基于岩石热解参数图版的烃源岩内部排烃效率计算方法

张冬梅; 张延延; 郭隽菁; 胡守志; 李水福

doi:10.11781/sysydz202103532

基于岩石热解参数图版的烃源岩内部排烃效率计算方法

doi: 10.11781/sysydz202103532

1.
中国地质大学(武汉) 资源学院, 武汉 430074
2.
中国石油集团测井有限公司新疆分公司, 乌鲁木齐 831511

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金面上项目 41672136

国家自然科学基金面上项目 42073067

详细信息

作者简介:
张冬梅(1968-), 女, 硕士, 高级工程师, 从事石油工程和油气地球化学实验教学与研究。E-mail: zdm2007@cug.edu.cn

中图分类号: TE122.1
计量
- 文章访问数: 705
- HTML全文浏览量: 170
- PDF下载量: 164
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-11-26
- 修回日期: 2021-03-29
- 刊出日期: 2021-05-28

A calculation method for the efficiency of hydrocarbon expulsion based on parameter-diagram of source rock pyrolysis

1.
School of Earth Resources, China University of Geosciences(Wuhan), Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China
2.
Xinjiang Branch of CNPC Logging Co., Ltd., Urumqi, Xinjiang 831511, China

摘要

摘要: 排烃效率是研究排烃作用的关键地质参数，准确计算烃源岩排烃效率对常规和非常规油气资源评价都有重要意义。在原始生烃潜力恢复法基础上，介绍了一种热解图版法。该方法是利用氢指数与最大热解峰温关系划分有机质类型的经典图版，将有机质类型分界线和成熟度趋势线均匀插值网格化，然后将样品的氢指数和最大热解峰温数据投点于图版中，沿着类型线向左追踪至与R_o为0.2%的成熟度线交点作为生烃指数的原始值，从而计算出排烃效率。通过南襄盆地泌阳凹陷泌页1井66个烃源岩实测数据，研究了排烃效率与烃源岩有机质丰度、类型、成熟度（ATM）特性以及页岩油富集程度的关系。结果表明，与人为赋值法相比，热解图版法获得的排烃效率与有机质ATM特性更具规律性，与页岩油富集程度的吻合度较高，而且计算过程与结果不会出现负值和排烃效率大于100%的现象。该方法计算的烃源岩内部排烃效率合理可行，可作为原始生烃潜力恢复法计算排烃效率的补充。
- 排烃效率 /
- 原始生烃潜力 /
- 人为赋值法 /
- 热解图版法 /
- 烃源岩 /
- 泌阳凹陷 /
- 南襄盆地
Abstract: The efficiency of hydrocarbon expulsion acts as a key geological factor for the study of hydrocarbon expulsion of conventional oil and gas, also, it indicates the enrichment degree of unconventional oil and/or gas. Based on the method of recovering the original hydrocarbon generation potential, a method according to pyrolysis chart was proposed in this paper. A classic diagram for classifying organic matter types based on hydrogen index (I_H) and maximum pyrolysis peak temperature (T_max) was introduced in this study. The dividing line of organic matter type and the maturity trend line were evenly interpolated and gridded. The I_H and T_max data were plotted into the chart, and then traced to the left along the type line to the intersection point of maturity line R_o=0.2% as the original value of hydrocarbon generation index, thus, the hydrocarbon expulsion efficiency can be calculated. Based on the results of 66 source rock samples from the well BYHF1 of Biyang Sag, the relationship between hydrocarbon expulsion efficiency and characteristics of organic matter (ATM) was studied. In addition, the correlation between hydrocarbon expulsion efficiency and shale oil enrichment degree was studied. The results indicated that the hydrocarbon expulsion efficiency and ATM characteristics of organic matter obtained by the pyrolysis chart method were more regular than those obtained by the artificial assignment method, and it had a higher consistency with the enrichment degree of shale oil (OSI). The calculation process and results will not to be negative value or hydrocarbon expulsion efficiency greater than 100%. Therefore, it is reasonable and feasible to calculate hydrocarbon expulsion efficiency by the pyrolysis chart method, which is a complement to the original hydrocarbon generation potential recovery method.
- hydrocarbon expulsion efficiency /
- original hydrocarbon generation potential /
- artificial assignment method /
- pyrolysis diagram method /
- source rock /
- Biyang Sag /
- Nanxiang Basin

HTML全文

图 1 岩石热解分析参数图版

图中数据点为南襄盆地泌阳凹陷泌页1井样品的数据点。

Figure 1. Parameter chart of Rock-Eval pyrolysis analysis

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 南襄盆地泌阳凹陷泌页1井烃源岩排烃效率与有机质特性(ATM)的关系(两种排烃效率计算方法对比)

图a—c为人为赋值法计算结果，A—C为热解图版法计算结果。

Figure 2. Correlation between hydrocarbon expulsion efficiency and organic matter characteristics (ATM) of well BYHF 1, Biyang Sag, Nanxiang Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 南襄盆地泌阳凹陷泌页1井5号页岩层不同方法计算的排烃效率与页岩油富集程度吻合性

Figure 3. Correlation between hydrocarbon expulsion efficiency calculated by different methods and shale oil enrichment degree for No.5 shale layer, well BYHF1, Biyang Sag, Nanxiang Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 南襄盆地泌阳凹陷泌页1井烃源岩内部排烃效率

Table 1. Internal expulsion efficiency of source rock of well BYHF 1, Biyang Sag, Nanxiang Basin

样品序号	T_max /℃	现今I_H/(mg·g^-1)	残烃指数/(mg·g^-1)	干酪根类型	人为赋值法					热解图版法
样品序号	T_max /℃	现今I_H/(mg·g^-1)	残烃指数/(mg·g^-1)	干酪根类型	原始I_H/(mg·g^-1)	生烃指数/(mg·g^-1)	排烃指数/(mg·g^-1)	排烃效率/%		原始I_H/(mg·g^-1)	排烃指数/(mg·g^-1)	生烃指数/(mg·g^-1)	排烃效率/%
BY01	451	613.91	20.86	Ⅰ	750	136.09	115.24	84.67		980.21	345.45	366.30	94.31
BY02	447	649.88	20.57	Ⅰ	750	100.12	79.55	79.46		928.43	257.98	278.55	92.62
BY03	446	634.17	15.60	Ⅰ	750	115.83	100.23	86.53		908.79	259.02	274.62	94.32
BY04	447	610.65	11.95	Ⅰ	750	139.35	127.40	91.43		914.70	292.10	304.05	96.07
BY05	450	615.41	12.37	Ⅰ	750	134.59	122.22	90.81		962.27	334.49	346.86	96.43
BY06	451	626.97	14.76	Ⅰ	750	123.03	108.27	88.00		983.38	341.65	356.41	95.86
BY07	449	654.26	18.94	Ⅰ	750	95.74	76.81	80.22		955.80	282.61	301.54	93.72
BY08	449	687.53	15.76	Ⅰ	750	62.47	46.71	74.76		965.55	262.26	278.02	94.33
BY09	446	609.86	15.02	Ⅰ	750	140.14	125.12	89.28		898.58	273.70	288.72	94.80
BY10	446	643.69	20.07	Ⅰ	750	106.31	86.23	81.12		911.45	247.68	267.76	92.50
BY11	446	615.31	19.39	Ⅰ	750	134.69	115.31	85.61		901.06	266.37	285.75	93.22
BY12	449	621.45	19.20	Ⅰ	750	128.55	109.35	85.06		947.08	306.43	325.63	94.10
BY13	439	415.28	31.94	Ⅱ₁	550	134.72	102.78	76.29		527.82	80.60	112.54	71.62
BY14	446	488.05	56.60	Ⅱ₁	550	61.95	5.35	8.63		778.31	233.66	290.26	80.50
BY15	444	489.37	34.55	Ⅱ₁	550	60.63	26.08	43.01		719.99	196.07	230.62	85.02
BY16	443	430.77	36.54	Ⅱ₁	550	119.23	82.69	69.35		583.09	115.78	152.32	76.01
BY17	447	536.78	23.37	Ⅱ₁	550	13.22	-10.15	-76.81		874.95	314.80	338.17	93.09
BY18	445	514.55	27.99	Ⅱ₁	550	35.45	7.46	21.05		791.38	248.84	276.83	89.89
BY19	441	423.67	87.92	Ⅱ₁	550	126.33	38.41	30.40		559.61	48.02	135.94	35.32
BY20	445	506.07	52.50	Ⅱ₁	550	43.93	-8.57	-19.51		777.98	219.41	271.91	80.69
BY21	444	516.11	54.03	Ⅱ₁	550	33.89	-20.14	-59.44		767.53	197.39	251.42	78.51
BY22	445	511.03	46.90	Ⅱ₁	550	38.97	-7.93	-20.35		787.47	229.54	276.44	83.04
BY23	444	406.36	38.56	Ⅱ₁	550	143.64	105.08	73.16		570.51	125.59	164.15	76.51
BY24	447	491.60	27.48	Ⅱ₁	550	58.40	30.92	52.94		823.78	304.70	332.18	91.73
BY25	446	525.64	23.85	Ⅱ₁	550	24.36	0.51	2.11		835.27	285.78	309.63	92.30
BY26	446	403.73	27.80	Ⅱ₁	550	146.27	118.47	81.00		591.73	160.20	188.00	85.21
BY27	445	525.94	19.45	Ⅱ₁	550	24.06	4.61	19.15		812.16	266.77	286.22	93.20
BY28	440	409.88	46.91	Ⅱ₁	550	140.12	93.21	66.52		532.09	75.30	122.21	61.61
BY29	440	493.86	32.13	Ⅱ₁	550	56.14	24.01	42.77		633.71	107.72	139.85	77.02
BY30	447	405.28	19.11	Ⅱ₁	550	144.72	125.61	86.80		612.26	187.87	206.98	90.77
BY31	448	477.57	26.84	Ⅱ₁	550	72.43	45.59	62.94		835.32	330.91	357.75	92.50
BY32	449	528.51	17.54	Ⅱ₁	550	21.49	3.95	18.37		911.99	365.94	383.48	95.43
BY33	444	525.46	35.28	Ⅱ₁	550	24.54	-10.74	-43.75		780.43	219.69	254.97	86.16
BY34	448	517.12	44.18	Ⅱ₁	550	32.88	-11.30	-34.37		844.55	283.25	327.43	86.51
BY35	444	573.28	22.22	Ⅱ₁	550	-23.28	-45.50	195.45		841.38	245.88	268.10	91.71
BY36	446	515.14	46.02	Ⅱ₁	550	34.86	-11.16	-32.00		824.53	263.37	309.39	85.13
BY37	446	450.57	53.99	Ⅱ₁	550	99.43	45.44	45.70		694.33	189.77	243.76	77.85
BY38	448	479.37	32.17	Ⅱ₁	550	70.63	38.46	54.46		836.78	325.24	357.41	91.00
BY39	447	532.62	18.20	Ⅱ₁	550	17.38	-0.83	-4.76		873.20	322.37	340.58	94.66
BY40	452	537.30	14.32	Ⅱ₁	550	12.70	-1.62	-12.77		984.84	433.22	447.54	96.80
BY41	447	436.51	36.93	Ⅱ₁	550	113.49	76.56	67.46		693.93	220.49	257.42	85.65
BY42	447	448.44	29.69	Ⅱ₁	550	101.56	71.88	70.77		728.26	250.14	279.82	89.39
BY43	446	524.23	16.64	Ⅱ₁	550	25.77	9.13	35.44		834.67	293.80	310.44	94.64
BY44	445	466.67	36.11	Ⅱ₁	550	83.33	47.22	56.67		700.39	197.61	233.72	84.55
BY45	449	401.39	46.88	Ⅱ₁	550	148.61	101.74	68.46		688.17	239.91	286.78	83.65
BY46	447	529.76	20.95	Ⅱ₁	550	20.24	-0.71	-3.53		869.78	319.07	340.02	93.84
BY47	446	458.92	20.96	Ⅱ₁	550	91.08	70.11	76.98		714.95	235.06	256.03	91.81
BY48	446	438.37	83.72	Ⅱ₁	550	111.63	27.91	25.00		655.83	133.74	217.46	61.50
BY49	445	507.99	26.04	Ⅱ₁	550	42.01	15.97	38.02		781.52	247.49	273.53	90.48
BY50	444	492.31	17.63	Ⅱ₁	550	57.69	40.06	69.44		726.79	216.85	234.48	92.48
BY51	447	580.90	10.67	Ⅱ₁	550	-30.90	-41.57	134.55		902.47	310.90	321.57	96.68
BY52	438	353.33	40.00	Ⅱ₂	350	-3.33	-43.33	1 300.00		449.11	55.78	95.78	58.24
BY53	438	253.13	43.75	Ⅱ₂	350	96.88	53.13	54.84		325.40	28.53	72.28	39.47
BY54	438	278.87	64.79	Ⅱ₂	350	71.13	6.34	8.91		353.35	9.69	74.48	13.01
BY55	445	395.35	44.96	Ⅱ₂	350	-45.35	-90.31	199.15		570.27	129.96	174.92	74.30
BY56	444	202.59	31.03	Ⅱ₂	350	147.41	116.38	78.95		305.04	71.42	102.45	69.71
BY57	443	373.30	38.64	Ⅱ₂	350	-23.30	-61.93	265.85		527.28	115.35	153.98	74.91
BY58	439	276.28	41.03	Ⅱ₂	350	73.72	32.69	44.35		378.16	60.85	101.88	59.73
BY59	438	358.33	33.33	Ⅱ₂	350	-8.33	-41.67	500.00		453.55	61.88	95.22	64.99
BY60	446	216.96	34.82	Ⅱ₂	350	133.04	98.21	73.83		351.03	99.24	134.07	74.03
BY61	447	389.72	50.47	Ⅱ₂	350	-39.72	-90.19	227.06		591.69	151.50	201.97	75.01
BY62	443	300.62	39.13	Ⅱ₂	350	49.38	10.25	20.75		432.36	92.61	131.74	70.30
BY63	442	246.95	51.22	Ⅱ₂	350	103.05	51.83	50.30		348.83	50.66	101.88	49.73
BY64	445	358.97	70.33	Ⅱ₂	350	-8.97	-79.30	883.67		538.17	108.87	179.20	60.75
BY65	446	372.67	27.91	Ⅱ₂	350	-22.67	-50.58	223.08	562.00	161.42	189.33	85.26
BY66	446	379.79	104.26	Ⅱ₂	350	-29.79	-134.04	450.00	568.35	84.31	188.56	44.71
注：人为赋值法中的原始I_H为人为赋值数据，参考文献[19]获得；热解图版法中的原始I_H为图版赋值数据，由图版(图 1)查得。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(33)

[1]	马卫, 李剑, 王东良, 等. 烃源岩排烃效率及其影响因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(9): 1742-1751. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201609020.htm MA Wei, LI Jian, WANG Dongliang, et al. Hydrocarbon expulsion efficiency of source rocks and its influencing factors[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27(9): 1742-1751. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201609020.htm
[2]	张世华. 川西坳陷须三-须四段含油气系统生排烃过程与主要成藏期关系[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 33(3): 252-255. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CDLG200603005.htm ZHANG Shihua. Relation between the main accumulation stage and the process of generation and expulsion of hydrocarbon in T₃x³-T₃x⁴ petroleum system of Upper Triassic in the West Sichuan Depression, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition), 2006, 33(3): 252-255. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CDLG200603005.htm
[3]	马行陟, 庞雄奇, 孟庆洋, 等. 辽东湾地区深层烃源岩排烃特征及资源潜力[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2011, 32(2): 251-258. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201102016.htm MA Xingzhi, PANG Xiongqi, MENG Qingyang, et al. Hydrocarbon expulsion characteristics and resource potential of deep source rocks in the Liaodong Bay[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2011, 32(2): 251-258. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201102016.htm
[4]	郭继刚, 庞雄奇, 刘丹丹, 等. 库车坳陷中、下侏罗统煤系烃源岩排烃特征及资源潜力评价[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2012, 23(2): 327-334. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201202019.htm GUO Jigang, PANG Xiongqi, LIU Dandan, et al. Hydrocarbon expulsion for Middle-Lower Jurassic coal measures and evaluation of potential resource in Kuqa Depression[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2012, 23(2): 327-334. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201202019.htm
[5]	胡朝伟, 胡广, 张玺华, 等. 川西北地区茅口组上部黑色岩系的层位、沉积环境及生烃潜力评价[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(2): 202-214. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202002202 HU Chaowei, HU Guang, ZHANG Xihua, et al. Sedimentary environment, hydrocarbon potential and development of black rocks in Upper Maokou Formation, northwestern Sichuan[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(2): 202-214. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202002202
[6]	赵雪娇, 王震亮, 范昌育, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区长7段烃源岩排烃机制及成藏意义[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2012, 19(1): 35-38. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201201014.htm ZHAO Xuejiao, WANG Zhenliang, FAN Changyu, et al. Hydrocarbon expulsion dynamic conditions and accumulation significance of petroleum of source rocks in Longdong area, Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2012, 19(1): 35-38. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201201014.htm
[7]	田善思. 排烃效率研究方法及松辽盆地烃源岩排烃效率[D]. 大庆: 东北石油大学, 2013. TIAN Shansi. The expulsion efficiency research methods and the Songliao Basin hydrocarbon source rock expulsion efficiency[D]. Daqing: Northeast Petroleum University, 2013.
[8]	李吉君, 吴慧, 卢双舫, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地长9烃源岩发育与排烃效率[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2012, 42(S1): 26-32. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ2012S1005.htm LI Jijun, WU Hui, LU Shuangfang, et al. Development and hydrocarbon expulsion efficiency of source rock in 9th member of Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2012, 42(S1): 26-32. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ2012S1005.htm
[9]	郭继刚, 李建华, 庞雄奇, 等. 准噶尔盆地南缘侏罗系烃源岩排烃效率研究[J]. 现代地质, 2013, 27(5): 1081-1088. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ201305010.htm GUO Jigang, LI Jianhua, PANG Xiongqi, et al. Study on expulsion efficiency of hydrocarbon for the Jurassic source rock in the southern margin of Junggar Basin[J]. Geoscience, 2013, 27(5): 1081-1088. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ201305010.htm
[10]	陈瑞银, 王汇彤, 陈建平, 等. 实验方法评价松辽盆地烃源岩的生排烃效率[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(5): 915-921. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201505015.htm CHEN Ruiyin, WANG Huitong, CHEN Jianping, et al. An experimental method to evaluate the hydrocarbon generation and expulsion efficiency in the Songliao Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015, 26(5): 915-921. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201505015.htm
[11]	王媛, 汪少勇, 李建忠, 等. 辽西雷家地区沙四段中-低熟烃源岩排烃效率与致密油-页岩油勘探前景[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(4): 810-821. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201904012.htm WANG Yuan, WANG Shaoyong, LI Jianzhong, et al. The hydrocarbon expulsion efficiency of medium-low mature source rocks and tight-shale oil potential in the Es⁴, Leijia area in West Depression, Liaohe Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(4): 810-821. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201904012.htm
[12]	黄振凯, 刘全有, 黎茂稳, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地长7段泥页岩层系排烃效率及其含油性[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(3): 513-521. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201803009.htm HUANG Zhenkai, LIU Quanyou, LI Maowen, et al. Hydrocarbon expulsion efficiency and oil-bearing property of the shale system in Chang 7 Member, Ordos Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2018, 39(3): 513-521. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201803009.htm
[13]	腾格尔, 陶成, 胡广, 等. 排烃效率对页岩气形成与富集的影响[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(3): 325-334. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202003325 BORJIGIN Tenger, TAO Cheng, HU Guang, et al. Effect of hydrocarbon expulsion efficiency on shale gas formation and enrichment[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(3): 325-334. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202003325
[14]	薛海涛, 田善思, 卢双舫, 等. 页岩油资源定量评价中关键参数的选取与校正: 以松辽盆地北部青山口组为例[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2015, 34(1): 70-78. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KYDH201501012.htm XUE Haitao, TIAN Shansi, LU Shuangfang, et al. Selection and verification of key parameters in the quantitative evaluation of shale oil: a case study at the Qingshankou Formation, northern Songliao Basin[J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 2015, 34(1): 70-78. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KYDH201501012.htm
[15]	刘庆, 张林晔, 王茹, 等. 湖相烃源岩原始有机质恢复与生排烃效率定量研究: 以东营凹陷古近系沙河街组四段优质烃源岩为例[J]. 地质论评, 2014, 60(4): 877-883. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP201404020.htm LIU Qing, ZHANG Linye, WANG Ru, et al. Recovery of original organic matter content and quantitatively study of generation and expulsion efficiency for lacustrine hydrocarbon source rocks: a case study of the excellent source rocks of the Palaeocene E_2-3s⁴, Dongying Sag[J]. Geological Review, 2014, 60(4): 877-883. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP201404020.htm
[16]	陈冬霞, 黄小惠, 李林涛, 等. 川西坳陷上三叠统烃源岩排烃特征与排烃史[J]. 天然气工业, 2010, 30(5): 41-45. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201005012.htm CHEN Dongxia, HUANG Xiaohui, LI Lintao, et al. Characteristics and history of hydrocarbon expulsion of the Upper Tertiary source rocks in the Western Sichuan Depression[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2010, 30(5): 41-45. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201005012.htm
[17]	邬立言. 生油岩热解快速定量评价[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1986. WU Liyan. Rapid quantitative evaluation of source rock pyrolysis[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1986.
[18]	JARVIE D M, HILL R J, RUBLE T E, et al. Unconventional shale-gas systems: the Mississippian Barnett shale of north-central Texas as one model for thermogenic shale-gas assessment[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2007, 91(4): 475-499.
[19]	陈建平, 孙永革, 钟宁宁, 等. 地质条件下湖相烃源岩生排烃效率与模式[J]. 地质学报, 2014, 88(11): 2005-2032. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE201411001.htm CHEN Jianping, SUN Yongge, ZHONG Ningning, et al. The efficiency and model of petroleum expulsion from the lacustrine source rocks within geological frame[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2014, 88(11): 2005-2032. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE201411001.htm
[20]	CHEN Zhuoheng, JIANG Chunqing. A data driven model for studying kerogen kinetics with application examples from Canadian sedimen-tary basins[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2015, 67: 795-803.
[21]	CHEN Zhuoheng, JIANG Chunqing, LAVOIE D, et al. Model-assisted Rock-Eval data interpretation for source rock evaluation: examples from producing and potential shale gas resource plays[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2016, 165: 290-302.
[22]	郭秋麟, 米敬奎, 王建, 等. 改进的烃源岩生烃潜力模型及关键参数模板[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(5): 661-669. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201905013.htm GUO Qiulin, MI Jingkui, WANG Jian, et al. An improved hydrocarbon generation model of source rocks and key parameter templates[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(5): 661-669. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTSY201905013.htm
[23]	LEYTHAEUSER D, SCHAEFER R G, RADKE M. On the primary migration of petroleum[C]//Proceedings of the 12th World Petroleum Congress. Houston, Texas: Wiley, 1987: 227-236.
[24]	ESPITALIÉ J, MARQUIS F, BARSONY I. Geochemical logging[M]//VOORHEES K J. Analytical pyrolysis: techniques and applications. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1984: 276-304.
[25]	侯读杰, 冯子辉. 油气地球化学[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2011: 176-177. HOU Dujie, FENG Zihui. Petroleum organic geochemistry[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2011: 176-177.
[26]	郎东升, 金成志, 郭冀义, 等. 储层流体的热解及气相色谱评价技术[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1999: 169-171. LANG Dongsheng, JIN Chengzhi, GUO Jiyi, et al. Pyrolysis and gas chromatographic evaluation of reservoir fluids[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 1999: 169-171.
[27]	DOW W G. Kerogen studies and geological interpretation[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 1977, 7: 79-99.
[28]	何生, 王青玲. 关于用镜质体反射率恢复地层剥蚀厚度的问题讨论[J]. 地质论评, 1989, 35(2): 119-126. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP198902002.htm HE Sheng, WANG Qingling. The eroded thickness reconstructed by vitrinite reflectance[J]. Geological Review, 1989, 35(2): 119-126. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP198902002.htm
[29]	李伟. 恢复地层剥蚀厚度方法综述[J]. 中国海上油气(地质), 1996, 10(3): 167-171. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHSD199603006.htm LI Wei. Summary of reconstruction of strata denudation thickness[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas(Geology), 1996, 10(3): 167-171. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHSD199603006.htm
[30]	孔伟思, 方石, 袁魏, 等. 镜质体反射率的研究现状[J]. 当代化工, 2015, 44(5): 1020-1028. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYHH201505047.htm KONG Weisi, FANG Shi, YUAN Wei, et al. Research status of vitrinite rreflectivity[J]. Contemporary Chemical Industry, 2015, 44(5): 1020-1028. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYHH201505047.htm
[31]	JARVIE D M. Extended abstract-shale resource systems for oil and gas[M]//BREYER J A. Shale reservoirs-Giant resources for the 21st century. Tulsa, USA: AAPG, 2012: 1-3.
[32]	JARVIE D M. Shale resource systems for oil and gas: Part 2-Shale-oil resource systems[M]//BREYER J A. Shale reservoirs-Giant resources for the 21st century. Tulsa, USA: AAPG, 2012: 89-119.
[33]	林会喜, 宋明水, 王圣柱, 等. 叠合盆地复杂构造带页岩油资源评价: 以准噶尔盆地东南缘博格达地区中二叠统芦草沟组为例[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2020, 27(2): 7-17. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS202002003.htm LIN Huixi, SONG Mingshui, WANG Shengzhu, et al. Shale oil resource evaluation in complex structural belt of superimposed basin: a case study of Middle Permian Lucaogou Formation in Bogda area, southeast margin of Junggar Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2020, 27(2): 7-17. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS202002003.htm