鄂尔多斯盆地南部上古生界致密碎屑岩储层预测——以镇泾地区为例

陆红梅; 张仲培; 王琳霖; 卞昌蓉; 孙宜朴; 卢颖忠

doi:10.11781/sysydz202103443

鄂尔多斯盆地南部上古生界致密碎屑岩储层预测——以镇泾地区为例

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202103443

中国石化石油勘探开发研究院, 北京 102206

基金项目:

中国科学院战略性先导科技专项（A类）子课题“深层油气富集规律与战略选区” XDA14010406

中国石化科技部项目“鄂南古生界油气富集关键因素及目标评价” P19022-2

详细信息

作者简介:
陆红梅(1969-), 女, 硕士, 高级工程师, 从事油气勘探地震地质综合研究。E-mail: luhm.syky@sinopec.com

中图分类号: TE122.24
计量
- 文章访问数: 664
- HTML全文浏览量: 190
- PDF下载量: 146
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-02-09
- 修回日期: 2021-04-16
- 刊出日期: 2021-05-28

Prediction of tight clastic reservoirs of Upper Paleozoic in southern Ordos Basin: a case study of Zhenjing district

SINOPEC Petroleum Exploration & Production Research Institute, Beijing 102206, China

摘要

摘要: 岩石物理特征难以有效区分储层与非储层，黄土塬叠后地震资料品质较差，储层预测成为鄂尔多斯盆地南部上古生界久攻不克的技术瓶颈，也成为制约该区勘探推进的原因之一。区带评价认为镇泾区块东北部是有利勘探区带，二叠系山西组二段、下石盒子组一段是主要勘探目的层。镇泾3D波形聚类地震相分析结果与镇泾地区物源、砂体展布特征一致，表明地震资料可以用来开展储层预测研究。结合沉积相展布特征的一系列地震正演模拟发现，山二段内与盒一段大套砂体有一定距离、具有一定厚度的砂体能够形成可识别的地震反射，这种地层岩性纵向上的空间组合与区域叠加型及厚层单一型砂体沉积模式吻合，正是周边已发现气藏的典型储盖组合类型。根据正演模拟结果优选的波峰数地震属性储层预测证实，山二段叠加型砂体及厚层单一型砂体呈SW-NE向宽幅条带状展布，进而开展的地震剖面特征同相轴的拾取解释与构造成图，直接圈定了山二段叠加型与厚层单一型砂体岩性圈闭的分布范围与埋深，为该区勘探部署提供了钻探目标。
- 砂体叠置方式 /
- 地震正演 /
- 地震相分析 /
- 薄层反射 /
- 储层预测 /
- 致密碎屑岩 /
- 上古生界 /
- 鄂尔多斯盆地南部
Abstract: It is difficult to distinguish reservoirs and non-reservoirs based on the rock's physical properties. The quality of post-stack seismic data in the loess plateau is poor, which makes it a technical bottleneck for the prediction of reservoir of the Upper Paleozoic, and the exploration in the southern Ordos Basin was then constrained. Block evaluations have indicated that the northeastern part of Zhenjing district has a good potential for exploration, with the second member of Permian Shanxi Formation and the first member of Xiashihezi Formation as the main target beds. The results of 3D seismic facies analysis in Zhenjing area are consistent with the regional sedimentary facies studies on provenance and the distribution of sand bodies, indicating that seismic data can be used for the prediction of reservoir. The distribution of sedimentary facies of a series of seismic forward modeling showed that the sand bodies distributed with a certain distance and thickness in the second member of Shanxi Formation and the first member of Xiashihezi Formation formed recognizable seismic reflections. This vertical spatial combination of stratigraphic lithology is consistent with the depositional model of regional superimposed and thick single-type sand bodies, which is the typical form of reservoir-caprock combination that has been discovered in the surrounding gas reservoirs. The reservoir prediction based on the optimal number of wave crests from the forward simulation results confirmed that the superimposed and the thick single-type sand bodies of the second member of Shanxi Member were distributed in SW-NE directions. Furthermore, the picking and interpretation of co-phase axis and the structural mapping of seismic profile were carried out, which directly delineated the distribution range and burial depth of lithologic traps in the sand bodies of the second member of Shanxi Formation, and provided drilling targets for exploration and deployment in this area.
- sand body stack mode /
- seismic forward modeling /
- facies analysis /
- thin layer reflection /
- reservoir prediction /
- tight clastic reservoir /
- Upper Paleozoic /
- southern part of Ordos Basin

HTML全文

图 1 研究区位置及鄂尔多斯盆地南部二叠系山西组二段砂体平面展布

据崔凯^[15]修改，2016。

Figure 1. Location of study area and distribution of sand bodies in second member of Permian Shanxi Formation, southern Ordos Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 鄂尔多斯盆地南部镇泾地区二叠系山西组—盒一段砂体展布与叠置方式变迁示意

Figure 2. Distribution and stack mode of sand bodies from Permian Shanxi Formation to first member of Xiashihezi Formation, Zhenjing area, southern Ordos Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 鄂尔多斯盆地南部镇泾地区DC1井山二段、盒一段岩石物理特征

Figure 3. Petrophysical characteristics of second member of Shanxi Formation and first member of Xiashihezi Formation, well DC 1, Zhenjing area, southern Ordos Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 鄂尔多斯盆地南部镇泾地区3D山二段—盒一段神经网络波形聚类平面图

Figure 4. Waveform clustering results from second member of Shanxi Formation to first member of Xiashihezi Formation in Zhenjing 3D area, southern Ordos Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 鄂尔多斯盆地南部镇泾地区3D北部地层界面反射系数与正演模型基础数据

Figure 5. Fundamental data of reflection coefficient and seismic forward modeling in the north of Zhenjing 3D area, southern Ordos Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 楔状模型与薄层模型地震响应

Figure 6. Seismic response of wedge and thin layer models

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 鄂尔多斯盆地南部镇泾地区目的层段一个地震正演模型及其模拟结果

Figure 7. Seismic forward modeling of target layers in Zhenjing area, southern Ordos Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 鄂尔多斯盆地南部镇泾地区DC1井地层柱状图及正演模拟结果与实际地震井旁道对比

Figure 8. Stratigraphic histogram of well DC1 and its forward modeling results compared with actual seismic well bypass, Zhenjing area, southern Ordos Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 鄂尔多斯盆地南部镇泾地区3DT₉—T₉d之间地震属性波峰数平面图

Figure 9. Seismic wave peak numbers between T₉ and T₉d in Zhenjing area, southern Ordos Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 鄂尔多斯盆地南部镇泾地区3D主测线2800地震剖面T₉—T₉d之间同相轴拾取

Figure 10. Event interpretation between T₉ and T₉d on seismic section of inline 2800, Zhenjing area, southern Ordos basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 鄂尔多斯盆地南部镇泾地区3D北部山二段岩性圈闭分布

平面图位置见图 10右中的蓝色虚线框。

Figure 11. Lithologic trap distribution in the second member of Shanxi Formation, northern Zhenjing area, southern Ordos Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

参考文献(21)

[1]	董宁, 刘振峰, 周小鹰, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地致密碎屑岩储层地震识别及预测[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2008, 29(5): 668-675. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT200805020.htm DONG Ning, LIU Zhenfeng, ZHOU Xiaoying, et al. Seismic detection and prediction of tight gas reservoirs in the Ordos Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2008, 29(5): 668-675. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT200805020.htm
[2]	刘峰, 蔡克汉, 赵德勇, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部深层致密薄砂岩地震预测[C]//中国石油学会2017年物探技术研讨会论文集. 天津: 石油地球物理勘探编辑部, 2017. LIU Feng, CAI Kehan, ZHAO Deyong, et al. Seismic prediction of deep tight thin sandstone in southwestern Ordos Basin[C]//2017 Symposium on Geophysical Exploration Technology. Tianjin, 2017.
[3]	秦波, 曹斌风, 周进松, 等. 致密砂岩气储层有效性识别和定量评价以鄂尔多斯盆地东南部上古生界山西组一段为例[J]. 沉积学报, 2019, 37(2): 403-415. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB201902016.htm QIN Bo, CAO Binfeng, ZHOU Jinsong, et al. Availability identification of tight gas sandstone reservoirs and quantitative assessment: a case study from the first member of the Upper Paleozoic Shanxi Formation in the southeastern Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2019, 37(2): 403-415. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB201902016.htm
[4]	徐宁宁, 邱隆伟, 王永诗, 等. 弱构造发育区致密砂岩气优质储层的预测方法: 以鄂尔多斯盆地大牛地气田上古生界为例[C]//2018年全国天然气学术年会论文集(03非常规气藏). 福州: 中国石油学会天然气专业委员会, 2018: 591-612. XU Ninging, QIU Longwei, WANG Yongshi, et al. Prediction method of high quality tight sandstone gas reservoir in weak structural area: take the Upper Paleozoic in Daniudi gas field, Ordos Basin as an example[C]//2018 National Natural Gas Conference proceedings(03 unconventional gas reservoirs). Fuzhou: Natural Gas Committee of Chinese Petroleum Society, 2018: 591-612.
[5]	曹绍贺, 陈叙安. AVO技术在杭锦旗锦58井区致密碎屑岩储层预测中的应用[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2017, 31(2): 53-56. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYHN201702015.htm CAO Shaohe, CHEN Xuan. Application of AVO technology in tight clastic reservoir prediction in Hangjinqi Jin58 well area[J]. Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 2017, 31(2): 53-56. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYHN201702015.htm
[6]	孙淮. 川西XC构造须家河组致密碎屑岩有利储层预测[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2012. SUN Huai. The prediction for favorable in tight clastic rocks at Xujiahe Formation of the Sichuan Depression in XC[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu Univerisity of Technology, 2012.
[7]	洪忠, 张猛刚, 朱筱敏. 基于岩石物理的致密碎屑岩气藏岩性及流体概率预测[J]. 石油物探, 2015, 54(6): 735-744. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYWT201506014.htm HONG Zong, ZHANG Menggang, ZHU Xiaomin. Prediction on lithology and fluid probabilities of tight clastic gas reservoir based on rock physics[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petro-leum, 2015, 54(6): 735-744. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYWT201506014.htm
[8]	张建坤, 吴吉忠, 徐文会, 等. 基于岩石物理的致密砂岩油藏叠前优势储层预测以渤海湾盆地南堡凹陷4号构造东营组二段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(7): 793-803. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201707006.htm ZHANG Jiankun, WU Jizhong, XU Wenhui, et al. Pre-stack favorable reservoir prediction in tight sandstone reservoirs based on rock physics: a case study of the 2nd member of Dongying Formation, structure 4, Nanpu Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2017, 38(7): 793-803. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201707006.htm
[9]	张睿, 贾晓静, 徐浩, 等. 塔里木盆地塔中北坡志留系致密碎屑岩地震反演技术及应用[J]. 重庆科技学院学报(自然科学版), 2013, 15(5): 14-17. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CQSG201305005.htm ZHANG Rui, JIA Xioajing, XU Hao, et al. Seismic inversion technology and applications of dense clastic of Silurian in the northern slope of the central Tarim Basin[J]. Journal of Chongqing University of Science and Technology(Natural Science Edition), 2013, 15(5): 14-17. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CQSG201305005.htm
[10]	甘其刚, 许多. 川西深层致密碎屑岩气藏储层预测方法[J]. 石油物探, 2008, 47(6): 593-597. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYWT200806013.htm GAN Qigang, XU Duo. Prediction of gas reservoir in deeply buried tight clastic rock in west Sichuan[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2008, 47(6): 593-597. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYWT200806013.htm
[11]	谯述蓉, 张虹, 赵爽. 川西DY地区须家河组致密砂岩储层预测技术及应用效果分析[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2008, 29(6): 774-780. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT200806013.htm QIAO Shurong, ZHANG Hong, ZHAO Shuang. Reservoir prediction techniques and their application to tight sandstones of the Xujiahe Formation in DY area, western Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2008, 29(6): 774-780. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT200806013.htm
[12]	陆红梅, 徐海, 沃玉进, 等. 时移地震"相对差异法"定量预测疏松砂岩油藏含油饱和度: 以西非深海泽塔油田为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(2): 409-416. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201902027.htm LU Hongmei, XU Hai, WO Yujin, et al. Quantitative prediction of oil saturation of unconsolidated sandstone reservoir based on time-lapse seismic "relative difference method": taking Zeta oil field in West Africa as an example[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(2): 409-416. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201902027.htm
[13]	杨华, 付金华, 刘新社, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界致密气成藏条件与勘探开发[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(3): 295-303. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201203006.htm YANG Hua, FU Jinhua, LIU Xinshe, et al. Accumulation conditions and exploration and development of tight gas in the Upper Paleozoic of the Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(3): 295-303. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201203006.htm
[14]	蒙晓灵, 兰义飞, 张宏波, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部深层致密砂岩气藏成藏特点及产能主控因素[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 35(5): 9-13. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XASY202005004.htm MENG Xiaoling, LAN Yifei, ZHANG Hongbo, et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation characteristics and main productivity control factors of deep tight sandstone in the south of Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University(Natural Science), 2020, 35(5): 9-13. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XASY202005004.htm
[15]	崔凯. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部上古生界山1盒8段物源及其对盆地南部沉积充填格局的影响[D]. 西安: 西北大学, 2019. CUI Kai. Provenance of the Upper Paleozoic Shan1-He 8 Formation in southern Ordos Basin and its influence on the sedimentary filling pattern[D]. Xi'an: Northwest University, 2019.
[16]	陈孟晋, 汪泽成, 郭彦如, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部晚古生代沉积特征与天然气勘探潜力[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2006, 33(1): 1-5. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK200601000.htm CHEN Mengjin, WANG Zecheng, GUO Yanru, et al. Late Paleozoic sedimentary systems and gas potential in the south Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2006, 33(1): 1-5. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK200601000.htm
[17]	马瑶, 李文厚, 张倩, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地及周缘地区中二叠统沉积特征[J]. 古地理学报, 2021, 23(1): 81-92. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GDLX202101007.htm MA Yao, LI Wenhou, ZHANG Qian, et al. Sedimentary characteristics of the Middle Permian in Ordos Basin and its adjacent areas[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2021, 23(1): 81-92. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GDLX202101007.htm
[18]	张雷, 余威, 陈江萌, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地庆探1井区山₁段储层砂体构型发育特征及模式[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 2020, 44(6): 70-81. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQSY202006008.htm ZHANG Lei, YU Wei, CHEN Jiangmeng, et al. Development characteristics and model of sandbody configuration of the Shan1 Member in the Qingtan 1 well area, Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2020, 44(6): 70-81. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQSY202006008.htm
[19]	田景春, 张兴良, 王峰, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地高桥地区上古生界储集砂体叠置关系及分布定量刻画[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2013, 34(6): 737-742. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201306005.htm TIAN Jingchun, ZHANG Xingliang, WANG Feng, et al. Quantitative characterization of superimposition relationship and distribution of reservoir sandbodies in the Upper Palaeozoic of Gaoqiao region, the Ordos Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2013, 34(6): 737-742. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201306005.htm
[20]	杨鹏, 张志刚, 韩茈茈. 苏里格气田桃2区块山₁段砂体特征及规模定量研究[J]. 西安文理学院学报(自然科学版). 2016, 19(4): 85-91. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAJY201604019.htm YANG Peng, ZHANG Zhigang, HANG Zizi. The quantitative research on characteristics and scale of sand bodies in section Shan 1 of block Tao 2 in Sulige Gasfield[J]. Journal of Xi'an University (Natural Science Edition), 2016, 19(4): 85-91. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAJY201604019.htm
[21]	封从军, 鲍志东, 代春明, 等. 三角洲前缘水下分流河道单砂体叠置机理及对剩余油的控制: 以扶余油田J19区块泉头组四段为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2015, 36(1): 128-135. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201501017.htm FENG Congjun, BAO Zhidong, DAI Chunming, et al. Superimposition patterns of underwater distributary channel sands in deltaic front and its control on remaining oil distribution: a case study from K₁q⁴ in J19 block, Fuyu oilfield[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2015, 36(1): 128-135. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201501017.htm