis, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), mercury intrusion porosimetry, CT scanning and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), the characteristics and main controlling factors of "sweet spots" of tight oil reservoirs with different lithologies in the K₁bt^1x were studied. Tuffaceous rocks, sandstones, dolomites and mudstones developed in the K₁bt^1x, and tuffaceous rocks and sandstones are the favorable lithologies for the development of tight oil reservoirs. The reservoir space consists of dissolved pores, intercrystalline micropores, residual intergranular pores, drainage pores and microfractures. The main reservoir space of tuff includes devitrified intercrystalline pores and dissolution pores, whereas that of sandstone includes residual intergranular pores and dissolution pores. The reservoir pore structures can be divided into 3 types and 4 subtypes. The thin-layered tuff and fine sandstone with solution pores have better pore structures, but the sedimentary tuff and dolomite have poor pore structures. The reservoir has a strong oil content heterogeneity controlled by reservoir lithology, porosity and permeability. The development of "sweet spots" in tuffaceous tight reservoirs is mainly controlled by the volcaniclastic deposition, devitrification and dissolution, while the development of "sweet spots" in sandstone reservoirs is mainly controlled by sedimentary microfacies, rock structure and dissolution.
- tight oil reservoir /
- geological characteristics /
- main controlling factor /
- A'nan Sag /
- Erlian Basin

HTML全文

图 1 二连盆地阿南凹陷区域构造(a)与腾一下亚段地层综合柱状图(b)

Figure 1. Regional tectonic map (a) and composite stratigraphic section of the lower submember of first member of Cretaceous Tengger Formation(b), A'nan Sag, Erlian Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 二连盆地阿南凹陷腾一下亚段致密储层岩石学特征

a.晶屑岩屑凝灰岩，凝灰结构，阿密2井，1 545.97 m，正交偏光；b.岩屑凝灰岩，火山尘胶结，阿密2井，1 561.92 m，单偏光；c.含灰晶屑凝灰岩，方解石、白云石交代凝灰质，阿密2井，1 568.35 m，正交偏光；d.含灰沉凝灰岩，示底构造，阿43井，2 067.78 m，单偏光；e.灰化、云化沉凝灰岩，自形晶白云石去云化，阿密2井，1 566.8 m，正交偏光；f.沉凝灰岩，泄水孔被白云石半充填，阿43井，2 054.8 m，单偏光；g.含内碎屑泥晶云岩，阿密2井，1 578.17 m，单偏光；h.长石岩屑细砂岩，方解石连晶胶结，阿密2井，1 595.23 m，正交偏光；i.长石岩屑中粗砂岩，方解石胶结，阿密2井，1 602.58 m，正交偏光；j.凝灰质泥岩，阿密2井，2 056.07 m，单偏光；k.凝灰岩，阿密2井，1 565.22 m，荧光薄片；l.样品同e，荧光薄片；m.长石岩屑细砂岩，阿密2井，1 591.52 m，荧光薄片；n.样品同g，荧光薄片；o.样品同j，荧光薄片

Figure 2. Rock types and structural characteristics of tight reservoirs in lower submember of first member of Cretaceous Tengger Formation, A'nan Sag, Erlian Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 二连盆地阿南凹陷腾一下亚段致密储层主要孔隙空间类型

a.含晶屑凝灰岩，溶蚀孔发育，阿密2井，1 568.50 m，激光共聚焦；b.样品同a，脱玻化晶间孔，氩离子抛光—场发射电镜；c.岩屑凝灰岩，脱玻化晶间孔发育，阿密2井，1 561.92 m，氩离子抛光—场发射电镜；d.沉凝灰岩，斑状方解石/白云石晶间孔、晶间溶孔，阿密2井，1 566.80 m；e.沉凝灰岩，泄水孔被方解石、方沸石充填，方沸石发生溶蚀，阿43井，2 054.80 m，铸体薄片；f.灰化沉凝灰岩，粒间、晶间微孔发育，阿密2井，1 584.66 m，氩离子抛光—场发射电镜；g.泥晶白云岩，晶间微孔发育，阿密2井，1 578.17 m，氩离子抛光—场发射电镜；h.长石岩屑细砂岩，粒间溶孔、粒内溶孔发育，阿密2井，1 591.60 m，铸体薄片；i.长石岩屑中粗砂岩，残余粒间孔、粒间溶孔、岩屑粒内溶孔发育，阿密2井，1 603.51 m，铸体薄片

Figure 3. Pore space types of tight oil reservoir in lower submember of first member of Cretaceous Tengger Formation, A'nan Sag, Erlian Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 二连盆地阿南凹陷腾一下亚段致密储层核磁共振T₂谱峰分布特征

Figure 4. T₂ spectrum of NMR of tight oil reservoir in lower submember of first member of Cretaceous Tengger Formation, A'nan Sag, Erlian Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 二连盆地阿南凹陷腾一下亚段致密储层压汞曲线特征

Figure 5. Mercury-injection curves of tight reservoirs in lower submember of first member of Cretaceous Tengger Formation, A'nan Sag, Erlian Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 二连盆地阿南凹陷腾一下亚段致密储层含油性与储层物性关系

Figure 6. Relationship between oil content and physical properties of tight reservoirs in lower submember of first member of Cretaceous Tengger Formation, A'nan Sag, Erlian Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 二连盆地阿南凹陷腾一下亚段致密储层恒速压汞孔隙结构参数

Table 1. Pore structure parameters of constant rate mercury injection of tight reservoirs in lower submember of first member of Cretaceous Tengger Formation, A'nan Sag, Erlian Basin

岩性	深度/m	最终进汞饱和度/%			单位体积岩样有效喉道体积/cm³	单位体积岩样有效孔隙体积/cm³	单位体积岩样有效孔隙喉道个数/个	有效孔喉半径比加权平均值
岩性	深度/m	总进汞	喉道进汞	孔隙进汞	单位体积岩样有效喉道体积/cm³	单位体积岩样有效孔隙体积/cm³	单位体积岩样有效孔隙喉道个数/个	有效孔喉半径比加权平均值
凝灰岩	1 546.0	46.47	20.75	25.72	0.012	0.015	1 209	419.18
凝灰岩	1 565.4	78.59	52.15	26.44	0.063	0.032	6 383	332.92
凝灰岩	1 568.6	81.69	48.11	33.58	0.081	0.056	8 178	192.18
云质沉凝灰岩	1 558.1	37.63	26.79	10.84	0.004	0.002	289	23.47
凝灰质云岩	1 578.2	4.20	1.28	2.92	0.001	0.002	87	17.50
粉砂质云岩	1 555.5	10.95	3.32	7.63	0.001	0.003	149	19.25
凝灰质粉砂岩	1 580.4	7.67	3.41	4.26	0.002	0.002	176	17.82
长石岩屑细砂岩	1 591.8	70.94	46.61	24.33	0.094	0.049	9 532	87.29
凝灰质粉细砂岩	1 597.4	31.98	16.11	15.87	0.028	0.027	3 210	287.16
长石岩屑粗砂岩	1 602.8	66.49	45.29	21.20	0.075	0.035	6 623	91.23

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 二连盆地阿南凹陷腾一下亚段致密储层孔隙结构特征

Table 2. Pore structure characteristics of tight reservoirs in lower submember of first member of Cretaceous Tengger Formation, A'nan Sag, Erlian Basin

参考文献(41)

[1]	张文朝, 雷怀玉, 姜冬华, 等. 二连盆地阿南凹陷的演化与油气聚集规律[J]. 河南石油, 1998, 12(2): 1-5. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYHN199802000.htm ZHANG Wenchao, LEI Huaiyu, JIANG Donghua, et al. Evolution of the Arnan Sag in the Erlian Basin and hydrocarbon accumulation[J]. Henan Petroleum, 1998, 12(2): 1-5. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYHN199802000.htm
[2]	李顺才. 阿南凹陷油藏特征及形成条件[J]. 复式油气田, 1983(1): 17-23. LI Shuncai. Reservoir characteristics and formation conditions of A'nan Sag[J]. Multiple Oil-Gas Field, 1983(1): 17-23.
[3]	赵文智, 胡素云, 侯连华, 等. 中国陆相页岩油类型、资源潜力及与致密油的边界[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(1): 1-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202001002.htm ZHAO Wenzhi, HU Suyun, HOU Lianhua, et al. Types and resource potential of continental shale oil in China and its boundary with tight oil[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(1): 1-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK202001002.htm
[4]	孙龙德, 邹才能, 贾爱林, 等. 中国致密油气发展特征与方向[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(6): 1015-1026. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201906002.htm SUN Longde, ZOU Caineng, JIA Ailin, et al. Development characte-ristics and orientation of tight oil and gas in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(6): 1015-1026. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201906002.htm
[5]	康玉柱. 中国北方石炭系-二叠系致密油气资源前景分析[J]. 断块油气田, 2020, 27(6): 681-683. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202006002.htm KANG Yuzhu. Prospect analysis of Carboniferous-Permian tight oil and gas resources in northern China[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2020, 27(6): 681-683. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT202006002.htm
[6]	彭金宁, 邱岐, 王东燕, 等. 苏北盆地古近系阜宁组致密油赋存状态与可动用性[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(1): 53-59. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202001053 PENG Jinning, QIU Qi, WANG Dongyan, et al. Occurrence and recoverability of tight oil in Paleogene Funing Formation, Subei Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(1): 53-59. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202001053
[7]	何崇康, 成良丙, 陈旭峰, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地新安边油田长7致密油有效储层识别与甜点优选[J]. 石油实验地质, 2017, 39(6): 812-818. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201706812 HE Chongkang, CHENG Liangbing, CHEN Xufeng, et al. Effective reservoir identification and "sweet spot" optimization of Chang 7 tight oil reservoir in Xin'anbian oil field, Ordos Basin[J]. Petro-leum Geology & Experiment, 2017, 39(6): 812-818. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201706812
[8]	林铁锋, 康德江. 松辽盆地三肇凹陷扶余油层致密储层分类精细评价[J]. 石油实验地质, 2017, 39(5): 686-693. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201705686 LIN Tiefeng, KANG Dejiang. Classification and evaluation of tight reservoirs in Fuyu oil layer, Sanzhao Sag, Songliao Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2017, 39(5): 686-693. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201705686
[9]	崔维兰, 韩华峰, 张永, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地靖边油田李家城则地区长6致密油储层微观特征与含油性[J]. 石油实验地质, 2019, 41(3): 390-397. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201903390 CUI Weilan, HAN Huafeng, ZHANG Yong, et al. Microscopic characteristics and oil content of Chang 6 tight sandstone reservoirs in Lijiachengze area, Jingbian Oil Field, Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2019, 41(3): 390-397. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201903390
[10]	匡立春, 唐勇, 雷德文, 等. 准噶尔盆地二叠系咸化湖相云质岩致密油形成条件与勘探潜力[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(6): 657-667. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201206004.htm KUANG Lichun, TANG Yong, LEI Dewen, et al. Formation conditions and exploration potential of tight oil in the Permian saline lacustrine dolomitic rock, Junggar Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(6): 657-667. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201206004.htm
[11]	JIANG Yiqin, LIU Yiqun, YANG Zhao, et al. Characteristics and origin of tuff-type tight oil in Jimusaer Sag, Junggar Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(6): 810-818.
[12]	朱国华, 张杰, 姚根顺, 等. 沉火山尘凝灰岩: 一种赋存油气资源的重要岩类: 以新疆北部中二叠统芦草沟组为例[J]. 海相油气地质, 2014, 19(1): 1-7. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HXYQ201401005.htm ZHU Guohua, ZHANG Jie, YAO Genshun, et al. Sedimentary volcanic dust tuff, an important kind of rock storing hydrocarbon resources: disscusion on the lithology of middle Permian Lucaogou oil-bearing rocks in the north of Xinjiang[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2014, 19(1): 1-7. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HXYQ201401005.htm
[13]	焦立新, 刘俊田, 张宏, 等. 三塘湖盆地沉凝灰岩致密储集层特征及其形成条件[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(11): 1697-1705. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201411004.htm JIAO Lixin, LIU Juntian, ZHANG Hong, et al. Tight reservoir characteristics and formation conditions of tuff in Santanghu Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2014, 25(11): 1697-1705. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201411004.htm
[14]	MA Jian, HUANG Zhilong, LIANG Shijun, et al. Geochemical and tight reservoir characteristics of sedimentary organic-matter-bearing tuff from the Permian Tiaohu Formation in the Santanghu Basin, Northwest China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2016, 73: 405-418.
[15]	MA Jian, LIU Guoheng, HUANG Zhilong, et al. Tight tuff reservoir characteristics and its controlling factors: a comparative study of the Permian Tiaohu Formation and Carboniferous Haerjiawu Formation in the Santanghu Basin, NW China[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2020, 187: 106808.
[16]	陈旋, 李杰, 梁浩, 等. 三塘湖盆地条湖组沉凝灰岩致密油藏成藏特征[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2014, 35(4): 386-390. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD201404004.htm CHEN Xuan, LI Jie, LIANG Hao, et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation elements analysis of Tiaohu tuff reservoir of Middle Permian, Santanghu Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2014, 35(4): 386-390. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD201404004.htm
[17]	蓝宝锋, 杨克兵, 彭传利, 等. 二连盆地阿南凹陷致密油勘探潜力分析[J]. 复杂油气藏, 2014, 7(2): 9-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FZYQ201402003.htm LAN Baofeng, YANG Kebing, PENG Chuanli, et al. Analysis of the exploration potential of tight oil in Anan Sag, Erlian Basin[J]. Complex Hydrocarbon Reservoirs, 2014, 7(2): 9-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FZYQ201402003.htm
[18]	李军, 王炜, 王书勋. 青西油田沉凝灰岩储集特征[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2004, 25(3): 288-290. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD200403019.htm LI Jun, WANG Wei, WANG Shuxun. Bedded tuff reservoir in Qingxi oilfield[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2004, 25(3): 288-290. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD200403019.htm
[19]	付小东, 吴健平, 寿建峰, 等. 渤海湾盆地束鹿凹陷古近系沙河街组湖相混积泥灰岩致密油储层特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(1): 78-91. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201901009.htm FU Xiaodong, WU Jianping, SHOU Jianfeng, et al. Tight oil reservoir characteristics of lacustrine mixed marlstone in the Palaeogene Shahejie Formation of Shulu Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(1): 78-91. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201901009.htm
[20]	GRYNBERG M E, PAPAVA D, SHENGELIA M, et al. Petrophysical characteristics of the Middle Eocene laumontite tuff reservoir, Samgori Field, Republic of Georgia[J]. Journal of Petroleum Geology, 1993, 16(3): 313-322.
[21]	KALAN T, SITORUS H P, EMAN E. Jatibarang field, geologic study of volcanic reservoir for horizontal well proposal[C]//Indonesian Petroleum Association, 23rd Annual Convention Proceedings. Tusla: AAPG, 1994: 229-244.
[22]	TOMARU H, LU Zunli, FEHN U, et al. Origin of hydrocarbons in the green tuff region of Japan: 129I results from oil field brines and hot springs in the Akita and Niigata basins[J]. Chemical Geology, 2009, 264(1/4): 221-231.
[23]	王会来, 高先志, 杨德相, 等. 二连盆地下白垩统湖相云质岩分布及控制因素[J]. 现代地质, 2014, 28(1): 163-172. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ201401017.htm WANG Huilai, GAO Xianzhi, YANG Dexiang, et al. Distribution characteristics and controlling factors of the Lower Cretaceous lacustrine dolomitic rock in Erlian Basin[J]. Geoscience, 2014, 28(1): 163-172. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ201401017.htm
[24]	张以明, 付小东, 郭永军, 等. 二连盆地阿南凹陷白垩系腾一下段致密油有效储层物性下限研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2016, 38(4): 551-558. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201604551 ZHANG Yiming, FU Xiaodong, GUO Yongjun, et al. Petrophysical property limits of effective tight oil reservoirs in the lower part of the first member of Cretaceous Tengger Formation, A'nan Sag, Erlian Basin, North China[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2016, 38(4): 551-558. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201604551
[25]	王宏语, 樊太亮, 肖莹莹, 等. 凝灰质成分对砂岩储集性能的影响[J]. 石油学报, 2010, 31(3): 432-439. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201003013.htm WANG Hongyu, FAN Tailiang, XIAO Yingying, et al. Effect of tuffaceous components on physical property of sandstone reservoir[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2010, 31(3): 432-439. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201003013.htm
[26]	赵海玲, 黄微, 王成, 等. 火山岩中脱玻化孔及其对储层的贡献[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2009, 30(1): 47-52. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT200901012.htm ZHAO Hailing, HUANG Wei, WANG Cheng, et al. Micropores from devitrification in volcanic rocks and their contribution to reservoirs[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2009, 30(1): 47-52. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT200901012.htm
[27]	赵玉婷, 单玄龙, 王璞珺, 等. 松辽盆地白垩系营城组火山岩脱玻化作用及其储层意义: 以盆缘剖面为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2007, 37(6): 1152-1158. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ200706013.htm ZHAO Yuting, SHAN Xuanlong, WANG Pujun, et al. Devitrification of the volcanic rocks of the Cretaceous Yingcheng Formation in the Songliao Basin and its reservoir significance: an example from a basin boundary section[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2007, 37(6): 1152-1158. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ200706013.htm
[28]	赵海玲, 王成, 刘振文, 等. 火山岩储层斜长石选择性溶蚀的岩石学特征和热力学条件[J]. 地质通报, 2009, 28(4): 412-419. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD200904004.htm ZHAO Hailing, WANG Cheng, LIU Zhenwen, et al. Characteristics of petrology and thermodynamics of selective dissolution of plagioclase in volcanic reservoir rocks[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2009, 28(4): 412-419. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD200904004.htm
[29]	徐梅桂, 张哨楠, 伏美燕, 等. 不同淡水成岩体系下长石溶蚀的对比实验[J]. 现代地质, 2013, 27(4): 925-933. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ201304021.htm XU Meigui, ZHANG Shaonan, FU Meiyan, et al. Contrast experiment about dissolution of feldspar in different freshwater diagenetic systems[J]. Geoscience, 2013, 27(4): 925-933. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ201304021.htm
[30]	朱焕来, 曲希玉, 刘立, 等. CO₂流体-长石相互作用实验研究[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2011, 41(3): 697-706. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ201103011.htm ZHU Huanlai, QU Xiyu, LIU Li, et al. Study on interaction between the feldspar and CO₂ fluid[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2011, 41(3): 697-706. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ201103011.htm
[31]	黄思静, 杨俊杰, 张文正, 等. 不同温度条件下乙酸对长石溶蚀过程的实验研究[J]. 沉积学报, 1995, 13(1): 7-17. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB501.001.htm HUANG Sijing, YANG Junjie, ZHANG Wenzheng, et al. Experimental study of feldspar dissolution by acetic acid at different burial temperatures[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1995, 13(1): 7-17. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB501.001.htm
[32]	远光辉, 操应长, 杨田, 等. 论碎屑岩储层成岩过程中有机酸的溶蚀增孔能力[J]. 地学前缘, 2013, 20(5): 207-219. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201305022.htm YUAN Guanghui, CAO Yingchang, YANG Tian, et al. Porosity enhancement potential through mineral dissolution by organic acids in the diagenetic process of clastic reservoir[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2013, 20(5): 207-219. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201305022.htm
[33]	朱筱敏, 王英国, 钟大康, 等. 济阳坳陷古近系储层孔隙类型与次生孔隙成因[J]. 地质学报, 2007, 81(2): 197-204. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE200702008.htm ZHU Xiaomin, WANG Yingguo, ZHONG Dakang, et al. Pore types and secondary pore evolution of Paleogene reservoir in the Jiyang Sag[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2007, 81(2): 197-204. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE200702008.htm
[34]	SURDAM R C, CROSSEY L J, HAGEN E S, et al. Organic-inorganic interactions and sandstone diagenesis[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1989, 73(1): 1-23.
[35]	BARTH T, BJØRLYKKE K. Organic acids from source rock maturation: generation potentials, transport mechanisms and relevance for mineral diagenesis[J]. Applied Geochemistry, 1993, 8(4): 325-337. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ShoppingCartURL&_method=add&_eid=1-s2.0-088329279390002X&originContentFamily=serial&_origin=article&_ts=1483786154&md5=e21945b4fd4e2f0a248f76d25633c3c9
[36]	黄思静, 武文慧, 刘洁, 等. 大气水在碎屑岩次生孔隙形成中的作用: 以鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组为例[J]. 地球科学(中国地质大学学报), 2003, 28(4): 419-424. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD202106013.htm HUANG Sijing, WU Wenhui, LIU Jie, et al. Generation of secondary porosity by meteoric water during time of subaerial exposure: an example from Yanchang Formation sandstone of Triassic of Ordos Basin[J]. Earth Science (Journal of China University of Geosciences), 2003, 28(4): 419-424. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD202106013.htm
[37]	丁晓琪, 韩玫梅, 张哨楠, 等. 大气淡水在碎屑岩次生孔隙中的作用[J]. 地质论评, 2014, 60(1): 145-158. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP201401016.htm DING Xiaoqi, HAN Meimei, ZHANG Shaonan, et al. Roles of meteoric water on secondary porosity of siliciclastic reservoirs[J]. Geological Review, 2014, 60(1): 145-158. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP201401016.htm
[38]	DE GROOT K. Experimental dedolomitization[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 1967, 37(4): 1216-1220.
[39]	张杰, 寿建峰, 文应初, 等. 去白云石化作用机理及其对储集层的改造[J]. 古地理学报, 2012, 14(1): 69-84. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GDLX201201011.htm ZHANG Jie, SHOU Jianfeng, WEN Yingchu, et al. Mechanism of dedolomitization and its rebuilding to reservoir[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2012, 14(1): 69-84. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GDLX201201011.htm
[40]	郭沫贞, 文川江, 苑国辉, 等. 三塘湖盆地牛东石炭系火山岩示顶底构造特征、成因及地质意义[J]. 海相油气地质, 2010, 15(3): 74-78. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HXYQ201003015.htm GUO Mozhen, WEN Chuanjiang, YUAN Guohui, et al. Features, origin and geological significance of geopetal structures in Carboniferous volcanic rocks in Niudong block, Santanghu Basin[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2010, 15(3): 74-78. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HXYQ201003015.htm
[41]	张丽霞, 李培俊, 朱国华, 等. 北三台石炭系火山岩示底构造及与油气的关系[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2009, 30(5): 569-570. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD200905009.htm ZHANG Lixia, LI Peijun, ZHU Guohua, et al. Volcanic geopetal structure of carboniferous and its relationship with petroleum in Beisantai field, Junggar Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2009, 30(5): 569-570. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD200905009.htm